Article published in:
Spanish in Context
Vol. 14:2 (2017) ► pp. 273–308

El Resumen de artículos de investigación científica

Variación disciplinar a nivel local y global

| Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso
| Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso
El objetivo del presente estudio es comparar el resumen de artículos de investigación científica (AICs) de dos disciplinas (Biología e Historia) a partir de su organización retórica y de las relaciones de coherencia que lo configuran. Para describir la organización retórica, utilizamos, como taxonomía de arranque, la propuesta de Hyland (2000), mientras que para las relaciones de coherencia, utilizamos la propuesta de Ibáñez, Moncada y Santana (2015). El corpus de esta investigación estuvo constituido por 160 resúmenes escritos en español, pertenecientes a AICs publicados en revistas especializadas. Los resultados revelan que mientras ciertas movidas son obligatorias en los resúmenes de una disciplina, en los de la otra son opcionales. También se observa que los resúmenes de ambas disciplinas se diferencian en sus configuraciones retóricas prototípicas, al igual que en las relaciones de coherencia más frecuentes.
Keywords: Resumen, relaciones de coherencia, organización retórica, discurso académico
Published online: 19 October 2017
https://doi.org/10.1075/sic.14.2.06iba
Referencias

Referencias

Bhatia, Vijay
1993 Analyzing genre. Language use in professional settings. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Ulla Connor y Thomas Upton
(Eds.) 2007 Discourse on the move. Using corpus analysis to describe discourse structure. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bolívar, Adriana
1997 La pragmática lingüística de los resúmenes de investigación para congresos. Boletín de Lingüística 12–13: 153–173.Google Scholar
1999a Los resúmenes para eventos científicos en lingüística aplicada en América Latina: estructura e interacción. OPCIÓN 29: 61–81.Google Scholar
1999b Homogeneidad versus variedad en la estructura de los resúmenes de investigación para congresos. Akademos 1–2: 121–136.Google Scholar
Bondi, Marina y Rosa Lorés-Sanz
2014 Abstracts in academic discourse: Variation and change. Bern: Peter Lang. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Busch-Lauer, Ines
2014 “Abstracts: Cross-linguistic, disciplinary and intercultural perspectives.” En Abstracts in academic discourse: Variation and change, ed. por Marina Bondi y Rosa Lorés-Sanz, 43–63. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Carlson, Linn y Daniel Marcu
2001 Discourse tagging reference manual. ISI Technical Report ISITR-545, 54.Google Scholar
Coffin, Caroline
1997 “Constructing and giving value to the past: An investigation into secondary school history”. En Genre and institutions: Social processes in the workplace and school, ed. por Frances Christie and Jim Martin, 196–230. London: Cassell.Google Scholar
Cohen, Ronald, Mark Swerdlik y Douglas Smith
1992 Psychological testing and assessment: An introduction to tests and measurements. Mountain View, CA: Mayfield Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Diani, Giuliana
2014 “Multivoiced interaction in English and Italian academic review discourse.” En Dialogicity in Written Specialised Genres, ed. por Luz Gil-Salom y Carmen Soler-Monreal, 87–112. John Benjamins, Amsterdam CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dos Santos, Mauro
1996 “The textual organization of research paper abstracts in applied linguistics”. Text & Talk 16(4): 481–499.Google Scholar
Farjami, Hadi
2013 “A corpus-based study of the lexical make-up of applied linguistics article resumens”. The Journal of Teaching Language Skills 5(2): 27–50.Google Scholar
Ge, Dongmei y Ruiying Yang
2005 “A genre analysis of research article resumens”. Modern Foreign Languages 28(2): 38–46.Google Scholar
Gholami, Javad, Zahra Mosalli y Shiva Bidel
2012 “Lexical complexity and discourse markers in soft and hard science articles”. World Applied Sciences Journal 17(3): 368–374.Google Scholar
Gray, Bethany
2015 Linguistic variation in research articles: When discipline tells only part of the story (Vol. 71). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Halliday, Michael y Ruqaiya Hasan
1976 Cohesion in English. London-New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Harvey, Ana
1986 A macrostructure analysis of 20 computer data-based abstracts in the field of engineering. Ponencia presentada en el Seminario Nacional de Lenguas con Fines Específicos, Santiago, Chile, Universidad Católica.Google Scholar
Harvey, Ana y Mercedes Horsella
1988 “Exploring and exploiting the structure of computational abstracts. The ESPecialist 9: 229–247.Google Scholar
Hatch, Evelyn y Anne Lazaraton
1991 The research manual: Design and statistics for applied linguistics. Massachusetts: Heinle & Heinle Publishers.Google Scholar
Hobbs, Jerry
1985 On the coherence and structure of discourse. Stanford: Centre for the Study of Language and Information.Google Scholar
Hovy, Eduard
1990 Parsimonious and profligate approaches to the question of discourse structure relations. In Proceedings of the 5th International Workshop on Natural Language Generation, Pittsburgh, U.S.A.Google Scholar
Hyland, Ken y Polly Tsé
2005 “Evaluative that constructions: Signaling stance in research abstracts”. Functions of Language 12(1): 39–63. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hyland, Ken
2000 Disciplinary discourse: Social interactions in academic writing. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Ibáñez, Romualdo, Fernando Moncada y Andrea Santana
2015 “Variación disciplinar en el discurso académico de la biología y del derecho: Un estudio a partir de las relaciones de coherencia”. Revista Onomázein 2(32): 101–131. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ibáñez, Romualdo
2010 “El texto disciplinar en la transmisión del conocimiento especializado”. Estudios Filológicos 46: 59–80. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ibáñez, Romualdo y Fernando Moncada
2012 La configuración de las relaciones causales en las introducciones del género AIC en dos áreas disciplinares. VII Encuentro Nacional de la ALED, Estudios del Discurso en Nuevos Contextos Sociales: Educación, Movilización y Redes Sociales, La Serena, Chile.Google Scholar
Kanoksilapatham, Budsaba
2005 “Rhetorical structure of biochemistry research articles”. English for Specific Purposes 24(3): 269–292. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lorés-Sanz, Rosa
2004 “On RA abstracts: From rhetorical structure to thematic organization”. English for Specific Purposes 23(3): 280–302. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2008 “Authorial visibility in research article and research article abstracts: The intergeneric perspective”. En English as an additional language in research publication and communication, ed. por Sally Burgess y Pedro Martín-Martín, 105–122. Berlin: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
2014 “Lost (and gained) in translation: A contrastive (English/Spanish) analysis of rhetorical and lexicogrammatical patterns in sociology research article abstracts”. En Abstracts in academic discourse: Variation and change, ed. por Marina Bondi y Rosa Lorés-Sanz, 85–110. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Mann, William y Sandra Thompson
1988 “Rhetorical structure theory: Toward a functional theory of text organization”. Text & Talk 8(3): 243–281.Google Scholar
Martin, Jim
1992 English text: System and structure. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Martin-Martin, Pedro
2003 “A genre analysis of English and Spanish research paper abstracts in experimental social sciences”. English for Specific Purposes 22(1): 25–43. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Matthiessen, Christian
2002 “Combining clauses into clause complexes. A multi-faceted view”. En Complex sentences in grammar and discourse: Essays in honor of Sandra A. Thompson, ed. por Joan Bybee y Michael Noonan, 235–320. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Melander, Bjorn, John Swales y Jim Fredrickson
1997 “Journal abstracts from three academic fields in the United States and Sweden: National or disciplinary proclivities?”. En Intellectual styles and cross-cultural communication, ed. por Anna Duszak, 251–271. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Moncada, Fernando y Romualdo Ibáñez
2014 Organización retórica y mecanismos de coherencia del abstract de Biología en inglés: Insumos para una propuesta basada en corpus. VIII Encuentro Nacional de Estudios del Discurso. Estudio del Discurso: Aplicaciones educativas y clínicas. Viña del Mar, Chile.Google Scholar
Nasser, Mohammed
2013 “Genre-based analysis of Arabic research article abstracts across four disciplines”. Journal of Educational and Social Research 3(3): 371–382.Google Scholar
Parodi, Giovanni
2010 “La organización retórica del género manual a través de cuatro disciplinas: ¿cómo se comunica y difunde la ciencia en diferentes contextos universitarios?”. Boletín de Lingüística XXII: 43–69.Google Scholar
Pezzini, Ornella
2003 “Genre analysis and translation. An investigation of abstracts of research articles in two languages”. Capa 2(12): 75–108.Google Scholar
Pho, Phuong
2008 “Research article abstracts in applied linguistics and educational technology: A study of linguistic realizations of rhetorical structure and authorial stance”. Discourse Studies 10(2): 231–250. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Redeker, Gisela
2000 “Coherence and structure in text and discourse”. In Abduction, belief and context in dialogue. Studies in computational pragmatics, ed. por William Black y Harry Bunt, 233–263. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Renkema, Jan
2009 The texture of discourse. Amsterdam. John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Saeeaw, Supachai and Supong Tangkiengsirisin
2014 “Rhetorical variation across research article abstracts in environmental science and applied linguistics”. English Language Teaching 7(8): 81–93. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Salager-Meyer, Françoise
1992 “A text-type and move analysis study of verb tense and modality distribution in medical English abstracts”. English for Specific Purposes 11(2): 93–113. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1990 “Discoursal flaws in medical English abstracts: A genre analysis per research and text type”. Text & Talk 10(4): 365–384.Google Scholar
Samraj, Betty
2002 “Disciplinary variation in abstracts: The case of wildlife behavior and conservation biology”. En Academic discourse, ed. por John Flowerdew, 40–56. London: Pearson.Google Scholar
2005 “An exploration of a genre set: Research article abstracts and introductions in two disciplines”. English for Specific Purposes 24(2): 141–156. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sanders, Ted and Henk Pander Maat
2006 “Cohesion and coherence: Linguistic approaches.” En Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, ed. por Keith Brown, 591–595. Amsterdam: Elsevier. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sanders, Ted, Wilbert Spooren y Leo Noordman
1992 “Toward a taxonomy of coherence relations”. Discourse Processes 15(1): 1–35. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1993 “Coherence relations in a cognitive theory of discourse representation”. Cognitive Linguistics 4(2): 93–133. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Scholman, Merel, Jacqueline Evers-Vermeul y Ted Sanders
2016 “Categories of coherence relations in discourse annotation: Towards a reliable categorization of coherence relations.” Dialogue & Discourse 7(2): 1–28.Google Scholar
Spooren, Wilbert and Liesbeth Degand
2010 “Coding coherence relations: Reliability and validity”. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 6(2): 241–266. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Spooren, Wilbert y Ted Sanders
2008 “The acquisition of coherence relations: On cognitive complexity in discourse”. Journal of Pragmatics 40(12): 2003–2026. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Suntara, Watinee y Siriluck Usaha
2013 “Research article abstracts in two related disciplines: Rhetorical variation between linguistics and applied linguistics”. English Language Teaching 6(2): 84–99. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Swales, John
1990 Genre analysis. English in academic and research settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Taboada, Maite y William Mann
2006 “Rhetorical structure theory: Looking back and moving ahead”. Discourse Studies 8(3): 423–459. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Taboada, Maite
2009 “Implicit and explicit coherence relations”. En Discourse, of course, ed. por Jan Renkema, 127–140. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tseng, Fan-ping
2011 “Analysis of move structure and verb tense of research article abstracts in applied linguistics journals”. International Journal of English Linguistics 1(2): 27–39. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Van Dijk, Teun
1977 Text and context. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Ventola, Eija
1994 “Abstracts as an object of linguistic study”. En Writing vs. speaking: Language, text, discourse, communication, ed. por Světla Čmejrková, František Daneš and Eva Havlová, 333–352.Tübingen: Gunter Narr.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 3 other publications

Cárcamo Morales, Benjamín
2019. Subjectivity in Spanish causal connectives. Spanish in Context 16:1 ► pp. 51 ff. Crossref logo
Parodi, Giovanni & Gina Burdiles
2019. Los pronombres neutros ‘esto’, ‘eso’ y ‘aquello’ como mecanismos encapsuladores en el discurso de la economía. Spanish in Context 16:1 ► pp. 104 ff. Crossref logo
Rashidi, Naser & Hussein Meihami
2018. Informetrics of Scientometrics abstracts: a rhetorical move analysis of the research abstracts published in Scientometrics journal. Scientometrics 116:3 ► pp. 1975 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 15 january 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.