Cover not available
Article published In:
Spanish in Context
Vol. 20:1 (2023) ► pp.154–177

Variation in Andorran Spanish past perfectives

Insights from the Portuguese diaspora

ORCID logo | University of Bristol

Romance varieties differ in their usage of preterit and present perfect verb tenses. Both are past perfectives, but whereas Portuguese uses the preterit in most contexts, spoken French prefers the present perfect. Peninsular Spanish lies between the two, though evidence indicates that the present perfect is becoming the default past perfective (Schwenter and Torres Cacoullos 2008) in a process of ‘aoristic drift’ (Squartini and Bertinetto 2000). How does speaker multilingualism affect this? Semi-structured interviews were conducted with second-generation members of the Portuguese diaspora in Andorra. We might expect native competence in Portuguese to inhibit aoristic drift in Spanish, since contact has been shown to affect past perfective verb tense in other Romance varieties (Gili Gaya 1993; Hawkey 2020). Contrary to expectations, participants demonstrated aoristic drift. Dense and multiplex migrant networks are, however, shown to favour the maintenance of vernacular norms (Milroy 1980), including generalising the function of the present perfect.

Keywords: morphosyntactic variation, past tenses, migrant social networks
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Research context: The Portuguese community in Andorra
  • 3.Theoretical background: Contact, LVC and migration
  • 4.Linguistic background: Preterit and present perfect in Ibero-Romance
    • 4.1Peninsular Spanish
    • 4.2Catalan
    • 4.3Portuguese
  • 5.Hypothesis and Methods
    • 5.1Research Hypothesis
    • 5.2Sampling
    • 5.3Coding of tokens
    • 5.4Statistical Analysis
  • 6.Results
  • 7.Discussion
  • 8.Conclusions
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 14 February 2023
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/sic.21012.haw
References
ADESSE
n.d. ADESSE: Base de datos de Verbos, Alternancias de Diátesis y Esquemas Sintáctico-Semánticos en Español. Consulted online at [URL], 10 March 2021.
Alarcos Llorach, Emilio
1980 [1947] “Perfecto simple y compuesto.” In Estudios de gramática functional del español, tercera edición, ed. by Emilio Alarcos Llorach, 13–49, Madrid: Gredos.Google Scholar
1994 Gramática de la lengua española. Madrid: RAE – Espasa Calpe.Google Scholar
Azpiazu, Susana
2012 “Antepresente prehodiernal y aorístico en el habla de Salamanca.” Revue de Linguistique Romane 761: 331–362.Google Scholar
Azpiazu, Susana, and Ilpo Kempas
2017 “Acerca del uso prehodiernal del pretérito perfecto compuesto resultativo en español.” Zeitschrift für Romanische Philologie 133.31:709–727. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baayen, R. Harald, Douglas J. Davidson, and Douglas M. Bates
2008 “Mixed-effects modelling with crossed random effects for subjects and items.” Journal of Memory and Language 59 (4):390–412. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Badia Margarit, Antonio M.
1962 [1985] Gramática catalana. Madrid: Gredos.Google Scholar
Butt, John, Carmen Benjamin, and Antonia Moreira Rodríguez
2019 A New Reference Grammar of Modern Spanish (sixth edition). London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan L., William Pagliuca, and Revere D. Perkins
1991 “Back to the future.” In Approaches to Grammaticalization: Volume 2, ed. by Elizabeth C. Traugott and Bernd Heine, 17–58. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Campos, Maria Henriqueta Costa
1997 Tempo, Aspecto e Modalidade. Estudos de Linguística Portuguesa. Porto: Porto Editora.Google Scholar
Camus Bergareche, Bruno
2008 “El perfecto compuesto (y otros tiempos compuestos) en las lenguas románicas: Formas y valores.” In Tiempos compuestos y formas verbales complejas, ed. by Ángeles Carrasco Gutiérrez, 65–99, Madrid: Vervuert. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cashman, Holly R.
2003 “Red social y bilingüismo (ingles/español) en Detroit, Michigan.” Revista Internacional de Lingüística Iberoamericana 31:59–78.Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard
1976 Aspect: An Introduction to the Study of Verbal Aspect and Related Problems. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Cook, Manuela
2004 Portuguese Verbs Explained: An Essential Guide. Knebworth: Able.Google Scholar
Copple, Mary T.
2011 “Tracking the constraints on a grammaticalizing perfect(ive).” Language Variation and Change 231:163–191. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dahl, Östen
1985 Tense and Aspect Systems. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Day, Meagan, and Sara Zahler
2014 “The continuous path of grammaticalization in Modern Peninsular Spanish”, University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 20 (1): 71–80.Google Scholar
Evans, Betsy
2004 “The role of social network in the acquisition of local dialect norms by Appalachian migrants in Ypsilanti, Michigan.” Language Variation and Change 16 (2):153–167. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gili Gaya, Samuel
1993 Curso superior de sintaxis española (fifteenth edition). Barcelona: Vox.Google Scholar
Govern d’Andorra
2019 Coneixements i usos lingüístics de la población d’Andorra. Situació actual i evolució (1995–2018). Andorra: Govern d’Andorra.Google Scholar
2020 Andorra en xifres 2020. Andorra: Govern d’Andorra.Google Scholar
Gumperz, John J.
1982 “Social network and language shift.” In Discourse Strategies, ed. by John J. Gumperz, 38–58. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Halliday, Michael A. K.
1985 An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Harris, Martin
1982 “The ‘past simple’ and ‘present perfect’ in Romance.” In Studies in the Romance Verb, ed. by Martin Harris and Nigel Vincent, 42–70. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Hawkey, James
2020 “Language attitudes as predictors of morphosyntactic variation: Evidence from Catalan speakers in southern France.” Journal of Sociolinguistics 24 (1): 16–34. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hernández Alonso, César
1996 Gramática funcional del español (third edition). Madrid: Gredos.Google Scholar
Johnson, Daniel Ezra
2009 “Getting off the GoldVarb standard: Introducing Rbrul for mixed-effects variable rule analysis.” Language and Linguistics Compass 3 (1):359–383. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2019 Rbrul, version 3.1.3. Consulted online at [URL], 12 March 2021.
Kempas, Ilpo
2006 Estudio sobre el uso del pretérito perfecto prehodiernal en el español peninsular y en comparación con la variedad del español argentino hablado en Santiago del Estero. Doctoral dissertation, University of Helsinki.
2008 “El pretérito perfecto compuesto y los contextos prehodiernales.” In Tiempos compuestos y formas verbales complejas, ed. by Ángeles Carrasco Gutiérrez, 231–273. Madrid: Vervuert. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2021 “En torno a la gramaticalización del pretérito perfecto compuesto (perfet) en catalán.” In Los pretéritos perfectos simple y compuesto en español peninsular y en otras lenguas románicas, ed. by Carmen Quijada van den Berghe and José J. Gómez-Asencio, 157–181. Madrid: Arco.Google Scholar
Labov, William
1972 Sociolinguistic Patterns. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
2001 Principles of Linguistic Change. Volume 2: Social Factors. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Milroy, Lesley
1980 Language and Social Networks. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Montoro del Arco, Esteban T.
2017 “El pretérito perfecto compuesto con valor aorístico en el habla urbana de Granada.” Orillas: Rivista d’Ispanistica 61: 455–470.Google Scholar
Pérez Saldanya, Manuel
2004 “Los tiempos verbales. Dificultades teóricas y terminológicas.” In El pretérito imperfecto, ed. by Luis García Fernández and Bruno Camus Begareche, 194–228. Madrid: Gredos.Google Scholar
Ravindranath Abtahian, Maya, and Jonathan Kasstan
2020 “Contact and sociolinguistic variation.” In The Handbook of Language Contact, second edition, ed. by Raymond Hickey, 221–240. Chichester: Wiley Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rojo, Guillermo
1990 “Relaciones entre temporalidad y aspecto en el verbo español.” In Tiempo y aspecto en español, ed. by Ignacio Bosque, 18–41. Madrid: Cátedra.Google Scholar
Sáez, Xavier
2004 “La consolidació: de 1970 al segle XXI.” In El segle XX: la modernització d’Andorra, ed. by María Jesús Lluelles, 239–444. Lleida: Pagès.Google Scholar
Schwenter, Scott
1994 “The grammaticalization of an anterior in progress: Evidence from a Peninsular Spanish dialect.” Studies in Language 18 (1):71–111. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schwenter, Scott, and Rena Torres Cacoullos
2008 “Defaults and indeterminacy in temporal grammaticalization: The ‘perfect’ road to perfective.” Language Variation and Change 201:1–39. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Seco, Rafael
1989 Manual de gramática española (eleventh edition). Madrid: Aguilar.Google Scholar
Serrano, María José
1996 “Accounting for morpho-syntactic change in Spanish: The present perfect case.” University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 3 (1):51–61.Google Scholar
Silva-Corvalán, Carmen
1994 Language Contact and Change: Spanish in Los Angeles. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Soler Montes, Carlos
2019 “Historia de una excepción perfecta: Norma y usos del pretérito perfecto compuesto en español.” Revue ReCHERches 231: 27–43. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Squartini, Mario, and Pier Marco Bertinetto
2000 “The simple and compound past in Romance languages.” In Tense and Aspect in the Languages of Europe, ed. by Östen Dahl, 189–226. Berlin/New York: Mouton De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sten, Holger
1973 L’Emploi des temps en portugais moderne. Copenhagen: Munksgaard.Google Scholar
Torres Cacoullos, Rena, and Catherine E. Travis
2018 Bilingualism in the Community: Code-switching and Grammars in Contact. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vaamonde, Gael, Fita González Domínguez, and José M. García-Miguel
2010 “ADESSE. A database with syntactic and semantic annotation of a corpus in Spanish.” Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC), Valletta, 1903–1910.Google Scholar
Van Buren, Jackelyn
2017 “The role of social networks in the retention of /f/ aspiration among Mexican migrant workers in the Pacific Northwest.” Studies in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics 10 (1):161–188. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wagner, Laura
1996 “The transition from haver to ter in Portuguese.” University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 3 (2): 133–145.Google Scholar
Weinreich, Uriel
1953 [1968] Languages in Contact: Findings and Problems. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Weinreich, Uriel, William Labov, and Marvin I. Herzog
1968 “Empirical foundations for a theory of language change.” In Directions for Historical Linguistics, ed. by Winfred P. Lehmann and Yakov Malkiel, 95–195. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Zentella, Ana Celia
1997 Growing up Bilingual. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar