Article In:
Spanish in Context: Online-First Articles

An integrated look at forms of address in Chilean Spanish using a contextualized picture-translation task

ORCID logo | Georgetown University,
This study uses an innovative contextualized translation task method and a quantitative variationist approach to offer an integrated look at second person singular address forms in Chilean Spanish, a Latin American variety with a tripartite address system that includes tuteo, ustedeo, and voseo forms. Results reveal that ustedeo has remained largely unaffected by recent changes in Chile’s address system and that this system’s main alternation is between tuteo and voseo, which function as competing variants. Results also provide further evidence that the documented shift towards a preference for voseo forms over tuteo forms in familiar address is led by members of the younger generation, especially men, and has the Central Region of the country as its epicenter. Finally, results suggest that, notwithstanding the shift from tuteo to voseo, the latter is unlikely to completely oust the former from Chile’s address system due to both linguistic and social reasons.
Keywords: Sociolinguistics, forms of address, Chile
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Address forms in Chile
  • 3.Methods
    • 3.1Translation task
    • 3.2Participants
    • 3.3Analytical framework
  • 4.Results
    • 4.1Interlocutor status
    • 4.2Distance
    • 4.3Participant gender
    • 4.4Participant origin
    • 4.5Participant age group
    • 4.6Interaction between participant gender and age group
  • 5.Discussion and closing remarks
  • Notes
  • References
This content is being prepared for publication; it may be subject to changes.
References (51)
References
Alemán Ocampo, Carlos. 2001. Estudios sobre idioma español en Nicaragua. Managua: Banco Central de Nicaragua.Google Scholar
Benavides, Carlos. 2003. “La distribución del voseo en Hispanoamérica.” Hispania 861: 612–623.Google Scholar
Bishop, Kelley, and Jim Michnowicz. 2010. “Forms of address in Chilean Spanish.” Hispania 931: 413–429.Google Scholar
Bland, Justin, and Terrell A. Morgan. 2020. “Geographic Variation of Voseo on Spanish Twitter.” In Current Theoretical and Applied Perspectives on Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics, ed. by Diego Pascual y Cabo, and Idoia Elola, 7–38. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Brown, Roger, and Albert Gilman. 1960. “The Pronouns of Power and Solidarity.” In Style in Language, ed. by Thomas A. Sebeok, 253–276. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Bürki, Yvette. 2005. La publicidad en escena: Análisis pragmático-textual del discurso publicitario de revistas en español. Zaragoza: Libros Pórtico.Google Scholar
Callaghan, Matthew. 2020. I’m talking tú vos: A comparative study of morphosyntactic variation and change in the Chilean second-person singular. Doctoral dissertation, The Australian National University, Canberra, Australia. DOI logo
Carricaburo, Norma. 1999. El voseo en la literatura argentina. Madrid: Arco Libros.Google Scholar
. 2015. Las fórmulas de tratamiento en el español actual (2nd edn.). Madrid: Arco Libros.Google Scholar
Cautín-Epifani, Violeta, and Marcela Rivadeneira Valenzuela. 2018. “Variación sociolingüística del voseo verbal chileno en interacciones escritas en la biografía Facebook.” Onomázein 41: 49–69. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chappell, Whitney. 2018. “The Importance of Motivated Comparison in Variationist Studies.” In Contemporary Trends in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics: Selected Papers from the Hispanic Linguistic Symposium 2015, ed. by Jonathan E. MacDonald, 143–168. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Christiansen, Ane, and Carmen Chavarría Úbeda. 2010. “Entre el habla y la escritura: Un análisis de las formas de tratamiento en los anuncios comerciales en Managua.” Revista Cátedra 141: 61–74.Google Scholar
De Jonge, Bob, and Dorien Nieuwenhuijsen. 2012. “Forms of Address”. In The Handbook of Hispanic Linguistics, ed. by José Ignacio Hualde, Antxon Olarrea, and Erin O’Rourke, 247–262. Malden: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Díaz-Campos, Manuel. 2014. Introducción a la sociolingüística hispánica. Malden: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Díaz, Tania, and Christian López. 2013. “Morfosintaxis del Español de Nicaragua.” In El Español Hablado en América Central: Nivel Morfosintáctico, ed. by Miguel Ángel Quesada Pacheco, 225–296. Iberoamericana: Madrid.Google Scholar
Eckert, Penelope. 1997. “Age as Sociolinguistic Variable.” In The Handbook of Sociolinguistics, ed. by Florian Coulmas, 151–167. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Ferguson, Christopher J. 2009. “An effect size primer: A guide for clinicians and researchers.” Professional Psychology: Research and Practice 401: 532–538. [URL]
Fernández-Mallat, Víctor. 2018. “Alternancia y variación de formas verbales tuteantes y voseantes en el español de santiaguinos: Estudio de caso basado en un corpus conversacional.” Boletín de Filología 531: 63–82.Google Scholar
. 2020. “Forms of address in interaction: Evidence from Chilean Spanish.” Journal of Pragmatics 1611: 95–106. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fernández-Mallat, Víctor, and Tabea Krebs. 2021. “Representaciones Sociomentales de Hablantes del Español Chileno en la Ciudad de Concepción.” In Lingüística del Castellano Chileno: Estudios sobre Variación, Innovación, Contacto e Identidad, ed. by Brandon M. A. Rogers, and Mauricio A. Figueroa Candia, 119–138. Wilmington: Vernon Press.Google Scholar
Fox, John, and Sanford Weisberg. 2019. An R companion to applied regression (3rd edn.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
Frago Gracia, Juan Antonio, and Mariano Franco Figueroa. 2003. El español de América (2nd edn.). Cádiz: Universidad de Cádiz.Google Scholar
Helincks, Kris. 2012. “La variación social y estilística del voseo chileno en diferentes géneros televisivos.” Revista Internacional de Lingüística Iberorománica 101: 185–211.Google Scholar
. 2015. “Negotiation of terms of address in a Chilean television talk show.” Bulletin of Hispanic Studies 921: 731–752. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hummel, Martin. 2004. El valor básico del subjuntivo español y románico. Cáceres: Universidad de Extremadura.Google Scholar
. 2010. “Reflexiones Metodológicas y Teóricas sobre el Estudio de las Formas de Tratamiento en el Mundo Hispanohablante, A Partir de una Investigación en Santiago de Chile.” In Formas y Fórmulas de Tratamiento en el Mundo Hispánico, ed. by Martin Hummel, Bettina Kluge, and María Eugenia Vázquez Laslop, 101–162. México, D.F.: El Colegio de México.Google Scholar
Kapović, Marko. 2007. “Fórmulas de tratamiento en dialectos del español: Fenómenos de voseo y ustedeo.” Hieronymus 11: 65–87.Google Scholar
Kristiansen, Tore. 2011. “Attitudes, Ideology and Awareness.” In The Sage Handbook of Sociolinguistics, ed. by Ruth Wodak, Barbara Johnstone, and Paul Kerswill, 265–278. Los Angeles: Sage.Google Scholar
Labov, William. 1972. Sociolinguistic patterns. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Lenth, Russell. 2020. emmeans: Estimated marginal means, aka least-squares means. R package version 1.5.0. [URL]
Lipski, John M. 1988. “Central American Spanish in the United States: Some remarks on the Salvadoran community.” Aztlán 171: 91–123.Google Scholar
1994. Latin American Spanish. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Lüdecke, Daniel, Mattan S. Ben-Shachar, Indrajeet Patil, Philip Waggoner, and Dominique Makowski. 2021. “performance: An R Package for assessment, comparison and testing of statistical models.” The Journal of Open Source Software 61: 3139. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Michnowicz, Jim, and Vannessa Quintana Sarria. 2020. “A new look at forms of address in the Spanish of Colombia, Cali.” Hispanic Studies Review 41: 121–139.Google Scholar
Morales Pettorino, F. 1998. “La conjugación en el español de Chile.” Literatura y Lingüística 111: 89–103. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Moreno Fernández, Félix. 2009. La lengua española en su geografía. Madrid: Arco Libros.Google Scholar
Morgan, Terrell A., and Scott A. Schwenter. 2016. “Vosotros, Ustedes, and the Myth of the Symmetrical Castilian Pronoun System.” In Inquiries in Hispanic Linguistics: From Theory to Empirical Evidence, ed. by Alejandro Cuza, Lori Czerwionka, and Daniel Olson, 263–280. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Newall, Greg. 2007. “The loss of the voseo in Chilean Spanish: Evidence in literature.” University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 131: 165–178.Google Scholar
Otheguy, Ricardo, and Ana Celia Zentella. 2012. Spanish in New York: Language contact, dialectal leveling, and structural continuity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
R Core Team. 2021. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. [URL]
Rivadeneira Valenzuela, Marcela. 2016. “Sociolinguistic Variation and Change in Chilean Voseo.” In Forms of Address in the Spanish of the Americas, ed. by María Irene Moyna, and Susana Rivera-Mills, 87–117. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Rivadeneira, Marcela J., and Esteve B. Clua. 2011. “El voseo chileno: Una visión desde el análisis de la variación dialectal y funcional en medios de comunicación.” Hispania 941: 680–703.Google Scholar
Rojas, Darío. 2012. “Percepción y valoración de variedades geográficas del español de Chile entre hispanohablantes santiaguinos.” Boletín de Filología 471: 137–163.Google Scholar
Signorell, Andri. 2020. DescTools: Tools for descriptive statistics. R package version 0.99.37. [URL]
Torrejón, Alfredo. 1989. “Andrés Bello, Domingo Faustino Sarmiento y el castellano culto de Chile.” Thesaurus 441: 534–558.Google Scholar
. 2010. “Nuevas Observaciones sobre el Voseo en el Español de Chile”. In Formas y Fórmulas de Tratamiento en el Mundo Hispánico, ed. by Martin Hummel, Bettina Kluge, and María Eugenia Vázquez Laslop 755–769. México, D.F.: El Colegio de México.Google Scholar
Trudgill, Peter. 1972. “Sex, covert prestige and linguistic change in the urban British English of Norwich.” Language in Society 11: 179–195. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Venables, William N., and Brian D. Ripley. 2002. Modern applied statistics with S (4th edn.). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Wagner, Claudio. 2006. “Las zonas dialectales de Chile”. Revista de Lingüística Teórica y Aplicada 441: 13–30.Google Scholar
Wolfram, Walt. 2013. “How to Uncover Linguistic Variables.” In Data Collection in Sociolinguistics: Methods and Applications, ed. by Christine Mallinson, Becky Childs, and Gerard Van Herk 21–24. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Yus Ramos, Francisco. 2001. Ciberpragmática. El uso del lenguaje en internet. Barcelona: Ariel.Google Scholar