Article published In:
Spanish in ContextVol. 8:2 (2011) ► pp.213–234
Accusative object marking
A change in progress in Cuban Spanish?
Although accusative object marking has been widely studied in Spanish, there do not appear to be sociolinguistic studies addressing its variation and possible change, despite evidence of loss of the marker from Dominican Spanish. This paper describes the findings of a study on the marking of human accusative objects in Cuban Spanish that compared two time periods and two generational cohorts with spoken data from the 1960s and 1990s. A significantly lower rate of object marking was found for the later time period, as well as similar rates for one generational cohort studied at both times. The findings of a logistic regression analysis suggested that loss of the object marker is a change in progress constrained by definiteness of the object. It is shown that the pattern found here for Cuban Spanish is more similar to Old Spanish than to Modern Spanish.
Cited by
Cited by 14 other publications
Arechabaleta Regulez, Begoña & Silvina Montrul
2021. Psycholinguistic Evidence for Incipient Language Change in Mexican Spanish: The Extension of Differential Object Marking. Languages 6:3 ► pp. 131 ff. 
Regulez, Begoña Arechabaleta & Silvina Montrul
2023. Production, acceptability, and online comprehension of Spanish differential object marking by heritage speakers and L2 learners. Frontiers in Psychology 14
Bautista-Maldonado, Salvador & Silvina Montrul
2019. An experimental investigation of differential object marking in Mexican Spanish. Spanish in Context 16:1 ► pp. 22 ff.
Brown, Esther & Javier Rivas
2019. Bringing Purported Black Sheep into the Fold: Galician Inflected Infinitives and Puerto Rican Spanish Pre-Verbal Infinitival Subject Pronouns. Languages 4:2 ► pp. 40 ff.
Callen, M. Cole & Karen Miller
2022. Linguistic Variation in the Acquisition of Morphosyntax: Variable Object Marking in the Speech of Mexican Children and Their Caregivers. Language Learning and Development 18:3 ► pp. 310 ff.
Cuza, Alejandro, Lauren Miller & Mariluz Ortíz
2016. On the production of differential object marking and wh-question formation in native and non-native Spanish. In Language Acquisition Beyond Parameters [Studies in Bilingualism, 51], ► pp. 187 ff.
Denbaum de Restrepo, Nofiya
2023. Chapter 8. The role of language attitudes in the L2 acquisition of sociolinguistic variation. In Study Abroad and the Second Language Acquisition of Sociolinguistic Variation in Spanish [Issues in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics, 37], ► pp. 229 ff.
Judy, Tiffany & Michael Iverson
2020. Chapter 5. The distribution of Differential Object Marking in L1 and L2 River Plate Spanish. In The Acquisition of Differential Object Marking [Trends in Language Acquisition Research, 26], ► pp. 133 ff.
Judy, Tiffany & Michael Iverson
2020. Chapter 5. The distribution of Differential Object Marking in L1 and L2 River Plate Spanish. In The Acquisition of Differential Object Marking [Trends in Language Acquisition Research, 26], ► pp. 133 ff.
Montrul, Silvina
2019. The acquisition of differential object marking in Spanish by Romanian
speakers. Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada/Spanish Journal of Applied Linguistics 32:1 ► pp. 185 ff.
Requena, Pablo E.
Rivas, Javier, Esther L. Brown & Mayra Cortés-Torres
2018. Variable subject pronominal expression in non-finite clauses: Implications for variant patterns and emergent contexts. Lingua 215 ► pp. 27 ff.
Rodríguez-Ordóñez, Itxaso
2020. Chapter 4. The acquisition of Differential Object Marking in Basque as a sociolinguistic variable. In The Acquisition of Differential Object Marking [Trends in Language Acquisition Research, 26], ► pp. 105 ff.
Rodríguez-Ordóñez, Itxaso
2020. Chapter 4. The acquisition of Differential Object Marking in Basque as a sociolinguistic variable. In The Acquisition of Differential Object Marking [Trends in Language Acquisition Research, 26], ► pp. 105 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.