Chapter published in:
Syntactic Variation in Insular Scandinavian
Edited by Höskuldur Thráinsson, Caroline Heycock, Hjalmar P. Petersen and Zakaris Svabo Hansen
[Studies in Germanic Linguistics 1] 2017
► pp. 141–164

Avoiding Genitive in Icelandic

The genitive is a highly idiosyncratic case for arguments in Icelandic. Hence it is sometimes substituted for by other cases, i.e. by structural case of subjects (nominative) and direct objects (accusative) or by the productive lexical dative case in other instances. Genitive objects of adjectives can only be replaced by dative, since dative is the only regular case for objects of adjectives. Genitive can also be replaced by dative in certain contexts of agreement or concord. Dative is a better alternative in such instances than nominative and accusative because dative and genitive share the property of being KPs (Kase Phrases) in the sense of Bayer, Bader and Meng (2001). This analysis is independently supported by facts about noun inflection in Icelandic.
Keywords: case marking, idiosyncratic case, structural case, genitive, dative, case variation, Icelandic
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Background
    • 2.1Case variation
    • 2.2Datives and genitives
  • 3.GA with arguments
    • 3.1Data
    • 3.2Subjects
    • 3.3Direct objects
    • 3.4Objects of adjectives
  • 4.Dative matching genitive
    • 4.1Predicative phrases with sem
    • 4.2Reduced relatives
    • 4.3Coordination and apposition
    • 4.4Analysis
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 18 July 2017
https://doi.org/10.1075/sigl.1.06jon
References
Árnadóttir, Hlíf, and Einar Freyr Sigurðsson
2013 “Case in Disguise”. In Variation in Datives. A Microcomparative Perspective, ed. by Beatriz Fernández, and Ricardo Etxepare, 96–143. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Barðdal, Jóhanna
2001 Case in Icelandic – A Synchronic, Diachronic and Comparative Approach. Lund: Department of Scandinavian Languages. [Lundastudier i nordisk språkvetenskap A57.]Google Scholar
2008 Productivity. Evidence from Case and Argument Structure in Icelandic. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2011a “Lexical vs. Structural Case: a False Dichotomy.” Morphology 21: 619–654. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2011b “The Rise of Dative Substitution in the History of Icelandic: A Diachronic Construction Grammar Account.” Lingua 121: 60–79. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bayer, Joseph, Markus Bader and Michael Meng
2001 “Morphological Underspecification Meets Oblique Case: Syntactic and Processing Effects in German.” Lingua 111: 465–514. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Caha, Pavel
2009 The Nanosyntax of Case. Doctoral dissertation, University of Tromsø, Tromsø.Google Scholar
Eggertsdóttir, Helga
2009 Eignarfallsflótti. [‘Genitive Avoidance.’] BA-thesis, University of Iceland, Reykjavík.Google Scholar
Einarsson, Stefán
1949 Icelandic. Grammar, Texts, Glossary. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Eythórsson, Thórhallur
2002 “Changes in Subject Case Marking in Icelandic.” In Syntactic Effects of Morphological Change, ed. by David Lightfoot, 196–212. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Guðjónsdóttir, Guðrún Línberg
2014 Reittur til reiðis. Um -s endingu í eignarfalli orða eins og reiði. [‘… On the Ending -s in the Genitive of Nouns Like reiði.’] BA-thesis, University of Iceland, Reykjavík.Google Scholar
Gunnarsdóttir, Ragnhildur
2015 Betra líf bíður mæðgunum. Setningafræðilegur eignarfallsflótti. [‘… The syntax of Genitive Avoidance.’] BA-thesis, University of Iceland, Reykjavík.Google Scholar
Halldórsson, Halldór
1982 “Um méranir: Drög að samtímalegri og sögulegri athugun.” [‘On Dative Substitution. An outline of a synchronic and a diachronic study.’] Íslenskt mál 4: 159–189.Google Scholar
Ingason, Anton Karl
2010 “Productivity of Non-default Case.” Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax 85: 65–117.Google Scholar
Jónsson, Jóhannes Gísli
2000 “Case and Double Objects in Icelandic.” In Leeds Working Papers in Linguistics and Phonetics 8, ed. by Diane Nelson and Paul Foulkes, 71–94. University of Leeds, Leeds.Google Scholar
2003 “Not So Quirky: On Subject Case in Icelandic.” In New Perspectives on Case Theory, ed. by Ellen Brandner, and Heike Zinsmeister, 127–164. Stanford, California: CSLI.Google Scholar
2009 “Verb Classes and Dative Objects in Insular Scandinavian.” In The Role of Semantic, Pragmatic and Discourse Factors in the Development of Case, ed. by Jóhanna Barðdal, and Shobhana Chelliah, 203–224. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013a “Dative versus Accusative and the Nature of Inherent Case.” In Variation in Datives. A Microcomparative Perspective, ed. by Beatriz Fernández, and Ricardo Etxepare, 144–160. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2013b “Two Types of Case Variation.” Nordic Journal of Linguistics 36: 5–25. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jónsson, Jóhannes Gísli, and Kristín Þ. Pétursdóttir
2012 “Þágufallsandlög með lýsingarorðum í íslensku og færeysku.” [‘Dative objects with adjectives in Icelandic and Faroese.’] In Frændafundur 7, ed. by Magnús Snædal and Turið Sigurðardóttir, 91–108. Reykjavík: Hugvísindastofnun Háskóla Íslands.Google Scholar
Jónsson, Jóhannes Gísli, and Thórhallur Eythórsson
2003 “Breytingar á frumlagsfalli í íslensku.” [‘Changes in subject case marking in Icelandic.’] Íslenskt mál 25: 7–40.Google Scholar
2005 “Variation in Subject Case Marking in Insular Scandinavian.” Nordic Journal of Linguistics 28: 223–245. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2011 “Structured Exceptions and Case Selection in Insular Scandinavian.” In Expecting the Unexpected: Exceptions in the Grammar, ed. by Horst Simon and Heiki Wiese, 213–242. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kjartansson, Helgi Skúli
1979 “Eignarfallsflótti. Uppástunga um nýja málvillu.” [‘Genitive Avoidance. Suggesting a new grammatical error.’] Íslenskt mál 1: 88–95.Google Scholar
1999 “Orð í belg um eignarfallsflótta.” [‘A few words on Genitive Avoidance.’]. Íslenskt mál 21: 151–160.Google Scholar
Maling, Joan
2002 “ ‘Það rignir þágufalli á Íslandi.’ [‘It rains datives in Iceland.’] Verbs with Dative Objects in Icelandic.” Íslenskt mál 24: 31–105.Google Scholar
McFadden, Thomas
2004 The Position of Morphological Case in the Derivation: A Study on the Syntax-morphology Interface. Doctoral dissertation, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Müller, Gereon
2005 “Syncretism and Iconicity in Icelandic Noun Declensions: A Distributed Morphology Approach.” In Yearbook of Morphology 2004, ed. by Booij, Geert, and Jaap van Marle, 229–271. Dordrecht: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nowenstein, Iris Edda
2012 Mig langar sjálfri til þess. Rannsókn á innri breytileika í fallmörkun frumlaga [‘Me wants self to do that: An investigation of intra-speaker variation in subject case.’] BA-thesis, University of Iceland, Reykjavík.Google Scholar
Pétursdóttir, Kristín Þ.
2014 Tungan er málinu vǫn. Um lýsingarorð sem stýra þágufalli. [‘… On adjectives that assign dative case.’] M.A.-thesis, University of Iceland, Reykjavík.Google Scholar
Rögnvaldsson, Eiríkur
1990 Íslensk orðhlutafræði. [‘Icelandic morphology.’] Reykjavík: Málvísindastofnun Háskóla Íslands.Google Scholar
Sigurðsson, Halldór Ármann
1991 “Icelandic Case-marked PRO and the Licensing of Lexical Arguments.” Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 9: 327–63. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2011 “On the New Passive.” Syntax 14: 148–178. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012 “Minimalist C/case”. Linguistic Inquiry 43: 191–227. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Svavarsdóttir, Ásta
1982 “Þágufallssýki.” [‘Dative Sickness.’] Íslenskt mál 4: 19–62.Google Scholar
1994 “Enn um eignarfallsflótta.” [‘More on Genitive Avoidance.’] Jónína hans Jóns G. Friðjónssonar, 7–13. Reykjavík.Google Scholar
Thorsteinsdóttir, Kristín Á.
2009 Afdrif eignarfallsins. Staða eignarfalls í íslensku nútímamáli. [‘The status of the Icelandic genitive.’] M.A.-thesis, University of Iceland, Reykjavík.Google Scholar
Thórarinsdóttir, Rannveig B.
2015 Fallstjórn slangursagna. [The Case Assignment of Slang Verbs.] BA-thesis, University of Iceland, Reykjavík.Google Scholar
Thráinsson, Höskuldur
2013 “Ideal Speakers and Other Speakers: The Case of Dative and Other Cases.” In Variation in Datives. A Microcomparative Perspective, ed. by Beatriz Fernández and Ricardo Etxepare, 161–188. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Thráinsson, Höskuldur, Thórhallur Eythórsson, Ásta Svavarsdóttir and Thórunn Blöndal
2015 “Fallmörkun.” [‘Case marking.’] In Tilbrigði í íslenskri setningagerð. II. Helstu niðurstöður. Tölfræðilegt yfirlit [‘Variation in Icelandic Syntax. II. Main results. A statistical overview.’], ed. by Höskuldur Thráinsson, Ásgrímur Angantýsson and Einar Freyr Sigurðsson, 33–76. Reykjavík: Málvísindastofnun Háskóla Íslands.Google Scholar
Viðarsson, Heimir Freyr
2009 “Tilbrigði í fallmörkun aukafallsfrumlaga. Þágufallshneigð í forníslensku?” [‘Variation in the case marking of oblique subjects. Dative Substitution in Old Icelandic?’] Íslenskt mál 31: 15–66.Google Scholar
Wood, Jim
2012 Icelandic Morphosyntax and Argument Structure. Doctoral dissertation, New York University, New York.Google Scholar
Yang, Charles
2016 The Price of Linguistic Productivity. How Children Learn to Break the Rules of Language. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Yip, Moira, Joan Maling and Ray Jackendoff
1987 “Case in Tiers.” Language 63: 217–250. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

WOOD, JIM, MATTHEW BARROS & EINAR FREYR SIGURÐSSON
2020. Case mismatching in Icelandic clausal ellipsis. Journal of Linguistics 56:2 ► pp. 399 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 31 march 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.