Adger, David. 2003. Core syntax: A minimalist approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Åfarli, Tor Anders. 1995. Seeds and functional projections. In Patxi Goenaga (ed.), De grammatica generativa, 139–150. Donostia: Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Åfarli, Tor A. 2001. Separationism in the functional domain of the clause. In Arthur J. Holmer, Jan-Olof Svantesson & Åke Viberg (eds.), Proceedings of the 18th Scandinavian Conference of Linguistics, volume 1, 179–189. Lund: Lund University.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Åfarli, Tor A. 2006. Passive and argument structure. In Werner Abraham & Larisa Leisiö (eds.), Passivization and typology: Form and function, 373–382. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Åfarli, Tor A. 2007. Do verbs have argument structure? In Eric Reuland, Tanmoy Bhattacharya & Giorgos Spathas (eds.), Argument Structure, 1–16. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Åfarli, Tor A. & Kristin M. Eide. 2000. Subject requirement and predication. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 23. 27–48. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Åfarli, Tor A. & Kristin M. Eide. 2001. Predication at the interface. In Niina Zhang (ed.), Syntax of predication, 1–25. ZASPIL – ZAS Papers in Linguistics. Berlin: ZAS.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Åfarli, Tor A. & Kristin M. Eide. 2003. Norsk generativ syntaks. Oslo: Novus forlag.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Åfarli, Tor A. & Karumuri V. Subbarao. (forthcoming). Models of grammar and the outcomes of long-term language contact. Trondheim: Norwegian University of Science and Technology NTNU.
Aitchison, Jean. 2003. Words in the mind: an introduction to the mental lexicon. Oxford: Blackwell.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Akmajian, Adrian & Frank Heny. 1975. An Introduction to the principles of transformational syntax. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Austin, John. L. 1962. How to do things with words. Oxford: Oxford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Avrutin, Sergey. 2006. Weak syntax. In Yosef Grodzinsky & Katrin Amunts (eds.), Broca’s region, 49–62. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bach, Emmon. 1964. An introduction to transformational grammars. New York & London: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Baker, Mark. 1997. Thematic roles and syntactic structure. In Liliane Haegeman (ed.), Elements of grammar: Handbook in generative syntax, 73–137. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Baker, Mark. 2003. Lexical categories: Verbs, nouns and adjectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Barstad, Åse K. 2000. Salmers syntaktiske struktur – En analyse av leddstillingen i norske salmevers. M.A. thesis NTNU.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Barton, Ellen L. 1998. The grammar of telegraphic structures. Sentential and nonsentential derivation. Journal of English Linguistics 26(1). 37–67. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Beaney, Michael. 1997. The Frege reader. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Biber, Douglas. 1999. Longman grammar of spoken and written English. Harlow: Pearson Education Ltd.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Blakemore, Diane 1992. Understanding utterances. An introduction to pragmatics. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Blanche-Benveniste, Claire. 1997. La notion de variation syntaxique dans la langue parlée. Langue française 115(1). 19–29. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Borer, Hagit. 2003. Exo-skeletal vs. endo-skeletal explanation: Syntactic projections and the lexicon. In John C. Moore & Maria Polinsky (eds.), The nature of explanation in linguistic theory, 31–67. Chicago: CSLI publications and University of Chicago Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Borer, Hagit. 2005a. Structuring sense volume I: In name only. Oxford: Oxford University Press.![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Borer, Hagit. 2005b. Structuring sense volume II: The normal course of events. Oxford: Oxford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bosque, Ignacio. 2006. Coordinated adjectives and the interpretation of number features. In Laura Brugè (ed.), Studies in Spanish Syntax, 47–60. Venezia: Libreria Editrice Cafoscarina.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bouchard, Denis. 1995. The semantics of syntax: A minimalist approach to grammar. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bowers, John. 1993. The syntax of predication. Linguistic Inquiry 24. 591–656.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bowers, John. 2001. Predication. In Baltin, Mark & Chris Collins (eds.), The handbook of contemporary syntactic theory, 299–333. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Brandt, Margareta et al.. 1992. Satztyp, satzmodus und illokution. In Inger Rosengren (ed.), Satz und illokution 1, 1–90. Tübingen: Niemeyer.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Brazil, David. 1995. A grammar of speech. Oxford: Oxford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bresnan, Joan W. 1971. Sentence stress and syntactic transformations. Language 47(2). 257–281. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bromberg, Hilary S. & Kenneth Wexler. 1995. Null subjects in wh-questions. In Carston T. Schütze et al. (eds.), Papers on language processing and acquisition, 221–248. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Brøseth, Heidi 2007. A neo-constructional approach to computer-oriented talk. Ph.D. dissertation. Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Caramazza, Alfonso. 1996. The brain’s dictionary. Nature 380. 485–486. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cardinaletti, Alfonso. 1990. Subject/object asymmetries in German null-topic constructions and the status of spec CP
. In Joan Mascarò & Marina Nespor (eds.), Grammar in Progress, 75–84. Dordrecht: Foris Publications. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Carstairs McCarthy, Andrew. 1999. The origins of complex language: An inquiry into the evolutionary beginnings of sentences, syllables, and truth. Oxford: Oxford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Carston, Robyn. 2002. Thoughts and utterances: The pragmatics of explicit communication. Malden: Blackwell Publishing. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Carter, Ronald & Michael McCarthy. 1995. Grammar and spoken language. Applied Linguistics 16(2). 141–158. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chafe, Wallace L. 1976. Givenness, contrastiveness, definiteness, subjects, topics and point of view. In Charles N. Li (ed.), Subject and topic, 25–55. New York: Academic Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chafe, Wallace & Jane Danielewicz. 1987. Properties of spoken and written language. In Rosalind Horowitz & S. Jay Samuels (eds.), Comprehending oral and written language, 83–113. New York: Academic Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chao, Wynn. 1987. On ellipsis. PhD dissertation. University of Massachusetts, Amherst.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cheshire, Jenny. 2005. Syntactic variation and spoken language. In Leonie Cornips and Karen Corrigan (eds.), Syntax and variation: Reconciling the biological and the social, 81–106. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chomsky, Noam. 1957. Syntactic structures. The Hague: Mouton.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chomsky, Noam. 1964. Current issues in linguistic theory. The Hague: Mouton.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chomsky, Noam. 1965. Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chomsky, Noam. 1970. Remarks on nominalization. In Roderick Jacobs & Peter Rosenbaum (eds.), Readings in English transformational grammar, 184–221. Waltham, MA: Ginn.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chomsky, Noam. 1981a. Lectures on government and binding. The Pisa Lectures. Dordrecht: Foris.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chomsky, Noam. 1981b. Markedness and core grammar. In Adriana Belletti, Luciana Brandi & Luigi Rizzi (eds.), Theory of markedness in generative grammar. Proceedings of the 1979 GLOW Conference,123–146. Pisa: Scuola normale superiore di Pisa.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chomsky, Noam. 1986a. Knowledge of language: Its nature, origin, and use. Westport & London: Praeger Publishers.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chomsky, Noam. 1986b. Barriers. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chomsky, Noam. 1995. The minimalist program. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chomsky, Noam. 2000a. New horizons in the study of language and mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chomsky, Noam. 2000b. Minimalist inquiries: The framework. In Roger Martin, David Michaels & Juan Uriagereka (eds.), Step by step: Essays on minimalist syntax in honor of Howard Lasnik, 89–155. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chomsky, Noam. 2000c. The architecture of language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chomsky, Noam. 2001. Derivation by phase. In Michael Kenstovicz (ed.), Ken Hale: A life in language, 1–54. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chomsky, Noam. 2002. On nature and language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chomsky, Noam. 2004. Beyond explanatory adequacy. In Adriana Belletti (ed.), Structures & beyond: The cartography of syntactic structures, 104–131. Oxford: Oxford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chomsky, Noam. 2007. Approaching UG from below. In Uli Sauerland & Hans-Martin Gärtner (eds.), Interfaces + Recursion = Language?, 1–29. New York: Mouton de Gruyter.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chomsky, Noam. 2008. On phases. In Robert Freidin, Carlos Peregrín Otero & Maria Luisa Zubizarreta (eds.), Foundational issues in linguistic theory. Essays in honor of Jean-Roger Vergnaud,133–166. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Clark, Herbert H. & Eve E. Clark. 1977. Psychology and language. New York: Harcourt Brace.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Clark, Herbert H. & Suan E. Haviland. 1977. Comprehension and the givenness contract. In Roy Freedle (ed.), Discourse production and comprehension, 1–40. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
de Clercq, Karen. 2009. Fonologische deletie in ja-neevraagfragmenten. In Handelingen van de Koninklijke Zuid-Nederlandse Maatschappij voor Taal- en Letterkunde en Geschiedenis, volume LXII. 5–14.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Comrie, Bernard. 1981. Language universals and linguistic typology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Corbett, Greville G. 1991. Gender. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Corbett, Greville G. 2000. Number. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cornips, Leonie & Cecilia Poletto. 2005. On standardising syntactic elicitation techniques (part 1). Lingua 115. 939–957. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Crane, Tim. 1990. The language of thought: No syntax without semantics. Mind & Language 5(3). 187–212. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Crystal, David. 1976. Neglected grammatical factors in conversational English. In Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech & Jan Svartvik (eds.), Studies in English linguistics, 153–166. London: Longman.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Crystal, David. 1987. The Cambridge encyclopedia of language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Crystal, David. 2008. Dictionary of linguistics and phonetics, 6th edition. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Culicover, Peter W. & Ray Jackendoff. 2005. Simpler syntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dalrymple, Mary, Stuart M. Shieber, & Fernando C.N. Pereira. 1991. Ellipsis and higher-order unification. Linguistics and Philosophy 14. 399–452. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Damasio, Hanna et al.. 1996. A neural basis for lexical retrieval. Nature 380. 499–505. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
den Dikken, Marcel. 2001. “Pluringulars,” pronouns and quirky agreement. The Linguistic Review 18. 19–41. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dowty, David R. 1989. On the semantic content of the notion `thematic role'. In Gennaro Chierchia, Barbara Partee & Raymond Turner (eds.), Properties, types and meaning Volume 2: Semantic issues, 69–130. Dordrecht: D. Reidel. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dowty, David R. 1991. Thematic proto-roles and argument selection. Language 67(3). 547–619. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dowty, David, Robert Wall, & Stanley Peters. 1981. Introduction to Montague semantics. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dyrland, Eyvind. 1973. Noen syntaktiske trekk i norske avisoverskrifter. Master’s thesis, University of Oslo.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Eide, Kristin M. 1998. Som-Predicatives: Exploring the predication operator. In Timo Haukioja (ed.), Papers from the 16th Scandinavian conference of linguistics, 64–74. Laskut: University of Turku.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Eide Kristin M. & Tor A. Åfarli. 1999a. Semantically charged syntax and the construction of meaning. U. Penn Working Papers in Linguistics 6(1). 111–126.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Eide Kristin M. & Tor A. Åfarli. 1999b. The syntactic disguises of the predication operator. Studia Linguistica 53. 153–181. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Eide Kristin M. & Tor A. Åfarli. 2007. Flerspråklighet – en utfordring for det generative rammeverket? – Om dialektsyntaks og parallelle grammatikker. In Torben Arboe (ed.), Nordisk dialektologi og sosiolingvistikk. Foredrag på 8. Nordiske Dialektologikonference. Århus 15.-18. august 2006, 126–135. Aarhus: Aarhus Universitet.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Elugardo, Reinaldo & Robert Stainton. 2005. Ellipsis and nonsentential speech: Studies in linguistics and philosophy. Dordrecht: Springer. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Embick, David. 2010. Localism versus globalism in morphology and phonology. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Embick, David & Rolf Noyer. 2001. Movement operations after syntax. Linguistic Inquiry 32. 555–595. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Embick, David & Rolf Noyer. 2007. Distributed morphology and the syntax morphologyinterface. In Gillian Ramchand and Charles Reiss (eds.), The Oxford handbook of linguistic interfaces, 289–324. Oxford: Oxford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Engdahl, Elisabet. 2012. Optional expletive subjects in Swedish. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 35. 99–144. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Epstein, Samuel D. & Daniel Seely. (eds.). 2002. Derivation and explanation in the minimalist program. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Erteschik-Shir, Nomi. 2007. Information structure : the syntax-discourse interface. Oxford: Oxford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Featherston, Sam. 2007. Data in generative grammar: The stick and the carrot. Theoretical Linguistics 33(3). 269–318. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fiengo, Robert & Robert May. 1994. Indices and identity. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fillmore, Charles J. 1988. The mechanisms of “construction grammar”. BLS 14. 35–55. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fillmore, Charles J. et al.. 1988. Regularity and idiomaticity in grammatical constructions: The case of let alone
. Language 64. 501–538. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fitzpatrick, Justin M. 2006. Deletion through movement. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 24. 399–431. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fjeldstad, Marte. 2000. Drept av krimliga. En syntaktisk og pragmatisk analyse av fragmentariske avisoverskrifter i norsk. Master’s thesis, INL, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU).![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fodor, Jerry. 1998. Concepts: Where cognitive science went wrong. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fodor, Jerry & Ernest Lepore. 2002. The compositionality papers. Oxford: Oxford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fox, Danny & Howard Lasnik. 2003. Successive cyclic movement and island repair: The difference between sluicing and VP ellipsis. Linguistic Inquiry 34. 143–154. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Frascarelli, Mara. 2007. Subjects, topics and the interpretation of referential pro: An interface approach to the linking of (null) pronouns. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 25. 691–734. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Frascarelli, Mara & Ronald Hinterhölzl. 2007. Types of topics in German and Italian. In Kerstin Schwabe & Susanne Winkler (eds.), On information structure, meaning and form, 87–116. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Frazier, Lyn & Charles Clifton. 1998. Comprehension of sluiced sentences. Language and Cognitive Processes 13. 499–520. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Frazier, Lyn & Charles Clifton. 2005. The syntax-discourse divide: Processing ellipsis. Syntax 8:2. 121–174. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Frege, Gottlob. 1879. Begriffsschrift: eine der arithmetischen nachgebildete Formelsprache des reinen Denkens. Halle.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Freiermuth, Mark R. 2011. Debating in an online world: A comparative analysis of speaking, writing and online chat. Text & Talk 31(2). 127–151 ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Freidin, Robert. 1992. Foundations of generative syntax. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Føllesdal, Dagfinn. 1967. Comments on Stenius’s ‘mood and language-game’. Synthese 17. 275–280. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gazzaniga, Michael et al.. 2002. Cognitive neuroscience: The biology of the mind. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
van Gelderen, Elly. 2013. Null subjects in Old English. Linguistic Inquiry 44(2). 271–285. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Givón, Talmy. 1983. Topic continuity in spoken English. In T. Givón (ed.), Topic continuityin discourse: A quantitative cross-language study, 343–363. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gleitman, Lila. 1990. The structural sources of verb meanings. Language Acquisition 1. 3–55. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Goldberg, Adele. 1995. Constructions: A construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Goldberg, Adele. 2006. Constructions at work – The nature of generalization in language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Greenfield, Patricia M. and Kaveri Subrahmanyam. 2003. Online discourse in a teen chatroom: New codes and new modes of coherence in a visual medium. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology 24(6). 713–738. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Grimshaw, Jane. 1990. Argument structure. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Grimstad, Maren B., Terje Lohndal & Tor A. Åfarli. 2014. Language mixing and exoskeletal theory: A case study of word-internal mixing in American Norwegian. Nordlyd 41. 213–237. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Grimstad, Maren B. et al.. (forthcoming) Lexicalist vs. exoskeletal approaches to language mixing. Trondheim: Norwegian University of Science and Technology NTNU.![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Gundel, Jeanette K. 1974. The role of topic and comment in linguistic theory. PhD dissertation, University of Texas, Austin.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gynnild, Astrid. 1988. Dagspressens visuelle kommunikasjon. En analyse av tekst, bilder og layout i Adresseavisen, Dagbladet, Ekstra Bladet og Politiken 1970 og 1987. Master’s thesis, University of Trondheim.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Haegeman, Liliane. 1987. Register variation in English: some theoretical observations. Journal of English Linguistics 20. 230–248. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Haegeman, Liliane. 1990. Understood subjects in English diaries. Multilingua 9. 157–199. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Haegeman, Liliane. 1992. Theory and description in generative syntax: A case study in West Flemish. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Haegeman, Liliane. 1994. Introduction to government and binding theory. Oxford: Blackwell.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Haegeman, Liliane. 1997. Register variation, truncation, and subject omission in English and French. English Language and Linguistics 1. 233–270. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Haegeman, Liliane. 2000. Adult null subjects in non pro-drop languages. In Marc-Ariel Friedemann & Luigi Rizzi (eds.), The acquisition of syntax: Studies in comparative developmental linguistics, 129–169. Harlow: Longman.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Haegeman, Liliane. 2007. Subject omission in present-day written English. On the theoretical relevance of peripheral data. Rivista di Grammatica Generativa 32. 91–124.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Haegeman, Liliane & Jacqueline Guéron. 1999. English Grammar. Oxford: Blackwell.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Haegeman, Liliane & Tabea Ihsane. 1999. Subject ellipsis in embedded clauses in English. English Language and Linguistics 3(1). 117–145. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Haegeman, Liliane & Tabea Ihsane. 2001. Adult null subjects in the non-pro-drop languages: Two diary dialects. Language Acquisition 9(4). 329–346. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Haegeman, Liliane & Marjo van Koppen. 2012. Complementizer agreement and the relation between C0 and T0
. Linguistic Inquiry 43(3). 441–454. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hale, Ken. & Samuel J. Keyser. 1993. On argument structure and the lexical expression of syntactic relations. In Ken Hale & Samuel J. Keyser (eds.), The view from building 20, 53–109. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hale, Ken. & Samuel J. Keyser. 2002. Prolegomenon to a theory of argument structure. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Halle, Morris. & Alec Marantz. 1993. Distributed morphology and the pieces of inflection. In Ken Hale and Samuel Jay Keyser (eds.), The view from building 20, 111–176. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Halliday, Michael A.K. 1967. Notes on transitivity and theme in English, part II. Journal of Linguistics 3. 199–244. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Halliday, Michael A.K. 1989. Spoken and written language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hanssen, Eskil et al.. 1978.
Oslomål. Prosjektbeskrivelse og syntaktisk analyse av oslomål med henblikk på sosiale skilnader. Talemålsundersøkelsen i Oslo (TAUS). Skrift nr. 6. Hovedrapport. Oslo: Novus forlag.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hanssen, Eskil. 1983. Avbrutte setninger i talemål.
Talemålsundersøkelsen i Oslo (TAUS). Skrift nr. 10. Oslo: Novus forlag As.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hardt, Daniel. 1993. Verb phrase ellipsis: Form, meaning, and processing. Ph.D. dissertation University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Harley, Heidi & Rolf Noyer. 1999. Distributed morphology. GLOT International 4(4). 3–9.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hellan, Lars. 1988. Anaphora in Norwegian and the theory of grammar. Dordrecht: Foris.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hendriks, Petra & Jennifer Spenader. 2005. Why be silent? Some functions of ellipsis in natural language. In Jennifer Spenader & Petra Hendriks (eds.), Proceedings of the ESSLLI 2005 workshop on Cross-Modular Approaches to Ellipsis, 29–36. Edinburgh: Heriot-Watt University.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Heycock, Caroline. 1991. Layers of predication: The non-lexical syntax of clauses. PhD dissertation, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hjelmslev, Louis. 1961. Prolegomena to a theory of language. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hoekstra, Teun & René Mulder. 1990. Unergatives as copular verbs: Locational and existential predication. The Linguistic review 7. 1–79. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Holmberg, Anders. 1986. Word order and syntactic features. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Stockholm, Stockholm.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Holmberg, Anders & Christer Platzack. 1995. The Role of Inflection in Scandinavian Syntax. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hopper, Paul J. 1998. Emergent grammar. In Michael Tomasello (ed.), The new psychology of language: Cognitive and functional approaches to language, 155–175. New York: Psychology Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hornstein, Norbert, Jairo Nunes & Kleanthes K. Grohmann. 2005. Understandin minimalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Huang, C.-T. James 1984. On the distribution and reference of empty pronouns. Linguistic Inquiry 15. 531–574.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Huang, C.-T. James. 1989.
Pro-drop in Chinese: a generalized control theory. In Osvaldo Jaeggli & Kenneth J. Safir (eds.), The null subject parameter, 185–214. Dordrecht: Kluwer. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Huang, Yan. 1995. On null subjects and null objects in generative grammar. Linguistics 33. 1081–1123. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Huang, Yan. 2007. Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hughes, Rebecca, Ronald Carter & Michael McCarthy. 1995. Discourse context as a predictor of grammatical choice. In David Graddol & Stephen Thomas (eds.), Language in a changing Europe, 47–54. Clevedon: BAAL/Multilingual Matters.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jackendoff, Ray. 1971. Gapping and related rules. Linguistic Inquiry 2. 21–35.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jackendoff, Ray. 1990. Semantic structures. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jackendoff, Ray. 2002. Foundations of language: Brain, meaning, grammar, evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Janda, Richard D. 1985. Note-taking English as a simplified register. Discourse Processes 8. 437–454. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Johannessen, Janne Bondi. 1996. Partial agreement and coordination. Linguistic Inquiry 27(4). 661–676.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Johannessen, Janne Bondi & Fredrik Jørgensen. 2006. Annotating and parsing spoken language. In Peter J. Henrichsen & Peter R. Skadhauge (eds.), Treebanking for discourse and speech, 83–103. København: Samfundslitteratur Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Johnson, Kyle. 2001. What VP ellipsis can do, and what it can’t, but not why. In Mark Baltin & Chris Collins (eds.), The handbook of contemporary syntactic theory, 439–479. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Josefsson, Gunlög. 2006. Semantic and grammatical genders in Swedish – independent but interacting dimensions. Lingua 116(9). 1346–1368.![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jouitteau, Mélanie. 2004. Gestures as expletives: Multichannel syntax. In Gina Garding & Mimu Tsujimura (eds.), WCCFL 23 Proceedings, 104–114. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jurafsky, Daniel and James H. Martin. 2000. Speech and language processing : an introduction to natural language processing, computational linguistics, and speech recognition. Upper Saddle River, N.J: Prentice Hall.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jurafsky, Daniel, and James H. Martin. 2009. Speech and language processing: An introduction to natural language processing, speech recognition, and computational linguistics. 2nd edition. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson/Prentice-Hall.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Katz, Jerrold J. & Paul M. Postal. 1964. An integrated theory of linguistic descriptions. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kennedy, Christopher. 2003. Ellipsis and syntactic representation. In Kerstin Schwabe & Susanne Winkler (eds.), The interfaces: Deriving and interpreting omitted structure, 29–53. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kenny, Anthony. 1995. Frege: An introduction to the founder of modern analytic philosophy. London: Penguin Books.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kiss, Katalin. 1994. Sentence structure and word order. In Ferenc Kiefer & Katalin É. Kiss (eds.), The Syntactic structure of Hungarian, 1–90. San Diego: Academic Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kitahara, Hisatsugu. 1997. Elementary operations and optimal derivations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
van Koppen, Marjo. 2005. One probe - two goals: Aspects of agreement in Dutch dialects. PhD dissertation, Leiden University.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Koster, Jan. 1975. Dutch as an SOV language. Linguistic Analysis 1. 111–136.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kratzer, Angelina. 1996. Severing the external argument from the verb. In Johan Rooryck & Laurie Zaring (eds.), Phrase structure and the lexicon, 109–137. Dordrecht: Kluwer. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lambrecht, Knud. 1994. Information structure and sentence form. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lasnik, Howard. 2000. Syntactic structures revisited. Contemporary lectures on classic transformational theory. Cambridge: The MIT Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lasnik, Howard. 2005. Review of Jason Merchant: The syntax of silence. Language 81. 259–265. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lasnik, Howard. 2010. On ellipsis: Is material that is phonetically absent but semantically present or absent syntactically? In Hans Götzche (ed.), Memory, mind and language, 221–242. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lasnik, Howard & Tim Stowell. 1991. Weakest crossover. Linguistic Inquiry 22. 687–720.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Leech, Geoffrey. 2000. Same grammar or different grammar? Contrasting approaches to the grammar of spoken English discourse. In Srikant Sarangi & Malcolm Coulthard (eds.), Discourse and social life, 48–65. Cornwall: Longman.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Levin, Beth & Malka Rappaport Hovav. 2005. Argument realization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lewis, David. 1976. General semantics. In Barbara H. Partee (ed.), Montague grammar, 1–50. New York, San Fransisco & London: Academic Press.![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lindström, Jan. 2008.
Tur och ordning
. Introduktion till svensk samtalsgrammatik. Stockholm: Norstedts Akademiska Förlag.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Linell, Per. 1988. The impact of literacy on the conception of language: The case of linguistics. In Roger Saljö (ed.), The written world, 41–58. Berlin: Springer. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Linell, Per. 2005. En dialogisk grammatik? In Jan Anward & Bengt Nordberg (eds.), Samtal Och grammatik. Studier i svenskt samtalsspråk, 231–328. Lund: Studentlitteratur.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lobeck, Anne. 1995. Ellipsis: Functional heads, licensing, and identification. Oxford: Oxford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lohndal, Terje. 2012. Without specifiers: Phrase structure and events. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Maryland.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lohndal, Terje & Paul Pietroski. 2011. Interrogatives, instructions, and I-languages: An i-semantics for questions. Linguistic Analysis 37. 458–515.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lyons, John. 1977. Semantics, vol. 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Marantz, Alec. 1991. Case and licensing. In German Westphal, Benjamin Ao & Hee-Rahk Chae (eds.),
Proceedings of the Eighth Eastern States Conference on Linguistics (ESCOL’91)
, 234–253. Ithaca, NY: CLC Publications.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Marantz, Alec. 1997. No escape from syntax: Don’t try morphological analysis in the privacy of your own lexicon. In Alexis Dimitriadis et al.(eds.),
Pennsylvanian Working Papers in Linguistics 4.2, 201–225. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Penn Linguistics Club.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
McCarthy, Michael. 1998. Spoken language and applied linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
McCawley, James. 1968. The role of semantics in a grammar. In Emmon Bach and Robert Harms (eds.), Universals in linguistic theory, 124–169. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
McShane, Marjorie. 2005. A theory of ellipsis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Merchant, Jason. 2001. The syntax of silence: Sluicing, islands, and the theory of ellipsis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Merchant, Jason. 2004. Fragments and ellipsis. Linguistics and Philosophy 27(6). 661–738. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Merchant, Jason. 2010. Three types of ellipsis. In Francois Recanati, Isidora Stojanovic & Neftali Villanueva (eds.), Context-dependence, perspective, and relativity, 141–195. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Merchant, Jason. 2013. Ellipsis: A survey of analytical approaches. In Jeroen van Craenenbroeck and Tanja Temmerman (eds), A Handbook of ellipsis, 1–33. Oxford: Oxford University Press. [URL] [Accessed August 2016]![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mikkelsen, Line. 2005.
VP anaphora and verb-second order in Danish. Journal of Linguistics 51. 595–643. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Miller, Jim. 1995. Does spoken language have sentences? In Frank R. Palmer (ed.), Grammar and meaning. Essays in honour of Sir John Lyons, 116–135. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Miller, Jim. 2006. Spoken and written English. In Bas Aarts and April McMahon (eds.), The handbook of English linguistics, 670–691. Oxford: Blackwell. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Miller, Jim & Regina Weinert. 1998. Spontaneous spoken language: Syntax and discourse. New York: Oxford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Miyagawa, Shigeru. 2010. Why agree? Why move? Unifying agreement-based and discourse-configurational languages. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Molnár, Valéria. 1991. Das TOPIK im Deutschen und im Ungarischen [Topic in German and Hungarian]. (Lunder germanistische Forchungen 58). Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell International.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Müller, Gereon. 2009. On deriving CED effects from the PIC. Linguistic Inquiry 41(1). 35–82. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Müller, Stefan & Stephen Wechsler. 2014. Lexical approaches to argument structure. Theoretical Linguistics 40(1/2). 89–112.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mörnsjö, Maria. 2002. V1 declaratives in spoken Swedish. Ph.D. dissertation, Lund University.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Napoli, Donna J. 1982. Initial material deletion. Glossa 16. 85–111.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Newmeyer, Frederick. 1983. Grammatical theory: Its limits and its possibilities. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Nunes, Jairo. 1995. The copy theory of movement and linearization of chains in the minimalist program. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Maryland.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Nunes, Jairo. 2001. Sideward movement. Linguistic Inquiry 31. 303–344. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Nunes, Jairo. 2004. Linearization of chains and sideward movement. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Nunes, Jairo. 2011. The copy theory. In Cédric Boeck (ed.), The Oxford handbook of Linguistic minimalism, 143–172. Oxford: Oxford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Nygård, Mari. 2004. Talespråkssyntaks. En analyse av elliptiske konstruksjoner i talespråk. MA thesis, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU).![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Nygård, Mari. 2011. Architecture of grammar and phi-feature valuing in clause-initial discourse ellipses. In Kamila Debowska-Kozlowska & Katarzyna Dziubalska-Kolaczyk (eds.), On words and sounds. A selection of papers from the 40th PLM, 2009. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Nygård, Mari, Kristin M. Eide & Tor A. Åfarli. 2008. Ellipsens syntaktiske struktur. In Janne Bondi Johannessen & Kristin Hagen (eds.), Språk i Oslo. Ny forskning omkring talespråk, 172–183. Oslo: Novus forlag.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Nygård, Mari and Tor A. Åfarli. 2015. On the structure of gender assignment. Indian Linguistics 76 (1–2). 2015: 67–76.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Palmer, Harold E. 1924. A grammar of spoken English on a strictly phonetic basis. Cambridge: Heffer & Sons.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Phillips, Colin. 1996. Order and structure. Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Linguistics & Philology, MIT Working Papers in Linguistics.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Platzack, Christer. 1996. Germanic verb second languages – attract vs. repel: On optimaility, A-bar movement and the symmetrical/asymmetrical verb second hypothesis. In Ewald Lang & Gisela Zifonum (eds.), Deutsch–typologisch, 92–120. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Platzack, Christer. 1998a. Svenskans inre grammatik – det minimalistiska programmet. En introduction till modern generativ grammatik. Lund: Studentlitteratur.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Platzack, Christer. 1998b. A visibility condition for the C-domain. Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax 61. 53–97.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Platzack, Christer. 2000. Multiple interfaces. In Emile van der Zee & Urpo Nikanne (eds.), Cognitive interfaces: Constraints on linking cognitive information, 21–53. Oxford: Oxford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Platzack, Christer. 2010. Den fantastiska grammatiken. En minimalistisk beskrivning av svenskan. Stockholm: Norstedts.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Platzack, Christer. 2012. Towards a minimal argument structure. Ms. Lund University. Available from: [URL]. [Accessed May 2012]![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Platzack, Christer & Inger Rosengren. 1998. On the subject of imperatives: A minimalist account of the imperative clause. The Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 1. 177–224. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Prince, Ellen F. 1981. Toward a taxonomy of given-new information. In Peter Cole (ed.), Radical pragmatics, 223–256. New York: Academic Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Quirk, Randolph et al.. 1972. A grammar of contemporary English. London: Longman.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Quirk, Randolph et al.. 1985. A comprehensive grammar of the English language. London: Longman.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Radford, Andrew. 1981. Transformational syntax. A student’s guide to Chomsky’s extended standard theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Radford, Andrew. 2004. Minimalist syntax: exploring the structure of English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ramchand, Gillian C. 2008. Verb meaning and the lexicon: A first-phase syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rayner, Keith & Charles Clifton. 2009. Language processing in reading and speech perception is fast and incremental: Implications for event related potential research. Biological Psychology 80(1). 4–9. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Reinhart, Tanya. 1981. Pragmatics and linguistics: An analysis of sentence topics. Philosophica 27. 53–94.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Reinhart, Tanya. 2002. The theta system: An overview. Theoretical Linguistics 28. 229–290.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Reuland, Eric J. 2011. Anaphora and language design. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Richards, Marc D. 2007. On feature inheritance: An argument from the phase impenetrability condition. Linguistic Inquiry 38(3). 563–572. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rivero, María Luisa & Arhonto Terzi. 1995. Imperatives, V-movement and logical mood. Journal of Linguistics 31(2). 301–322. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rizzi, Luigi. 1986. Null objects in Italian and the theory of pro
. Linguistic Inquiry 17(3). 501–557.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rizzi, Luigi. 1991. Proper head government and the definition of A-positions. GLOW Newsletter 26. 46–47.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rizzi, Luigi. 1997. The fine structure of the left periphery. In Liliane Haegeman (ed.), Elements of grammar: A handbook in generative syntax, 281–337. Dordrecht: Kluwer. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rizzi, Luigi & Ian Roberts. 1996. Complex inversion in French. In Adriana Belletti & Luigi Rizzi (eds.), Parameters and functional heads: Essays in comparative syntax, 91–116. Oxford: Oxford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Roberge, Yves. 2010. Syntactic recoverability of null arguments. Montreal: McGill-Queens University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Roberts, Ian. 2007. Introduction. In Ian Roberts (ed.),
Comparative grammar: Critical concepts in linguistics, Vol 2(The Null Subject Parameter). London: Routledge.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Roeper, Tom. 1999. Universal bilingualism. Bilingualism 2. 169–186. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rosenkvist, Henrik. 1995. Discourse identification of non-canonical empty categories. An inquiry into the typology of empty categories. Ms. University of Lund.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ross, John Robert. 1968. Constraints on variables in syntax. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ross, John Robert. 1982.
Pronoun deleting processes in German. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Linguistic Society of America, San Diego, California.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rögnvaldsson, Eiríkur & Höskuldur Thráinsson. 1990. On Icelandic word order once more. In Joan Maling & Annie Zaenen (eds.), Modern Icelandic syntax, 3–40. San Diego: Academic Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sag, Ivan. 1976. Deletion and logical form. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sag, Ivan A. & Thomas Wasow. 1999. Syntactic theory: A formal introduction. Stanford: CSLI Publications.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sandøy, Helge. 1994. Talesyntaks og dialektsyntaks. In Helge Sandøy & Ivar Utne (eds.),
Helsing til Lars Vassenden på 70-årsdagen, Johan Myking, 195–206. Nordisk Institutt: University of Bergen.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sauerland, Uli & Paul Elbourne. 2002. Total reconstruction, pf movement, and derivational order. Linguistic Inquiry 33(2). 283–319. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Seuren, Peter A.M. 1998. Western linguistics: An historical introduction. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Shlonsky, Ur. 1994. Agreement in comp
. The Linguistic Review 11. 351–375. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sigurdsson, Halldór Ármann. 1989. Verbal syntax and case in Icelandic. Ph.D. dissertation, Lund University.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sigurðsson, Halldór Ármann. 2004a. Meaningful silence, meaningless sounds. In Pierre Pica et al.. (eds.), Linguistic variation yearbook 2004, 235–259. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sigurðsson, Halldór Á. 2004b. The syntax of person, tense, and speech features. Italian Journal of Linguistics 16. 219–251.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sigurðsson, Halldór Á. 2011. Conditions on argument drop. Linguistic Inquiry 42. 267–304. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sigurðsson, Halldór Á. & Joan Maling. 2010. The empty left edge condition. In Michael Putnam (ed.), Exploring crash-proof grammars, 59–86. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sperber, Dan & Deirdre Wilson. 1995. Relevance. Communication & Cognition. 2nd edition. Oxford: Blackwell.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Stainton, Robert J. 2006. Words and thoughts: Subsentences, ellipsis, and the philosophy of language. Oxford: Clarendon Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Stanley, Jason. 2000. Context and logical form. Linguistics and Philosophy 23. 391–434. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Stenius, Erik. 1967. Mood and language-game. Synthese 17. 254–274. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Steriade, Donca. 1995. Underspecification and markedness. In John Goldsmith et al. (eds.), The handbook of phonological theory, 114–174. Oxford: Blackwell.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Stowell, Tim. 1981. Origins of phrase structure, Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Straumann, Heinrich. 1935. Newspaper headlines. A study in linguistic method. Woking: Unwin Brothers Ltd.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Strawson, Peter Frederick. 1964. Identifying reference and truth-values. Theoria 30. 96–118. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Strawson, Peter Frederick. 1971. Identifying reference and truth-values. In Danny Steinberg & Leon Jakobovitz (eds.), Semantics: An interdisciplinary reader, 86–99. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Strawson, Peter Frederick. 1974. Subject and predicate in logic and grammar. London: Methuen.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sullet-Nylander, Françoise. 1998. Le titre de presse. Analyses syntaxtique, pragmatique et rhétorique. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Stockholm.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Svenonius, Peter. 2004. On the edge. In David Adger, Cécile de Cat & George Tsoulas (eds.), Peripheries: Syntactic edges and their effects, 261–287. Dordrecht: Kluwer. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Svenonius, Peter. 2012. Spanning. Ms., CASTL, University of Tromsø. Available from: [URL] [Accessed July 2012]
Tallerman, Maggie. 2006. Challenging the syllabic model of ‘syntax-as-it-is’. Lingua 116 (5). 689–709.![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Taraldsen, Knut Tarald. 1986.
Som and the binding theory. In Lars Hellan & Kirsti Koch-Christensen (eds.), Topics in Scandinavian syntax, 149–184. Dordrecht: D. Reidel. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Teleman, Ulf. 1983. Har tal- och skriftspråk olika grammatiker. Nordlund 3, Institutionen för nordiska språk, Lund University: 3–23.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tesak, Jürgen & Jürgen Dittmann. 1991. Telegraphic style in normal and aphasics. Linguistics 29. 1111–1137. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Trask, Robert Lawrence. 1993. A dictionary of grammatical terms in linguistics. London & New York: Routledge.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Travis, Lisa. 1984. Parameters and effects of word order variation. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Travis, Lisa. 1991. Parameters of phrase structure and verb-second phenomena. In Robert Freidin (ed.), Principles and parameters in comparative grammar, 339–364. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tsao, Feng-fu 1977. A functional study of topic in Chinese: the first step towards discourse analysis. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Southern California.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Uriagereka, Juan. 1999. Multiple spell-out. In Samuel D. Epstein & Norbert Hornstein (eds.), Working minimalism, 251–282. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Vikner, Sten. 1995. Verb movement and expletive subjects in the Germanic languages. Oxford: Oxford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Vinet, Marie Thérèse. 1993. L’aspect et la copule vide dans la grammaire des titres.
Langue Francaise. 83–100. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wechsler, Stephen and Larisa Zlatic. 2003. The many faces of agreement. The Stanford Monographs in Linguistics. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Weissenborn, Jürgen. 1992. Null subjects in early grammars: Implications for parameter setting theory. In Jürgen Weissenborn, Helen Goodluck & Tom Roeper (eds.), Theoretical issues in language acquisition, 269–299. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Westergaard, Marit & Øystein A Vangsnes. 2005.WH-questions, V2, and the left periphery of three Norwegian dialect types. Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 8. 119–160. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wiggen, Geirr. 1986. Utelatelse av setningsledd. In Eskil Hanssen et al.(eds.), Artikler 1–4. Talemålsundersøkelsen i Oslo (Taus). Skrift 1–4, 69–125. Oslo: Novus forlag As.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Williams, Edwin. 1980. Predication. Linguistic Inquiry 11. 203–238.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1922.
Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. Translated by R. Ogden. New York: Harcourt, Brace.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1953. Philosophical investigations. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Zanuttini, Raffaela & Paul Portner. 2003. Exclamative clauses: At the syntax-semantics interface. Language 79(1). 39–51. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Zwart, C. Jan-Wouter. 1997. Morphosyntax of verb movement. A minimalist approach to the syntax of Dutch. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Empirical sources
BigBrother-korpuset (The BigBrother Corpus), Tekstlaboratoriet, ILN, Universitetet i Oslo. [URL]
Bross, H. & Ilves, K. 2009. Nye bestevenner. Oslo: Omnipax.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fielding, H. 1996. Bridget Jones’s Diary. London: Penguin Books.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fielding, H. 1998. Le journal de Bridget Jones. Paris: Albin Michel.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fielding, H. 2001. Bridget Jones’ dagbok. Oslo: Aschehoug.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Nesbø, J. 2008. Doktor Proktors tidsbadekar. Kanskje. Oslo: Aschehoug.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Norsk talespråkskorpus – Oslodelen (NoTa-Oslo: Norwegian Speech Corpus – the Oslo part), Tekstlaboratoriet, ILN, Universitetet i Oslo. [URL]
Lindstad, Arne Martinus; Nøklestad, Anders; Johannessen, Janne Bondi; Vangsnes, Øystein Alexander. 2009. The Nordic Dialect Database: Mapping Microsyntactic Variation in the Scandinavian Languages. In Jokinen, Kristiina and Eckhard Bick (eds): NEALT Proceedings Series; Volum 4.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)