Cover not available
Part of
The Ditransitive Alternation in Present-Day German: A corpus-based analysis
Hilde De Vaere
[Studies in Germanic Linguistics 6] 2023
► pp. xvi–xviii

List of figures

Figure 1.Serialisation of arguments (“actants”) – examples from Wegener (1985: 234)
Figure 2.“Satzbaupläne” 17 (1490) and 19 (1494) according to Duden (2006) and (2016: 932–933)
Figure 3.Duden “Satzbauplan” 24 (1502)
Figure 4.The six senses of the Ditransitive Construction according to Goldberg (1995: 38)
Figure 5.Kay’s Abstract Recipient Construction (2005: 78)
Figure 6.The dative ‘constructeme’ and its ‘allostructions’ according to Perek (2015: 156)
Figure 7.Höllein’s niches of a PO-preposition
Figure 8.Welke’s representation of the geben (type)-construction (2019: 297)
Figure 9.Welke’s semantic description of the geben-construction (2019: 297)
Figure 10.Transitive verb-particle construction with its two allostructions according to Cappelle (2006: 18)
Figure 11.The dative constructeme and its allostructions according to Perek (2015: 156)
Figure 12.Ranking of apparent importance of predictors based on ANOVA of nested models
Figure 13.Effect plots for the geben dataset
Figure 14.Ranking of apparent importance of predictors based on ANOVA of nested models (model without RecConc)
Figure 15.Effect plots for the schicken/senden dataset
Figure 16.CIT for schicken
Figure 17.CIT for senden
Figure 18.CIT for IOC vs. an-POC and zu-POC
Figure 19.Intransitive, monotransitive and ditransitive uses of the verbs under study (based on the random sample data in Table 4 and Table 6)
Figure 20.Constructional distribution within the ditransitive uses (based on the random sample data)
Figure 21.Effect plots for the complex geben dataset
Figure 22.Random effect Sense in the complex geben dataset (Verbs have been added to the plot for the sake of clarity)
Figure 23.CIT for abgeben
Figure 24.CIT for preisgeben
Figure 25.CIT for übergeben
Figure 26.CIT for zurückgeben
Figure 27.CIT for weitergeben
Figure 28.ANOVA for complex schicken/senden
Figure 29.Effect plots for the complex schicken/senden dataset
Figure 30.CIT for all the complex schicken/senden verbs
Figure 31.CIT for einschicken
Figure 32.CIT for einsenden
Figure 33.CIT for zurückschicken
Figure 34.CIT for zurücksenden
Figure 35.CIT for übersenden
Figure 36.CIT for weiterschicken
Figure 37.ANOVA for ausleihen, verleihen, verkaufen
Figure 38.Effect plots for ausleihen, verleihen and verkaufen
Figure 39.CIT for ausleihen, verleihen, verkaufen
Figure 40.CIT for ausleihen
Figure 41.CIT for verleihen
Figure 42.CIT for verkaufen
Figure 43.Adler’s representation of the single meaning option of geben-type verbs (2011: 195) as opposed to the single meaning option of give-type verbs (Adler 2011: 181)
Figure 44.Proportions of Denotational Class in the geben dataset and effect plot
Figure 45.Adler’s (2011: 184; 216) representation of the Verb Sensitive Approach to verb meaning for schicken and send/throw
Figure 46.Representation of the Verb Sensitive Approach to verb meaning for schicken in the terminology of the present account
Figure 47.Delimitation of the ditransitive alternation with regard to schicken in the present account
Figure 48.Adler’s representation of verkaufen-type verbs
This content is being prepared for publication; it may be subject to changes.