Part of
Investigating West Germanic Languages: Studies in honor of Robert B. Howell
Edited by Jennifer Hendriks and B. Richard Page
[Studies in Germanic Linguistics 8] 2024
► pp. 301324
References (76)
References
Auer, Anita, Catharina Peersman, Simon Pickl, Gijsbert Rutten & Rik Vosters. 2015. Historical sociolinguistics: The field and its future. Journal of Historical Sociolinguistics 1(1). 1–12. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Auer, Peter, David Fertig, Paul J. Hopper & Robert W. Murray (eds.). 2015. Hermann Paul’s Principles of language history revisited: Translations and reflections. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Babenko, A. S. 1985. Commentary. V. M. Zhirmunsky – Selected writings: Linguistics, poetics, 384–404. Moscow: Progress Publishers.Google Scholar
Baudouin de Courtenay, Ivan Aleksandrovich (Бодуэнъ-де-Куртенэ, Иванъ Александровичъ). 1897. Boduėn"-de-Kurtenė (Baudouin de Courtenay), Ivan" Aleksandrovič", izvěstnyj lingvist" (Бодуэнъ-де-Куртенэ (Baudouin de Courtenay), Иванъ Александровичъ, извѣстный лингвистъ) [Baudouin de Courtenay, Ivan Alexandrovich, famous linguist]. In Vengerov, S. A. (Венгеровъ, С. А.) Kritiko-biografičeskij slovar' russkix" pisatelej i učenyx" (ot" načala russkoj obrazovannosti do našix" dnej). Tom" V. S" alfavitnym" ukazatelem" ko vsěm" pjati tomam" (Критико-біографическій словарь русскихъ писателей и ученыхъ (отъ начала русской образованности до нашихъ дней). Томъ V. Съ алфавитнымъ указателемъ ко всѣмъ пяти томамъ) [Critical-biographical dictionary of Russian writers and scholars (from the beginning of Russian education to the present day). Volume V. With an alphabetical index to all five volumes], 18–50. S.-Peterburg": Tipografija M. M. Stasjuleviča. [URL]/ or [URL]Google Scholar
Baudouin de Courtenay, I[van] A[leksandrovich] (Бодуэнъ-де-Куртенэ, И[ванъ] А[лександровичъ]. 1901. O směšannom" xarakterě vsěx" jazykov" (О смѣшанномъ характерѣ всѣхъ языковъ) [On the mixed character of all languages]. Žurnal" ministerstva narodnago prosvěščenija (Журналъ министерства народнаго просвѣщенія) [Journal of the Ministry of Public Education]. Sed'moe desjatilětie, čast' CCCXXXVII, Sentjabr' (Седьмое десятилѣтіе, часть CCCXXXVII, Сентябрь) [Seventh decade, part 337, September]. 12–24. [URL] or [URL]Google Scholar
Bright, William (ed.). 1966. Sociolinguistics: Proceedings of the UCLA sociolinguistics conference, 1964. (Janua Linguarum: Series Maior 20). The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Christy, T. Craig. 1983. Uniformitarianism in linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Coșeriu, Eugenio. 1978. Sincronía, diacronía e historia. El problema del cambio lingüístico. 3rd edn., Madrid: Gredos. (First published 1957. German translation: Synchronie, Diachronie und Geschichte. Das Problem des Sprachwandels. 2nd edn., München: Wilhelm Fink. 1984).Google Scholar
Crowley, Terry & Claire Bowern. 2010. An introduction to historical linguistics. 4th edn. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dekker, Rudolf. 2002. Jacques Presser’s heritage: Egodocuments in the study of history. Memoria y Civilización 5. 13–37. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ferguson, Charles A. 1959. Diglossia. Word 15(2). 325–340. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fishman, Joshua A. 1964. Language maintenance and language shift as a field of inquiry: A definition of the field and suggestions for its further development. Linguistics 2(9). 32–70. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1965. Who speaks what language to whom and when? La Linguistique 1(2). 67–88.Google Scholar
1967. Bilingualism with and without diglossia; diglossia with and without bilingualism. Journal of Social Issues 23(2). 29–38. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1991. My life through my work; my work through my life. In Koerner, E.F. Konrad (ed.), First person singular II: Autobiographies by North American scholars in the language sciences, 105–124. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fought, John. 1982. The reinvention of Hugo Schuchardt. Language in Society 1. 419–436. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gamillscheg, Emil. 1934–1936. Romania germanica: Sprach- und Siedlungsgeschichte der Germanen auf dem Boden des alten Römerreichs. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
. 1966. Etymologisches Wörterbuch der französischen Sprache. 2nd edn. Heidelberg: Carl Winter.Google Scholar
Gozzi, Raymond Dante. 1957. Tropes and figures: A psychological study of David Henry Thoreau. PhD dissertation, New York University.Google Scholar
Grimm, Jacob. 1848. Geschichte der deutschen Sprache. Leipzig: Weidmannsche Buchhandlung.Google Scholar
Haugen, Einar. 1953. The Norwegian language in America. 2 vols. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
. 1980. On the making of a linguist. In Davis, Boyd H. & Raymond K. O’Cain (eds.), First person singular: Papers from the conference on an oral archive for the history of American linguistics (Charlotte, NC, 9–10 March 1979), 133–143. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hernández-Campoy, Juan Manuel & Juan Camilo Conde-Silvestre (eds.). 2012. The handbook of historical sociolinguistics. Oxford: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Horner, Kristine & Andrew J. Bradley. 2019. Language ideology. In Darquennes, Jeroen, Wim Vandenbussche & Joseph Salmons (eds.). Contact linguistics, vol. 1, 296–307. Berlin: de Gruyter Handbooks.Google Scholar
Howell, Robert B. 1991. Old English breaking and its Germanic analogues. Tübingen: Niemeyer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2006. Immigration and koineisation: The formation of early modern Dutch urban vernaculars. Transactions of the Philological Society 104. 207–227. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012. Were the cities of Holland 1200–1650 “New Towns”? Urban demography and koineisation in the urban vernaculars of Holland. Invited Plenary at the Forum on Germanic Language Study, Sheffield, England, January 6–7.Google Scholar
Kahane, Henry. 1991. A linguist’s vita as historiography. In Koerner, E.F. Konrad (ed.), First person singular II: Autobiographies by North American scholars in the language sciences, 187–204. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koerner, E.F. Konrad (ed.). 1991. First person singular II: Autobiographies by North American scholars in the language sciences. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(ed.). 1998. First person singular III: Autobiographies by North American scholars in the language sciences. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koerner, E.F. Konrad. 2002. Toward a history of American linguistics. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kruszewski, Mikołaj. 1995. Writings in general linguistics: On Sound Alternation (1881) and Outline of Linguistic Science (1883). Mikołaj Kruszewski (1851–1887); edited with an introduction by Konrad Koerner. (Amsterdam studies in the theory and history of linguistic science. Series I, Amsterdam classics in linguistics, 1800–1925, v. 11). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lauersdorf, Mark Richard. 2013. Eugen Pauliny and historical sociolinguistics. In Múcsková, Gabriela, Katarína Muziková, Zuzana Hargašová & Mark Richard Lauersdorf (eds.). Slovo a tvar v štrukúre a v komunikácii [Word and form in structure and communication], Thematic issue of: Philologica (Zborník Filozofickej fakulty Univerzity Komenského) LXXII. 243–249. Bratislava: Univerzita Komenského.Google Scholar
. 2018. Historical (standard) language development and the writing of historical identities: A plaidoyer for a data-driven approach to the investigation of the sociolinguistic history of (not only) Slovak. In Dickey, Stephen M. & Mark Richard Lauersdorf (eds.), V zeleni drželi zeleni breg: Studies in honor of Marc L. Greenberg, 199–218. Bloomington, Indiana: Slavica Publishers.Google Scholar
. 2021. Historical sociolinguistics and the necessity of interdisciplinary collaboration. In Burkette, Allison & Tamara Warhol (eds), Crossing borders, making connections: Interdisciplinarity in linguistics, 207–230. Berlin: de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. Manuscript. Standard language ideology in the Slovak-speaking region of Central Europe: Controlling space and time, form and function.
Lehmann, Winfred P. (ed.). 1967. A reader in nineteenth century historical Indo-European linguistics. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
1980. Linguistics at Wisconsin (1937–41) and at Texas (1949–): A retrospective view. In Davis, Boyd H. & Raymond K. O’Cain (eds.), First person singular: Papers from the conference on an oral archive for the history of American linguistics (Charlotte, NC, 9–10 March 1979), 183–190. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leskien, August. 1898. Letter from August Leskien, Professor of the Slavic Languages, University of Leipsic, Saxony, Member of the Royal Saxon Society of Sciences. Leipzig, 25. November 1894. Journal of the American Oriental Society 19. 93–94. (in Appendix I: Original Text of the Letters from Foreign Scholars concerning Professor Whitney, pp. 67–105) [URL]Google Scholar
Meillet, Antoine. 1905–1906. Comment les mots changent de sense. L’Année sociologique 1905–1906. 1–38. (Reprinted in Meillet, Antoine. 1982. Linguistique historique et linguistique générale, 237–271. Paris: Champion).Google Scholar
. 1906. L’état actuel des études de linguistique générale (Leçon d’ouverture du cours de Grammaire comparée au Collège de France lue le mardi 13 février 1906). (Reprinted in Meillet, Antoine. 1982. Linguistique historique et linguistique générale, 1–18. Paris: Champion).Google Scholar
Nevalainen, Terttu & Helena Raumolin-Brunberg. 2012. Historical sociolinguistics: Origins, motivations, and paradigms. In Hernández-Campoy, Juan Manuel & Juan Camilo Conde-Silvestre (eds.), The handbook of historical sociolinguistics, 23–40. Oxford: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Osthoff, Hermann & Karl Brugmann. 1878. Morphologische Untersuchungen auf dem Gebiete der indogermanischen Sprachen, Leipzig: Hirzel.Google Scholar
Paul, Hermann. 1880. Prinzipien der Sprachgeschichte. Halle: Max Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Polomé, Edgar C. 1991. From philology to language and culture. In Koerner, E.F. Konrad (ed.), First person singular II: Autobiographies by North American scholars in the language sciences, 255–271. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Purnell, Thomas. 2010. Phonetic detail in the perception of ethnic varieties of US English. In Preston, Dennis & Nancy Niedzielski (eds.), A reader in sociophonetics, 289–326. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Read, Allen Walker. 1937. Bilingualism in the Middle Colonies, 1725–1775. American Speech 12(2). 93–99. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Romaine, Suzanne. 1982. Socio-historical linguistics. Its status and methodology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2005. Historical sociolinguistics/historische Soziolinguistik. In Ammon, Ulrich, Norbert Dittmar, Klaus J. Mattheier & Peter Trudgill (eds.), Sociolinguistics: An international handbook of the science of language and society, vol. 2, 1696–1703. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Russi, Cinzia. 2016. Introduction. In Russi, Cinzia, Katarzyna Grzegorek, & Manuela Rocchi (eds.), Current trends in historical sociolinguistics, 1–18. Berlin: De Gruyter Open.Google Scholar
Rutten, Gijsbert & Rik Vosters (eds.). 2020. Revisiting Haugen: Historical-sociolinguistic perspectives on standardization. Thematic issue of the journal Language Policy 19(2).Google Scholar
Salmons, Joseph. 2018. A history of German: What the past reveals about today’s language. 2nd edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
. 2021a. Sound change. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2021b. Contributions to phonology of nineteenth century historical linguistics. In Dresher, B. Elan & Harry van der Hulst (eds.), Oxford handbook of the history of phonology, 163–176. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Schirmunski, Viktor M. [See also Žirmunskij (Жирмунский)]. 1930. Sprachgeschichte und Siedelungsmundarten. Germanisch-Romanische Monatsschrift 18. 113–122, 171–188.Google Scholar
Schmidt-Rohr, Georg. 1932. Die Sprache als Bildnerin der Völker: Eine Wesens- und Lebenskunde der Volkstümer. Jena: Eugen Diederichs Verlag. (Subsequent editions: Mutter Sprache. Vom Amt der Sprache bei der Volkswerdung. Jena 1933; Mutter Sprache. Jena 1963).Google Scholar
Schuchardt, Hugo. 1885. Ueber die Lautgesetze: Gegen die Junggrammatiker. Berlin: Robert Oppenheim. (Translated and reprinted in 1972, On sound laws: Against the neogrammarians. In Vennemann, Theo & Terence Wilbur (eds.), Schuchardt, the neogrammarians, and the transformational theory of phonological change, 1–72. Frankfurt: Athenäum).Google Scholar
Shuy, Roger W. 1997. A brief history of American sociolinguistics: 1949–1989. In Paulston, Christina Bratt & G. Richard Tucker (eds.), The early days of sociolinguistics: Memories and reflections. Dallas: The Summer Institute of Linguistics, 11–32. (Reprinted from Historiographia Linguistica 17, 1(2). 183–209, 1990).Google Scholar
Silverstein, Michael. 1985. Language and the culture of gender: At the intersection of structure, usage and ideology. In Mertz, Elizabeth & Richard J. Parmentier (eds.), Semiotic mediation, 219–259. Orlando: Academic Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2010. Dell Hathaway Hymes. Language 86(4). 933–939. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stankiewicz, Edward. 1972. A Baudouin de Courtenay anthology: The beginnings of structural linguistics. By Jan Baudouian de Courtenay. Translated and edited with an introduction by Edward Stankiewicz. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Steinthal, Heymann. 1860. Assimilation und attraction, psychologisch beleuchtet. Zeitschrift für Völkerpsychologie und Sprachwissenschaft 1(2). 93–179.Google Scholar
te Winkel, Jan. 1904. Inleiding tot de geschiedenis van de Nederlandsche taal. Culemborg: Blom & Olivierse.Google Scholar
van der Hulst, Harry. 2013. The discoverers of the phoneme. In Allan, Keith (ed.), The Oxford history of linguistics, 167–190. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Walkden, George. 2019. The many faces of uniformitarianism in linguistics. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics 4(1). Art. 52. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Waugh, Linda, José Aldemar Álvarez, Tom Hong Do, Kristen Michelson & M’Balia Thomas. 2013. Meaning in texts and contexts. In Allan, Keith (ed.), Oxford handbook of the history of linguistics, 613–634. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Weinreich, Uriel. 1953. Languages in contact. New York: Linguistic Circle of New York.Google Scholar
Weinreich, Uriel, William Labov & Marvin I. Herzog. 1968. Empirical foundations for a theory of language change. In Lehmann, Winfred P. & Yakov Malkiel (eds.), Directions for historical linguistics: A symposium, 97–195. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Whitney, William Dwight. 1867. Language and the study of language: Twelve lectures on the principles of linguistic science. London: N. Trübner & Co. (Reprint 2013, Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
. 1875. The life and growth of language. London: Henry S. King & Co. (Reprint 2013, Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Williams, Joanna Radwańska. 1993. A paradigm lost: The linguistic theory of Mikołaj Kruszewski. (Amsterdam studies in the theory and history of linguistic science. Series III, Studies in the history of the language sciences, v. 72). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Winteler, Jost. 1876. Die Kerenzer Mundart in ihren Grundzügen dargestellt. Leipzig: Winter.Google Scholar
Žirmunskij, Viktor Maksimovič (Жирмунский, Виктор Максимович). [see also Schirmunski]. 1936. Nacional'nyj jayzk i social'nye dialekty (Национальный язык и социальные диалекты) [National language and social dialects]. Leningrad: Gosudarstvennoe izdatel'stvo “Xudožestvennaja literatura”.Google Scholar
(Жирмунский, Виктор Максимович). 1968. Problema social'noj differenciacii jazykov (Проблема социальной дифференциации языков) [The problem of the social differentiation of languages]. In Filin, F. P. (Ф. П. Филин) (ed.), Jazyk i obščestvo (Язык и общество) [Language and society], 22–39. Moskva: Izdatel'stvo “Nauka”.Google Scholar
Žirmunskij, Viktor Maksimovič (Жирмунский, Виктор Максимович). 1969. Marksizm i social'naja lingvistika (Doklad na jubilejnoj sessii Otdelenija literatury i jazyka AN SSSR, posvjaščennoj 50-letiju Velikoj Oktjabr'skoj socialističeskoj revoljucii 19–20 oktjabrja 1967 g.) (Марксизм и социальная лингвистика (Доклад на юбилейной сессии Отделения литературы и языка АН СССР, посвященной 50-летию Великой Октябрьской социалистической революции, 19–20 октября 1967 г.)) [Marxism and sociolinguistics (Lecture at the jubilee session of the Department of literature and language of the Academy of sciences of the SSSR, dedicated to the 50th anniversary of the Great October Socialist Revolution, 19–20 October 1967)]. In Desnitskaja, A. V. (А. В. Десницкая), V. M. Žirmunskij (В. М. Жирмунский) & L. S. Kovtun (Л. С. Ковтун) (eds.), Voprosy social'noj lingvistiki (Вопросы социальной лингвистики) [Questions in sociolinguistics], 5–25. Leningrad: Izdatel'stvo “Nauka”.Google Scholar