Cover not available
Part of
History of Linguistics 2011: Selected Papers from the 12th International Conference on the History of the Language Sciences (ICHoLS XII), Saint Petersburg, 28 August - 2 September 2011
Edited by Vadim Kasevich, Yuri A. Kleiner and Patrick Sériot
[Studies in the History of the Language Sciences 123] 2014
► pp. 169–180

Anti-positivism in early Soviet linguistics

A Marxist or idealist stance?

| University of Lausanne
Soviet linguistics of the 1920s–1930s has often been presented, in the Soviet Union as well as in the so-called “Western world”, as a quest for a Marxist science of language. As a matter of fact, it would be more accurate to speak of an original blend of German romanticism, Neo-Platonistic tradition and new “social” theories of language in order to characterize the various linguistic trends of Soviet linguistics in the inter-war period. What was at stake was the question of Positivism. R. Jakobson, as well as V. Vološinov refused “mechanical causality”, the former quoting J. de Maistre, the latter – K. Vossler. It appears that the German-Italian idealist trend of thought is a better explanation for the Soviet linguistics of the inter-war period than Marxism.
Published online: 29 August 2014
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/sihols.123.15ser
References (27)
References
Amsterdamska, Olga. 1987. Schools of Thought: The Development of Linguistics From Bopp to Saussure. Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar
Croce, Benedetto. 1902. Estetica come scienza dell’espressione e linguistica generale. Milano: Sandron.Google Scholar
. 1909. Esthetic as Science of Expression and General Linguistic. London: MacMillan.Google Scholar
Danilevskij, Nikolaj. 1885–1889. Darvinism: kriticheskoe izsledovanie, 2nd vol. Saint Petersburg: Komarov. Google Scholar
Engliš, K. 1930. Teleologie jako forma vědeckého poznání, Praha: Topič.Google Scholar
Fischer, J.L. 1931. Základy poznání, Praha: Topič.Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman. 1928. “O hláskoslovném zákonu a teleologickém hláskosloví”. Časopis pro moderní filologii, 14.183–184. (English translation “The concept of the sound law and the teleological criterion”, in Jakobson 1971a, 1–2).Google Scholar
. 1929. “Über die heutigen Voraussetzungen der russischen Slavistik”. Slavische Rundschau 1.629–646. (Repr. in Roman Jakobson: Semiotik, Ausgewählte Texte 1919–1982, ed. by Herausgegeben von Elmar Holenstein, 50–70. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1988.).Google Scholar
. 1929a. “Remarques sur l’évolution phonologique du russe”. Travaux du Cercle linguistique de Prague, II.Google Scholar
. 1931a. K xarakteristike evrazijskogo jazykovogo sojuza. Paris: Izdatelstvo evrazijcev.Google Scholar
. 1931b. “Der russische Frankreich-Mythus”, Slavische Rundschau 6.636–642.Google Scholar
. 1933. “La scuola linguistica di Praga”. La Cultura XII: 3.633–641.Google Scholar
. 1971a. Selected Writings, vol. I (Phonological Studies). Paris – The Hague: Mouton. Google Scholar
. 1971b. Selected Writings, vol. II (Word and language). Paris – The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
. 1988. Semiotik. Ausgewählte Texte 1919–1982, ed. by Elmar Holenstein. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman & Pomorska Krystyna. 1982. Besedy. Jerusalem: The Magnes Press, The Hebrew University.Google Scholar
. 1983. Dialogues. Cambridge – London: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
de Maistre, Joseph. 1842. Les soirées de Saint-Pétersbourg. Lyon: Louis Lesne Éditeur (1st ed. 1821).Google Scholar
Savickij, Petr. 1927. Geograficheskie osobennosti Rossii. Prague: Evrazijskoe knigoizdatel’stvo.Google Scholar
Sériot, Patrick. 2012. Structure et totalité. Les origines intellectuelles du structuralisme en Europe centrale et orientale. Limoges: Lambert-Lucas. (2nd ed.).Google Scholar
Vološinov, Valentin. 1930. Marksizm i filosofija jazyka, Leningrad: Priboj(1st ed.: 1929).Google Scholar
Voloshinov, Valentin. 1973. Marxism and the Philosophy of Language. New York & London: Seminar Press. (8th ed.: Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
Vossler, Karl. 1904. Positivismus und Idealismus in der Sprachwissenschaft. Eine sprachphilosophische Untersuchung. Heidelberg: C. Winter.Google Scholar
. 1913. Frankreichs Kultur im Spiegel seiner Sprachentwicklung. Heidelberg: C. Winter.Google Scholar
Vucinich, Alexander. 1988a. Darwin in Russian Thought. Berkeley: Univ. of California Press.Google Scholar
. 1988b. “Russia: biological sciences”, The Comparative Reception of Darwinism, ed. by T.F. Glick, 227–255. Austin: The Univ. of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Wilbur, Terence. 1977. The ‘Lautgesetz’ Controversy. A Documentation (1885–1886). Amsterdam: J. Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar