Cover not available
Part of
History of Linguistics 2014: Selected papers from the 13th International Conference on the History of the Language Sciences (ICHoLS XIII), Vila Real, Portugal, 25–29 August 2014
Edited by Carlos Assunção, Gonçalo Fernandes and Rolf Kemmler
[Studies in the History of the Language Sciences 126] 2016
► pp. 163–176

Anton Marty’s philosophy of language and his dialogue with linguists

ORCID logo
Marty (1847–1914), a Swiss pupil of the philosopher Franz Brentano, was called to the German University in Prague in 1880. According to Brentano’s ‘empirical standpoint’, he devoted a great deal of his philosophy of language to descriptive semasiology. His model intertwines general grammar, logic and psychology. Two case studies are considered: the theory of judgment vs. sentences without subjects, and the theory of relationships vs. case theories. He wishes to establish agreement with linguists he feels close to, both because of their knowledge of linguistic facts and rules and because they, too, are keen on the enquiry regarding language functions and invariant structures – which remains a desirable objective.
Published online: 17 August 2016
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/sihols.126.13ray
References (33)
References
Baumgartner, Wilhelm, Robin Rollinger & Dagmar Fügmann, eds. 2006–2009. Brentano Studien: Internationales Jahrbuch der Franz Brentano Forschung / Brentano Studien XII: Die Philosophie Anton Martys. Dettelbach: Röll.Google Scholar
Bokhove, Niels W. & Savina Raynaud. 1990. “A bibliography of works by and on Anton Marty”. Mind, Meaning and Metaphysics: the Philosophy and Theory of Language of Anton Marty, ed. by Kevin Mulligan, 237–284. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bréal, Michel. 1879. “La science du langage”. Revue scientifique de la France et de l’étranger, 26. avril 1879.1005–1011. Repr. 1995, De la grammaire comparée à la sémantique, ed. by Piet Desmet & Pierre Swiggers, 253–266. Leuven / Paris: Peeters.Google Scholar
Brentano, Franz. 1874. Psychologie vom empirischen Standpunkte. Leipzig: Duncker & Humblot.Google Scholar
. 1883. “Miklosich über subjektlose Sätze”, Wiener Zeitung 13–14.11.1883. French translation 1944. “A propos des «propositions sans sujet» de Miklosich”, Wiener Zeitung, 13–14 nov. 1883 (articles reproduits en appendice à l’Origine de la connaissance morale, 1re édition, 1889 ); in Brentano, Franz. 1944, 299–307. Psychologie du point de vue empirique. Paris: Aubier-Montaigne.Google Scholar
Bühler, Karl. 1934. Sprachtheorie. Die Darstellungsfunktion der Sprache. Jena: Fischer.Google Scholar
Cesalli, Laurent & Janette Friedrich, eds. 2014. Anton Marty and Karl Bühler: Between Mind and Language. Basel: Schwabe.Google Scholar
Delbrück, Berthold. 1901. Grundfragen der Sprachforschung. Mit Rücksicht auf W. Wundts Sprachpsychologie erörtert. Strassburg: Karl J. Trübner.Google Scholar
Fisette, Denis & Guillaume Fréchette, eds. 2007. À l’école de Brentano. De Würzburg à Vienne (= Bibliothèque des textes philosophiques). Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar
. 2013. Themes from Brentano. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Formigari, Lia. 2015. “Sentence and its Parts : A Psycholinguistic Theory of Syntactic Value”, Histoire Épistémologie Langage 37:1.9–25. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fréchette, Guillaume. 2012. “Phenomenology as Descriptive Psychology. The Munich Interpretation”. Symposium 16:2.150–170. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Graffi, Giorgio. 2001. 200 Years of Syntax: A critical survey (= Studies in the History of the Language Sciences, 98). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marty, Anton. 1884–1895. “Über subjektlose Sätze und das Verhältnis der Grammatik zur Logik und Psychologie.” Vierteljahrsschrift für wissenschaftliche Philosophie”. Repr. 1918. Gesammelte Schriften , ed. by Josef Eisenmeier, Alfred Kastil & Oskar Kraus, vol. II.1, 3–307. Halle a.S.: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
. 1893. “Über das Verhältnis von Grammatik und Logik”. Symbolae Pragenses. Festgabe der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Alterthumskunde in Prag zur 42.Versammlung deutscher Philologen und Schulmänner in Wien, Wien: Tempsky, 99–126. Repr. 1920. Gesammelte Schriften , ed. by Josef Eisenmeier, Alfred Kastil & Oskar Kraus. Halle a.S.: Niemeyer, vol. II.2, 57–99. (French translation: Marty 2007).Google Scholar
. 1908. Untersuchungen zur Grundlegung der allgemeinen Grammatik und Sprachphilosophie. Halle a.S.: Niemeyer; Hildesheim & New York: Olms. The latter references belong to the 1976 facsimile edition.Google Scholar
. 1910a. “Über Begriff und Methode der allgemeinen Grammatik und Sprachphilosophie”. Zeitschrift für Psychologie LV.257–299. Repr. 1920. Gesammelte Schriften , ed. by Josef Eisenmeier, Alfred Kastil & Oskar Kraus. Halle a.S.: Niemeyer, vol. II.2, 129–172.Google Scholar
. 1910b. Zur Sprachphilosophie. Die “logische”, “lokalistische” und andere Kasustheorien. Halle a.S.: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
. 2007. “Sur le rapport entre la grammaire et la logique”, French translation of Marty 1893 by Denis Seron, ed. by Denis Fisette & Guillaume Fréchette, Christian von Ehrenfels, Edmund Husserl, Anton Marty, Alexius Meinong, Carl Stumpf, Kazimierz Twardowski. Traduit par Denis Fisette, Guillaume Fréchette, A l’école de Brentano. De Würzbourg à Vienne, 385–421. Paris: J. Vrin.Google Scholar
Mathesius, Vilém. 1911. “Poznamky o tak zvane ellipse a anglickych větac neslovesnych”, Sbornik Filologicky 2:215–234. Italian transl. by Andrea Trovesi, “Note intorno alla cosiddetta ellissi e alle frasi senza verbo in inglese”, Linguistica e Filologia 33 (2013).137–162.Google Scholar
Miklosich, Franz. 1865. Die Verba impersonalia im Slavischen. Vorgelegt in Der Sitzung Am 23. Febr. 1865. (Besonders Abgedr. A.D. XIV Bd., A. 199, Der Denkschriften Der Phil. Hist. Klasse.Google Scholar
. 1883. Subjektlose Sätze. Wien: W. Braumüller.Google Scholar
Mulligan, Kevin, ed. 1990. Mind, Meaning and Metaphysics: the Philosophy and Theory of Language of Anton Marty. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2012. Wittgenstein et la philosophie austro-allemande. Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar
Niveleau, Charles-Édouard. 2014. Vers une philosophie scientifique. Le programme de Brentano. Paris: Demopolis.Google Scholar
Raynaud, Savina. 1982. Anton Marty, filosofo del linguaggio. Uno strutturalismo presaussuriano. Roma: La Goliardica.Google Scholar
. 1990. Il Circolo Linguistico di Praga (1926–1939). Radici storiche e apporti teorici. Milano: Vita e Pensiero.Google Scholar
. 2008. “The Basic Syntagmatic Act is Predication”, Slovo a slovesnost 68:4.49–66.Google Scholar
. 2012. “Queries and Predicate — Argument Relationship”. Semantics: Advances in Theories and Mathematical Models, ed. by Muhammad Tanvir Afzal, 45–80. Rijeka: InTech. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2014. “Humboldtian inner linguistic form. A crucial notion for present-day division of labor”. Language and Language Behavior, Special Issue Devoted to International Conference on the History of Language Sciences, 14.97–105. St-Petersburg 2011, St-Petersburg State University, Faculty of Philology.Google Scholar
Rollinger, Robin. 2010. Philosophy of Language and Other Matters in the Work of Anton Marty: Analysis and Translations (= Studien zur österreichischen Philosophie, 42). Amsterdam / New York: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Vonk, Frank, 2014. “Das impersonale Urteil. Eine logische und sprachwissenschaftliche Diskussion im ausgehenden 19. Jahrhundert”. Beiträge zur Geschichte der Sprachwissenschaft 24:1.111–132.Google Scholar
Wegener, Philipp. 1921. “Der Wortsatz”. Indogermanische Forschungen 39.1–26. Ital. translation by M. Paola Tenchini. Ed. 2016. Il Wortsatz di Philipp Wegener, ovvero dell’unità comunicativa minima. Milano: Mimesis.Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Paola Tenchini, Maria
2020. Wegener’s Wortsatz and the notion of sentence. In History of Linguistics 2017 [Studies in the History of the Language Sciences, 127], ► pp. 49 ff. DOI logo
Raynaud, Savina
2020. Moving Words. Gestalt Theory 42:1 ► pp. 17 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.