And Along Came Boas
Continuity and revolution in Americanist anthropology
The advent of Franz Boas on the North American scene irrevocably redirected the course of Americanist anthropology. This volume documents the revolutionary character of the theoretical and methodological standpoint introduced by Boas and his first generation of students, among whom linguist Edward Sapir was among the most distinguished. Virtually all of the classic Boasians were at least part-time linguists alongside their ethnological work. During the crucial transitional period beginning with the founding of the Bureau of American Ethnology in 1879, there were as many continuities as discontinuities between the work of Boas and that of John Wesley Powell and his Bureau. Boas shared with Powell a commitment to the study of aboriginal languages, to a symbolic definition of culture, to ethnography based on texts, to historical reconstruction on linguistic grounds, and to mapping the linguistic and cultural diversity of native North America. The obstacle to Boas’s vision of anthropology was not the Bureau but the archaeological and museum establishment centred in Washington, D.C. and in Boston. Moreover, the “scientific revolution” was concluded not when Boas began to teach at Columbia University in New York in 1897 but around 1920 when first generation Boasians cominated the discipline in institutional as well as theoretical terms. The impact of Boas is explored in terms of theoretical positions, interactional networks of scholars, and institutions within which anthropological work was carried out. The volume shows how collaboration of universities and museums gradually gave way to an academic centre for anthropology in North America, in line with the professionalization of American science along German lines during the late 19th and early 20th centuries.
The author is Professor of Anthropology and Director of the Centre for Research and Teaching of Canadian Native Languages at the University of Western Ontario, Canada. She is a fellow of the Royal Society of Canada.
The author is Professor of Anthropology and Director of the Centre for Research and Teaching of Canadian Native Languages at the University of Western Ontario, Canada. She is a fellow of the Royal Society of Canada.
[Studies in the History of the Language Sciences, 86] 1998. xviii, 333 pp.
Publishing status: Available
Published online on 3 October 2011
Published online on 3 October 2011
© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Table of Contents
-
Frontispiece | p. v
-
Preface | p. xi
-
Introduction: Continuities Across Scientific Revolutions | p. 1
-
I. The Bureau of American Ethnology
-
1 The Development of Professional Anthropology in America | p. 11
-
2 Government-Sponsored Science | p. 19
-
2.1 Joseph Henry and the Smithsonian Institution
-
2.2 Spencer Baird and the Collection of Specimens
-
2.3 The Geological Surveys
-
2.4 The Curtailment of Government Science
-
2.5 From Geology to Ethnology
-
3 Constraints of Government Anthropology | p. 31
-
3.1 Bureau Archaeology
-
3.2 Finances of the Bureau
-
3.3 Applied Anthropology
-
3.4 The Limitation to the American Indian
-
4 The Mapping of North America | p. 45
-
4.1 The Myth Concordance
-
4.2 Linguistic Manuscripts
-
4.3 Bibliographies
-
4.4 ‘Introduction to the Study of Indian Languages’
-
4.5 The Definition of Linguistic Families
-
4.6 Brinton's Linguistic Classification
-
4.7 The Authorship of the Powell Classification
-
5 Organizing Anthropological Research in America | p. 69
-
5.1 Problems in Professional Standards
-
5.2 Bureau Fieldwork
-
5.3 Collaboration
-
5.4 The Missisonary Question
-
5.5 Powell's Evolutionary Synthesis
-
5.6 The End of an Era in the Bureau
-
II. The Development of Institutional Alternatives
-
6 Early Attempts at University Anthropology | p. 99
-
6.1 Graduate Education in America
-
6.2 False Starts in Academic Anthropology
-
6.3 The University of Pennsylvania
-
6.4 Clark University
-
6.5 The University of Chicago
-
6.6 The Temporary Insufficiency of Academic Anthropology
-
7 The Tradition of Museum Research | p. 117
-
7.1 The Peabody Museum
-
7.2 The Bureau and the National Museum
-
7.3 Changing Times in the Bureau
-
8 Uneasy Institutional Cooperation | p. 133
-
8.1 The Field Columbian Museum
-
8.2 The American Museum of Natural History
-
8.3 The University of California, Berkeley
-
9 Boasian University Programs | p. 157
-
9.1 Boas's Teaching at Columbia
-
9.2 The University of Pennsylvania
-
9.3 Boasian Anthropology at Chicago
-
9.4 The Geological Survey of Canada
-
9.5 The Autonomy of Academic Anthropology
-
III. Continued Mapping of North America
-
10 Boas and the Bureau of American Ethnology | p. 179
-
10.1 From Synonymy to Handbook
-
10.2 Boas's ‘Handbook of American Indian Languages’
-
10.3 The Myth Concordance
-
10.4 The Phonetics Committee
-
11 Mapping the Languages of California | p. 199
-
11.1 ‘The Handbook of California Indians’
-
11.2 California Institutional Cooperation
-
12 Revising the Linguistic Classification | p. 211
-
12.1 ‘Diffusional Cumulation’ and ‘Archaic Residue’
-
12.2 The Linguistic Stocks of California
-
12.3 The Sapir Classification
-
12.4 Radin and the Genetic Unity of All American Languages
-
IV. Boasian Hegemony Consolidated
-
13 Formalizations in the Face of Opposition | p. 245
-
13.1 The Establishment of a National Journal
-
13.2 The American Anthropological Association
-
13.3 The National Association Becomes Boasian
-
13.4 The American Folklore Society
-
13.5 The American Council of Learned Societies
-
13.6 Confrontations with the Old Establishment
-
13.7 Boasians in the Bureau
-
14 Articulating the Boasian Paradigm | p. 271
-
14.1 The Content of the Boasian Paradigm
-
14.2 Boasian Ethnology
-
14.3 The Distribution of Folklore Elements
-
14.4 Boasian Fieldwork
-
14.5 The Culture Area Concept
-
14.6 The Critique of Evolution
-
14.7 The Emphasis on Cultural Wholes
-
14.8 Theoretical Syntheses
-
14.9 Envoi
-
List of Illustrations | p. 299
-
Illustration Credits | p. 299
-
List of Figures | p. 300
-
-
Index of Biographical Names | p. 321
-
Index of Subjects and Terms | p. 327
“It’s a measure of any really good book, ..., that it makes you change your mind. For me, Darnell’s work falls squarely into this category.”
Keith H. Basso
“This is a fascinating and insightful work that makes a major contribution to documenting the history of anthropology.”
Raymond J. DeMallie
“[...] an ‘adequate history’ of American anthropology that successfully brings together theories, institutional structures, and networks of anthropologists and thereby convincingly demonstrates existing continuities across the Powellian and Boasian paradigms. [...] Darnell’s account of the shift from the Powellian to the Boasian paradigm makes fascinating reading and should be obligatory for anybody seriously interested in the history of American anthropology and linguistics.”
Michael Mackert (Morgantown, West Virginia)
“[...] Darnell’s dissertation has been the most important unpublished source for the history of the professionalization of North American anthropology, and it is a great pleasure to see it now become available, strongly updated, appropriately expanded, and compactly argued, to a wider audience.”
Curtis M. Hinsley, Northern Arizona University
“[...] a model of intellectual history [...]
It will become a standard reference for the early years of American anthropology.
”
Michael D. Levin in the Toronto Quarterly, Volume 70:1
“[...] of interest not only to historians but also to anyone in anthropology — especially linguistics anthropology [...]
[...] to anyone who wants to understand more about what occurs at the critical junctures when theories change[...]
”
Wendy Leeds-Hurwitz, Department of Communication, University of Winconsin
Cited by (112)
Cited by 112 other publications
Koytak, Muhammet Elyesa
Angelbeck, Bill
Laplantine, Chloé
Solleveld, Floris
Gupta, Akhil & Jessie Stoolman
van Eekelen, Bregje F.
Alliegro, Enzo Vinicio
Beresin, Anna
Gaeta, Luca
Höntzsch, Frauke, Rüdiger Voigt, Ingo Elbe, Claudia Opitz-Belakhal, Wolfgang Bergem, Alexandra Kurth, Fabian Kessl, Michael Winkler, Tanja Angela Kubes, Urs Lindner, Holger Zapf, Hannah Bethke, Helmut Staubmann, Matthias Klemm, Christine Kirchhoff, Annica Peter, Franz Walter, Jöran Klatt, Michael Thöndl, Doris Lemmermöhle, Margret Kraul, Verena Hambauer, Ruth Ayaß, Peter Dudek, Felix Buchhaupt, Joachim Fontana, Lukas Geck, Karin Kurz, Andreas Peglau, Thomas Göymen-Steck, Matthias Völcker, Janne Mende, Uta Gerhardt, Robert Chr. van Ooyen, Artur Bogner, Gabriele Rosenthal, Florian Eisheuer, Frank Schale, Winfried Süß, Anton Pelinka, Samuel Salzborn, Lars Rensmann, Julia König, Florian Hessel, Oswald Balandis, Maria Kanitz, Thomas Pettigrew, Kerstin Hammann, Nicolle Pfaff, Thomas Reinhardt, Susanne Pickel, David Kreitz, Jennifer Ch. Müller, Ulrike Ackermann, Monika Oberle, Andreas Busch, Jovan Maud, Heinz-Jürgen Niedenzu, Julia von Blumenthal, Sebastian Scharch, Rolf Pohl, Ina Hunger, Johannes Müller, Alfred Krovoza, Armin Bernhard, Ingrid Miethe, Alexander Thumfart, Steffen Hagemann, Mai Wegener, Wolfgang Frindte, Daniel Geschke, Markus Schroer, Martina Ritter, Albert Scherr, Anja Thiele, Hans-Dieter König, Wilhelm Hofmann, Nicole Burgermeister, Jan Lohl, Shida Kiani, Dana Ionescu, Alex Aßmann, Ursula Birsl, Walter Reese-Schäfer, Gert Pickel, Beate Rosenzweig, Oliver Hidalgo, Ilona Ostner, Wibke Backhaus, André Dingelstedt, Anja Jetschke, Ina Kerner, Torben B. F. Stich, Esther Scheurle, Martin Schröder & Bernd Schlipphak
Hui, Alexandra
Stanlaw, James
Teslow, Tracy
Teslow, Tracy
Thomas, Margaret
2020. The monolingual approach in American linguistic fieldwork. Historiographia Linguistica 47:2-3 ► pp. 266 ff.
Timmerman, Nicholas A.
Baker, Lee D.
Johnson, Adam Fulton
Fowler, Don D. & Nancy J. Parezo
Glass, Aaron
Goodman, Alan H.
Kan, Sergei
Karlander, David
Nichols, Catherine A.
Nolte, Insa, Keith Shear & Kevin A. Yelvington
Radin, Joanna
BARGHEER, STEFAN
Epps, Patience L., Anthony K. Webster & Anthony C. Woodbury
Garbutt, Rob, Ros Sten, Jenny Smith, Dianne Harrington, Thelma James & Mickey Ryan
McElvenny, James
Stuhl, Andrew
Ballestero, Diego & Marina Sardi
Bens, Jonas
Eisheuer, Florian
McCarty, Teresa L. & Lu Liu
McCarty, Teresa L. & Lu Liu
Szabó, Péter
Willoughby-Herard, Tiffany
Klassen, Pamela E.
MORRIS-REICH, AMOS
Wesson, Cameron
Zwartjes, Otto
2012. The Historiography of Missionary Linguistics. Historiographia Linguistica 39:2-3 ► pp. 185 ff.
Elliott, Michael A.
Lassiter, Luke Eric & Elizabeth Campbell
Harper, Kenn
Laurière, Christine
Schaffer, Gavin
Tomalin, Marcus
2008. Reassessing Nineteenth-Century Missionary Linguistics on the Pacific Northwest Coast. Historiographia Linguistica 35:1-2 ► pp. 83 ff.
Blommaert, Jan
Bronner, Simon J.
Oppenheim, Robert
Koelsch, William A.
LAMPHERE, LOUISE
Thom, Brian & Geneviève Dionne
Gravlee, Clarence C., H. Russell Bernard & William R. Leonard
Watters, David R. & Oscar Fonseca Zamor
Watters, David R. & Oscar Fonseca Zamora
Briggs, Charles L.
Browman, David L.
Gleach, Frederic W.
Jacknis, Ira
Trencher, Susan R.
Nader, Laura
Schulte-Tenckhoff, Isabelle
Murray, Stephen O. & Regna Darnell
Darnell, Regna
Darnell, Regna
Darnell, Regna
Darnell, Regna
[no author supplied]
[no author supplied]
[no author supplied]
[no author supplied]
[no author supplied]
[no author supplied]
[no author supplied]
[no author supplied]
[no author supplied]
[no author supplied]
[no author supplied]
[no author supplied]
2020. Chapter 7. Edward Sapir. In Last Papers in Linguistic Historiography [Studies in the History of the Language Sciences, 128], ► pp. 164 ff.
[no author supplied]
[no author supplied]
[no author supplied]
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
Subjects
Main BIC Subject
CF: Linguistics
Main BISAC Subject
LAN009000: LANGUAGE ARTS & DISCIPLINES / Linguistics / General