The Structure of Discourse-Pragmatic Variation
Author
Everyday language use overflows with discourse-pragmatic features. Their frequency, form and function can vary greatly across social groups and change dramatically over time. And yet these features have not figured prominently in studies of language variation and change. The Structure of Discourse-Pragmatic Variation demonstrates the theoretical insights that can be gained into both the structure of synchronic language variation and the interactional mechanisms creating it by subjecting discourse-pragmatic features to systematic variationist analysis. Introducing an innovative methodology that combines principles of variationist linguistics, grammaticalisation studies and conversation analysis, it explores patterns of variation in the formal encoding of I DON’T KNOW, I DON’T THINK and negative polarity tags in a north-east England interview corpus. Speakers strategically exploit the formal variability of these constructions to signal subtle meaning differences and to index social identities closely linked to the variables’ and their variants’ functional compartmentalisation in the variety. The methodology, results and implications of this study will be of great interest to scholars working throughout variationist sociolinguistics, grammaticalisation and discourse analysis.
[Studies in Language Variation, 13] 2013. xxi, 276 pp.
Publishing status: Available
© John Benjamins
Table of Contents
-
List of figures | p. xi
-
List of tables | pp. xiii–xiv
-
List of abbreviations and typographical conventions | p. xv
-
Key to transcription conventions | p. xvii
-
Glossary of dialect words | p. xix
-
Acknowledgements | p. xxi
-
Part I
-
1. Introduction | pp. 3–20
-
2. Data, methodology and theoretical framework | pp. 21–50
-
3. The BwE verb negation system | pp. 51–66
-
Part II
-
4. The construction i don’t know | pp. 69–122
-
5. The construction i don’t think | pp. 123–168
-
6. Negative polarity question tags (neg-tags) | pp. 169–212
-
Part III
-
7. Discussion & conclusion | pp. 215–226
-
8. Challenges for the future | pp. 227–236
-
-
Appendices | pp. 259–270
-
Index | pp. 271–276
“The study of discourse-pragmatic variation has long cried out for sensitive, meticulous, sophisticated and careful scholarship. This book provides it. It is fully aware of the methodological and analytical hurdles, provides scrupulous and close analysis, and recognises that such work cannot be sufficient without an intimate understanding of the mechanics of interaction. This volume truly provides a model for future scholars.”
David Britian, Chair of Modern English Linguistics, Universität Bern
“Heike Pichler’s book provides a methodology for studying discourse-pragmatic variability that should be the foundation for further work in this field. The multivariate analysis is compelling in highlighting the complexity of the units in question and of their social distribution. At the same time, the qualitative, functional discussion is highly thought-provoking and provides empirical challenges for some current hypotheses concerning directionality of change.”
Elizabeth Closs Traugott, Professor of Linguistics and English, Emerita, Stanford University
“The Structure of Discourse-Pragmatic Variation demonstrates a multi-dimensional methodology to explore the ways in which discourse-pragmatic features are used in a small market town on the border between England and Scotland. It employs a combination of quantitative and qualitative approaches from variationist sociolinguistics and conversation analysis to provide an integrated account of discourse variation. It will enlighten anyone interested in investigating the complex factors that contribute to variation in discourse.”
Ronald Macaulay, Emeritus Professor of Linguistics, Pitzer College
“The broad scope of the analysis enhances our understanding of the structure of discourse-pragmatic variation and the value of discourse variation analysis. The analytic framework is a good example for future studies to follow, and this book is a good reference for students and researchers who are interested in the theory and practice of sociolinguistic and discourse variation studies.”
Xinzhang Yang, Xiamen University, in Discourse Studies 17(5), 2015
Cited by
Cited by 53 other publications
Adachi, Chie
2016. Sugoi! – Indexicality and stancetaking in Japanese compliments. Language in Society 45:2 ► pp. 193 ff. 
Amador-Moreno, Carolina P., Kevin McCafferty & Elaine Vaughan
2015. Introduction. In Pragmatic Markers in Irish English [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 258], ► pp. 1 ff.
Barron, Anne
2021. Synchronic and Diachronic Pragmatic Variability. In The Cambridge Handbook of Sociopragmatics, ► pp. 182 ff.
Barron, Anne
2021. Contrastivity and comparability: pragmatic variation across pluricentric varieties. Sociolinguistica 35:1 ► pp. 189 ff.
Beeching, Kate
2018. Chapter 6. Metacommenting in English and French. In Positioning the Self and Others [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 292], ► pp. 127 ff.
Beeching, Kate & Helen Woodfield
2015. Introduction. In Researching Sociopragmatic Variability, ► pp. 1 ff.
Carvalho, Ana M. & Joseph Kern
2019. The permeability of tag questions in a language contact situation. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) 29:4 ► pp. 463 ff.
Childs, Claire
2021. Mechanisms of Grammaticalization in the Variation of Negative Question Tags. Journal of English Linguistics 49:4 ► pp. 419 ff.
CHILDS, CLAIRE, CHRISTOPHER HARVEY, KAREN P. CORRIGAN & SALI A. TAGLIAMONTE
2020. Transatlantic perspectives on variation in negative expressions. English Language and Linguistics 24:1 ► pp. 23 ff.
Corrigan, Karen P.
2015. “I always think of people here, you know, saying ‘like’ after every sentence”. In Pragmatic Markers in Irish English [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 258], ► pp. 37 ff.
Corrigan, Karen P. & Chloé Diskin
2020. ‘Northmen, Southmen, comrades all’? The adoption of discourselikeby migrants north and south of the Irish border. Language in Society 49:5 ► pp. 745 ff.
Di Martino, Emilia
2022. New Digital Media and the Chav. In Indexing ‘Chav’ on Social Media, ► pp. 155 ff.
Diskin, Chloé
2017. HeikePichler (ed.). Discourse‐Pragmatic Variation and Change in English: New Methods and Insights. Cambridge, U.K./New York: Cambridge University Press. 2016. 324 pp. Hb (9781107055766) US$110.00.. Journal of Sociolinguistics 21:2 ► pp. 293 ff.
DISKIN, CHLOÉ & VERA REGAN
2017. The attitudes of recently-arrived Polish migrants to Irish English. World Englishes 36:2 ► pp. 191 ff.
Fox, Sue & Eivind Torgersen
2018. Language Change and Innovation in London: Multicultural London English. In Sociolinguistics in England, ► pp. 189 ff.
Glynn, Dylan
2014. Techniques and tools. In Corpus Methods for Semantics [Human Cognitive Processing, 43], ► pp. 307 ff.
Grund, Peter J.
2020. What it means to describe speech. In Late Modern English [Studies in Language Companion Series, 214], ► pp. 296 ff.
Gómez González, María de los Ángeles
2018. “God that came out quick didn’t it eh”. In The Construction of Discourse as Verbal Interaction [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 296], ► pp. 109 ff.
Gómez González, María de los Ángeles & J. Lachlan Mackenzie
2018. Introduction. In The Construction of Discourse as Verbal Interaction [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 296], ► pp. 1 ff.
Hesson, Ashley M. & Heike Pichler
2018. Breaking Down Barriers in Pediatric Mental Health Consultations: Understanding Patients’ Use of I DON’T KNOW. Health Communication 33:7 ► pp. 867 ff.
Higashiizumi, Yuko
2016. The development of confirmation/agreement markers away from the RP in Japanese. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 17:2 ► pp. 282 ff.
Ho, Victor
2019. Larssyn Staley, Socioeconomic Pragmatic Variation: Speech acts and address forms in
context
. Pragmatics and Society 10:4 ► pp. 648 ff.
Hofmockel, Carolin
ILBURY, CHRISTIAN
2021. ‘Ey, wait, wait, gully!’ Style, stance and the social meaning of attention signals in East London adolescent speech. English Language and Linguistics 25:3 ► pp. 621 ff.
Kern, Joseph
2020. Likein English andcomo, como que, andlikein Spanish in the speech of Southern Arizona bilinguals. International Journal of Bilingualism 24:2 ► pp. 184 ff.
Leuckert, Sven & Sofia Rüdiger
2021. Discourse markers and world Englishes. World Englishes
Muntigl, Peter, Adam O. Horvath, Eva Bänninger-Huber & Lynne Angus
2020. Responding to self-criticism in psychotherapy. Psychotherapy Research 30:6 ► pp. 800 ff.
MYCOCK, LOUISE
2019. Right-dislocated pronouns in British English: the form and functions of ProTag constructions. English Language and Linguistics 23:2 ► pp. 253 ff.
PALACIOS MARTÍNEZ, IGNACIO
2015. Variation, development and pragmatic uses ofinnitin the language of British adults and teenagers. English Language and Linguistics 19:3 ► pp. 383 ff.
Pichler, Heike
2021. Grammaticalization and language contact in a discourse-pragmatic change in progress: The spread of innit in London English. Language in Society 50:5 ► pp. 723 ff.
Pichler, Heike, Suzanne Evans Wagner & Ashley Hesson
2018. Old-age language variation and change: Confronting variationist ageism. Language and Linguistics Compass 12:6 ► pp. e12281 ff.
Roberts, Nicholas S.
2016. The future of Martinique French: The role of random effects on the variable expression of futurity. Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique 61:3 ► pp. 286 ff.
Schoning, Christian, Jørn Helder & Chloé Diskin-Holdaway
2023. Vi snakker sådan: An analysis of the Danish discourse-pragmatic marker sådan. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 46:1 ► pp. 46 ff.
Schweinberger, Martin
2020. Speech-unit final like in Irish English. English World-Wide. A Journal of Varieties of English 41:1 ► pp. 89 ff.
Secova, Maria
2017. Changement grammatical et discursif en français multiculturel de la région parisienne. Lingvisticae Investigationes 40:2 ► pp. 173 ff.
Tagliamonte, Sali A.
2017. Changing Places. In Language and a Sense of Place, ► pp. 15 ff.
Tagliamonte, Sali A.
2021.
Wait, It’s a Discourse Marker. American Speech 96:4 ► pp. 424 ff.
Unuabonah, Foluke Olayinka, Adebola Adebileje & Rotimi Olanrele Oladipupo
2021. Intensifier Usage in Nigerian English: A Corpus-Based Approach. Corpus Pragmatics 5:3 ► pp. 335 ff.
Unuabonah, Foluke Olayinka & Ulrike Gut
2018. Commentary pragmatic markers in Nigerian English. English World-Wide. A Journal of Varieties of English 39:2 ► pp. 190 ff.
Unuabonah, Foluke Olayinka & Oluwateniola Oluwabukola Kupolati
2023. The pragmatics of ‘it is well’ in Nigerian English. Poznan Studies in Contemporary Linguistics 59:1 ► pp. 193 ff.
Westphal, Michael
2020. Question Tags in Philippine English. Corpus Pragmatics 4:4 ► pp. 401 ff.
Westphal, Michael
2021. Question tags across New Englishes. World Englishes
Westphal, Michael
2022. The Multilingual Pragmatics of New Englishes: An Analysis of Question Tags in Nigerian English. Frontiers in Communication 6
WILSON, GUYANNE, MICHAEL WESTPHAL, JOHANNA HARTMANN & DAGMAR DEUBER
2017. The use of question tags in different text types of Trinidadian English. World Englishes 36:4 ► pp. 726 ff.
Wiltschko, Martina, Derek Denis & Alexandra D'Arcy
2018. Deconstructing variation in pragmatic function: A transdisciplinary case study. Language in Society 47:4 ► pp. 569 ff.
Woolford, Kaleigh
2021.
Just
in Tyneside English
. World Englishes
[no author supplied]
2013. PUBLICATIONS RECEIVED. English Language and Linguistics 17:3 ► pp. 601 ff.
[no author supplied]
2013. Publications Received. Language in Society 42:5 ► pp. 605 ff.
[no author supplied]
[no author supplied]
[no author supplied]
[no author supplied]
[no author supplied]
2021. Fundamentals of Sociopragmatics. In The Cambridge Handbook of Sociopragmatics, ► pp. 13 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 7 may 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
Subjects
Main BIC Subject
CFB: Sociolinguistics
Main BISAC Subject
LAN009000: LANGUAGE ARTS & DISCIPLINES / Linguistics / General