The Structure of Discourse-Pragmatic Variation
Author
Everyday language use overflows with discourse-pragmatic features. Their frequency, form and function can vary greatly across social groups and change dramatically over time. And yet these features have not figured prominently in studies of language variation and change. The Structure of Discourse-Pragmatic Variation demonstrates the theoretical insights that can be gained into both the structure of synchronic language variation and the interactional mechanisms creating it by subjecting discourse-pragmatic features to systematic variationist analysis. Introducing an innovative methodology that combines principles of variationist linguistics, grammaticalisation studies and conversation analysis, it explores patterns of variation in the formal encoding of I DON’T KNOW, I DON’T THINK and negative polarity tags in a north-east England interview corpus. Speakers strategically exploit the formal variability of these constructions to signal subtle meaning differences and to index social identities closely linked to the variables’ and their variants’ functional compartmentalisation in the variety. The methodology, results and implications of this study will be of great interest to scholars working throughout variationist sociolinguistics, grammaticalisation and discourse analysis.
[Studies in Language Variation, 13] 2013. xxi, 276 pp.
Publishing status: Available
© John Benjamins
Table of Contents
-
List of figures | p. xi
-
List of tables | pp. xiii–xiv
-
List of abbreviations and typographical conventions | p. xv
-
Key to transcription conventions | p. xvii
-
Glossary of dialect words | p. xix
-
Acknowledgements | p. xxi
-
Part I
-
1. Introduction | pp. 3–20
-
2. Data, methodology and theoretical framework | pp. 21–50
-
3. The BwE verb negation system | pp. 51–66
-
Part II
-
4. The construction i don’t know | pp. 69–122
-
5. The construction i don’t think | pp. 123–168
-
6. Negative polarity question tags (neg-tags) | pp. 169–212
-
Part III
-
7. Discussion & conclusion | pp. 215–226
-
8. Challenges for the future | pp. 227–236
-
-
Appendices | pp. 259–270
-
Index | pp. 271–276
“The study of discourse-pragmatic variation has long cried out for sensitive, meticulous, sophisticated and careful scholarship. This book provides it. It is fully aware of the methodological and analytical hurdles, provides scrupulous and close analysis, and recognises that such work cannot be sufficient without an intimate understanding of the mechanics of interaction. This volume truly provides a model for future scholars.”
David Britian, Chair of Modern English Linguistics, Universität Bern
“Heike Pichler’s book provides a methodology for studying discourse-pragmatic variability that should be the foundation for further work in this field. The multivariate analysis is compelling in highlighting the complexity of the units in question and of their social distribution. At the same time, the qualitative, functional discussion is highly thought-provoking and provides empirical challenges for some current hypotheses concerning directionality of change.”
Elizabeth Closs Traugott, Professor of Linguistics and English, Emerita, Stanford University
“The Structure of Discourse-Pragmatic Variation demonstrates a multi-dimensional methodology to explore the ways in which discourse-pragmatic features are used in a small market town on the border between England and Scotland. It employs a combination of quantitative and qualitative approaches from variationist sociolinguistics and conversation analysis to provide an integrated account of discourse variation. It will enlighten anyone interested in investigating the complex factors that contribute to variation in discourse.”
Ronald Macaulay, Emeritus Professor of Linguistics, Pitzer College
“The broad scope of the analysis enhances our understanding of the structure of discourse-pragmatic variation and the value of discourse variation analysis. The analytic framework is a good example for future studies to follow, and this book is a good reference for students and researchers who are interested in the theory and practice of sociolinguistic and discourse variation studies.”
Xinzhang Yang, Xiamen University, in Discourse Studies 17(5), 2015
Cited by
Cited by 53 other publications
Adachi, Chie
Amador-Moreno, Carolina P., Kevin McCafferty & Elaine Vaughan
2015. Introduction. In Pragmatic Markers in Irish English [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 258], ► pp. 1 ff. 
Barron, Anne
Barron, Anne
Beeching, Kate
2018. Chapter 6. Metacommenting in English and French. In Positioning the Self and Others [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 292], ► pp. 127 ff. 
Beeching, Kate & Helen Woodfield
Carvalho, Ana M. & Joseph Kern
2019. The permeability of tag questions in a language contact situation. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) 29:4 ► pp. 463 ff. 
Childs, Claire
CHILDS, CLAIRE, CHRISTOPHER HARVEY, KAREN P. CORRIGAN & SALI A. TAGLIAMONTE
Corrigan, Karen P.
2015. “I always think of people here, you know, saying ‘like’ after every sentence”. In Pragmatic Markers in Irish English [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 258], ► pp. 37 ff. 
Corrigan, Karen P. & Chloé Diskin
Di Martino, Emilia
Diskin, Chloé
DISKIN, CHLOÉ & VERA REGAN
Fox, Sue & Eivind Torgersen
Glynn, Dylan
2014. Techniques and tools. In Corpus Methods for Semantics [Human Cognitive Processing, 43], ► pp. 307 ff. 
Grund, Peter J.
2020. What it means to describe speech. In Late Modern English [Studies in Language Companion Series, 214], ► pp. 296 ff. 
Gómez González, María de los Ángeles
2018. “God that came out quick didn’t it eh”. In The Construction of Discourse as Verbal Interaction [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 296], ► pp. 109 ff. 
Gómez González, María de los Ángeles & J. Lachlan Mackenzie
2018. Introduction. In The Construction of Discourse as Verbal Interaction [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 296], ► pp. 1 ff. 
Hesson, Ashley M. & Heike Pichler
Higashiizumi, Yuko
2016. The development of confirmation/agreement markers away from the RP in Japanese. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 17:2 ► pp. 282 ff. 
Ho, Victor
2019. Larssyn Staley, Socioeconomic Pragmatic Variation: Speech acts and address forms in
context
. Pragmatics and Society 10:4 ► pp. 648 ff. 
Hofmockel, Carolin
ILBURY, CHRISTIAN
Kern, Joseph
Muntigl, Peter, Adam O. Horvath, Eva Bänninger-Huber & Lynne Angus
MYCOCK, LOUISE
PALACIOS MARTÍNEZ, IGNACIO
Pichler, Heike
Pichler, Heike, Suzanne Evans Wagner & Ashley Hesson
Roberts, Nicholas S.
Schoning, Christian, Jørn Helder & Chloé Diskin-Holdaway
Schweinberger, Martin
2020. Speech-unit final like in Irish English. English World-Wide. A Journal of Varieties of English 41:1 ► pp. 89 ff. 
Secova, Maria
2017. Changement grammatical et discursif en français multiculturel de la région parisienne. Lingvisticae Investigationes 40:2 ► pp. 173 ff. 
Unuabonah, Foluke Olayinka, Adebola Adebileje & Rotimi Olanrele Oladipupo
Unuabonah, Foluke Olayinka & Ulrike Gut
2018. Commentary pragmatic markers in Nigerian English. English World-Wide. A Journal of Varieties of English 39:2 ► pp. 190 ff. 
Unuabonah, Foluke Olayinka & Oluwateniola Oluwabukola Kupolati
Westphal, Michael
WILSON, GUYANNE, MICHAEL WESTPHAL, JOHANNA HARTMANN & DAGMAR DEUBER
Wiltschko, Martina, Derek Denis & Alexandra D'Arcy
[no author supplied]
[no author supplied]
[no author supplied]
[no author supplied]
[no author supplied]
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 7 may 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
Subjects
Main BIC Subject
CFB: Sociolinguistics
Main BISAC Subject
LAN009000: LANGUAGE ARTS & DISCIPLINES / Linguistics / General