The Structure of Discourse-Pragmatic Variation
| Newcastle University
Everyday language use overflows with discourse-pragmatic features. Their frequency, form and function can vary greatly across social groups and change dramatically over time. And yet these features have not figured prominently in studies of language variation and change. The Structure of Discourse-Pragmatic Variation demonstrates the theoretical insights that can be gained into both the structure of synchronic language variation and the interactional mechanisms creating it by subjecting discourse-pragmatic features to systematic variationist analysis. Introducing an innovative methodology that combines principles of variationist linguistics, grammaticalisation studies and conversation analysis, it explores patterns of variation in the formal encoding of I DON’T KNOW, I DON’T THINK and negative polarity tags in a north-east England interview corpus. Speakers strategically exploit the formal variability of these constructions to signal subtle meaning differences and to index social identities closely linked to the variables’ and their variants’ functional compartmentalisation in the variety. The methodology, results and implications of this study will be of great interest to scholars working throughout variationist sociolinguistics, grammaticalisation and discourse analysis.
[Studies in Language Variation, 13] 2013. xxi, 276 pp.
Publishing status: Available
© John Benjamins
Table of Contents
List of figures
|
xi
|
List of tables
|
xiii–xiv
|
List of abbreviations and typographical conventions
|
xv
|
Key to transcription conventions
|
xvii
|
Glossary of dialect words
|
xix
|
Acknowledgements
|
xxi
|
Part I
|
|
1. Introduction
|
3–20
|
2. Data, methodology and theoretical framework
|
21–50
|
3. The BwE verb negation system
|
51–66
|
Part II
|
|
4. The construction i don’t know
|
69–122
|
5. The construction i don’t think
|
123–168
|
6. Negative polarity question tags (neg-tags)
|
169–212
|
Part III
|
|
7. Discussion & conclusion
|
215–226
|
8. Challenges for the future
|
227–236
|
References
|
237–258
|
Appendices
|
259–270
|
Index
|
271–276
|
“The study of discourse-pragmatic variation has long cried out for sensitive, meticulous, sophisticated and careful scholarship. This book provides it. It is fully aware of the methodological and analytical hurdles, provides scrupulous and close analysis, and recognises that such work cannot be sufficient without an intimate understanding of the mechanics of interaction. This volume truly provides a model for future scholars.”
David Britian, Chair of Modern English Linguistics, Universität Bern
“Heike Pichler’s book provides a methodology for studying discourse-pragmatic variability that should be the foundation for further work in this field. The multivariate analysis is compelling in highlighting the complexity of the units in question and of their social distribution. At the same time, the qualitative, functional discussion is highly thought-provoking and provides empirical challenges for some current hypotheses concerning directionality of change.”
Elizabeth Closs Traugott, Professor of Linguistics and English, Emerita, Stanford University
“
The Structure of Discourse-Pragmatic Variation demonstrates a multi-dimensional methodology to explore the ways in which discourse-pragmatic features are used in a small market town on the border between England and Scotland. It employs a combination of quantitative and qualitative approaches from variationist sociolinguistics and conversation analysis to provide an integrated account of discourse variation. It will enlighten anyone interested in investigating the complex factors that contribute to variation in discourse.”
Ronald Macaulay, Emeritus Professor of Linguistics, Pitzer College
“The broad scope of the analysis enhances our understanding of the structure of discourse-pragmatic variation and the value of discourse variation analysis. The analytic framework is a good example for future studies to follow, and this book is a good reference for students and researchers who are interested in the theory and practice of sociolinguistic and discourse variation studies.”
Xinzhang Yang, Xiamen University, in Discourse Studies 17(5), 2015
Cited by
Cited by 35 other publications
No author info given
No author info given
No author info given
Adachi, Chie
Amador-Moreno, Carolina P., Kevin McCafferty & Elaine Vaughan
Beeching, Kate
Carvalho, Ana M. & Joseph Kern
Corrigan, Karen P.
Corrigan, Karen P. & Chloé Diskin
Diskin, Chloé
DISKIN, CHLOÉ & VERA REGAN
Grund, Peter J.
Gómez González, María de los Ángeles
Gómez González, María de los Ángeles & J. Lachlan Mackenzie
Hesson, Ashley M. & Heike Pichler
Higashiizumi, Yuko
Ho, Victor
Kern, Joseph
Muntigl, Peter, Adam O. Horvath, Eva Bänninger-Huber & Lynne Angus
PALACIOS MARTÍNEZ, IGNACIO
Pichler, Heike, Suzanne Evans Wagner & Ashley Hesson
Roberts, Nicholas S.
Schweinberger, Martin
Secova, Maria
Unuabonah, Foluke Olayinka & Ulrike Gut
WILSON, GUYANNE, MICHAEL WESTPHAL, JOHANNA HARTMANN & DAGMAR DEUBER
Wiltschko, Martina, Derek Denis & Alexandra D'Arcy
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 08 february 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
Subjects
Linguistics
BIC Subject: CFB – Sociolinguistics
BISAC Subject: LAN009000 – LANGUAGE ARTS & DISCIPLINES / Linguistics / General