French liaison and the lexical repository
Bernard Laks | Université de Paris Ouest Nanterre La Défense,
Institut Universitaire de France
In this paper we propose a frequency analysis of French liaison that focuses on the liaison environments attested in the PFC database. The results of the analysis show the existence of a significant relationship (statistically interpreted as a power-law distribution) according to which a very restricted set of liaison environments has very high frequency of occurrence in the corpus and is substantially untouched by phonological and sociolinguistic variation, while a large “periphery” of infrequent uses appears to show significant aspects of style- and speaker-dependent variation. The study therefore demonstrates the importance of basing any variationist analysis on very large data sample, such as those provided by contemporary, well-reasoned linguistic corpora.
References (54)
Ashby, William J.
1981 “French liaison as a sociolinguistic phenomenon”.
Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages
ed. by
William W. Cressey &
Donna J. Napoli, 46–57. Washington: Georgetown University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Barlow, Michael & Suzanne Kemmer
eds
2000
Usage based models of language
. Stanford: CSLI.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Boersma, Paul & Silke Hamann
, eds
2009
Phonology in perception
. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Booij, Geert & Daan de Jong
1987 “The domain of liaison: theories and data”.
Linguistics
25. 1005–1025.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Brillouin, Léon
1959
La science et la théorie de l’information
. Paris: Masson.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bybee, Joan L.
2001 “Frequency effects on French liaison”.
Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure
ed. by
Joan L. Bybee &
Paul Hopper, 337–359. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bybee, Joan L.
2005 “La liaison: effets de fréquence et constructions”.
Langages
158. 24–37.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bybee, Joan L.
2006
Frequency of use and the organization of language
. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bybee, Joan L. & James L. McClellan
2005 “Alternatives to the combinatorial paradigm of linguistic theory based on domain general principles of human cognition”.
The Linguistic Rreview
22/2-4. 381–410.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chevrot, Jean-Pierre, Aurélie Nardy & Stéphanie Barbu
2011 “Development dynamics of SES-related differences in children’s production of obligatory and variable phonological alternations”.
Language Sciences
33. 180–191.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chomsky, Noam
1957
Syntactic Structures
. The Hague: Mouton.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chomsky, Noam
1965
Aspects of the theory of syntax
. Cambridge: MIT Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Clédat, Léon
1917
Manuel de phonétique et de morphologie historique du français
. Paris: Hachette.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Clauset A., Shalizi C.R.
, And
Newman M.E.J. 2009 “Power-law distributions in empirical data”,
SIAM Review
51/4. 661–703.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Coquillon Annelise, Jacques Durand, Chantal Lyche & Julien Eychenne
2010 “French Liaison: From global results to local varieties”.
Colloque International PhonLex
, Toulouse, Université de Toulouse II Le Mirail
8th–
10th September 2010.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
de Jong, Daan
1994 “La sociophonologie de la liaison orléanaise”.
French Generative Phonology : Retrospective and Perspectives
ed. by
Chantal Lyche, 95–131. Salford: ESRI.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dell, François
1973
Les règles et les sons : introduction à la phonologie générative
. Paris: Hermann.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Durand, Jacques, Bernard Laks & Chantal Lyche
2002 “La phonologie du français contemporain: usages, variétés et structures”.
Romanistische Korpuslinguistik: Korpora und Gesprochene Sprache / Romance Corpus Linguistics: Corpora and Spoken Language
ed. by
Claus D. Pusch &
Wolfgang Raible. 93–106.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Durand, Jacques, Bernard Laks & Chantal Lyche
2005 “Un corpus numérisé pour la phonologie du français”.
La linguistique de corpus
ed. by
Geoffrey Williams, 205–217. Rennes: Presses Universitaires de Rennes.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Durand, Jacques, Bernard Laks, Basilio Calderone & Atanas Tchobanov
2011 “Que savons-nous de la liaison aujourd’hui?”.
Langue Française
169. 103–135.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Durand, Jacques, Bernard Laks & Chantal Lyche
2009 “Le Projet PFC : une source de données primaires structurées”.
Phonologie, variation et accents du français
ed. by
Jacques Durand,
Bernard Laks &
Chantal Lyche, 19–61. Paris: Hermès.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Durand J. & Lyche, C.
2008 “French liaison in the light of corpus data”.
Journal of French Language Studies
18/1. 33–66.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Encrevé, Pierre
1988
La liaison avec et sans enchaînement: phonologie tridimentionnelle et usages du français
. Paris: Le Seuil.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Foulkes, Paul
2006 “Phonological variation: a global perspective”.
Handbook of English Linguistics
ed. by
Bas Aarts &
April M.S. McMahon, 625–669. Oxford: Blackwell.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Foulkes, Paul & Gerard J. Docherty
2006 “The social life of phonetics and phonology”.
Journal of Phonetics
34/4. 409–438.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fougeron, Cécile, Jean-Philippe Goldman & Ulrich H. Frauenfelder
2001 “Liaison and schwa deletion in French: an effect of lexical frequency and competition?”
EUROSPEECH 2001 - 7th European Conference on Speech Communication and Technology (Aalborg, September 3-7, 2001)
ed. by
Paul Dalsgaard,
Boslashge Lindberg,
Henrik Benner,
Zheng-Hua Tan, 639–642.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Goldinger, Stephen D.
1998 “Echoes of echoes? an episodic theory of lexical access”.
Psychological Review
105. 251–279.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Grammont, Maurice
1914
Traité pratique de prononciation française
. Paris: Delagrave.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hornsby, David
2012 “Getting It Wrong: Liaison, Pataquès, and Repair in Contemporary French”.
On Linguistic Change in French: Socio-Historical Approaches. Festschrift for R. Anthony Lodge
ed. by
Tim Pooley &
Dominique Lagorgette, 69–84. Chambéry: Editions de l’Université de Savoie.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Johnson, Keith
2006 “Resonance in an exemplar-based lexicon: The emergence of social identity and phonology”.
Journal of Phonetics
34. 485–499.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Labov, William
2004 “Quantitative analysis of linguistic variation”.
Sociolinguistics. An international handbook of the science of language and society
, Vol.1, ed. by
Ulrich Ammon,
Norbert Dittmar,
Klaus J. Mattheier &
Peter Trudgill, 6–22. Berlin: de Gruyter.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Labov, William, Sharon Ash & Charles Boberg
2006
The Atlas of North American English
. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Laks, Bernard
2005 “La liaison et l’illusion”.
Langages
158. 101–126.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Laks, Bernard
2006 “Phonologie et construction syntaxique”.
Linx
53. 155–171.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Laks, Bernard
2007 “Les hommes politiques français et la liaison (1908-1999)”.
Modéliser le changement : les voies du français
ed. by
Luc Baronian &
France Martineau. Montréal, Presses de l’Université de Montréal.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Laks, Bernard
2008 “Pour une phonologie de corpus”.
Journal of French Language Studies
18/1. 3–32.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Laks, Bernard
2011 “La phonologie du français et les corpus”.
Langue Française
169. 3–9.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Langacker, Ronald W.
1987
Foundations of Cognitive Grammar I: Theoretical Prerequisite
. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Langacker, Ronald W.
2000 “A dynamic usage-based model”.
Usage based models of language
ed. by
Michael Barlow &
Suzanne Kemmer, 1–65. Stanford: CSLI.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Le Prieult, Henri
2006
Grammaticalité: traditions et modernités
. Toulouse: Presses Universitaires du Mirail.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Malécot, André
1975 “French liaison as a function of grammatical, phonetic and paralinguistic variables”.
Phonetica
31. 161–179.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mallet, Géraldine
2008
La liaison en français, descriptions et analyses dans le corpus PFC
. Thèse de doctorat, Université de Paris Ouest.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pagliano, Claudine & Bernard Laks
2005 “Problématique de la liaison dans l’analyse d’un corpus de français oral actuel”. Colloque
Français fondamental, corpus oraux, contenus d’enseignement. 50 ans de travaux et d’enjeux
, Ecole Normale Supérieure Lettres et Sciences Humaines, Lyon, 8–10
décembre 2005.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pulgram, Ernst
1970
Syllable, word, nexus, cursus
. The Hague: Mouton.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ranson, Diana
2008 “La liaison variable dans un corpus du français méridional: L’importance relative de la fonction grammaticale”.
Congrès mondial de linguistique française
ed. by
Jacques Durand,
Benoît Habert &
Bernard Laks, 1657–1671. Paris: Institut de Linguistique Française.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Schane, Scott A.
1965
The phonological and morphological structure of French
, PhD Thesis, Boston, Massachussets Institute of Technology.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tomasello, Michael
2003
Constructing a language: A usage based theory of language acquisition
. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tomasello, Michael
2008
Origins of human cognition
. Cambridge: MIT press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tranel, Bernard
1995a “Current issues in French phonology: Liaison and position theories”.
The handbook of phonological theory
ed. by
John A. Goldsmith, 798–816. Oxford: Blackwell.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tranel, Bernard
1995b “French final consonants and nonlinear phonology”.
Lingua
95. 131–167.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Weinreich, Uriel, William Labov & Marvin I. Herzog
1968 “Empirical foundations for a theory of language change”.
Directions for historical linguistics
ed. by
Winfred P. Lehmann and
Yakov Malkiel, 95–188. Austin: University of Texas Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wimmer, Gejza & Gabriel Altmann
1999
Thesaurus of univariate discrete probability distributions
. Essen: Stamm Verlag.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Zipf, George K.
1949
Human behavior and the principle of least effort
. Boston: Addison-Wesley Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cited by (2)
Cited by 2 other publications
De Faviis, Giulia, F. Neveu, B. Harmegnies, L. Hriba, S. Prévost & A. Steuckardt
2020.
Liaison et conscience phonologique en Côte d’Ivoire : analyse des réponses épi- et métaphonologiques face à un test d’acceptabilité administré aux adultes abidjanais.
SHS Web of Conferences 78
► pp. 10007 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Sylvain Detey, Jacques Durand, Bernard Laks & Chantal Lyche
2016.
Varieties of Spoken French,
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 16 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.