Cover not available
Part of
Advances in Sociophonetics
Edited by Chiara Celata and Silvia Calamai
[Studies in Language Variation 15] 2014
► pp. 137–168

New parameters for the sociophonetic indexes

Evidence from the Tuscan varieties of Italian

A sociophonetic analysis of the main phonological processes occurring in Tuscan Italian is presented within a global proposal of a new, original set of parameters of variation. After a general discussion on the sociophonetic indexes and the illustration of phonological processes occurring in the local pronunciation of Italian, the parameters of the new model are metaphorically identified as properties of solids, i.e. shape, size, thickness and weight. In the last section of the paper, the sociophonetic parameters proposed are compared with the socially-marked variables proposed by Labov (2001), showing analogies and differences. The advantages derivable from the model proposed are finally discussed, with the explicit acknowledgement of the need for the inspection of the phonological system in sociophonetic analysis.
Published online: 12 June 2014
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/silv.15.05mar
References (73)
References
Agostiniani, Luciano. 1989. “Fenomenologia dell’elisione nel parlato in Toscana”. Rivista Italiana di Dialettologia 13. 7–46.Google Scholar
. 1992. “Su alcuni aspetti del ‘rafforzamento sintattico’ in Toscana e sulla loro importanza per la qualificazione del fenomeno in generale”. Quaderni del Dipartimento di Linguistica dell’Università di Firenze 3. 1–28.Google Scholar
Agostiniani, Luciano & Luciano Giannelli. 1990. “Considerazioni per un’analisi del parlato toscano”. L’italiano regionale. Atti del XVIII Congresso Internazionale della Società di Linguistica Italiana ed. by Manlio A. Cortelazzo & Alberto M. Mioni, 219–237. Roma: Bulzoni.Google Scholar
Albert, Abraham A. 1949. Solid Analytic Geometry . Chicago: McGraw Hill Book Company Inc.Google Scholar
Baroni, Maria Rosa. 1983. Il linguaggio trasparente. Indagine psicolinguistica su chi parla e chi ascolta . Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
Bernhard, Gerlad. 1998. Das Romanesco des ausgehenden 20. Jahrhunderts. Varationslinguistische Untersuchungen . Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Bertinetto, Pier Marco & Michele Loporcaro. 2005. “The sound pattern of Standard Italian, as compared with the varieties spoken in Florence, Milan and Rome”. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 35. 131–151.Google Scholar
Biliotti, Francesca & Silvia Calamai. 2012. “Linguistic opinions and attitudes in Tuscany”. Proceedings of the Workshop Sociophonetics, at the crossroads of speech variation, processing and communication ed. by Silvia Calamai, Chiara Celata & Luca Ciucci, 1–4. Pisa: Edizioni della Normale.Google Scholar
Borrelli, Doris. 2002. Raddoppiamento Sintattico in Italian: A Synchronic and Diachronic Cross-Dialectal Study . New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Calamai, Silvia. 2004. Il vocalismo tonico pisano e livornese. Aspetti storici, percettivi, acustici . Alessandria: Edizioni dell’Orso.Google Scholar
. 2011. “Per una storia della pronuncia degli italiani: opinioni e atteggiamenti intorno alla pronuncia fiorentina”. Storia della lingua italiana e storia dell’Italia Unita. L’italiano e lo stato nazionale. Atti del IX Convegno ASLI ed. by Annalisa Nesi, Silvia Morgana & Nicoletta Maraschio, 15–184. Firenze: Cesati.Google Scholar
Calamai, Silvia & Irene Ricci. 2005. “Un esperimento di matched-guise in Toscana”. Studi Linguistici e Filologici on Line 3(1). 63–105.Google Scholar
Carlson, Rolf & Sarah Hawkins. 2007. “When is fine phonetic detail a detail?”. Proceedings of the 16th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences ed. by Jürgen Trouvain & William J. Barry, 211–214 (ID 1721). [URL]
Celata, Chiara. 2008. “I contrasti allofonici nella percezione nativa e non-nativa”. Processi fonetici e categorie fonologiche nell’acquisizione dell’italiano ed. by Lidia Costamagna & Giovanna Marotta, 147–163. Pisa: Pacini.Google Scholar
. 2009. “The impact of allophonic variation on L2 speech perception”. Recent Research in Second Language Phonetics/Phonology. Perception and Production ed. by Michael A. Watkins, Andreia S. Rauber & Barbara O. Baptista, 64–79. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
Coulmas, Florian. 1998. “Introduction”. Handbook of Sociolinguistics ed. by Fred Coulmas, 1–11. Oxford & Malden: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2001. “Sociolinguistics”. Handbook of Linguistics ed. by Mark Aronoff & Janie Rees-Miller, 563–581. Oxford & Malden: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Cravens, Thomas & Luciano Giannelli. 1995. “Relative salience of gender and class in a situation of multiple competing norms”. Language Variation and Change 7. 261–285. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Deshaies-Lafontaine, Denise. 1974. A sociophonetic study of a Québec French community: Trois-Rivières , PhD Thesis, London, University College of London.Google Scholar
Docherty, Gerard J. 2007. “Speech in its natural habitat: Accounting for social factors in phonetic variability”. Papers in Laboratory Phonology 9 ed. by Jennifer Cole & José Ignacio Hualde, 1–35. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Fanciullo, Franco. 1997. Raddoppiamento sintattico e ricostruzione linguistica nel Sud italiano . Pisa: ETS.Google Scholar
Foulkes, Paul & Gerard J. Docherty. 2006. “The social life of phonetics and phonology”. Journal of Phonetics 34. 409–438. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Galli De’ Paratesi, Nora. 1984. Lingua toscana in bocca ambrosiana . Tendenze verso l‘italiano standard: un’inchiesta sociolinguistica . Bologna: il Mulino.Google Scholar
Giannelli, Luciano. 1976. Toscana . Pisa: Pacini (2nd edition: 2000).Google Scholar
. 1988. “Toscana”. Lexikon der Romanistischen Linguistik ed. by Gunter Holtus, Michael Metzeltin & Christian Schmitt, 594–606. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Giannelli, Luciano & Leonardo M. Savoia. 1978. “L’indebolimento consonantico in Toscana, I”. Rivista Italiana di Dialettologia 2. 25–58.Google Scholar
1979–80. “L’indebolimento consonantico in Toscana, II”. Rivista Italiana di Dialettologia 3–4. 39–101.
1991. “Restrizioni sull’esito [h] dat in fiorentino e nelle altre varietà toscane”. Studi Italiani di Linguistica Teorica e Applicata 20(1). 3–57.Google Scholar
Giannelli, Luciano & Beatrice Pacini. 1998. “Il processo di cambiamento dell’indebo1imento consonantico a Cortona: studio sociolinguistico”. Rivista Italiana di Dialettologia 22. 15–57.Google Scholar
Grassi, Corrado, Alberto Sobrero & Tullio Telmon. 1997. Fondamenti di dialettologia . Roma & Bari: Laterza.Google Scholar
. 2006. Introduzione alla dialettologia italiana . Roma & Bari: Laterza.Google Scholar
Hawkins, Sarah. 2003. “Rules and representations of systematic fine phonetic detail in speech understanding”. Journal of Phonetics 31. 373–405. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2010. “Phonetic variation as communicative system: Perception of the particular and the abstract”. Papers in Laboratory Phonology 10 ed. by Cécile Fougeron, Barbara Kühnert, Mariapaola d’Imperio & Nathalie Vallée, 479–510. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Holtus, Gunter, Michael Metzeltin & Christian Schmitt, eds. 1988. Lexikon der Romanistischen Linguistik, IV: Italienisch, Korsisch, Sardisch . Tübingen: Niemeyer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Horvath, Barbara M. & Ronald J. Horvath. 1997. “A multilocality study of a sound change in progress: The case of l vocalization in New Zealand and Australian English”. Language variation and Change 13(1). 37–57. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jannedy, Stephanie & Jenifer Hay. 2006. “Modelling sociophonetic variation”. Journal of Phonetics 34. 405–408. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Keith. 1997. “Speech perception without speaker normalization: An exemplar model”. Talker variability in Speech Processing ed. by Keith Johnson & John W. Mullennix, 145–165. San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Labov, William. 1966. The Social Stratification of English in New York City . Washington DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
. 1972. Sociolinguistic patterns . Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
. 1975. “On the use of the present to explain the past”. Proceedings of the 11th International Congress of Linguists , Vol. I ed. by Luigi Heilman, 825–251. Bologna: il Mulino.Google Scholar
. 1994. Principles of Linguistic Change , vol. I, Internal Factors. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
. 2001. Principles of Linguistic Change , vol. II, Social Factors. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
. 2006. “A sociolinguistic perspective on sociophonetic research”. Journal of Phonetics 34. 500–515. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Labov, William, Sharon Ash & Charles Boberg. 2006. The Atlas of North American English . Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Local, John. 2003. “Variable domains and variable relevance: interpreting phonetic exponents”. Journal of Phonetics 31. 321–339. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Loporcaro, Michele. 1997. L’origine del raddoppiamento fonosintattico. Saggio di fonologia diacronica romanza . Basel & Tübingen: Francke.Google Scholar
Marotta, Giovanna. 1983–1986. “Rhythmical constraints on syntactic doubling”. Journal of Italian Linguistics 8. 35–52.
. 1995. “Apocope nel parlato di Toscana”. Studi Italiani di Linguistica Teorica e Applicata 24(2). 297–322.Google Scholar
. 2000. “Oxytone infinitives in the dialect of Pisa”. Phonological theory and the dialects of Italy ed. by Lori Repetti, 191–210. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: Benjamins.Google Scholar
. 2001/2004. “Non solo spiranti. La ‘Gorgia toscana’ nel parlato di Pisa”. L’Italia Dialettale 62. 27–60.Google Scholar
. 2008. “Lenition in Tuscan Italian (Gorgia Toscana)”. Lenition ed. by Joaquim Brandao de Carvalho, Tobias Scheer & Philippe Ségéral, 235–271. Berlin: Mouton-de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marotta, Giovanna & Nadia Nocchi. 2001. “La liquida laterale nel livornese”. Rivista Italiana di Dialettologia 25. 285–326.Google Scholar
Milroy, Lesley. 1987. Language and Social Networks (2nd ed.). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Milroy, James. 1992. Linguistic Variation and Change . Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Nocchi, Nadia & Giovanna Marotta. 2003. “A phonetic ‘conspiracy’: Low vowels and velarized lateral in Leghorn”. Proceedings of the 15th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences ed. Maria Josep Solé, Danile Recasens & Joaquim Romero, 909–912. Barcelona: Casual Productions.Google Scholar
Nocchi Nadia & Lorenzo Filipponio. 2011. “Lo vuoi co[z]ì o co[s]ì? A sociophonetic study on sibilants in the regional Italian of Livorno (Tuscany)”. Proceedings of Sociophonetics at the crossroads of speech variation, processing and communication ed. by Silvia Calamai, Chiara Celata & Luca Ciucci, 53–56. Pisa: Edizioni della Normale.Google Scholar
Pacini, Beatrice. 1998. “Il processo di cambiamento dell’indebolimento consonantico a Cortona: studio sociolinguistico”. Rivista Italiana di Dialettologia 22. 15–57.Google Scholar
Pacini, Beatrice & Luciano Giannelli. 1999. “Norma multipla e dinamiche sociolinguistiche nel consonantismo della Toscana orientale”. Dialetti oggi ed. by Giovanna Marcato, 141–153. Padova: Unipress.Google Scholar
Peirce, Charles S. 1972. The Essential Writings ed. by Edward C. Moore. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
1991. Writings on Semiotics ed. by James Hoopes. Chapel Hill & London: The University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Pierrehumbert, Janet. 2001. “Exemplar dynamics: Word frequency, lenition, and contrast”. Frequency and the Emergence of Linguistic Structure ed. by Joan L. Bybee & Paul Hopper, 137–157. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: Benjamins.Google Scholar
. 2006. “The next Toolkit”. Journal of Phonetics 34. 515–530. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rohlfs, Gerhard. 1968. Grammatica storica della lingua italiana e dei suoi dialetti , Vol. II, Morfologia . Torino: Einaudi.Google Scholar
Savoia, Leonardo M. 1990. “Proprietà vocaliche e struttura metrico-sillabica in alcune varietà abruzzesi”. Studi in memoria di Ernesto Giammarco ed. by Luisa Mucciante, 331–380. Pisa: Giardini.Google Scholar
Silverstein, Michael. 2003. “Indexical order and the dialects of social life”. Language and Communication 23. 267–274. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tabouret-Keller, Andree. 1997. “Language and Identity”. The Handbook of Sociolinguistics ed. by Florian Coulmas, 315–326. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Telmon, Tullio. 1996. “Varietà regionali”. Introduzione all’italiano contemporaneo , vol. II, La variazione e gli usi ed. by Alberto Sobrero, 93–149. Bari & Roma: Laterza.Google Scholar
Thomason, Sarah G. & Terrence Kaufman. 1992. Language contact, creolization, and genetic linguistics . Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Tollfree, Laura. 1999. “South-East London English: Discrete versus Continuous Modelling of Consonantal Reduction”. Urban Voices:Accent Studies in the British Isles ed. by Paul Foulkes & Gerard J. Docherty, 163–184. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Turchi, Laura & Barbara Gili Fivela. 2004. “L’affricazione di /s/ postconsonantico nella varietà pisana di italiano”. Il parlato italiano ed. by Federico Albano Leoni & Renata Savy, 1–25. Napoli: D’Auria Editore.Google Scholar
Trudgill, Peter. 1972. “Sex, covert prestige and linguistic change in Urban British English”. Language in Society 1. 179–195. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Volkart-Rey, Reinhardt. 1990. Atteggiamenti linguistici e stratificazione sociale. La percezione dello status sociale attraverso la pronuncia. Indagine empirica a Catania e a Roma . Roma: Bonacci.Google Scholar
Wells, John C. 1982. Accents of English , Cambridge & New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Morris, Jonathan
2017. Sociophonetic variation in a long‐term language contact situation: /l/‐darkening in Welsh‐English bilingual speech. Journal of Sociolinguistics 21:2 ► pp. 183 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 16 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.