Article published in:
Stability and Divergence in Language Contact: Factors and Mechanisms
Edited by Kurt Braunmüller, Steffen Höder and Karoline Kühl
[Studies in Language Variation 16] 2014
► pp. 1338
References
Aikhenvald, A.
2007Grammars in contact. A cross-linguistic perspective. In Grammars in Contact. A Cross-linguistic Typology, A. Aikhenvald & R. Dixon (eds), 1–66. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ammon, U.
2004Standard variety. In Sociolinguistics. An international handbook of the Science of Language and Society, Vol. 1 [Handbooks of Linguistics and Communication Science, 3], U. Ammon et al. (eds), 273–283. Berlin/New York: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Auer, P. & Hinskens, F.
1996The convergence and divergence of dialects in Europe. New and not so new developments in an old area. In Konvergenz und Divergenz von Dialekten in Europa [Sociolinguistica. Internationales Jahrbuch für Europäische Soziolinguistik, 10], P. Auer, F. Hinskens & K. Mattheier (eds), 2–30. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer.Google Scholar
2005The role of interpersonal accommodation in a theory of language change. In Dialect Change. Convergence and Divergence in European Languages, P. Auer, F. Hinskens & P. Kerswill (eds), 335–357. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Auer, P., Hinskens, F. & Kerswill, P.
(eds) 2005Dialect Change. Convergence and Divergence in European Languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Auer, P. & Schmidt, J.E.
(eds) 2010Language and Space. An International Handbook of Linguistic Variation, Vol. 1 [Handbooks of Linguistics and Communication Science 30, 1]. Berlin/New York: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Backus, A.
2004Convergence as a mechanism in language change. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 7(2): 179–181. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Becher, V., House, J. & Kranich, S.
2009Convergence and divergence of communicative norms through language contact in translation. In Convergence and Divergence in Language Contact Situations [Hamburg Studies on Multilingualism, 8] K. Braunmüller & J. House (eds), 125–151. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bock, K.N.
1933Niederdeutsch auf dänischem Substrat. Studien zur Dialektgeographie Südostschleswigs [Deutsche Dialektgeographie, 34]. Copenhagen: Levin & Munksgaard.Google Scholar
Bossong, G.
2008Die romanischen Sprachen. Eine vergleichende Einführung. Hamburg: Buske.Google Scholar
Braunmüller, K.
[1984] 1995Morphologische Undurchsichtigkeit – ein Charakteristikum kleiner Sprachen. In Beiträge zur skandinavistischen Linguistik [Studia nordica, 1], K. Braunmüller (ed.), 53–80. Oslo: Novus forlag.Google Scholar
2002Semicommunication and accommodation: Observations from the linguistic situation in Scandinavia. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 12 (1), 1–23. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2003Language, typology and society. Possible correlations. In Minor Languages. Approaches, Definitions, Controversies (Diversitas Linguarum, 3), J. Sherzer & T. Stolz (eds), 89–101. Bochum: Dr. Brockmeyer.Google Scholar
2004Plädoyer für eine Umorientierung in der Beschreibung von Sprachwandelprozessen. NOWELE 44: 21–49. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2007Die skandinavischen Sprachen im Überblick, 3rd rev. edn. Tübingen, Basel: Francke.Google Scholar
2009Converging genetically related languages. Endstation code mixing?In Convergence and Divergence in Language Contact Situations [Hamburg Studies on Multilingualism, 8], K. Braunmüller & J. House (eds), 53–69. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Braunmüller, K. & Besters-Dilger, J.
2013Sociolinguistic and areal factors promoting or inhibiting convergence within language families. In Family Effects in Language Contact. Modelling Congruence as a Factor in Contact Induced Change [Linguae & Litterae 27], J.�­Besters-Dilger, C. Dermarkar, S. Pfänder & A. Rabus (eds), 390–410. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Campbell, L. & Muntzel, M.
1989The structural consequences of language death. In Investigating Obsolescence: Studies in Language Contraction and Death, N.C. Dorian (ed.), 181–196. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Clyne, M.
2003Dynamics of Language Contact: English and Immigrant Languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Crystal, D.
2003A Dictionary of Linguistics and Phonetics, 5th edn. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Farrar, K. & Jones, M.C.
2002Introduction. In Language Change. The Interplay of Internal, External and Extra-linguistic Factors (Contributions to the sociology of language, 86), M.C. Jones & E. Esch (eds), 1–18. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Giles, H. & Coupland, N.
1991Language: Contexts and Consequences. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.Google Scholar
Gröschel, B.
2009Das Serbokroatische zwischen Linguistik und Politik. Mit einer Bibliographie zum postjugoslawischen Sprachenstreit. München: Lincom. Europa.Google Scholar
Hällström, C. & Reuter, M.
2000Finlandssvensk ordbok. Esboo: Schildts.Google Scholar
Harnisch, R.
2010Divergence of linguistic varieties in a language space. In Language and Space. An International Handbook of Linguistic Variation, Vol. 1 [Handbooks of Linguistics and Communication Science 30.1], P. Auer & J.E. Schmidt ( eds), 275–295. Berlin/New York: de Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Haugen, Einar
[1966] 1972. Dialect, language, nation. In The Ecology of Language. Essays by Einar Haugen, A.S. Dil (ed.), 237–254. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Hauksdóttir, A.
2011aDanske minder i Island: om mødet mellem dansk og islandsk kultur. Danske Studier 9 (106): 5–49.Google Scholar
2011bYderst mod Norden lyser en ø…. Strejflys over islændingernes møde med dansk og norsk sprog. In Vestnordisk språkkontakt gjennom 1200 år, G. Akselberg & E. Bugge (eds), 39–78. Tórshavn: Fróðskapur.Google Scholar
Heine, B. & Kuteva, T.
2005Language Contact and Grammatical Change. Cambridge: ­Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Höder, S.
2010Sprachausbau im Sprachkontakt. Syntaktischer Wandel im Altschwedischen [Germanistische Bibliothek, 35]. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
2012Multilingual constructions: A diasystematic approach to common structures. In Multilingual Individuals and Multilingual Societies [Hamburg Studies on Multilingualism, 13], K. Braunmüller & C. Gabriel (eds), 241–257. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Forthcoming. Though this be contact, yet there is system in ’t. Was man noch heute von Uriel Weinreich über Sprachkontakt lernen kann. In Classics revisited. Wegbereiter der Linguistik neu gelesen [Kieler Forschungen zur Sprachwissenschaft, 4], A. Walker (ed.) Frankfurt am Main Peter Lang
House, J.
2007Covert translation and language contact and change. The Chinese Translators Journal 28: 17–26.Google Scholar
Jacobsen, J. í Lon
2001Føroyskt – Færøsk. Sprogforum 7(19): 40–45.Google Scholar
2004Den officielle normering av färösk. In Det främmande i nordisk språkpolitik. Om normering af utländska ord [Moderne importord i Norden, 2], H. Sandøy & J.-O. Östman (eds), 71–106. Oslo: Novus.Google Scholar
2012Ærligt talt, who cares? En sociolingvistisk undersøgelse af holdninger til og brug af importord og afløsningsord i færøsk. Oslo: Novus.Google Scholar
Kaufmann, G.
2010Non-convergence despite language contact. In Language and Space. An International Handbook of Linguistic Variation, Vol. 1 [Handbooks of Linguistics and Communication Science 30.1], P. Auer & J.E. Schmidt ( eds), 478–493. Berlin/New York: de Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Kerswill, P.
1996Divergence and convergence in sociolinguistic structures in Norway and England. In Konvergenz und Divergenz von Dialekten in Europa [Sociolinguistica. Internationales Jahrbuch für Europäische Soziolinguistik, 10], P. Auer, F. Hinskens & K. Mattheier (eds), 90–104. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Kloss, H.
[1952] 1978Die Entwicklung neuer germanischer Kultursprachen seit 1800, 2nd rev. edn. [Sprache der Gegenwart, 37]. Düsseldorf: Schwann.Google Scholar
Kranich, S.. et al. (
eds) 2011Multilingual Discourse Production. Diachronic and Synchronic Perspectives [Hamburg Studies on Multilingualism, 12]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kranich, S., House, J. & Becher, V.
2012Changing conventions in English-German translations of popular scientific texts. In Multilingual Individuals and Multilingual Societies [Hamburg Studies on Multilingualism, 13], K. Braunmüller & C. Gabriel (eds), 315–334. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kühl, K.
2011Features of writtenness transferred. Faroe-Danish language of distance. In Multilingual Discourse Production. Diachronic and Synchronic Perspectives [Hamburg Studies on Multilingualism, 12], S. Kranich et al. (eds), 183–207. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kunzmann-Müller, B.
2000Sprachliche Wende und Sprachwandel im Kroatischen /Serbischen. In Die Sprachen Südosteuropas heute. Umbrüche und Aufbruch [Berliner Slawistische Arbeiten, 12], B. Kunzmann-Müller (ed.), 42–65. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Labov, W.
1963The social motivation of a sound change. Word 19: 273–309. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2006The Social Stratification of English in New York. Cambridge: Cambridge ­University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lange, C.
2012Postcolonial Englishes: From norms to standards. In Codification, canons, and Curricula. Description and prescription in language and literature, A. Schröder, U. Busse & R. Schneider (eds), 233–246. Bielefeld: Aisthesis.Google Scholar
Larsen, A.B.
[1917] 1993Naboopposisjon – knot. In Historisk språkvitenskap [Studier i norsk språkvitenskap, 5], E.H. Jahr, O. Lorentz & M. Christoffersen (eds), 97–131. Oslo: Novus.Google Scholar
Lüdi, G.
1996Mehrsprachigkeit. In Contact Linguistics. An International Handbook of Contemporary Research, Vol. 1 [Handbooks of Linguistics and Communication Science 12.1], H. Goebl, et al. (eds), 233–245. Berlin/New York: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Matras, Y.
2009Language Contact [Cambridge Textbooks in Linguistics]. Cambridge: ­Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mattheier, K.
1996Varietätenkonvergenz: Überlegungen zu einem Baustein einer Theorie der Sprachvariation. In Konvergenz und Divergenz von Dialekten in Europa [Sociolinguistica. Internationales Jahrbuch für Europäische Soziolinguistik, 10], P. Auer, F. Hinskens & K. Mattheier (eds), 31–52. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
McWhorter, J.
2007Language Interrupted. Signs of Non-native Acquisition in Standard Language Grammars. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Milroy, J.
1992The theoretical status of sociolinguistics. In Sociolinguistics Today. International Perspectives, K. Bolton & H. Kwok (eds), 356–360. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Petersen, H.
2010The Dynamics of Faroese-Danish Language Contact. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
Polinsky, M. & Kagan, O.
2007Heritage languages: In the ‘wild’ and in the classroom. In Language and Linguistic Compass 1(5), 368–395. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Reuter, M.
2005Swedish in Finland in the 20th century. In The Nordic Languages. An International Handbook of the History of the North Germanic Languages, Vol. 2 [Handbooks of Linguistics and Communication Science, 22.2], O. Bandle et al. (eds), 1647–1656. Berlin/New York: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Sandøy, H.
2003Purisme i færøysk. In Purt og reint.Om purisme i dei nordiske språk [Skrifter fra Ivar Aasen-instituttet, 15], H. Sandøy, R. Brodersen & E. Brunstad (eds), 85–110. Volda: Høgskulen.Google Scholar
2004Types of society and language change in the Nordic countries. In Language and Variation in Europe. Papers from ICLaVE 2. B.-L. Gunnarsson et al. (eds), 53–76. Uppsala: Uppsala University. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schirmunski, V.
1930Sprachgeschichte und Siedlungsmundarten. Germanisch-Romanische Monatsschrift 18: 113–122 (part 1) and171–188 (part 2).Google Scholar
Sigmundsson, S.
2003Purisme og nation på Island. In Purt og reint.Om purisme i dei nordiske språk [Skrifter fra Ivar Aasen-instituttet, 15], H. Sandøy, R. Brodersen & E. Brunstad (eds), 65–84. Volda: Høgskulen.Google Scholar
Stenmark, H.
1983Finlandssvenska ord och uttryck. Stockholm: Proprius.Google Scholar
Taeldeman, J.
2006Polarization revisited. In Language Variation – European Perspectives [Studies in Language Variation, 1], F. Hinskens (ed.), 233–248. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010Linguistic stability in a language space. In Language and Space. An International Handbook of Linguistic Variation, Vol. 1 [Handbooks of Linguistics and Communication Science 30.1], P. Auer & J.E. Schmidt ( eds), 355–374. Berlin/New York: de Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Teleman, U.
2002Ära, rikedom & reda. Svensk språkvård och språkpolitik under äldre nyare tid. Stockholm: Nordsteds Ordbok.Google Scholar
Thomason, S.
2008Social and linguistic factors as predictors of contact-induced change. Journal of Language Contact, Thema 2, 42–56. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Thomason, S. & Kaufman, T.
1988Language Contact, Creolization, and Genetic Linguistics. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Thurston, W.R.
1987Processes of Change in the Languages of Northwestern Britain. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
Trudgill, P.
1972Sex, covert prestige and linguistic change in the urban British English of Norwich. Language in Society 1(2): 179–195. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1988Dialect contact and interdialect in linguistic change. In Historical Dialectology: Regional and Social, J. Fisiak (ed.), 555–564. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
2010Contact and sociolinguistic typology. In The Handbook of Language Contact [Blackwell Handbooks in Linguistics], R. Hickey (ed.), 299–319. Malden: Wiley-Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2011Sociolinguistic Typology. Social Determinants of Linguistic Complexity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Trumper, J. & v M. Maddalon
1988Converging divergence and diverging convergence: The dialect-language conflict and contrasting evolutionary trends in modern Italy. In Variation and Convergence, P. Auer & A. Di Luzio (eds), 217–259. Berlin/New York: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Weinreich, M.
. [ Max Vaynraykh] 1945Der YIVO un di problemen fun undzer tsayt. YIVO Bletter 25(1): 3–18.Google Scholar
Weinreich, U.
[1953] 1968. Languages in Contact. Findings and Problems. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
1954Is a structural dialectology possible? Word 10: 388–400. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wingender, M.
2000Aktuelle Entwicklungen in der kroatischen Standardsprache. In Die Sprachen Südosteuropas heute. Umbrüche und Aufbruch [Berliner Slawistische Arbeiten 12], B. Kunzmann-Müller (ed.), 251–270. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Woolhiser, C.
2005Political borders and dialect divergence/convergence in Europe. In Dialect Change. Convergence and Divergence in European Languages, P. Auer, F. Hinskens & P. Kerswill (eds), 236–262. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 3 other publications

Cerruti, Massimo & Riccardo Regis
2020. Partitive determiners in Piedmontese: A case of language variation and change in a contact setting . Linguistics 58:3  pp. 651 ff. Crossref logo
Fischer, Susann, Christoph Gabriel & Elena Kireva
2014.  In Stability and Divergence in Language Contact [Studies in Language Variation, 16],  pp. 77 ff. Crossref logo
van der Wal, Marijke
2018. Early Modern migrants in a language contact setting: Characteristics of the Dutch Heusch correspondence (1664–1665) . Journal of Historical Sociolinguistics 4:2  pp. 253 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 03 may 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.