Cover not available
Part of
Stability and Divergence in Language Contact: Factors and Mechanisms
Edited by Kurt Braunmüller, Steffen Höder and Karoline Kühl
[Studies in Language Variation 16] 2014
► pp. 13–38

Linguistic stability and divergence

An extended perspective on language contact

In contrast to the amount of research that has been performed on linguistic convergence in language contact, this paper focuses on the possibility of linguistic systems remaining stable, or even diverging, in language contact settings. It carves out multiple relevant mechanisms and factors that influence linguistic stability and divergence (e.g. degree and type of multilingual competence, sociolinguistic, socio-economic and socio-political factors, cognitive mechanisms, etc.) and gives an account of contact situations where structural divergence and stability can be observed. Based on these examples, we suggest a classification of divergence and stability that builds on the assumption that these developments may take place either due to, or despite, language contact.

Published online: 26 November 2014
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/silv.16.02kuh
References
Aikhenvald, A
2007 Grammars in contact. A cross-linguistic perspective. In Grammars in Contact. A Cross-linguistic Typology, A. Aikhenvald & R. Dixon (eds), 1–66. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ammon, U
2004 Standard variety. In Sociolinguistics. An international handbook of the Science of Language and Society, Vol. 1 [Handbooks of Linguistics and Communication Science, 3], U. Ammon et al. (eds), 273–283. Berlin/New York: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Auer, P. & Hinskens, F
1996 The convergence and divergence of dialects in Europe. New and not so new developments in an old area. In Konvergenz und Divergenz von Dialekten in Europa [Sociolinguistica. Internationales Jahrbuch für Europäische Soziolinguistik, 10], P. Auer, F. Hinskens & K. Mattheier (eds), 2–30. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer.Google Scholar
2005 The role of interpersonal accommodation in a theory of language change. In Dialect Change. Convergence and Divergence in European Languages, P. Auer, F. Hinskens & P. Kerswill (eds), 335–357. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Auer, P., Hinskens, F. & Kerswill, P
(eds) 2005 Dialect Change. Convergence and Divergence in European Languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Auer, P. & Schmidt, J.E
(eds) 2010 Language and Space. An International Handbook of Linguistic Variation, Vol. 1 [Handbooks of Linguistics and Communication Science 30, 1]. Berlin/New York: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Backus, A
2004 Convergence as a mechanism in language change. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 7(2): 179–181. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Becher, V., House, J. & Kranich, S
2009 Convergence and divergence of communicative norms through language contact in translation. In Convergence and Divergence in Language Contact Situations [Hamburg Studies on Multilingualism, 8] K. Braunmüller & J. House (eds), 125–151. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bock, K.N
1933 Niederdeutsch auf dänischem Substrat. Studien zur Dialektgeographie Südostschleswigs [Deutsche Dialektgeographie, 34]. Copenhagen: Levin & Munksgaard.Google Scholar
Bossong, G
2008 Die romanischen Sprachen. Eine vergleichende Einführung. Hamburg: Buske.Google Scholar
Braunmüller, K
[1984] 1995 Morphologische Undurchsichtigkeit – ein Charakteristikum kleiner Sprachen. In Beiträge zur skandinavistischen Linguistik [Studia nordica, 1], K. Braunmüller (ed.), 53–80. Oslo: Novus forlag.Google Scholar
2002 Semicommunication and accommodation: Observations from the linguistic situation in Scandinavia. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 12 (1), 1–23. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2003 Language, typology and society. Possible correlations. In Minor Languages. Approaches, Definitions, Controversies (Diversitas Linguarum, 3), J. Sherzer & T. Stolz (eds), 89–101. Bochum: Dr. Brockmeyer.Google Scholar
2007 Die skandinavischen Sprachen im Überblick, 3rd rev. edn. Tübingen, Basel: Francke.Google Scholar
2009 Converging genetically related languages. Endstation code mixing?In Convergence and Divergence in Language Contact Situations [Hamburg Studies on Multilingualism, 8], K. Braunmüller & J. House (eds), 53–69. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Braunmüller, K. & Besters-Dilger, J
2013 Sociolinguistic and areal factors promoting or inhibiting convergence within language families. In Family Effects in Language Contact. Modelling Congruence as a Factor in Contact Induced Change [Linguae & Litterae 27], J.�­Besters-Dilger, C. Dermarkar, S. Pfänder & A. Rabus (eds), 390–410. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Campbell, L. & Muntzel, M
1989 The structural consequences of language death. In Investigating Obsolescence: Studies in Language Contraction and Death, N.C. Dorian (ed.), 181–196. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clyne, M
2003 Dynamics of Language Contact: English and Immigrant Languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Crystal, D
2003 A Dictionary of Linguistics and Phonetics, 5th edn. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Farrar, K. & Jones, M.C
2002 Introduction. In Language Change. The Interplay of Internal, External and Extra-linguistic Factors (Contributions to the sociology of language, 86), M.C. Jones & E. Esch (eds), 1–18. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Giles, H. & Coupland, N
1991 Language: Contexts and Consequences. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.Google Scholar
Gröschel, B
2009 Das Serbokroatische zwischen Linguistik und Politik. Mit einer Bibliographie zum postjugoslawischen Sprachenstreit. München: Lincom. Europa.Google Scholar
Hällström, C. & Reuter, M
2000 Finlandssvensk ordbok. Esboo: Schildts.Google Scholar
Harnisch, R
2010 Divergence of linguistic varieties in a language space. In Language and Space. An International Handbook of Linguistic Variation, Vol. 1 [Handbooks of Linguistics and Communication Science 30.1], P. Auer & J.E. Schmidt ( eds), 275–295. Berlin/New York: de Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Haugen, Einar
[1966] 1972. Dialect, language, nation. In The Ecology of Language. Essays by Einar Haugen, A.S. Dil (ed.), 237–254. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Hauksdóttir, A
2011a Danske minder i Island: om mødet mellem dansk og islandsk kultur. Danske Studier 9 (106): 5–49.Google Scholar
2011b Yderst mod Norden lyser en ø…. Strejflys over islændingernes møde med dansk og norsk sprog. In Vestnordisk språkkontakt gjennom 1200 år, G. Akselberg & E. Bugge (eds), 39–78. Tórshavn: Fróðskapur.Google Scholar
Heine, B. & Kuteva, T
2005 Language Contact and Grammatical Change. Cambridge: ­Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Höder, S
2010 Sprachausbau im Sprachkontakt. Syntaktischer Wandel im Altschwedischen [Germanistische Bibliothek, 35]. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
2012 Multilingual constructions: A diasystematic approach to common structures. In Multilingual Individuals and Multilingual Societies [Hamburg Studies on Multilingualism, 13], K. Braunmüller & C. Gabriel (eds), 241–257. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Forthcoming. Though this be contact, yet there is system in ’t. Was man noch heute von Uriel Weinreich über Sprachkontakt lernen kann. In Classics revisited. Wegbereiter der Linguistik neu gelesen [Kieler Forschungen zur Sprachwissenschaft, 4], A. Walker (ed.) Frankfurt am Main Peter Lang
House, J
2007 Covert translation and language contact and change. The Chinese Translators Journal 28: 17–26.Google Scholar
Jacobsen, J. í Lon
2001 Føroyskt – Færøsk. Sprogforum 7(19): 40–45.Google Scholar
2004 Den officielle normering av färösk. In Det främmande i nordisk språkpolitik. Om normering af utländska ord [Moderne importord i Norden, 2], H. Sandøy & J.-O. Östman (eds), 71–106. Oslo: Novus.Google Scholar
2012 Ærligt talt, who cares? En sociolingvistisk undersøgelse af holdninger til og brug af importord og afløsningsord i færøsk. Oslo: Novus.Google Scholar
Kaufmann, G
2010 Non-convergence despite language contact. In Language and Space. An International Handbook of Linguistic Variation, Vol. 1 [Handbooks of Linguistics and Communication Science 30.1], P. Auer & J.E. Schmidt ( eds), 478–493. Berlin/New York: de Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Kerswill, P
1996 Divergence and convergence in sociolinguistic structures in Norway and England. In Konvergenz und Divergenz von Dialekten in Europa [Sociolinguistica. Internationales Jahrbuch für Europäische Soziolinguistik, 10], P. Auer, F. Hinskens & K. Mattheier (eds), 90–104. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Kloss, H
[1952] 1978 Die Entwicklung neuer germanischer Kultursprachen seit 1800, 2nd rev. edn. [Sprache der Gegenwart, 37]. Düsseldorf: Schwann.Google Scholar
Kranich, S. et al. (
eds) 2011 Multilingual Discourse Production. Diachronic and Synchronic Perspectives [Hamburg Studies on Multilingualism, 12]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kranich, S., House, J. & Becher, V
2012 Changing conventions in English-German translations of popular scientific texts. In Multilingual Individuals and Multilingual Societies [Hamburg Studies on Multilingualism, 13], K. Braunmüller & C. Gabriel (eds), 315–334. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kühl, K
2011 Features of writtenness transferred. Faroe-Danish language of distance. In Multilingual Discourse Production. Diachronic and Synchronic Perspectives [Hamburg Studies on Multilingualism, 12], S. Kranich et al. (eds), 183–207. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kunzmann-Müller, B
2000 Sprachliche Wende und Sprachwandel im Kroatischen /Serbischen. In Die Sprachen Südosteuropas heute. Umbrüche und Aufbruch [Berliner Slawistische Arbeiten, 12], B. Kunzmann-Müller (ed.), 42–65. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Labov, W
1963 The social motivation of a sound change. Word 19: 273–309. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2006 The Social Stratification of English in New York. Cambridge: Cambridge ­University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lange, C
2012 Postcolonial Englishes: From norms to standards. In Codification, canons, and Curricula. Description and prescription in language and literature, A. Schröder, U. Busse & R. Schneider (eds), 233–246. Bielefeld: Aisthesis.Google Scholar
Larsen, A.B
[1917] 1993 Naboopposisjon – knot. In Historisk språkvitenskap [Studier i norsk språkvitenskap, 5], E.H. Jahr, O. Lorentz & M. Christoffersen (eds), 97–131. Oslo: Novus.Google Scholar
Lüdi, G
1996 Mehrsprachigkeit. In Contact Linguistics. An International Handbook of Contemporary Research, Vol. 1 [Handbooks of Linguistics and Communication Science 12.1], H. Goebl, et al. (eds), 233–245. Berlin/New York: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Matras, Y
2009 Language Contact [Cambridge Textbooks in Linguistics]. Cambridge: ­Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mattheier, K
1996 Varietätenkonvergenz: Überlegungen zu einem Baustein einer Theorie der Sprachvariation. In Konvergenz und Divergenz von Dialekten in Europa [Sociolinguistica. Internationales Jahrbuch für Europäische Soziolinguistik, 10], P. Auer, F. Hinskens & K. Mattheier (eds), 31–52. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
McWhorter, J
2007 Language Interrupted. Signs of Non-native Acquisition in Standard Language Grammars. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Milroy, J
1992 The theoretical status of sociolinguistics. In Sociolinguistics Today. International Perspectives, K. Bolton & H. Kwok (eds), 356–360. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Petersen, H
2010 The Dynamics of Faroese-Danish Language Contact. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
Polinsky, M. & Kagan, O
2007 Heritage languages: In the ‘wild’ and in the classroom. In Language and Linguistic Compass 1(5), 368–395. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Reuter, M
2005 Swedish in Finland in the 20th century. In The Nordic Languages. An International Handbook of the History of the North Germanic Languages, Vol. 2 [Handbooks of Linguistics and Communication Science, 22.2], O. Bandle et al. (eds), 1647–1656. Berlin/New York: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Sandøy, H
2003 Purisme i færøysk. In Purt og reint.Om purisme i dei nordiske språk [Skrifter fra Ivar Aasen-instituttet, 15], H. Sandøy, R. Brodersen & E. Brunstad (eds), 85–110. Volda: Høgskulen.Google Scholar
2004 Types of society and language change in the Nordic countries. In Language and Variation in Europe. Papers from ICLaVE 2. B.-L. Gunnarsson et al. (eds), 53–76. Uppsala: Uppsala University. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schirmunski, V
1930 Sprachgeschichte und Siedlungsmundarten. Germanisch-Romanische Monatsschrift 18: 113–122 (part 1) and171–188 (part 2).Google Scholar
Sigmundsson, S
2003 Purisme og nation på Island. In Purt og reint.Om purisme i dei nordiske språk [Skrifter fra Ivar Aasen-instituttet, 15], H. Sandøy, R. Brodersen & E. Brunstad (eds), 65–84. Volda: Høgskulen.Google Scholar
Stenmark, H
1983 Finlandssvenska ord och uttryck. Stockholm: Proprius.Google Scholar
Taeldeman, J
2006 Polarization revisited. In Language Variation – European Perspectives [Studies in Language Variation, 1], F. Hinskens (ed.), 233–248. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2010 Linguistic stability in a language space. In Language and Space. An International Handbook of Linguistic Variation, Vol. 1 [Handbooks of Linguistics and Communication Science 30.1], P. Auer & J.E. Schmidt ( eds), 355–374. Berlin/New York: de Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Teleman, U
2002 Ära, rikedom & reda. Svensk språkvård och språkpolitik under äldre nyare tid. Stockholm: Nordsteds Ordbok.Google Scholar
Thomason, S
2008 Social and linguistic factors as predictors of contact-induced change. Journal of Language Contact, Thema 2, 42–56. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thomason, S. & Kaufman, T
1988 Language Contact, Creolization, and Genetic Linguistics. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Thurston, W.R
1987 Processes of Change in the Languages of Northwestern Britain. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
Trudgill, P
1972 Sex, covert prestige and linguistic change in the urban British English of Norwich. Language in Society 1(2): 179–195. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1988 Dialect contact and interdialect in linguistic change. In Historical Dialectology: Regional and Social, J. Fisiak (ed.), 555–564. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
2010 Contact and sociolinguistic typology. In The Handbook of Language Contact [Blackwell Handbooks in Linguistics], R. Hickey (ed.), 299–319. Malden: Wiley-Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2011 Sociolinguistic Typology. Social Determinants of Linguistic Complexity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Trumper, J. & v M. Maddalon
1988 Converging divergence and diverging convergence: The dialect-language conflict and contrasting evolutionary trends in modern Italy. In Variation and Convergence, P. Auer & A. Di Luzio (eds), 217–259. Berlin/New York: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Weinreich, M
. [ Max Vaynraykh] 1945 Der YIVO un di problemen fun undzer tsayt. YIVO Bletter 25(1): 3–18.Google Scholar
Weinreich, U
[1953] 1968. Languages in Contact. Findings and Problems. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
1954 Is a structural dialectology possible? Word 10: 388–400. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wingender, M
2000 Aktuelle Entwicklungen in der kroatischen Standardsprache. In Die Sprachen Südosteuropas heute. Umbrüche und Aufbruch [Berliner Slawistische Arbeiten 12], B. Kunzmann-Müller (ed.), 251–270. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Woolhiser, C
2005 Political borders and dialect divergence/convergence in Europe. In Dialect Change. Convergence and Divergence in European Languages, P. Auer, F. Hinskens & P. Kerswill (eds), 236–262. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 5 other publications

Cerruti, Massimo & Riccardo Regis
2020. Partitive determiners in Piedmontese: A case of language variation and change in a contact setting . Linguistics 58:3 ► pp. 651 ff. DOI logo
Fischer, Susann, Christoph Gabriel & Elena Kireva
2014. Towards a typological classification of Judeo-Spanish. In Stability and Divergence in Language Contact [Studies in Language Variation, 16], ► pp. 77 ff. DOI logo
Silva-Domínguez, Carme
2022. O posesivo non concordado en galego e en castelán de Galicia como mudanza sintáctica en curso. Madrygal. Revista de Estudios Gallegos 24 ► pp. 191 ff. DOI logo
van der Wal, Marijke
2018. Early Modern migrants in a language contact setting: Characteristics of the Dutch Heusch correspondence (1664–1665) . Journal of Historical Sociolinguistics 4:2 ► pp. 253 ff. DOI logo
Vergeiner, Philip C. & Dominik Wallner
2022. On explaining stable dialect features: A real- and apparent-time study on the variable (en) in Austrian base dialects. Open Linguistics 8:1 ► pp. 65 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 11 march 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.