The paper opens with a discussion of some key notions; in this connection
a proposal is made to distinguish two different types of hyperdialectism.
Subsequently, a two-pronged hypothesis and a methodological consideration
are presented. Attention will then be paid to four different studies of nonstandard
varieties of present-day Dutch. Three of these concern endogenous
dialects, the fourth one deals with two modern ethnolects; in the presentation
of the dialect studies, the geographical perspective will gradually widen. In all
four studies, attention will focus on instances of variation and change in the
sound components which can be analyzed as divergence. Finally, the findings
from the cases studied will be discussed against the background of the hypothesis.
Special attention will be paid to the role the two types of hyperdialectisms
may have played and to a recent proposal by Labov.
Andersen, H. 1973. Abductive and deductive change. Language 49(4): 765–793.
Aubin, H., Frings, Th. & Müller, J. 1926. Kulturströmungen und Kulturprovinzen in den Rheinlanden. Geschichte, Sprache, Volkskunde. Bonn: Röhrscheid.
Auer, P. & Hinskens, F. 1996. The convergence and divergence of dialects in Europe. New and not so new developments in an old area. In The Convergence and Divergence of Dialects in a Changing Europe = Sociolinguistica 10, P. Auer, F. Hinskens & K. Mattheier (eds), 1–30. Berlin/New York: de Gruyter.
Bell, A. 1984. Language style as audience design. Language in Society 13(2): 145–204.
Bellmann, G. 1996. Between base dialect and standard language. InP. Auer (ed.), Dialect Levelling and the Standard Varieties in Europe = Folia Linguistica 32(1–2): 23–34.
Bennis, H. & Hinskens, F. 2014. Goed of fout. Niet-standaard inflectie in het hedendaags Standaardnederlands. Nederlandse Taalkunde, 19 (2): 131–184.
Bybee, J. 2001. Phonology and Language Use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Chambers, J. 1992. Dialect acquisition. Language 68: 673–705.
Clyne, M. (ed.). 1992. Pluricentric Languages: Differing Norms in Different Nations. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
De Vink, L. 2004. Dialect en dialectverandering in Katwijk aan Zee. Ph.D. thesis, University of Leiden.
Dressler, W. 1986. Explanation in natural morphology, illustrated with comparative and agent-noun formation. Linguistics 24: 519–548.
Ferguson, Ch. 1959. Diglossia. Word 15: 325–240.
Frings, Th. 1957. Grundlegung einer Geschichte der deutschen Sprache. Halle (Saale): Niemeyer. 3. erweiterte Auflage.
Geeraerts, D. & van de Velde, H. 2013. Supra-regional characteristics of colloquial Dutch. In Language and Space: Dutch, F. Hinskens & J. Taeldeman (eds), 532–556. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Giesbers, Ch. 2008. Dialecten op de grens van twee talen: een dialectologisch en sociolinguïstisch onderzoek in het Kleverlands dialectgebied. Ph.D. thesis, Nijmegen University.
Haeseryn, W. 2013. Belgian Dutch. In Language and Space: Dutch, F. Hinskens & J. Taeldeman (eds), 700–721. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Harnisch, R. 2010. Divergence of linguistic varieties in a variety space. In Language and Space: Theories and Methods, P. Auer & J.E. Schmidt (eds), 275–295. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Heeringa, W. & Hinskens, F. 2015 (to appear). Visualizing dialect change as such: Factoring out the role of the standard language. Journal of Linguistic Geography.
Hinskens, F. 1992. Dialect Levelling in Limburg. Structural and Sociolinguistic Aspects. Ph.D. thesis, University of Nijmegen.An abridged and revised version was published under the same title by Niemeyer, Tübingen (1996).
Hinskens, F. 1998. Variation studies in dialectology and three types of sound change. In Linguistics of Variation = Sociolinguistica 12, U. Ammon (ed.), 155–193.
Hinskens, F. 2006. Dialectgrenzen, taalgrenzen en staatsgrenzen. Taal en tongval, 57, 3–25.
Hinskens, F. 2007. New types of non-standard Dutch. In Standard, Variation and Language Change in Germanic Languages, C. Fandrych & R. Salverda (ed.), 281–300. Mannheim & Tübingen: IDS & Narr, Francke, Attempto.
Hinskens, F. 2011a. Koineization in the present-day Dutch dialect landscape: Postvocalic /r/ and more. In Talige en buitentalige factoren bij regiolectvorming, G. de Vogelaer & W. Heeringa (eds), 99–126. Special issue of Taal en tongval
.
Hinskens, F., Auer, P. & Kerswill, P. 2005. The study of dialect convergence and divergence: Conceptual and methodological considerations. In Dialect Change. The Convergence and Divergence of Dialects in Contemporary Societies, P. Auer, F. Hinskens & P. Kerswill (eds), 1–48. Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press.
Hinskens, F., Kallen, J. & Taeldeman, J. 2000. Merging and drifting apart. Convergence and divergence of dialects across political borders. In Dialect Convergence and Divergence across European Borders (= International Journal of the Sociology of Language 145), J. Kallen, F. Hinskens & J. Taeldeman (eds), 1–28.
Hock, H. 1991. Principles of Historical Linguistics, Second, corrected and augmented edition. Berlin.
Hoppenbrouwers, C. 1983. Het genus in een Brabants regiolect. Tabu 13(1): 1–25.
Hoppenbrouwers, C. 1990. Het regiolect: van dialect tot Algemeen Nederlands. Muiderberg (Coutinho).
Hume, E. 1992. Front Vowels, Coronal Consonants and their Interaction in Non-Linear Phonolog. Ph.D. dissertation, Cornell University.
Kaufmann, G. 2010. Non-convergence despite language contact. In Language and Space: Theories and Methods, P. Auer & J.E. Schmidt (eds), 478–493. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Kremer, L. 1990. Kontinuum oder Bruchstelle? Zur Entwicklung der Grenzdialekte zwischen Niederrhein und Vechtegebiet, 85123. In Grenzdialekte.Studien zur Entwicklung kontinentalwestgermanischer Dialektkontinua (Germanistische Linguistik 101103.), L. Kremer & H. Niebaum (eds). Hildesheim/New York: Olms.
Labov, W. 2001. Principles of Linguistic Change. Volume 2: Social Actors. Oxford: Blackwell.
Labov, W., Ash, S. & Boberg, C. 2006. Atlas of North American English: Phonology and Phonetics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Labov, W. 2010. Principles of Linguistic Change. Volume 3: Cognitive and Cultural Factors. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell.
Larsen, A. 1917. Naboopposition – knot. Maal og Minne 1917: 34–46.
Lenz, A. 2003a. Struktur und Dynamik des Substandards. Eine Studie zum Westmitteldeutschen (Wittlich/Eifel). Stuttgart: Steiner.
Lenz, A. 2003b. Hyperforms and variety barriers. In Language Variation in Europe. Papers from the Second International Conference on Language Variation in Europe, ICLaVE 2, Uppsala University, Sweden, June 12–14, 2003, B.-L. Gunnarssonet al. (eds), 281–293.
Mattheier, K.J. 1996. Varietätenkonvergenz. Überlegungen zu einem Baustein einer Theorie der Sprachvariation. In Convergence and Divergence of Dialects in Europe (= Sociolinguistica 10), P. Auer, F. Hinskens & K. Mattheier (eds), 31–52. Berlin/New York: de Gruyter.
McClelland, C. III. 2008. A Phonology of Tarifit Berber. Muenchen: Lincolm GmbH.
Rys, K., Daelemans, W., de Pauw, G. & Gillis, S. 2012. Leermechanismen in tweededialectverwerving. Tabu 40: 59–88.
Sapir, E. 1921. Language. An Introduction to the Study of Speech. San Diego: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
Schneider, E. 2007. Postcolonial English: Varieties around the World. Cambridge University Press.
Siegel, J. 1985. Koines and koineization. Language in Society 14(3): 357–378.
Siegel, J. 2001. Koine formation and creole genesis. In Creolization and Contact, N. Smith & T. Veenstra (eds), 175–197. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Sobrero, A. 1996. Italianization and variation in the repertoire: The Koinai. In Convergence and Divergence of Dialects in Europe (= Sociolinguistica 10), P. Auer, F. Hinskens & K. Mattheier (eds), 105–111.
Swanenberg, J. 2009. Van alterande sorte. Brabants tussen dialect en standaardtaal. Tilburg: Universiteit van Tilburg.
Taeldeman, J. 2006. Polarization revisited. In Language Variation. European Perspectives. Selected Papers from the Third International Conference on Language Variation in Europe (ICLaVE 3), Amsterdam, June 2005, F. Hinskens (ed.), 233–248. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Trudgill, P. 1986. Dialects in Contact. Oxford: Blackwell.
Trudgill, P. 1988. On the role of dialect contact and interdialect in linguistic change. In Historical Dialectology. Regional and Social, J. Fisiak (ed.), 547–563. Berlin etc.: Mouton de Gruyter.
Vandekerckhove, R. 2013. Southwestern Dutch dialects today. In Language and Space: Dutch, F. Hinskens & J. Taeldeman (eds), 194–211. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Van Meel, L., Hinskens, F. & van Hout, R. 2013. Ethnolectal variation in the realization of /z/ by Dutch youngsters. Zeitschrift für Dialektologie und Linguistik 80: 297–325.
Van Oostendorp, M. 2013. Holland and Utrecht: Phonology and phonetics. In Language and Space: Dutch, F. Hinskens & J. Taeldeman (eds), 399–418. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Weinreich, U. 1954. Is a structural dialectology possible?Word 10(2–3): 388–400.
Cited by (4)
Cited by four other publications
Doreleijers, Kristel & Stefan Grondelaers
2024. Between (anti-)grammar and identity: a quantitative and qualitative study of hyperdialectisms in Brabantish. Linguistics
2022. Better catch them young, but how?. Dutch Journal of Applied Linguistics 11
Opsahl, Toril
2021. Dead, but Won’t Lie Down? Grammatical Gender among Norwegians. Journal of Germanic Linguistics 33:1 ► pp. 122 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.