Article published in:
Stability and Divergence in Language Contact: Factors and Mechanisms
Edited by Kurt Braunmüller, Steffen Höder and Karoline Kühl
[Studies in Language Variation 16] 2014
► pp. 141–162

Stability in Chinese and Malay heritage languages as a source of divergence

| Universteit van Amsterdam
| Radboud Universiteit Nijmegen
This article discusses Malay and Chinese heritage languages as spoken in the Netherlands. Heritage speakers are dominant in another language and use their heritage language less. Moreover, they have qualitatively and quantitatively different input from monolinguals. Heritage languages are often described in terms of change. This article focuses on three types of stability in heritage speakers: stability in form, based on two case studies on progressive and definite marking, stability in function, based on a study on classifiers in Mandarin and Cantonese Chinese, and stability in form and meaning based on a study on the non-completion of the grammaticalization process of punya. We relate (non)- change to the influence of the dominant language as well as to more general effects of bilingualism.
Published online: 26 November 2014
https://doi.org/10.1075/silv.16.07aal
References
Allan, K
1977 Classifiers. Language 53 (2): 285–311. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Boumans, L
2006 The attributive possessive in Moroccan Arabic spoken by young bilinguals in the Netherlands and their peers in Morocco. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 9(3): 213–231. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cheng, L. & Sybesma, R
1999 Bare and not-so-bare nouns and the structure of NP. Linguistic Inquiry 30(4): 509–542. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chau, W
2011 The Influence of Dutch on Cantonese in the Netherlands. Rural versus Urban Areas. Master thesis, Leiden University.Google Scholar
Van Coetsem, F
1988 Loan phonology and the two transfer types in language contact. Dordrecht: Foris. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Collins, J
1983 Syntactic change in Ambonese Malay: The possessive construction. In Studies in Malay Dialects, J. Collins (ed.), 28–41. Universitas Atma Jaya: Badan Penyelenggara Seri NUSA.Google Scholar
Cook, V
(ed.) 2003 Effects of the Second Language on the First. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Doetjes, J
1996 Mass and count: Syntax or semantics? In Proceedings of Meaning on the HIL, 34–52. (HIL Occasional Papers in Linguistics 1), HIL/Leiden University.Google Scholar
1997 Quantifiers and Selection: On the Distribution of Quantifying Expressions in French, Dutch and English. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Leiden University.Google Scholar
Erbaugh, M.S
1986 Taking stock: The development of Chinese noun classifiers historically and in young children. In Noun Classes and Categorization, C. Craig (ed.), 399–436. ­Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ernestus, M
2000 Voice Assimilation and Segment Reduction in Casual Dutch. Utrecht: LOT.Google Scholar
Gao, H
2010 A study of Swedish speakers’ learning of Chinese noun classifiers. In The Nordic Languages and Second Language Acquisition Theory. Special issue of Nordic Journal of Linguistics, U. Bohnacker & M. Westergaard (Eds.), 33(2), 197–229.Google Scholar
O’Grady, W
2012  Designing Acquisition Experiments for Heritage Language Populations . Paper Presented at the Sixth Heritage Language Research Institute on June 20th, 2012, Retrieved from http://​www​.nhlrc​.ucla​.edu​/events​/institute​/2012​/presentations​/ogrady​.presentation​.2012​.pdf
O’Grady, W., Kwak, H-Y., Lee, O-S. & Lee, M
2011 An emergentist perspective on heritage language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 33(2): 223–245. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
O’Grady, W., Lee M. & Choo, M
2001 The acquisition of relative clauses by heritage and non-heritage learners of Korean as a second language: A comparative study. Journal of Korean Language Education 12: 283–294.Google Scholar
Harnisch, R
2010 Divergence of linguistic varieties in a language space. In Language and Space: An International Handbook of Linguistic Variation, P. Auer & J. Schmidt (eds), 275–295. Berlin/New York: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, M
2008 A frequentist explanation of some universals of reflexive marking. Linguistic Discovery 6(1): 40–63. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jakobson, R
1941 Kindersprache, Aphasie und allgemeine Lautgesetze. Uppsala: Almqvist.Google Scholar
Hu, Q
1993 The Acquisition of Chinese Classifiers by Young Mandarin Speaking Children. Doctoral dissertation, Boston University. UMI dissertation Services: Order number 9318205.Google Scholar
Huwaë, R
1992 Tweetaligheid in Wierden: het taalgebruik van jongeren uit een Molukse gemeenschap. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Laleko, O., & Polinsky, M
2013 Marking topic or marking case: A comparative investigation of heritage Japanese and heritage Korean. Heritage Language Journal 10(2): 40–62Google Scholar
Lestrade, S
2010 The Space of Case. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Radboud University Nijmegen.Google Scholar
Li, W. & Lee, S
2001 L1 development in an L2 environment: The use of Cantonese classifiers and quantifiers by young British-born Chinese in Tyneside. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 4(6): 359–381. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Liu, C
2013 Mandarin Chinese as a Heritage Language: A Case Study of Classifiers and Motion Events in One Heritage Family in the Netherlands. Master thesis, Radboud University Nijmegen.Google Scholar
Marle, J. van & Smits, C
1993. The inflectional systems of overseas Dutch. In Historical Linguistics 1989. Papers from the 9th International Conference on Historical Linguistics. Rutgers University, 14–18 August 1989, H. Aertsen & R.J. Jeffers (Eds.), 313–328. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Minde, D. van
1997 Malayu Ambong. Phonology, Morphology, Syntax. Leiden: CNWS Publications.Google Scholar
Montrul, S. & Bowles, M
2009 Back to basics: Incomplete knowledge of differential object marking in Spanish heritage speakers. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 12(3): 363–383. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Moro, F
Forthcoming. Dynamics of Ambon Malay: Comparing Ambon and the Netherlands. Doctoral dissertation, Radboud University Nijmegen.
Muysken, P
2013 Language contact outcomes as the result of bilingual optimization strategies. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 16(4): 709–730. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Paauw, S
2008 The Malay Contact Varieties of Eastern Indonesia: A Typological Comparison. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, State University of New York at Buffalo.Google Scholar
Paradis, M
2007 L1 attrition features predicted by a neurolinguistic theory of bilingualism. In Language Attrition. Theoretical Perspectives, B. Köpke, M. Schmid, M. Keijzer & S. Dostert (eds), 121–134. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Piantadosi, S., Tily, H. & Gibson, E
2011 Word lengths are optimized for efficient communication. PNAS 108(9): 3526–3529. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pires, A. & Rothman, J
2009 Disentangling sources of incomplete acquisition: An explanation for competence divergence across heritage grammars. International Journal of Bilingualism 13(2). Special Issue: Understanding the Nature and Outcomes of Early Bilingualism, 211–238. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2008 Without aspect. In Case and Grammatical Relations, G.G. Corbett & M. Noonan (eds), 263–282. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Shi, Meng
2011 Incomplete Knowledge of Aspect in Heritage Speakers of Mandarin Chinese in the Netherlands. M. A. thesis, Linguistics Department, Radboud University, Nijmegen.Google Scholar
Schmid, M
2007 The role of L1 use for L1 attrition. In Language Attrition. Theoretical Perspectives, B. Köpke, M. Schmid, M. Keijzer & S. Dostert (eds), 135–153. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schoenmakers-Klein Gunnewiek, M
1997 Dutch language loss in Brazil and the conceptual hypothesis. In Studies in Maintenance and Loss of Dutch as an Immigrant Language, J. ­Klatter-Folmer & S. Kroon (eds), 99–119. Tilburg: Tilburg University Press.Google Scholar
Tahitu, B
1989 Melaju Sini. Het Maleis van Molukse jongeren in Nederland. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Leiden.Google Scholar
Tang, S.-W
2001 A complementation approach to Chinese passives and its consequences. Linguistics 39, 257–295 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Thomason, S.G. & Kaufman, T
1988 Language contact, creolization, and genetic linguistics. University of California Press.Google Scholar
Torres Cacoullos, R
2000 Grammaticization, Synchronic Variation, and Language Contact. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tse, S. & Li, H
2007 The acquisition of Cantonese classifiers by preschool children in Hong Kong. Journal of Child Language 34: 495–517. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tjia, J
2004 The development of possessive and passive-like constructions in Ambonese language. NUSA 53: 51–62.Google Scholar
Trudgill, P
2011 Sociolinguistic Typology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Veenman, J
(ed.) 1994 The Social Integration of Moluccans. Koninklijke Vermande/ISEO.Google Scholar
Voigt, H
1994 Code-wisseling, taalverschuiving en taalverandering in het Melaju Sini. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Tilburg.Google Scholar
Yap, F
2007 On native and contact-induced grammaticalization: The case of Malay empunya . Manuscript, Department of Linguistics and Modern Languages, Chinese University of Hong Kong.
Zipf, G
1965 Human Behavior and the Principle of Least Effort. An Introduction to Human Ecology. New York and London: Hafner publishing company.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 2 other publications

Moro, Francesca R
2017. Aspectual distinctions in Dutch-Ambon Malay bilingual heritage speakers. International Journal of Bilingualism 21:2 ► pp. 178 ff. Crossref logo
Moro, Francesca R
2018. Divergence in heritage Ambon Malay in the Netherlands: The role of social-psychological factors. International Journal of Bilingualism 22:4 ► pp. 395 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 19 august 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.