Article published in:
Stability and Divergence in Language Contact: Factors and Mechanisms
Edited by Kurt Braunmüller, Steffen Höder and Karoline Kühl
[Studies in Language Variation 16] 2014
► pp. 265290
References
Ares Montes, J
1956. Góngora y la poesía portuguesa en el s. XVII. Madrid: Gredos.Google Scholar
Backus, A
2004Convergence as a mechanism of language change. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 7: 179–181. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bastardas Parera, J
1953Particularidades sintácticas del latín medieval. Cartularios españoles de los siglos VIII al XI. Barcelona/Madrid: Escuela de Filología.Google Scholar
Beltrán, L
1997Cuarenta y cinco cantigas del códice rico de Alfonso el Sabio. Palma de Mallorca: Olañeta.Google Scholar
Bossong, G
1982Historische Sprachwissenschaft und empirische Universalienforschung. Romanistisches Jahrbuch 33: 17–51.Google Scholar
1984Diachronie und Pragmatik der spanischen Wortstellung. Zeitschrift für romanische Philologie 100: 92–111. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1985Empirische Universalienforschung. Differentielle Objektmarkierung in den Neuiranischen Sprachen. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
1990Sprachwissenschaft und Sprachphilosophie in der Romania. Tübingen: Gunther Narr.Google Scholar
2006La sintaxis de las Glosas Emilianenses en una perspectiva tipológica. In Actas del VI Congreso Internacional de Historia de la Lengua Española (Madrid, septiembre 2003), 529–543. Madrid: Arco Libros.Google Scholar
2009Divergence, convergence, contact. Challenges for the genealogical classification of languages. In Convergence and Divergence in Language Contact Situations [Hamburg Studies on Multilingualism 8], K. Braunmüller & J. House (eds), 13–40. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brito Gibrail, A.V
2003O acusativo preposicionado do português clássico: uma abordagem diacrônica e teórica. Ph.D. dissertation, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Brazil.Google Scholar
Camões, L. de
1999 [1572]Die Lusiaden – Os Lusíadas. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.Google Scholar
CdE =
Davies, M 2002Corpus del Español: 100 million words, 1200s–1900s. Available online at http://​www​.corpusdelespanol​.org. (May 29th 2013)Google Scholar
CDP =
Corpo Diplomático Portuguez contendo os actos e relações políticas e diplomáticas de Portugal com as diversas potençias do mundo, desde o seculo XVI até os nossos días. Lisboa: Academia Real das Sciencias. [Tomos I–XV (1862–1936). Relações com a Curia Romana (1501–1680)].
CdP =Davies, M. & Ferreira, M
2006Corpus do Português: 45 Million Words, 1300s–1900s. Available online at http://​www​.corpusdoportugues​.org. (May 29th 2013).Google Scholar
Company Company, C
2003Transitivity and grammaticalization of object. The diachronic struggle of direct and indirect object in Spanish. In Romance Objects: Transitivity in Romance Languages, G. Fiorentino (ed.), 217–260. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Comrie, B
. 21989Language Universals and Linguistic Typology. Chicago: The University of ­Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Corriente, F
1997Poesía dialectal árabe y romance en Alandalús. Madrid: Gredos.Google Scholar
Costa, I
2002O uso do artigo definido diante de nome próprio de pessoa e de possessivo do século XIII ao século XVI. In O português quinhentista. Estudos lingüísticos, R.V. Mattos e Silva & A.V. Lopes Machado Filho (eds), 283–306. Salvador: EDUFBA/Feira de Santana, UEFS.Google Scholar
Dalrymple, M. & Nikolaeva, I
2011Objects and Information Structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Defourneaux, M
1964La vie quotidienne en Espagne au siècle d’or. Paris: Hachette.Google Scholar
Delille, K.H
1970Die geschichtliche Entwicklung des präpositionalen Akkusativs im Portugiesischen. Bonn: Romanisches Seminar der Universität Bonn.Google Scholar
Döhla, H.-J
2009El libro de Calila e Dimna (1251). Nueva edición y estudio de los dos manuscritos castellanos. Zaragoza: Instituto de Estudios Islámicos y del Oriente Próximo.Google Scholar
García García, M
2010Differentielle Objektmarkierung bei unbelebten Objekten im Spanischen. Dissertation Universiät Freiburg i. Br.Google Scholar
García Márquez, G
2007 [1967] Cien años de soledad. Madrid: Real Academia Española. [Portuguese translation: 252009. Cem anos de solidão, tradução de M. Santiago. Alfragide: Dom Quixote/English translation: 1972. One Hundred Years of Solitude, translated by G. Rabassa. London: Penguin.]Google Scholar
Givón, T
1976Topic, pronoun, and grammatical agreement. In Subject and Topic, C.N. Li (ed.), 149–188. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Haugen, E
1966Dialect, language, nation. American Anthropologist, New Series 68(4): 922–935. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
von Heusinger, K
2008Verbal semantics and the diachronic development of DOM in Spanish. Probus 20: 1–31. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
von Heusinger, K. & Kaiser, G
2011Affectedness and differential object marking in Spanish. In Morphology 21, 593–617. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hundertmark-Santos Martins, M.T
. 21998Portugiesische Grammatik. Tübingen: Niemeyer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Iemmolo, G
2010/11Towards a Typological Study of Differential Object Marking and Differential Object Indexation. Ph.D. dissertation, Università degli Studi di Pavia.Google Scholar
Koch, R. & Österreicher, W
1985Sprache der Nähe – Sprache der Distanz. Mündlichkeit und Schriftlichkeit im Spannungsfeld von Sprachtheorie und Sprachgeschichte. Romanistisches Jahrbuch 36: 15–43.Google Scholar
2007Lengua hablada en la Romania: español, francés, italiano. Madrid: Gredos.Google Scholar
Labov, W
2010Principles of Linguistic Change. Volume 3: Cognitive and Cultural Factors. New York: Wiley-Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lyons, C
1999Definiteness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Montaner Frutos, A
2011Cantar de mio Cid. Edición, estudio y notas. Barcelona: Galaxia Gutenberg/Círculo de Lectores.Google Scholar
Montoya, J
1988Alfonso X el Sabio: Cantigas. Madrid: Cátedra.Google Scholar
Müller, C
2007Die Arcádia Lusitana. Gescheitertes Experiment oder nachhaltiger Impuls. ­Frankfurt am Main: Verlag Teo Ferrer de Mesquita.Google Scholar
Neumann-Holzschuh, I
1997Die Satzgliedanordnung im Spanischen. Eine diachrone Analyse. Tübingen: Niemeyer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Oliveira Marques, A.H. de
2001Geschichte Portugals und des portugiesischen Weltreichs. ­Stuttgart: Kröner. [original: 1995. Breve História de Portugal. Lisboa: Presença]Google Scholar
Pensado Ruiz, C
1995La creación del complemento directo preposicional y la flexión de los pronombres personales en las lenguas románicas. In El complemento directo preposicional, C. Pensado Ruiz (ed.), 179–230. Madrid: Visor Libros.Google Scholar
Reichenkron, G
1951Das präpositionale Akkusativ-Objekt im ältesten Spanisch. Romanische Forschungen 63: 342–397.Google Scholar
Ribeiro, B
1557/58 [1554] Primeira e segunda parte do liuro chamado as Saudades de Bernardim Ribeiro com todas suas obras; treladado de seu proprio original [Menina e moça]. Évora: Casa de Andre de Burgos.Google Scholar
Schäfer-Prieß, B
2000Die portugiesische Grammatikschreibung von 1540 bis 1822: Entstehungsbedingungen und Kategorisierungsverfahren vor dem Hintergrund der lateinischen, spanischen und französischen Tradition. Tübingen: Niemeyer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2002O acusativo preposicional na história da língua portuguesa. In História da Língua e História da Gramática. Actas do Encontro, B. Head et al. (eds), 405–419. Braga: Universidade do Minho.Google Scholar
Schäfer-Prieß, B. & Schöntag, R
2012Spanisch/Portugiesisch kontrastiv. Berlin/Boston: de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Silverstein, M
1976Hierarchy of features and ergativity. In Grammatical Categories in Australian Languages, R.M.W. Dixon (ed.), 112–171. Canberra: Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies & New Jersey: Humanities Press.Google Scholar
Theyssier, P
1959La langue de Gil Vicente. Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar
Thomason, S.G
2001Language Contact: An Introduction. Washington D.C.: Georgetown ­University Press.Google Scholar
Verney, L.A
1746Verdadeiro método de estudar, para ser util à Republica, e à Igreja: proporcionado ao estilo, e necesidade de Portugal, 2 vols. Valensa: Na oficina de Antonio Ballé.Google Scholar
Yamamoto, M
1999Animacy and Reference. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 3 other publications

Cardoso, Hugo C.
2021. Convergence in the Malabar. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 36:2  pp. 298 ff. Crossref logo
Pires, Aline Jéssica
2020. A influência da gramática espanhola na Marcação Diferencial de Objeto no português diacrônico. Cadernos de Linguística 1:2  pp. 01 ff. Crossref logo
Silva-Domínguez, Carme
2022. O posesivo non concordado en galego e en castelán de Galicia como mudanza sintáctica en curso. Madrygal. Revista de Estudios Gallegos 24  pp. 191 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 19 august 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.