Article published in:
Language Variation - European Perspectives V: Selected papers from the Seventh International Conference on Language Variation in Europe (ICLaVE 7), Trondheim, June 2013
Edited by Eivind Torgersen, Stian Hårstad, Brit Mæhlum and Unn Røyneland
[Studies in Language Variation 17] 2015
► pp. 31–42

Language variation in Slovene

A case study of two geographically mobile speakers

The article presents the results of a pilot study that aims to test the methodological approaches of variationist sociolinguistics on Slovene language material in order to define the typology of linguistic strategies in dialect contacts in the Slovene capital. The research investigates the real language use of mobile speakers from the Idrija region, who commute for work or school to Ljubljana. The research corpus is based on text selection from informants’ full-day self audio recordings, according to time, place, interlocutors, topic of the conversation and formality of the situation. Methodologically, the analysis of five phonological variables is combined with qualitative data from interviews about the speakers’ experiences with language use, language attitudes and the perception of their own language behaviour.
Keywords: dialect contact, identity, language attitudes, mobile speakers, phonology, self audio recording, Slovene language
Published online: 09 April 2015
https://doi.org/10.1075/silv.17.03bit
References

References

Besch, Werner
(ed.) 1983 Sprachverhalten in ländlichen Gemeinden: Dialekt und Standardsprache in Sprecherurteil: Forschungsbericht Erp-Projekt: Band 2. Berlin: E. Schmidt.Google Scholar
Bitenc, Maja
2013 “Slovene, Between Purism and Plurilingualism.” In Survival and Development of Language Communities: Prospects and Challenges, ed. by F. Xavier Vila, 58–80. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
2014a “Stališ?a gimnazijcev do slovenskih jezikovnih zvrsti: Raziskava s tehniko prikritih dvojic.” Annales: Series historia et sociologia 24 (2): 307–318.Google Scholar
2014b “Tehnika prikritih dvojic: Primerjava in kriti?no ovrednotenje dveh psokusov.” Annales: Series historia et sociologia 24 (2): 319–330.Google Scholar
Greenberg, Marc L.
(ed.) 1997 The Sociolinguistics of Slovene. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 124. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Dunaj, Bogusław
1981 “Odmiana oficjalna i nieoficjalna języka mówionego.” In Studia nad polszczyzną mówioną Krakowa 1. Kraków: Nakładem Uniwersytetu Jagielońskiego. 11–20.Google Scholar
1989 Język mieszkańców Krakowa 1: Zagadnienia teoretyczne, fonetyka, fleksja. Warszawa, Kraków: PWN.Google Scholar
Fasold, Ralph
1996 The Sociolinguistic of Language: Introduction to Sociolinguistics: Volume II. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Jurgec, Peter
2011 “Slovenščina ima 9 samoglasnikov.” Slavistična revija 59 (3): 243–268.Google Scholar
Kenda-Jež, Karmen
1999 “Med narečjem in knjižnim jezikom.” In Logarjev zbornik, ed. by Zinka Zorko, and Mihaela Koletnik, 304–315. Maribor: Slavistično društvo.Google Scholar
2002 Cerkljansko narečje: Teoretični model dialektološkega raziskovanja na zgledu besedišča in glasoslovja: Doktorska disertacija. Ljubljana: Filozofska fakulteta.Google Scholar
Labov, William
1972 Sociolinguistic Patterns. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Макарова, Ирина
2009 Языковая ситуация в Любляне и особенности люблянской разговорной речи. Москва: Московский государственный университет им. М. В. Ломоносова, Филологический факультет.Google Scholar
Mæhlum, Brit
1986 Språklige variasjonsmønstre hos innflyttere i Oslo. Oslo: Novus.Google Scholar
2010 “Language and Social Spaces.” In Language and Space: An International Handbook of Linguistic Variation: Volume 1: Theories and Methods, ed. by Peter Auer, and Jurgen Erich Schmidt, 18–32. Berlin, New York: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Niebaum, Hermann and Jürgen Macha
1999 Einführung in die Dialektologie des Deutschen (Germanistische Arbeitshefte 37). Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pogorelec, Breda
1984 “K vprašanju bilingvizma in diglosije iz slovenske izkušnje.” In Dvojezičnost - individualne in družbene razsežnosti, ed. by Albina Nećak-Lük, and Inka Štrukelj, 67– 73. Ljubljana: Društvo za uporabno jezikoslovje.Google Scholar
1998 “Jezikovno načrtovanje govornega jezika pri Slovencih: Teorija, praksa in odprti problemi slovenskega zbornega jezika.” In Jezik za danes in jutri, ed. by Inka Štrukelj, 56–64. Ljubljana: Društvo za uporabno jezikoslovje.Google Scholar
Rigler, Jakob
1970–1978 “Akcentske variante I–III.” Slavistična revija 18 (1–2): 5–15, 19 (1): 1–12, 26 (4): 365–374.Google Scholar
Smole, Vera
2004 “Nekaj resnic in zmot o narečjih v Sloveniji danes.” In Aktualizacija jezikovnozvrstne teorije na Slovenskem: Členitev jezikovne resničnosti (Obdobja 22), ed. by Erika Kržišnik, 321–330. Ljubljana: Filozofska fakulteta.Google Scholar
Srebot Rejec, Tatjana
1988 Word Accent and Vowel Duration in Standard Slovene: An Acoustic and Linguistic Investigation. München: Verlag O. Sagner.Google Scholar
Stabej, Marko
2010 V družbi z jezikom. Ljubljana: Trojina, zavod za uporabno slovenistiko.Google Scholar
Škofic-Guzej, Jožica
1994 “O oblikovanju slovenskega pogovarjalnega jezika.” Slavistična revija 42 (4): 571–578.Google Scholar
Škofic, Jožica et al.
2011 Slovenski lingvistični atlas 1: Človek (telo, bolezni, družina). Ljubljana: Založba ZRC, ZRC SAZU.Google Scholar
Tagliamonte, Sali A.
2012 Variationist Sociolinguistics: Change, Observation, Interpretation. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Toporišič, Jože
2000 Slovenska slovnica. Maribor: Obzorja.Google Scholar
Wilson, James
2010 Moravians in Prague: A Sociolinguistic Study of Dialect Contact in the Czech Republic. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by other publications

Pisanski Peterlin, Agnes
2019. Self-translation of academic discourse: the attitudes and experiences of authors-translators. Perspectives 27:6 ► pp. 846 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 december 2020. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.