Article published in:
Language Variation - European Perspectives V: Selected papers from the Seventh International Conference on Language Variation in Europe (ICLaVE 7), Trondheim, June 2013
Edited by Eivind Torgersen, Stian Hårstad, Brit Mæhlum and Unn Røyneland
[Studies in Language Variation 17] 2015
► pp. 183–196

Standard-dialect variation and its functionalization

This paper deals with the use of standard-dialect variation in the Upper Saxon dialect region. After the d-value for three recording situations was quantified, a variable analysis was conducted to investigate the frequencies of regional variants in the different settings. An in-depth analysis of one speaker finally showed interesting standard-dialect variation within one recording setting. The results indicate that a base dialect is extinct. Nevertheless, all speakers did use regional variants but rarely and inconsistently. The in-depth analysis, however, pointed out that dialect is used rather as a stylistic marker than as a marker of regional belonging.
Keywords: dialectality, East Central German, functional variation, standard-dialect variation, Upper Saxon
Published online: 09 April 2015
https://doi.org/10.1075/silv.17.14sch
References

References

Becker, Horst, and Gunter Bergmann
1969 Sächsische Mundartenkunde. Halle/Saale: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Deutscher Sprachatlas (DSA)
1927–1956 Marburg.Google Scholar
Fleischer, Wolfgang
1961 Namen und Mundart im Raum von Dresden. Berlin: Akademie-Verlag.Google Scholar
Große, Rudolf
1955 Die Meissnische Sprachlandschaft. Halle/Saale: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Herrgen, Joachim, and Jürgen E. Schmidt
1989 “Dialektalitätsareale und Dialektabbau.” In Dialektgeographie und Dialektologie, ed. by Wolfgang Putschke, Werner H. Veith, and Peter Wiesinger, 304–346. Marburg: N. G. Elwert.Google Scholar
Herrgen, Joachim
1986 Koronalisierung und Hyperkorrektion. Stuttgart: Steiner.Google Scholar
Hünecke, Rainer, Evelyn Koch, and Xaver Koch
2012 “Wie hört sich das gegenwärtige Sächsische im Fernsehen an? Zur aktuellen Sprachsituation im obersächsischen Raum: Ein audiovisuelles Korpus und seine Potenzen.” In Die obersächsische Sprachlandschaft in Geschichte und Gegenwart, ed. by Rainer Hünecke, and Karlheinz Jakob, 143–166. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
Jannedy, Stefanie, and Melanie Weirich
2014 “Sound change in an urban setting: Category instability of the palatal fricative in Berlin.” Laboratory Phonology 5 (1): 91–122. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Khan, Sameer ud Dowla, and Constanze Weise
2013 “Upper Saxon (Chemnitz dialect).” Journal of the International Phonetic Association 43 (2): 231–241. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kehrein, Roland
2012 Regionalsprachliche Spektren im Raum. Stuttgart: Steiner.Google Scholar
Kohler, Klaus J.
1990 “Segmental reduction in connected speech in German: Phonological facts and phonetic explanations.” In Speech production and speech modelling, ed. by William J. Hardcastle, and Alain Marchal, 69–92. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lameli, Alfred
2004 Standard und Substandard. Stuttgart: Steiner.Google Scholar
Lenz, Alexandra
2003 Struktur und Dynamik des Substandards. Stuttgart: Steiner.Google Scholar
Lüders, Björn
2013 “PAM: Ein Programm zur phonetischen Abstandsmessung: Version 0.3.5.” Accessed April 03, 2013. www​.mpiorn​.de​/pam.
Macha, Jürgen
1991 Der flexible Sprecher. Köln: Böhlau.Google Scholar
Purschke, Christoph
2012 Regionalsprache und Hörerurteil. Stuttgart, Marburg: Steiner.Google Scholar
2011 “Regional linguistic knowledge and perception: On the conceptualization of Hessian”. Dialectologia. Special Issue II: Production, Perception and Attitude: 91–118.Google Scholar
Schaufuß, Anja, and Beat Siebenhaar
2012 “Spracheinstellungen und phonetische Variation als Ausdruck verschwommener Dialektabgrenzung.” LiLi166: 88–109.Google Scholar
Schmidt, Jürgen Erich
2010 “Language and space: The linguistic dynamics approach.” In Language and Space: Theories and methods, ed. by Peter Auer, and Jürgen Erich Schmidt, 201–225. Berlin/New York: de Gruyter. (HSK 30.1)Google Scholar
Schmidt, Jürgen Erich, and Joachim Herrgen
2011 Sprachdynamik. Berlin: Schmidt.Google Scholar