Cover not available
Part of
Language Variation - European Perspectives VI: Selected papers from the Eighth International Conference on Language Variation in Europe (ICLaVE 8), Leipzig, May 2015
Edited by Isabelle Buchstaller and Beat Siebenhaar
[Studies in Language Variation 19] 2017
► pp. 85–98

Inter-individual variation among young children growing up in a bidialectal community

The acquisition of dialect and standard Dutch vocabulary

| Utrecht University
| Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences, Maastricht University | Meertens Institute Amsterdam
| Department of Special Education, Utrecht University
| Fryske Akademy
| Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences, Maastricht University | Meertens Institute Amsterdam

This study focuses on the relationship between dialect use and the acquisition of standard Dutch vocabulary by young children in the Dutch province of Limburg. The results of a newly-developed dialect expressive vocabulary task show extensive inter-individual variation that does not support a dichotomous distinction between monolingual and bidialectal children. The children’s dialect vocabulary scores are neither positively nor negatively associated with their results on a standardized receptive Dutch vocabulary task. Thus, the acquisition of a dialect does not hinder or facilitate the acquisition of standard Dutch vocabulary.

Keywords: bidialectal acquisition, inter-speaker variation, inter-item variation, Dutch vocabulary, dialect vocabulary, classification of children
Article outline
  • 1. Introduction: Bidialectism in the Dutch province of Limburg
  • 2.Method
    • 2.1Participants and procedure
    • 2.2Measures
      • 2.2.1Dialect proficiency
      • 2.2.2Dutch language proficiency
    • 2.3Parental questionnaire, and overview of participants and results
  • 3.Results of the Limburgish Word Task
  • 4.Relationship between the extent of dialect used in the LWT and the acquisition of Dutch vocabulary
  • 5. Discussion and conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 26 July 2017
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/silv.19.05fra
References

References

Belemans, Rob
2002 Eindrapport over de Limburg-Enquête (periode 1/8/2001–30/4/2002). Maastricht: Road veur ’t Limburgs en Bureau StreektaalNederlands-Limburg.Google Scholar
Cornips, Leonie
2013 “Recent developments in the Limburg dialect region.” In Language and Space: An International Handbook of Linguistic Variation. Volume 3, Dutch, ed. by Frans Hinskens and Johan Taeldeman, 378–399. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
2014a “Socio-syntax and variation in acquisition: Problematizing monolingual and bidialectal acquisition”. Linguistic Variation, 14(1): 1–25. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2014b “Language contact, linguistic variability and the construction of local identities.” In The sociolinguistics of grammar, ed. by Tor A. Åfarlí and Brit Mæhlum, 67–90. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
COST Action IS0804
2011 “Questionnaire for Parents of Bilingual Children (PaBiQ).” [URL].
Driessen, Geert
2006 “Ontwikkelingen in het gebruik van streektalen en dialecten in de periode 1995–2003.” Toegepaste Taalwetenschap in Artikelen 75: 103–113. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dunn, Lyod M., and Douglas M. Dunn, L.
2005 “Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test-III-NL. Nederlandse versie door L. Schlichting.” Amsterdam: Harcourt Assessment B.V.Google Scholar
Fishman, Joshua A.
1967 “Bilingualism with and without diglossia; diglossia with and without bilingualism.” Journal of Social Issues 23 (2): 29–38. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Garraffa, Maria, Madeleine Beveridge, and Antonella Sorace
2015 “Linguistic and Cognitive Skills in Sardinian–Italian Bilingual Children.” Frontiers in Psychology, 6: 1898. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Heeringa, Wilbert
2004 Measuring Dialect Pronunciation Differences using Levenshtein Distance. PhD Thesis University of Groningen.Google Scholar
Kraaykamp, Gerbert
2005 “Dialect en sociale ongelijkheid: Een emprische studie naar de sociaal-economische gevolgen van het spreken van dialect in de jeugd.” Pedagogische Studiën 82: 390–403.Google Scholar
Kroon, Sjaak and Ton Vallen
eds. 2004 Dialect en school in Limburg. Amsterdam: Aksant Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
Laufer, Batia, and T. Sima Paribakht
1998 “Relationship between passive and active vocabularies: Effects of language learning context.” Language Learning 48: 365–391. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Mulder, Froukje, Yolande Timman, and Simon Verhallen
2009 Handreiking bij basiswoordenschat Amsterdamse kleuters (BAK). Amsterdam: ITTA, UvA.Google Scholar
Opiniepanel EenVandaag
2014 “Dialect spreken is verbondenheid voelen” [Speaking a dialect means being connected]. Retrieved from [URL].
Paradis, Johanne
2011 “Individual Differences in Child English Second Language Acquisition: Comparing Child Internal and Child-External Factors.” Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 1: 213–237. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Paradis, Joanne, Kristyn Emmerzael, and Tamara Sorenson Duncan
2010 “Assessment of English Language Learners: Using Parent Report on First Language Development.” Journal of Communication Disorders 43: 474–497. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Smith, Jennifer, and Mercedes Durham
2012 “Bidialectalism or dialect death? Explaining generational change in the Shetland Islands, Scotland.” American Speech 87 (1): 57–88. DOI logo.Google Scholar
2011 “A Tipping Point in Dialect Obsolescence? Change across the Generations in Lerwick, Shetland.” Journal of Sociolinguistics 15: 197–225. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Tuller, Laurice
2015 “Clinical use of parental questionnaires in multilingual contexts. In Methods for assessing multilingual children: disentangling bilingualism from Language Impairment”, ed. by Sharon Armon-Lotem, Jan de Jong, and Natalia Meir, 301–330. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Vangsnes, Øystein, Göran B. W. Söderlund, and Morten Blekesaune
2015 “The effect of bidialectal literacy on school achievement.” International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism: 1–16. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Yao, Yuxin, Asako Ohinata, and Jan C. van Ours
2015 “The Educational Consequences of Language Proficiency for Young Children.” Center Discussion Paper. Tilburg University: Economics.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 3 other publications

Blom, Elma, Tessel Boerma, Evelyn Bosma, Leonie Cornips, Kirsten van den Heuij & Mona Timmermeister
2020. Cross-language distance influences receptive vocabulary outcomes of bilingual children. First Language 40:2 ► pp. 151 ff. DOI logo
Blom, Elma, Leonie Cornips & Jeannette Schaeffer
2017. Cross-linguistic influence in bilingualism. In Cross-linguistic Influence in Bilingualism [Studies in Bilingualism, 52], ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Cornips, Leonie, Jetske Klatter-Folmer, Trudie Schils & Romy Roumans
2022. A Longitudinal Comparison of Spelling and Reading Comprehension of Bidialectal and Monolingual Dutch Speaking Children in Primary School. In Handbook of Literacy in Diglossia and in Dialectal Contexts [Literacy Studies, 22], ► pp. 219 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 6 may 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.