Cover not available
Part of
Language Variation - European Perspectives VI: Selected papers from the Eighth International Conference on Language Variation in Europe (ICLaVE 8), Leipzig, May 2015
Edited by Isabelle Buchstaller and Beat Siebenhaar
[Studies in Language Variation 19] 2017
► pp. 99–112

The unruly dialect variant [a]

The case of the opening of (ɛ) in the traditional Torsby dialect

| Institute for Language and Folkore, Sweden
| Institute for Language and Folkore, Sweden

We investigate the realisation of the variable (ɛ) (as either the dialect variant [a] or the standard variant [ɛ]) in the Swedish county of Värmland, with special attention to the small rural village of Torsby. Our analysis shows that dialect variants that are infrequent in recordings made in this area in the 1940s are generally absent in data from 2011. However, the dialect variant [a] deviates from this pattern. Even though it is used infrequently in some consonantal contexts in older data, it has increased significantly over the last 70 years, both language-internally as well as in the speech community. We present an acoustic analysis of the vowel pronunciation and discuss the social meaning this feature has in contemporary Torsby.

Keywords: dialect change, dialect stability, sociophonetics, rural Sweden, vowel change, social meaning
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Background
  • 3.Data
  • 4.Dialect change in Torsby
  • 5.The unruly [a]
  • 6.Discussion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 26 July 2017
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/silv.19.06nil
References
Agha, Asif
2007 Language and social relations (No. 24). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Auer, Peter
1998 “Dialect Levelling and the Standard Varieties in Europe”. Folia Linguistica 32 (1–2): 1–10. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2005 “Europe’s sociolinguistic unity, or: A typology of European dialect/standard constellations”. In Perspectives on Variation: Sociolinguistic, Historical, Comparative, ed. by N. Delbecque et al., 7–42. (Trends in Linguistics. Studies and Monographs 163.) Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Auer, Peter, and Hinskens, Frans
2005 “The role of interpersonal accommodation in a theory of language change”. In Dialect change: convergence and divergence in European languages, ed. by P. Auer, F. Hinskens, and P. Kerswill, 335–357. New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boersma, Paul and Weenink, David
2013 Praat: doing phonetics by computer [Computer program]. Version 5.3.51, retrieved 2 June 2013 from [URL].
Broberg, Richard
[1972] 2001 Språk- och kulturgränser i Värmland. En översikt och några synpunkter. (Svenska landsmål och svenskt folkliv B:67.) Uppsala: Språk- och folkminnesinstitutet.Google Scholar
Chambers, Jack K. and Trudgill, Peter
1980 Dialectology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Collin, H. S., Schlyter, C. J.
(eds.) [1827] 1976 Westgöta-lagen. Lund: Ekstrand.Google Scholar
Eckert, Penelope
2008 ”Variation and the indexical field”, Journal of Sociolinguistics 12 (4): 453–476. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Engstrand, Olle
1999 Handbook of the International Phonetic Association. A Guide to the usage of the International Phonetic Alphabet. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Finnur Friðriksson
2008 Language change vs. stability in conservative language communities: A case study of Icelandic. Göteborg: Institutionen för lingvistik.Google Scholar
Giles, Howard and Robert N. St. Clair
(eds.) 1979 Language and Social Psychology. Oxford: Blackwell and Baltimore.Google Scholar
Giles, Howard and Philip Smith
1979 ”Accommodation Theory: Optimal Levels of Convergence”. In Language and Social Psychology, ed. by Howard Giles and Robert N. St. Clair, 45–65. Oxford: Blackwell and Baltimore.Google Scholar
Götlind, Johan and Samuel Landtmanson
1940–50 Västergötlands folkmål. Vol. 1–4. (Skrifter utg. av Kungl. Gustav Adolfs Akademien för folklivsforskning 6.) Uppsala: Lundequistska bokh.Google Scholar
Ivars, Ann-Marie
2003 ”Lokalt och regionalt i svenskan i Finland. Tendenser i språkutvecklingen i norr och söder”. In Nordisk dialektologi, ed. by Gunnstein Akselberg et al., 51–81. Oslo: Novus.Google Scholar
Johnstone, Barbara
2009 “Pittsburghese shirts: commodification and the enregisterment of an urban dialect”, American Speech 84 (2): 157–175. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2014 ““100% Authentic Pittsburgh”: Sociolinguistic authenticity and the linguistics of particularity”. In Indexing Authenticity: Sociolinguistic Perspectives, ed. by T. Breyer, J. Leimgruber, and V. Lacoste 97–112. (Linguae & litterae 39). Berlin, München, Boston: DeGruyter.Google Scholar
Johnstone, Barbara, Jennifer Andrus, Andrew E. Danielson
2006 “Mobility, Indexicality, and the Enregisterment of ‘Pittsburghese’”, Journal of English Linguistics 34 (2): 77–104. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Johnstone, Barbara and Scott F. Kiesling
2008 “Indexicality and experience: Exploring the meanings of /aw/-monophthongization in Pittsburgh”, Journal of Sociolinguistics 12 (1): 5–33. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Labov, William
1972 Sociolinguistic patterns. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Leinonen, Therese
2010 An Acoustic Analysis of Vowel Pronunciation in Swedish Dialects. GRODIL 83. Groningen: Rijksuniversiteit Groningen.Google Scholar
Nilsson, Jenny
2009 “Dialect change?”. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 32: 207–220. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2015 “Stabilitet och förändring i norra Värmland – dialekten i Torsbyområdet 1940-tal och 2010-tal”. Folkmålsstudier 53: 167–198.Google Scholar
Norrby, Catrin, Camilla Wide, Jenny Nilsson, and Jan Lindström
2015 “Address and Interpersonal Relationships in Finland-Swedish and Sweden-Swedish Service Encounters”. In Address Practice as Social Action, ed. by Catrin Norrby and Camilla Wide, 75–96. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire; New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Pedersen, Inge Lise
2005 “Processes of standardization in Scandinavia”. In Dialect change. Convergence and Divergence in European Languages, ed. by Peter Auer, Frans Hinskens and Paul Kerswill, 171–195. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Røyneland, Unn
2005 Dialektnivellering, ungdom och identitet. Ein komparativ studie av sprakleg variasjon og endring i to tilgrensande dialektområden, Røros og Tynset. (Acta Humaniora 231.) Oslo: Det humanistiske fakultet, Universitetet i Oslo.Google Scholar
Sandøy, Helge
2004 “Types of society and language change in the Nordic countries.” In Language Variation in Europe. Papers from the Second International Conference on Language Variation in Europe, ICLaVE 2 Uppsala University, Sweden, June 12–14, 2003, ed. by Britt-Louise Gunnarsson et al., 53–76. Uppsala: Department of Scandinavian Languages, Uppsala University.Google Scholar
Silverstein, Michael
1998 “Contemporary Transformations of Local Linguistic Communities”, Annual Review of Anthropology 27 (1): 401–426. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2003 “Indexical Order and the Dialectics of Sociolinguistic Life.” Language and Communication 23: 193–229. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Svahn, Margareta and Jenny Nilsson
2014 Dialektutjämning i Västsverige Göteborg: Dialekt-, ortnamns- och folkminnesarkivet i Göteborg.Google Scholar
Thelander, Mats
1979 Språkliga variationsmodeller tillämpade på nutida Burträsktal. (Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis. Studia Philologiae Scandinavicae Upsaliensia 14:1 & 2.) Uppsala: Uppsala universitet.Google Scholar
Wenner, Lena
2010 När lögnare blir lugnare. En sociofonetisk studie av sammanfallet mellan kort ö och kort u i uppländskan. (Skrifter utg. av Institutionen för nordiska språk vid Uppsala universitet 80). Uppsala: Uppsala University.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 2 other publications

Jansson, Denny
2023. Dialektala möten i skolmiljö. Nordlyd 47:2 ► pp. 149 ff. DOI logo
Nilsson, Jenny, Lena Wenner, Therese Leinonen & Eva Thorselius
2021. New and old social meanings in urban and rural Sweden. In Urban Matters [Studies in Language Variation, 27], ► pp. 179 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 12 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.