Cover not available
Part of
Processes of Change: Studies in Late Modern and Present-Day English
Edited by Sandra Jansen and Lucia Siebers
[Studies in Language Variation 21] 2019
► pp. 227–246

Chapter 12
The goose vowel in South African English with special reference to Coloured communities in 5 cities

This paper adds to the South African and international literature on the fronting of /u:/ in present day English. It investigates the extent to which varieties of South African English spoken by “Coloured” people participate in GOOSE fronting, which has been noted as a notable characteristic of the variety spoken by “Whites” (Lass 1995). At the same time it investigates whether there are any regional and social differences within South Africa’s Coloured communities in the cities of Cape Town, Kimberley, Port Elizabeth, Johannesburg and Durban. An acoustic analysis of the norms of 10 speakers per city showed that structural environment was the best predictor of goose fronting, in line with international findings. There were no consistent patterns for the regional variable of “city” or the social variables of gender and class. Overall Coloured communities show relatively lower degrees of fronting compared to the White norms.

Keywords: goose-fronting, ethnic variation, regional variation, South Africa, acoustic analysis
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2. goose-fronting in post 1994 sociolinguistics
  • 3.Coloured identities
  • 4.Sample and methodology
  • 5.Findings
    • 5.1 goose means in relation to other monophthongs
    • 5.2 goose distribution by environment
    • 5.3Overall differences by city and sub-factors
  • 6.Discussion and conclusion
  • Acknowledgments
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 13 August 2019
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/silv.21.12mes
References
Adhikari, Mohamed
2009 Burdened by race: Coloured identities in Southern Africa. Cape Town: UCT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bekker, Ian
2009 The vowels of South African English. PhD thesis: North-West University.Google Scholar
Boberg, Charles
2011 Reshaping the vowel system: An index of phonetic innovation in Canadian English. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 17 (2) Article 4.Google Scholar
Boersma, Paul & David Weenink
2008 PRAAT: Doing phonetics by computer (Version 5.0.08) [Computer program]. Retrieved February 11, 2008, from [URL]
Bughwan, Devamonie
1979 Language practices. In Bridglal Pachai (ed.), South Africa’s Indians: The Evolution of a Minority, 464–518. Washington: United Press of America.Google Scholar
Chevalier, Alida
2016 Globalisation versus internal development: The reverse short front vowel shift in South African English. PhD thesis: University of Cape Town.Google Scholar
Dyers, Charlyn
2008 Truncated multilingualism or language shift? An examination of language use in intimate domains in a new non-racial working class township in South Africa. Journal of Multicultural and Multilingual Development 29 (2). 110–126. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Erasmus, Zimitri
2001 Coloured by history, shaped by place. Cape Town: Kwela.Google Scholar
Evanini, Keelan
2009 The permeability of dialect boundaries: A case study of the region surrounding Erie, Pennsylvania. PhD thesis: University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Fraser, Lynn Marie
2017 An acoustic analysis: Mapping regional and social variation of the bath vowel among ‘coloured’ speakers of South African English using the FAVE toolkit. MA thesis: University of Cape Town.Google Scholar
Finn, Peter
2004 Cape Flats English: Phonology. In Edgar Schneider, Kate Burridge, Bernd Kortmann, Rajend Mesthrie & Clive Upton (eds.), A handbook of varieties of English vol. 1: Phonology , 964–984. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Fridland, Valerie
2008 Patterns of /uw/, /ʊ/ and /ow/ fronting in Reno, Nevada. American Speech 83 (4). 432–454. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gordon, Elizabeth, Lyle Campbell, Jennifer Hay, Margaret Maclagan, Andrea Sudbury & Peter Trudgill
. 2004 New Zealand English: Its origins and evolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hickey, Raymond
2004 Irish English: phonology. In Edgar Schneider, Kate Burridge, Bernd Kortmann, Rajend Mesthrie & Clive Upton (eds.), A handbook of varieties of English vol. 1: Phonology , 68–97. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
(ed.) 2008 Legacies of colonial English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
ed. forthcoming English in multilingual South Africa Cambridge Cambridge University Press
Hopwood, David
1928 South African English pronunciation. Cape Town: Juta.Google Scholar
Hothorn, Torsten, Kurt Hornik & Achim Zeileis
2006 Unbiased recursive partitioning: A conditional inference framework.” Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics 15 (3). 651–674. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hundleby, Charles E.,
1964 Xhosa-English Pronunciation in the South-East CapeUnpublished PhD. Rhodes University.Google Scholar
Jansen, Sandra
2019 Change and stability in goose, goat and foot: Back vowel dynamics in Carlisle English. English Language and Linguistics 23(1): 1–29.Google Scholar
Johnson, Daniel
, Evra 2009 Getting off the GoldVarb standard: introducing R-brul for mixed effects variable rule analysis. Language and Linguistics Compass 3(1). 1–23. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kuznetsova, Alexandra, Per Bruun Brockhoff & Rune Haubo Christensen, R. B.
2014 lmer Test: Tests for random and fixed effects for linear mixed effect models (lmer objects of lme4 package). R package version 2.0-32. Available at: [URL]. [6 June 2016].
Labov, William
1972 Sociolinguistic patterns. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
1994  Principles of linguistic change. Volume 1: Internal factors . Malden, Massachusetts: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Labov, William, Sherry Ash & Charles Boberg
2006 A phonological atlas of North American English. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Labov, William, Rosenfelder, Ingrid & Josef Fruehwald
2013 One hundred years of sound change in Philadelphia: Linear incrementation, reversal and reanalysis. Language 89 (1). 30–65. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lanham, Leonard W.
1978 South African English. In Leonard W. Lanham, & Karel P. Prinsloo (eds.), Language communication studies in Southern Africa, 138–166. Cape Town: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lass, Roger
1995 South African English. In Rajend Mesthrie (ed.), Language and social history: Studies in South African sociolinguistics, 89-106. Cape Town: David Philip.Google Scholar
2004 South African English. In Raymond Hickey (ed.), Legacies of colonial English, 363-386. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lobanov, B.M.
1971 Classification of Russian vowels spoken by different listeners. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 49:606-8.Google Scholar
Mesthrie, Rajend
2009 Deracialising the goose vowel in South African English: accelerated linguistic change amongst young, middle-class, females in post-apartheid South Africa. In Thomas Hoffmann & Lucia Siebers (eds.), World Englishes-- problems, properties and prospects: Selected papers from the 13th IAWE conference, 3–18. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2010 Socio-phonetics and social change: Deracialisation of the goose vowel in South African English.” Journal of Sociolinguistics 14 (1). 3–33. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012 Ethnicity, substrate and place: The dynamics of coloured and Indian English in five South African cities in relation to the variable (t). Language Variation and Change 24 (3). 371–395. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2017 Class, gender and substrate erasure in sociolinguistic change: a sociophonetic study of schwa in deracialising South African English. Language 93 (2). 314–346. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mesthrie, Rajend, Alida Chevalier & Timothy Dunne
2015 A regional and social dialectology of the bath vowel in South African English. Language Variation and Change 27 (1). 1–30. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Reddy, Thiven
2001 The politics of naming: the constitution of coloured subjects in South Africa. In Zimitri Erasmus (ed.), Coloured by history, shaped by place: New perspectives on coloured identities in Cape Town, 64–78. Cape Town: Kwela Books.Google Scholar
Robinson, Anthony
1994 The British English example pronunciation dictionary. Cambridge: Cambridge University.Google Scholar
Stroud, Christopher & Sibonile Mpendukana
2009 Towards a material ethnography of linguistic landscape: Multilingualism, mobility and space in a South African township. Journal of Sociolinguistics 13 (3). 363–386. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Toefy, Tracey
2014 Sociophonetics and class differentiation: A study of working- and middle-class English in Cape Town’s coloured community. PhD thesis: University of Cape Town.Google Scholar
Trudgill, Peter
1983 Sociolinguistics: An introduction to language and society. 2nd edition. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Van Rooy, Bertus
2004 Black South African English. In Edgar Schneider, Kate Burridge, Bernd Kortmann, Rajend Mesthrie & Clive Upton (eds.), A handbook of varieties of English vol. 1: Phonology , 943–963. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Watt, Dominic & Anne Fabicius
2003 Evaluation of a technique for improving the mapping of multiple speakers' vowel spaces in the F1 ~ F2 plane. Leeds Working Papers in Linguistics and Phonetics 9. 159–173.Google Scholar
Wells, John C.
1982 Accents of English I – An introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Williams, Quentin
2012 The enregisterment of English in rap braggadocio: A study from English-Afrikaans bilingualism in Cape Town. English Today 28 (2). 54–59. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wills, Simone
2016 B.A. (Hons) thesisLinguistics section. University of Cape Town.
2017 The goose vowel: A sociophonetic tale of two cities. Unpublished Honours research paper: University of Cape Town.
Wood, Tahir
1987 Perceptions of, and attitudes towards, varieties of English in the Cape peninsula, with particular reference to the ‘coloured community’. M.A. thesis: Rhodes University.Google Scholar
Yuan, J. & Mark Liberman
2008 Speaker identification on the SCOTUS corpus. Proceedings of the Acoustics 2008. Reading, UK: Curran Associates, Inc: 5687–5690. Accessed at: [URL]. [06 June 2016].Google Scholar