Cover not available
Part of
Language Variation - European Perspectives VII: Selected papers from the Ninth International Conference on Language Variation in Europe (ICLaVE 9), Malaga, June 2017
Edited by Juan-Andrés Villena-Ponsoda, Francisco Díaz Montesinos, Antonio Manuel Ávila-Muñoz and Matilde Vida-Castro
[Studies in Language Variation 22] 2019
► pp. 27–52

Chapter 2
Of clocks, clouds and sound change

| Meertens Instituut and Radboud Universiteit Nijmegen

The study of sound change has evolved from a heuristic tool for 19th century comparative historical reconstruction into the backbone of the rigid approach to language change developed by the Neogrammarians. In the course of the 20th and early 21st century it has become the main meeting point for a range of subdisciplines of linguistics (historical linguistics, dialectology, sociolinguistics, phonology, phonetics and cognitivist approaches to phonetic variation). This contribution sketches some of the main aspects of the approaches to sound change taken in the various corners of the field. By way of a synthesis a theory will be outlined in which three approaches to sound change dovetail to account for the huge and seemingly chaotic body of insights into the phenomenon. Empirical studies of instances of both historical and ongoing sound change in specific varieties of Dutch will serve to illustrate parts of the theory.

Keywords: awareness, Exemplar Theory, generative phonology, hyperdialectism, indicator, marker, stereotype, lexically diffuse sound change, lexical frequency effects, life cycle of sound change, (mis–)perception, Neogrammarians, opacity, Optimality Theory, style, Usage based phonology, variation
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.The Neogrammarian legacy
  • 3.Formal theory: Generative phonology and Optimality Theory
    • 3.1The life cycle of sound change
    • 3.2Awareness
  • 4.Sociolinguistics
    • 4.1Exceptionlessness versus lexical diffuseness in the sociolinguistic study of sound change
  • 5.Cognitivist approaches
  • 6.Towards an integrated theory
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 12 December 2019
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/silv.22.02hin
References
Almeida, Manuel
2013 La frecuencia de las palabras en los proceses de variación y cambio. Revista de la Sociedad Española de Lingüística (RSEL) 43 (2). 37–62.Google Scholar
Andersen, Henning
1988 Center and periphery: Adoption, diffusion and spread. In J. Fysiak (ed.), Historical dialectology: Regional and social, 39–83. Berlin: de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Anttila, Arto
2006 Variation and opacity. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 24. 893–944. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bermúdez-Otero, Ricardo
2015 Amphichronic explanation and the life cycle of phonological processes. In P. Honeybone and J. Salmons (eds.), The Oxford handbook of historical phonology, 374–399. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bloomfield, Leonard
1933 Language. London: Unwin.Google Scholar
Browman, Catherine and Louis Goldstein
1992 Articulatory phonology: An overview. Phonetica 49. 155–180. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan
2001 Phonology and language use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2006 From usage to grammar: The mind’s response to repetition. Language 82 (4). 711–733. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2010 Language, use and cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012 Patterns of lexical diffusion and articulatory motivation for sound change. In M. J. Solé and D. Recasens (eds.), The initiation of sound change: Perception, production, and social factors, 211–234. Amsterdam-Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam and Morris Halle
1968 The sound pattern of English. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Coetzee, Andries
2008 Grammaticality and ungrammaticality in phonology. Language 84 (2). 218–257. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cohen Priva, Uriel
2017 Informativity and the actuation of lenition. Language 93 (3). 569–597. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dinkin, Aron
2008 The real effect of word frequency on phonetic variation. Penn Working Papers in Linguistics 14 (1). 97–106.Google Scholar
Dressler, Wolfgang
1975 Methodisches zu Allegro-Regeln. In W. Dressler et al.. (eds.), Phonologica 1972, 219–234. München: Fink.Google Scholar
Garrett, Andrew
2009 Patterns of sound change. Slides for a class in a course on Historical Linguistics in the 2009 Linguistic Institute of the Linguistic Society of America, held at the University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Goossens, Jan
1969 Strukturelle Sprachgeographie. Eine Einführung in Methodik und Ergebnisse. Heildelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
Guy, Gregory
1991 Explanation in variable phonology: An exponential model of morphological constraints. Language Variation and Change 3. 1–22. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haddican, Bill, Foulkes, Paul, Vincent Hughes and Hazel Richard
2013 Interaction of social and linguistic constraints on two vowel changes in northern England. Language Variation and Change 25 (3). 371–401. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hinskens, Frans
1992 Dialect levelling in Limburg. Structural and sociolinguistic aspects. PhD-thesis University of Nijmegen (revised and abridged version 1996, Niemeyer, Tübingen).Google Scholar
2004  Nieuwe regenboogkleuren. Jonge typen niet-standaardtaal en hun taalkundig belang . Inaugural address, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam. Retrieved from [URL].
2014 Despite or because of intensive contact? Internal, external and extralinguistic aspects of divergence in modern dialects and ethnolects of Dutch. In K. Braunmüller, S. Höder, and K. Kühl (eds.), Stability and divergence in language contact: Factors and mechanisms, 109–140. Amsterdam-Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing.Google Scholar
2020 The expanding universe of the study of sound change. To appear in R. Janda, B. Joseph and B. Vance (eds.), The handbook of historical linguistics, 2nd ed. Hoboken-Oxford: Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar
Janda, Richard
2003 ‘Phonologization’ as the start of dephonetization – or, on sound change and its aftermath: Of extension, generalization, lexicalization, and morphologization. In B. Joseph and R. Jansa (eds.), The handbook of historical linguistics, 410–422. Malden MA-Oxford: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Janda, Richard and Brian Joseph
2003 On language, change and language change – or, of history, linguistics, and historical linguistics. In B. Joseph and R. Janda (eds.), The handbook of historical linguistics, 3–180. Malden MA-Oxford: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Keith
1997 Speech perception without speaker normalization: An exemplar model. In K. Johnson, J. Mullennix (eds.), Talker variability in speech processing, 145–165. San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Johnstone, Barbara, Jennifer Andrus and Andrew Danielson
2006 Mobility, indexicality, and the enregisterment of “Pittsburghese”. Journal of English Linguistics 34 (2). 77–104. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Joseph, Brian
2012 Lexical diffusion and the regular transmission of language change in its sociohistorical context. In J. Hernández-Campoy and J. Conde-Silvestre (eds.), The handbook of historical sociolinguistics, 408–426. Malden USA: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kerswill, Paul
2011 Sociolinguistic approaches to language change: Phonology. In R. Wodak, B. Johnstone and P. Kerswill (eds.), The Sage handbook of sociolinguistics, 219–235. London: Sage. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul
1968 Linguistic universals and linguistic change. In E. Bach and R. T. Harms (eds.), Universals in linguistic theory, 171–210. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
1988 Phonological change. In F. Newmeyer (ed.), Linguistics: The Cambridge survey, vol. 1, Linguistic theory: Foundations, 363–413. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
1995 The phonological basis of sound change. In J. Goldsmith (ed.), The handbook of phonological theory, 640–670. Cambridge, Mass: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Kloeke, Gesinus
1927 De Hollandsche expansie in de zestiende en zeventiende eeuw en haar weerspiegeling in de hedendaagsche Nederlandsche dialecten. Den Haag: Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Kroch, Anthony
1989 Reflexes of grammar in patterns of language change. Language Variation and Change (1/3). 199–244. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Labov, William
1972 Sociolinguistic patterns. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
1981 Resolving the neogrammarian controversy. Language 57 (2). 267–308. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2001 Principles of linguistic change. Volume 2: Social factors. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
2006 A sociolinguistic perspective on sociophonetic research. Journal of Phonetics (34). 500–515. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2007 Transmission and diffusion. Language 83 (2). 344–387. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Luce, Paul and David Pisoni
1998 Recognizing spoken words. The neighborhood activation model. Ear and hearing 19. 1–36. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Moulton, William
1961 Lautwandel durch innere Kausalität: Die Ostschweizerische Vokalspaltung. Zeitschrift für Mundartforschung, 28. 227–251.Google Scholar
Ohala, John
2003 Phonetics and historical phonology. In B. Joseph and R. Janda (eds.), The handbook of historical linguistics, 669–686. Malden MA-Oxford: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Osthoff, Hermann and Karl Brugmann
1878 Morphologische Untersuchungen auf dem Gebiete der indogermanischen Sprachen. Leipzig: HirzelGoogle Scholar
Pappas, Panayiotis
2006 Stereotypes and /n/ variation in Patra, Greece. Results from a pilot study. In F. Hinskens (ed.), Language variation – European perspective, 153–167. Amsterdam-Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Penzl, Herbert
1939 Kompromissvokal‘ und Lautwandel. Anglia 63. 88–99.Google Scholar
Pierrehumbert, Janet
2002 Word-specific phonetics. In C. Gussenhoven and N. Warner (eds.), Laboratory phonology VII, 101–140. Berlin: de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Popper, Karl
1966 Of clocks and clouds. An approach to the problem of rationality and the freedom of man. St. Louis: Washington UniversityGoogle Scholar
Ramsammy, Michael
2015 The life cycle of phonological processes: Accounting for dialectal microtypologies. Language and Linguistics Compass (9/1). 33–54. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Regan, Brendan
2017 The effect of dialect contact and social identity on fricative demerger. PhD-thesis, University of Texas at Austin.Google Scholar
Robinson, Orrin and Frans van Coetsem
1973 Review article of R. King, 1969, Historical linguistics and generative grammar. Lingua 31. 331–369. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Scheuringer, Hermann
1992 Die grammatikalische Erklärung von Sprachvariation. Zeitschrift für Phonetik, Sprachwissenschaft und Kommunikations-forschung. (ZPSK), 45 (5). 481–494.Google Scholar
Scheutz, Hannes
2005 Aktuell stattfindender Lautwandel/Sound change in progress. In U. Ammon, N. Dittmar and K. J. Mattheier (eds.), An international handbook of the science of language and society. Sociolinguistics, 2nd ed., 1704–1717. Vol. 2. Berlin-NewYork: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Schleicher, August
1861 Compendium der vergleichenden grammatik der indogermanischen sprachen. Weimar: Böhlau.Google Scholar
Schmidt, Johannes
1872 Die Verwandtschaftsverhältnisse der indogermanischen Sprachen. Weimar: Böhlau.Google Scholar
Schuchardt, H.
1885 Über die Lautgesetze: Gegen die Junggrammatiker. In Leo Spitzer (ed.), Hugo Schuchardt-Brevier. Ein Vademekum der allgemeinen Sprachwissenschaft, 51–87. Niemeyer, Halle.Google Scholar
Schwarz, Christoph
2012 Rezenz als Faktor phonologischer Variation. Zeitschrift für Literaturwissenschaft und Linguistik (LiLi) 166. 29–44. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Seidelmann, Erich
1972 Lautwandel, Lautersatz und die Bedingungen des Sprachwandels. In A. Weiss (ed.), Dialekte im Wandel, 111–127. Göppingen: Göppinger Arbeiten zur Linguistik, 538.Google Scholar
Silverstein, Michael
2003 Indexical order and the dialectics of sociolinguistic life. Language and Communication 23. 193–229. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Swanenberg, Jos
2009 Van alterande sorte. Brabants tussen dialect en standaardtaal. Tilburg: Universiteit van Tilburg.Google Scholar
Trudgill, Peter
1988 On the role of dialect contact and interdialect in linguistic change. In J. Fisiak (ed.), Historical dialectology. Regional and social, 547–563. Berlin: de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Reenen, Pieter and Michael Elias
1998 Taalverschillen. Een werkboek over variatie en verandering in taal. Bussum: Coutinho.Google Scholar
Villena-Ponsoda, Juan-Andrés
2001 La continuidad del cambio lingüístico. Granada: Universidad.Google Scholar
Wang, William
1969 Competing changes as a cause of residue. Language 45. 9–25. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zampaolo, André
2016 Sibilant sound change in the history of Portuguese. An Information-theoretic approach. Diachronica 33 (4). 503–529. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zellou, Georgia and Meredith Tamminga
2014 Nasal coarticulation changes over time in Philadelphia English. Journal of Phonetics, 47. 18–35. DOI logoGoogle Scholar