References

References

Baron-Cohen, Simon, Sally Wheelwright, Richard Skinner, Joanne Martin & Emma Clubley
2001The Autism-Spectrum Quotient (AQ): Evidence from Asperger Syndrome/High-Functioning Autism, males, females, scientists and mathematicians. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 31. 5–17. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bates, Douglas, Martin Mächler, Ben Bolker & Steve Walker
2015Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software 67(1). 1–48. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Becker, Kara
2016Linking community coherence, individual coherence, and bricolage: The co-occurrence of (R), raised BOUGHT and raised BAD in New York City English. Lingua 172–173. 87–99. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brysbaert, Marc & Boris New
2009Moving beyond Kučera and Francis: A critical evaluation of current word frequency norms and the introduction of a new and improved word frequency measure for American English. Behavioral Research Methods 41(4). 977–90. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Denis, Derek
2011Innovators and innovation: Tracking the innovators of ‘and stuff’ in York English. Penn Working Papers in Linguistics: Selected Papers from NWAV 39 17(2).Google Scholar
Dodsworth, Robin
2014Network embeddedness and the retreat from Southern vowels in Raleigh. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 20(2). 41–50.Google Scholar
Dodsworth, Robin & Mary Kohn
2012Urban rejection of the vernacular: The SVS undone. Language Variation and Change 24. 221–45. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Drager, Katie & Jennifer Hay
2012Exploiting random intercepts: Two case studies in sociophonetics. Language Variation and Change 24. 59–78. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Feehand, Dennis M. & Matthew J. Salganik
Fruehwald, Josef
2013The phonological influence on phonetic change. University of Pennsylvania: Ph.D. thesis.Google Scholar
2019Is phonetic target uniformity phonologically, or sociolinguistically grounded? In Marija Tabain, Paul Warren, Sasha Calhoun & Paola Escudero (eds.), Proceedings of the 19th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Melbourne, Australia 2019, 681–85. Canberra, Australia: Australasian Speech Science Technology Association Inc.Google Scholar
Goldberg, Lewis R.
1992The development of markers for the Big-Five factor structure. Personality Assessment 4(1). 26–42.Google Scholar
Guy, Gregory R.
2013The cognitive coherence of sociolects: How do speakers handle multiple sociolinguistic variables? Journal of Pragmatics 52. 63–71. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Guy, Gregory R. & Frans Hinskens
2016Linguistic coherence: Systems, repertoires and speech communities. Lingua 172–173. 1–9. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Haeri, Niloofar
1991Sociolinguistic variation in Cairene Arabic: Palatalization and the ‘Qaf’ in the speech of men and women. University of Pennsylvania: Ph.D. thesis.Google Scholar
John, Oliver P. & Sanjay Srivastava
1999The Big-Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. In Lawrence A. Pervin & Oliver P. John (eds.), Theory and Research (Handbook of Personality 2), 102–38. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Kassambara, Alboukadel & Fabian Mundt
2017Factoextra: Extract and visualize the results of multivariate data analyses. https://​CRAN​.R​-project​.org​/package​=factoextra
Kingston, John, Stephanie Rich, Alice Shen & Shifra Sered
2015Is perception personal? In The Scottish Consortium for ICPhS 2015 (ed.), Proceedings of the 18th International Congress of the Phonetic Sciences, paper 887. Glasgow: The University of Glasgow.Google Scholar
Labov, William
2001Principles of Linguistic Change, Vol. 2. Social Factors. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Labov, William & Ingrid Rosenfelder
2011The Philadelphia Neighborhood Corpus of LING 560 Studies, 1972–2010.Google Scholar
Labov, William, Ingrid Rosenfelder & Josef Fruehwald
2013One hundred years of sound change in Philadelphia: Linear incrementation, reversal, and reanalysis. Language 89(1). 30–65. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lev-Ari, Shiri
2017Talking to fewer people leads to having more malleable linguistic representations. PLoS ONE 12(8). e01835593. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2018aSocial network size can influence linguistic malleability and the propagation of linguistic change. Cognition 176. 31–39. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2018bThe influence of social network size on speech perception. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 71(10). 2249–60. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2018cPeople with larger social networks are better at predicting what someone will say but not how they will say it. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience 34(1). 101–14. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Maclagan, Margaret A., Elizabeth Gordon & Gillian Lewis
1999Women and sound change: Conservative and innovative behavior by the same speakers. Language Variation and Change 11. 19–41. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
McCormick, Tyler H., Matthew J. Salganik & Tian Zheng
2010How many people do you know? Efficiently estimating personal network size. Journal of the American Statistical Association 105(489). 59–70. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Milroy, James
1993On the social origins of language change. In Charles Jones (ed.), Historical Linguistics: Problems and Perspectives. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Milroy, James & Lesley Milroy
1985Linguistic change, social network and speaker innovation. Journal of Linguistics 21. 339–84. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Milroy, Lesley
1980Language and social networks. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Milroy, Lesley & James Milroy
1992Social network and social class: Toward an integrated sociolinguistic model. Language in Society 21(1). 1–26. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nevalainen, Terttu, Helene Raumolin-Brunberg & Heikki Mannila
2011The diffusion of language change in real time: Progressive and conservative individuals and the time depth of change. Language Variation and Change 23. 1–43. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Oushiro, Livia
2016Social and structural constraints in lectal cohesion. Lingua 173–173. 116–30. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rosenfelder, Ingrid, Josef Fruehwald, Keelan Evanini & Jiahong Yuan
2011FAVE Program Suite [Forced Alignment and Vowel Extraction]. University of Pennsylvania. fave.ling.upenn.edu.Google Scholar
Sharma, Devyani
2017Scalar effects of social networks on language variation. Language Variation and Change 29. 393–418. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sneller, Betsy
2015A community divided: Co-occurrence in retreat from local features. Poster presented at UKLVC 10, University of York, Sept. 2.
Stewart, Mary E. & Mitsuhiko Ota
2008Lexical effects on speech perception in individuals with ‘autistic’ traits. Cognition 109. 157–62. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tamminga, Meredith
2019Interspeaker covariation in Philadelphia vowel changes. Language Variation and Change 31(2). 119–133. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Thorburn, Jennifer
2014Dialect development in Nain, Nunatsiavut: Emerging English in a Canadian Aboriginal community. St. John’s Memorial University of Newfoundland: Ph.D. thesis.Google Scholar
Wagner, Suzanne Evans & Ashley Hesson
2014Individual sensitivity to the frequency of socially meaningful linguistic cues affects language attitudes. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 33(6). 651–66. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Waters, Cathleen & Sali Tagliamonte
2017Is one innovation enough? Leaders, covariation, and language change. American Speech 92(1). 23–40. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Yu, Alan C. L.
2013Individual differences in socio-cognitive processing and the actuation of sound change. In Alan C. L. Yu (ed.), Origins of sound change: Approaches to phonologization, 201–27. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Yu, Alan C. L., Carissa Abrego-Collier & Morgan Sonderegger
2013Phonetic imitation from an individual-difference perspective: Subjective attitude, personality and ‘autistic’ traits. PLoS ONE 8(9). e74746. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Yu, Alan C. L., Julian Grove, Martina Martinovic & Morgan Sonderegger
2011Effects of working memory capacity and ‘autistic’ traits on phonotactic effects in speech perception. In Wai Sum Lee (ed.), Proceedings of the International Congress of the Phonetic Sciences XVII, Hong Kong: International Congress of the Phonetic Sciences, 2236–2239.Google Scholar