References

References

Aurrekoetxea, Gotzon, Ariane Ensunza Aldamizetxebarria, Hans Van de Velde & Jožica Škofic
(eds.) 2020DIACLEU: Dialect classification of languages in Europe [Website]. http://​diacleu​.eu/ (7 January 2021).
Boer, Meike M. de & Willemijn F. L. Heeren
2020Cross-linguistic filled pause realization: The acoustics of uh and um in native Dutch and non-native English. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 148(6). 3612–3622. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brand, Sophie & Mirjam Ernestus
2019Understanding reduced words: The relevance of reduction degree and frequency of occurrence. In Sasha Calhoun, Paola Escudero, Marija Tabain & Paul Warren (eds.), Proceedings of the 19th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Melbourne, Australia 2019, 91–101. Canberra: Australasian Speech Science and Technology Association Inc.Google Scholar
Coler, Matt & Andrew Nevins
forthcoming. Minoritized and diaspora languages of Europe and linguistic contact. Berlin: Language Science Press.
De Smet, Isabeau & Freek Van de Velde
2020A corpus-based quantitative analysis of twelve centuries of preterite and past participle morphology in Dutch. Language Variation and Change 32(2). 241–265. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Doreleijers, Kristel, Marjo van Koppen & Jos Swanenberg
2020De dynamiek van geslachtsmarkering in de Noord-Brabantse dialecten. Taal en Tongval 72(1). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Franco, Karlien, Dirk Geeraerts, Dirk Speelman & Roeland van Hout
2019Concept characteristics and variation in lexical diversity in two Dutch dialect areas. Cognitive Linguistics 30(1). 205–242. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Goldshtein, Yonatan & Rasmus Puggaard
2019Overblik over danske dialektoptagelser. Ord & Sag 39. 18–28.Google Scholar
Grondelaers, Stefan, Dirk Speelman, Chloé Lybaert & Paul van Gent
2020Getting a (big) data-based grip on ideological change: Evidence from Belgian Dutch. Journal of Linguistic Geography 8(1). 49–65. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Halteren, Hans van, Roeland van Hout & Romy Roumans
2018Tweet geography: Tweet based mapping of dialect features in Limburg. Computational Linguistics in the Netherlands Journal 8. 138–162. https://​www​.clinjournal​.org​/clinj​/article​/view​/84​/76
Hilte, Lisa, Reinhild Vandekerckhove & Walter Daelemans
2020Modeling adolescents’ online writing practices: The sociolectometry of non-standard writing on social media. Zeitschrift für Dialektologie und Linguistik 87(2). 173–201. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hout, Roeland van & Pieter C. Muysken
2016Taming chaos: Chance and variability in the language sciences. In Klaas Landsman & Ellen van Wolde (eds.), The challenge of chance: A multidisciplinary approach from science and the humanities, 249–266. Dordrecht: Springer Verlag. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jansen, Sandra & Natalie Braber
2020 foot-fronting and foot-strut splitting: Vowel variation in the East Midlands. English Language & Linguistics [Online First]. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kopf, Kristin
2021aGenitiv- und von-Attribute. In Marek Konopka, Angelika Wöllstein & Ekkehard Felder (eds.), Bausteine einer Korpusgrammatik des Deutschen, vol. 2(1). Heidelberg: Heidelberg University Publishing.Google Scholar
2021bStellung des adnominalen Genitivs. In Marek Konopka, Angelika Wöllstein & Ekkehard Felder (eds.), Bausteine einer Korpusgrammatik des Deutschen, vol. 2(1). Heidelberg: Heidelberg University Publishing.Google Scholar
Lundquist, Björn, Ida Larsson, Maud Westendorp, Eirik Tengesdal & Anders Nøklestad
2019Nordic word order database: Motivations, methods, material and infrastructure. Nordic Atlas of Language Structures (NALS) Journal 4(1). 1–33. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nodari, Rosalba & Chiara Meluzzi
2020aRhotic degemination in Rome Italian. Studi e Saggi Linguistici 58(2).Google Scholar
2020bSpie sociolinguistiche e percezione della provenienza geografica nell’italiano di Roma. Studi Italiani di Linguistica Teorica e Applicata 49.Google Scholar
Orozco, Rafael & Luz Marcela Hurtado
2021A variationist study of subject pronoun expression in Medellín, Colombia. Languages 6(1). 5. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pischlöger, Christian
forthcoming. Jangyš! Uspeh udmurtskogo jazyka v internete s ‘ošibkami’. In Eva Toulouze, Elena Popova & Nikolaj Anisimov eds. Sovremennaja udmurtskaja kultura Tallinn Tallinn University Press
Ruutma, Mirjam
2019Do contact languages influence the distribution of prepositions in Estonian dialects? Nordic Journal of Linguistics 42(3). 365–384. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schweden, Theresa
2019Möllers Karl, Schulten Mama und Schmidtenbuur: Soziopragmatik der Personenreferenz im Niederdeutschen synchron und diachron. Zeitschrift für Dialektologie und Linguistik 86(2). 134–154. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2020s Kaufmanns Ingrid und de Fischer Kurt. Struktur und Soziopragmatik onymischer Genitivphrasen und Komposita im Pfälzischen. In Luise Kempf, Damaris Nübling & Mirjam Schmuck (eds.), Linguistik der Eigennamen (Linguistik – Impulse & Tendenzen 8), 397–424. Berlin: De Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Strelluf, Christopher
2020 needs+past participle in regional Englishes on Twitter. World Englishes 39(1). 119–134. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sundgren, Eva
2019Individuell språklig variation och förändring: Sex informanter inspelade 1967, 1996 och 2018. Svenska landsmål och svenskt folkliv 142. 141–169.Google Scholar
Szmrecsanyi, Benedikt, Jason Grafmiller & Laura Rosseel
2019Variation-based distance and similarity modelling: A case study in World Englishes. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence 2. 23. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Van de Velde, Hans, Evie Tops & Roeland van Hout
2013The spreading of uvular [R] in Flanders. In L. Spreafico & A. Vietti (eds.), Rhotics: New data and perspectives, 225–248. Bolzano: Bolzano University Press.Google Scholar
Voeten, Cesko C.
2020Individual differences in the adoption of sound change. Language and Speech [Online First]. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
von Essen, María Clara
2020On the different ways of being a bidialectal immigrant: The case of Argentineans in Spain. Lengua y Migración/Language and Migration 12(2). 7–43.Google Scholar
Wittenberg, Eva & Andreas Trotzke
forthcoming. A psycholinguistic investigation into diminutive strategies in the East Franconian Noun Phrase: Little schnitzels stay big, but little crooks become nicer. Journal of Germanic Linguistics.
Young, Nathan J.
forthcoming. The sociolectal and stylistic variability of rhythm in Stockholm. Language and Speech.
Zenner, Eline, Laura Rosseel & Dirk Speelman
2020Starman or Sterrenman: An acquisitional perspective on the social meaning of English in Flanders. International Journal of Bilingualism [Online First]. CrossrefGoogle Scholar