Cover not available
Part of
Sociolinguistic Variation and Language Acquisition across the Lifespan
Edited by Anna Ghimenton, Aurélie Nardy and Jean-Pierre Chevrot
[Studies in Language Variation 26] 2021
► pp. 251–276

Chapter 11
The standard-dialect repertoire of second language users in German-speaking Switzerland

ORCID logo | University of Salzburg
The coexistence of dialect and standard language is a pronounced characteristic of everyday life in the Swiss German context. This paper examines the linguistic repertoire of second language users in the Swiss context and how they deal with dialect-standard variation in a structured interview situation with a dialect speaker and a standard language speaker. The data from eight second language users, with English or Turkish as their first language, illustrate different patterns in the use of dialect, standard, and a mixture of both codes. Among the eight selected speakers, high ability to discriminate dialect from standard language can be observed, and only some L2 users show frequent mixing of dialect and standard, which violates the strict separation of the two codes according to L1 speaker norms. Furthermore, the L2 speakers only rarely change their usage of the codes according to their interlocutor. The results reveal that integrating dialect and standard language in the L2 repertoire is challenging. L2 users – depending on their constructed identity within the Swiss German community and influenced by their L1 social categorization of codes – compose their linguistic repertoire with more or less openness to dialect, standard, or integrated use of both codes.
Keywords: standard-dialect variation, linguistic repertoire, German, Switzerland, second language acquisition, code-mixing
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Constructing a dialect-standard L2 repertoire in an Alemannic context
    • 2.1The relevance of learning sociolinguistic variation in an L2
    • 2.2Distinguishing dialect and standard language
    • 2.3The ability to align to native speakers and variation in the input
  • 3.Methods
    • 3.1Participants
    • 3.2Data
    • 3.3Analysis
      • Transcription
      • Segmentation
      • Annotation
  • 4.Results
    • 4.1Patterns of dialect and standard use in elicited free speech
    • 4.2Nature of the code-mixing
  • 5.Discussion and conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 16 August 2021
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/silv.26.11end
References
Ammon, Ulrich
2003 “Dialektschwund, Dialekt-Standard-Kontinuum, Diglossie: Drei Typen des Verhältnisses Dialekt – Standardvarietät im deutschen Sprachgebiet.” In »Standardfragen«. Soziolinguistische Perspektiven auf Sprachgeschichte, Sprachkontakt und Sprachvariation, ed. by Jannis K. Androutsopoulos, and Evelyn Ziegler, 163–171. Frankfurt a.M. et al.: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Atkinson, Dwight
2002 “Toward a sociocognitive approach to second language acquisition.” The Modern Language Journal 86(4): 525–545. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2010 “Extended, embodied cognition and second language acquisition.” Applied Linguistics 31(5): 599–622. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bailey, Robert, and Vera Regan
2004 “Introduction: The acquisition of sociolinguistic competence.” Journal of Sociolinguistics 8(3): 323–338. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baßler, Harald, and Helmut Spiekermann
2001 “Dialekt und Standardsprache im DaF-Unterricht. Wie Schüler urteilen – wie Lehrer urteilen. ” Linguistik Online 9(2). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bayyurt, Yasemin
2010 “A sociolinguistic profile of Turkey, Northern Cyprus and other Turkic states in Central Asia.” In The Routledge Handbook of Sociolinguistics Around the World, ed. by Martin J. Ball, 117–126. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Beckner, Clay, Nick C. Ellis, Richard Blythe, John Holland, Joan Bybee, Jinyun Ke, Morten H. Christiansen, Diane Larsen-Freeman, William Croft, and Tom Schoenemann
2009 “Language is a complex adaptive system: Position paper.” Language Learning 59: Suppl. 1: 1–26. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Berthele, Raphael
2004 “Vor lauter Linguisten die Sprache nicht mehr sehen – Diglossie und Ideologie in der deutschsprachigen Schweiz.” In Dialekt, Regiolekt und Standardsprache im sozialen und zeitlichen Raum, ed. by Helen Christen, 111–136. Vienna: Edition Praesens.Google Scholar
Busch, Brigitta
2012 “The linguistic repertoire revisited.” Applied Linguistics 33(5): 503–523. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Campbell-Kibler, Kathryn
2010 “New directions in sociolinguistic cognition.“ University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 15(2): 30–39.Google Scholar
Christen, Helen, Elvira Glaser, and Matthias Friedli
2012 Kleiner Sprachatlas der deutschen Schweiz. Frauenfeld et al.: Huber.Google Scholar
Christen, Helen, Manuela Guntern, Ingrid Hove, and Marina Petkova
2010 Hochdeutsch in aller Munde. Eine empirische Untersuchung zur gesprochenen Standardsprache in der Deutschschweiz [Zeitschrift für Dialektologie und Linguistik; Beihefte; 140]. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag.Google Scholar
Christen, Helen
2000 Standardsprachliche Varianten als stilistische Dialektvarianten? In Vom Umgang mit sprachlicher Variation. Soziolinguistik, Dialektologie, Methoden und Wissenschaftsgeschichte, ed. by Annelies Häcki Buhofer, 245–260. Tübingen/Basel: Francke.Google Scholar
Culhane, Stephen F.
2004 “An intercultural interaction model: Acculturation attitudes in second language acquisition.” Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching 1: 50–61.Google Scholar
Dieth, Eugen
1986 Schwyzertüütschi Dialäktschrift. Dieth-Schreibung. 2nd edition edited by Christian Schmid-Cadalbert. Aarau: Sauerländer.Google Scholar
De Vogelaer, Gunther, Jean-Pierre Chevrot, Matthias Katerbow, and Aurélie Nardy
2017 “Bridging the gap between language acquisition and sociolinguistics: Introduction to an interdisciplinary topic.” In Acquiring Sociolinguistic Variation, ed. by Gunther De Vogelaer and Matthias Katerbow, 1–41. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dewaele, Jean-Marc, and Raymond Mougeon
(eds.) 2004 “Patterns of variation in the interlanguage of advanced second language learners.” International Review of Applied Linguistics 42(4).Google Scholar
Doğançay-Aktuna, Seran
2004 “Language planning in Turkey: yesterday and today”. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 165: 5–32. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Drummond, Rob
2010 “Sociolinguistic variation in a second language: the influence of local accent on the pronunciation of non-native English speakers living in Manchester.” Doctoral Dissertation, School of Languages, Linguistics and Cultures, University of Manchester.Google Scholar
Durham, Mercedes
2014 The acquisition of sociolinguistic competence in a lingua franca context. Bristol et al.: Multilingual Matters. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Durrell, Martin
1995 Sprachliche Variation als Kommunikationsbarriere. In Deutsch als Fremdsprache: an den Quellen eines Faches. Festschrift für Gerhard Helbig zum 65. Geburtstag, ed. by Heidrun Popp, 417–428. München: iudicium.Google Scholar
1999 Standardsprache in England und Deutschland. Zeitschrift für germanistische Linguistik 27, 285–308. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ender, Andrea, and Irmtraud Kaiser
2009 “Zum Stellenwert von Dialekt und Standard im österreichischen und Schweizer Alltag – Ergebnisse einer Umfrage.” Zeitschrift für germanistische Linguistik 39(2): 266–295. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ender, Andrea
2017 “What is the target variety? The diverse effects of standard-dialect variation in second language acquisition.” In Acquiring Sociolinguistic Variation, ed. by Gunther De Vogelaer, and Matthias Katerbow, 155–184. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ferguson, Charles A.
1959 “Diglossia.” Word 15, 325–340. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Foster, Pauline, Alan Tonkyn and Gillian Wigglesworth
2000 “Measuring spoken language: a unit for all reasons.” Applied Linguistics 21(3): 354–375. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gardner, Robert C.
1985 Social psychology and second language learning: The role of attitude and motivation. London: Edward Arnold Publishing.Google Scholar
Gumperz, John J.
1964 “Linguistic and social interaction in two communities.” American Anthropologist 66(6/2): 137–153. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hove, Ingrid
2008 “Zur Unterscheidung des Schweizerdeutschen und der (schweizerischen) Standardsprache.” In Sprechen, Schreiben, Hören: Zur Produktion und Perzeption von Dialekt und Standardsprache zu Beginn des 21. Jahrhunderts, ed. by Helen Christen and Evelyn Ziegler, 63–82. Vienna: Praesens.Google Scholar
Howard, Martin, Raymond Mougeon, and Jean-Marc Dewaele
2013 “Sociolinguistics and second language acquisition.” In The Oxford handbook of sociolinguistics, ed. by Robert Bayley, Richard Cameron and Ceil Lucas, 340–359. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hudson Kam, Carla L.
2015 “The impact of conditioning variables on the acquisition of variation in adult and child learners.“ Language 91(4): 906–937. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hudson Kam, Carla L., and Elissa L. Newport
2005 “Regularizing unpredictable variation: The roles of adult and child learners in language variation and change.” Language Learning and Development 1: 151–195. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Li, Xiaoshi
2010 “Sociolinguistic Variation in the Speech of Learners of Chineses as a second Language.” Language Learning 60(2): 366–408. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Milroy, James, and Lesley Milroy
2012 Authority in language: investigating standard English. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Muysken, Peter
2000 Bilingual speech. A typology of code-mixing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Petkova, Marina
2012 “Die Deutschschweizer Diglossie: eine Kategorie mit fuzzy boundaries.” Zeitschrift für Literaturwissenschaft und Linguistik 168: 126–154. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2016 Multiples Code-switching: ein Sprachkontaktphänomen am Beispiel der Deutschschweiz: die Fernsehberichterstattung zur “Euro 08” und andere Vorkommenskontexte aus interaktionsanalytischer Perspektive. Heidelberg: Universitätsverlag Winter.Google Scholar
Rash, Felicity J.
1998 The German language in Switzerland: Multilingualism, diglossia and variation. Bern: Lang.Google Scholar
Rehner, Katherine
2002 The development of aspects of linguistic and discourse competence by advanced second language learners of French. Ph.D. Thesis. Toronto: Ontario Institute for Studies in Education/University of Toronto.Google Scholar
Romaine, Suzanne
2004 “Variation.” In The handbook of second language acquisition, ed. by Catherine Doughty, and Michael H. Long, 409–435. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Schleef, Erik
2017 “Developmental sociolinguistics and the acquisition of T-glottalling by immigrant teenagers in London.” In Acquiring Sociolinguistic Variation, ed. by Gunther De Vogelaer and Matthias Katerbow, 305–341. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Seidlhofer, Barbara
2011 Understanding English as a Lingua Franca. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Selting, Margret, Peter Auer, Dagmar Barth-Weingarten et al.
2009 “Gesprächsanalytisches Transkriptionssystem 2 (GAT 2).” Gesprächsforschung – Online-Zeitschrift zur verbalen Interaktion 10: 353–402, [URL]
Tarone, Elaine
2007 “Sociolinguistic approaches to second language acquisition research – 1997–2007.” The Modern Language Journal 91: 837–848. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Werlen, Iwar
1998 “Mediale Diglossie oder asymmetrische Zweisprachigkeit? Mundart und Hochsprache in der deutschen Schweiz.” Babylonia 1: 22–35.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 2 other publications

Della Putta, Paolo
2022. Neapolitan, Regional and Standard Italian in the Linguistic Repertoire of Ukrainian Private Carers in Naples: Sociolinguistic Competence and Attitudes Towards a Complex Linguistic Context. In Italo-Romance Dialects in the Linguistic Repertoires of Immigrants in Italy [Palgrave Studies in Minority Languages and Communities, ], ► pp. 47 ff. DOI logo
Wirtz, Mason A & Simone E Pfenninger
2023. Capturing Thresholds and Continuities: Individual Differences as Predictors of L2 Sociolinguistic Repertoires in Adult Migrant Learners in Austria. Applied Linguistics DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 31 october 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.