Chapter published in:
Urban Matters: Current approaches in variationist sociolinguistics
Edited by Arne Ziegler, Stefanie Edler and Georg Oberdorfer
[Studies in Language Variation 27] 2021
► pp. 253–278

Testing models of diffusion of morphosyntactic innovations in Twitter data

| University of Cambridge
| University of Cambridge
| University of Oxford
| University of Bern
Established models of the spatial diffusion of linguistic innovations vary in their relationship to population density. Differences in prediction between the gravity models (Trudgill 1974), in which probability of diffusion is sensitive to settlement size, and the traditional wave models can be challenging to test due to the difficulty of large-scale and finely-grained geographical sampling. This paper tests the suitability of data derived from Twitter in establishing diffusion patterns. Using two case studies from British English – variation in the realisation of ditransitives, and preposition drop with go – we propose that the correlation between (local) population density and linguistic similarity to geographical neighbours can be used as a measure of hierarchical patterning for an individual innovation.
Keywords: dialectology, syntactic variation, computational sociolinguistics, British English, dative alternation
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Methodology and corpus construction
    • 2.1Corpus structure
      • 2.1.1Localisation
  • 3.Mapping the distribution of morphosyntactic variants
    • 3.1Dative alternation revisited
    • 3.2Preposition drop
  • 4.Approaches to the quantification of diffusion
    • 4.1Measurement
      • 4.1.1Simulated data
    • 4.2Evaluating real data
  • 5.Conclusions
  • Notes
  • References
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives (CC BY-NC-ND) 4.0 license.

For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at rights@benjamins.nl.

Published online: 16 December 2021
https://doi.org/10.1075/silv.27.11bla
References
Bailey, Guy et al.
1993 Some patterns of linguistic diffusion. Language Variation and Change 5(3). 359–390. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bailey, Laura R.
2018 Some characteristics of Southeast English preposition dropping. Iberia: An International Journal of Theoretical Linguistics 10. 48–70.Google Scholar
Bamman, David, Jacob Eisenstein and Tyler Schnoebelen
2014 Gender identity and lexical variation in social media. Journal of Sociolinguistics 18(2). 135–160. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Biggs, Alison
2014 Passive variation in the dialects of Northwest British English. Paper presented at the 3rd Conference of the International Society for the Linguistics of English (ISLE), University of Zürich, 24–27 August. https://​www​.isle​-linguistics​.org​/assets​/content​/documents​/hogg​/Biggs​--passive​_variation​--2014​.pdf (4 February 2020)
2015 A new case for A-movement in Northwest British English. In Ulrike Steindl et al. (eds.), Proceedings of the 32nd West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics (WCCFL 32), 218–227. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
2016 Locating variation in the dative alternation. Linguistic Variation 16(2). 151–182. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bloomfield, Leonard
1933 Language. New York, NY: Holt & Company.Google Scholar
Bresnan, Joan W. and Marilyn Ford
2010 Predicting syntax. Processing dative constructions in American and Australian varieties of English. Language 86(1). 168–213. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Burridge, James
2018 Unifying models of dialect spread and extinction using surface tension dynamics. Royal Society Open Science 5(1). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Doyle, Gabriel
2014 Mapping dialectal variation by querying social media. In Shuly Wintner, Sharon Goldwater and Stefan Riezler (eds.), Proceedings of the 14th conference of the European chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 98–106. Gothenburg: Association for Computational Linguistics. https://​www​.aclweb​.org​/anthology​/E14​-1011​.pdf. Crossref
Eisenstein, Jacob et al.
2014 Diffusion of lexical change in social media. PLoS ONE 9(11). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Eisenstein, Jacob
2018 Identifying regional dialects in on-line social media. In Charles Boberg, John Nerbonne and Dominic Watt (eds.), The handbook of dialectology, 368–383. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley–Blackwell.Google Scholar
Gast, Volker
2007 I gave it him – on the motivation of the ‘alternative double object construction’ in varieties of British English. Functions of Language 14(1). 31–56. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gerwin, Johanna
2013 Give it me!: Pronominal ditransitives in English dialects. English Language and Linguistics 17(3). 445–463. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gonçalves, Bruno and David Sánchez
2014 Crowdsourcing dialect characterization through Twitter. PLoS ONE 9(11). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Grieve, Jack et al.
2019 Mapping lexical dialect variation in British English using Twitter. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence 2. Article 11. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Grieve, Jack, Andrea Nini and Diansheng Guo
2017 Analyzing lexical emergence in Modern American English online. English Language and Linguistics 21(1). 99–127. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Haddican, William
2010 Theme-goal ditransitives and theme passivisation in British English dialects. Lingua 120(10). 2424–2443. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Haddican, William and Daniel E. Johnson
2012 Effects on the particle verb alternation across English dialects. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 18(2). 31–40.Google Scholar
Hägerstrand, Torsten
1952 The propagation of innovation in waves (Lund Studies in Geography, Ser. B, Human Geography, 4). Lund: Royal University of Lund, Department of Geography.Google Scholar
Haggett, Peter
1965 Locational analysis in human geography. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Hall, David
2019 P D drop and pseuo-incorporation in London English. In Maggie Baird and Jonathan Pesetsky (eds.), NELS 49: Proceedings of the Forty-Ninth Annual Meeting of the North East Linguistic Society: Volume 2, 85–89. Amherst, MA: GLSA.Google Scholar
Hecht, Brent and Monica Stephens
2014 A tale of cities: Urban biases in volunteered geographic information. In Eytan Adar and Paul Resnick (eds.), Proceedings of the Eighth International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, 197–205. Palo Alto, CA: Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence.Google Scholar
Huang, Yuan et al.
2016 Understanding U.S. regional linguistic variation with Twitter data analysis. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 59. 244–255. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jones, Taylor
2015 Toward a description of African American Vernacular English dialect regions using “Black Twitter”. American Speech 90(4). 403–440. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Labov, William
2001 Principles of linguistic change, vol. 2: Social factors (Language in Society 29). Malden, MA: Wiley–Blackwell.Google Scholar
Malik, Momin et al.
2015 Population bias in geotagged tweets. In Derek Ruths and Jürgen Pfeffer (eds.), Standards and Practices in Large-Scale Social Media Research: Papers from the 2015 ICWSM Workshop. https://​www​.aaai​.org​/ocs​/index​.php​/ICWSM​/ICWSM15​/paper​/view​/10662 (10 January 2020.)
Myler, Neil
2013 On coming the pub in the North West of England: Accusative unaccusatives, dependent case, and preposition incorporation. Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 16(2/3). 189–207. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nguyen, Dong et al.
2014 Why gender and age prediction from tweets is hard. Lessons from a crowdsourcing experiment. In Junichi Tsujii and Jan Hajić (eds.), Proceedings of COLING 2014, the 25th international conference on computational linguistics: Technical papers, 1950–1961. Dublin: Dublin City University and Association for Computational Linguistics.Google Scholar
Office For National Statistics, Geography Division
2016 Index of place names in Great Britain (July 2016). https://​www​.ons​.gov​.uk​/methodology​/geography​/geographicalproducts​/otherproducts​/indexofplacenamesipn
Olsson, Gunnar
1965 Distance and human interaction. A review and bibliography (Bibliography Series 2). Philadelphia, PA: Regional Science Research Institute.Google Scholar
Ordnance Survey Ireland
2016 Townlands – OSi national placenames gazetteer. https://​data​-osi​.opendata​.arcgis​.com​/datasets​/townlands​-osi​-national​-placenames​-gazetteer (10 January 2020)
Orton, Harold
1962 Survey of English Dialects (A): Introduction. Leeds: Arnold.Google Scholar
Orton, Harold, Stewart Sanderson and John D. A. Widdowson
1978 The linguistic atlas of England. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Pavalanathan, Umashanthi and Jacob Eisenstein
2015 Confounds and consequences in geotagged Twitter data. In Lluís Màrquez, Chris Callison-Burch, Jian Su (eds.), Proceedings of the 2015 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, 2138–2148. Stroudsburg, PA: Association for Computational Linguistics. Crossref. https://​www​.aclweb​.org​/anthology​/D15​-1256
Reis, Stefan. et al.
2017 UK gridded population 2011 based on Census 2011 and Land Cover Map 2015. NERC Environmental Information Data Centre. (Dataset). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Russ, Brice
2012 Examining large-scale regional variation through online geotagged corpora. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Dialect Society, Portland. http://​www​.briceruss​.com​/ADStalk​.pdf
Schmidt, Johannes
1872 Die verwantschaftsverhältnisse der indoger manischen sprachen. Weimar: Böhlau.Google Scholar
Shoemark, Philippa et al.
2017 Aye or naw, whit dae ye hink? Scottish independence and linguistic identity on social media. In Mirella Lapata, Phil Blunsom and Alexander Koller (eds.), Proceedings of the 15th conference of the European chapter of the association for computational linguistics, vol. 1, long papers. Stroudsburg, PA: Association for Computational Linguistics. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Siewierska, Anna and Willem B. Hollmann
2007 Ditransitive clauses in English with special reference to Lancashire dialect. In Mike Hannay and Gerard J. Steen (eds.), Structural-functional studies in English grammar. In honour of Lachlan Mackenzie, vol. 83: Studies in Language Companion Series, 83–102. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stevenson, Jonathan
2016 Dialect in digitally mediated written interaction: A survey of the geohistorical distribution of the ditransitive in British English using Twitter. Master’s Thesis. York: University of York.Google Scholar
Strelluf, Christopher
2019 Anymore, it’s on Twitter. Positive anymore, American regional dialects, and polarity licensing in tweets. American Speech 94(3). 313–351. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Szmrecsanyi, Benedikt
2013 Grammatical variation in British English dialects. A study in corpus-based dialectometry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Trudgill, Peter
1974 Linguistic change and diffusion: Description and explanation in sociolinguistic dialect geography. Language in Society 3(2). 215–246. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Upton, Clive and John D. A. Widdowson
1996 An atlas of English dialects: Region and dialect. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wikle, Thomas and Guy Bailey
1997 The spatial diffusion of linguistic features in Oklahoma. Proceedings of the Oklahoma Academy of Science 77. 1–15.Google Scholar
Willis, David
2020 Using social-media data to investigate morphosyntactic variation and dialect syntax in a lesser-used language: Two case studies from Welsh. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics 5(1). 103. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wolk, Christoph et al.
2013 Dative and genitive variability in Late Modern English. Exploring cross-constructional variation and change. Diachronica 30(3). 382–419. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Yáñez-Bouza, Nuria and David Denison
2015 Which comes first in the double object construction? English Language and Linguistics 19(2). 247–268. CrossrefGoogle Scholar