Chapter 7
Using narrative thinking in argumentative writing
Narrative skills emerge in early childhood and are enhanced by exposure to oral traditions, bookreading, and caregiver questioning. Less is known about how argumentation skills develop, a question of increasing importance given that current standards specify that students should produce written claims with supportive evidence by the middle grades. In this chapter, we posit that narrative skills may be a transferable resource that facilitates students’ emerging argumentation, as both are extended discourse forms that depend on a sophisticated understanding of the social world. Two embedded studies draw on argumentative essays written by 4th–7th grade students during the implementation of an innovative, discussion-based curriculum to explore the question of how students use narrative thinking in their argumentative writing. In Study 1 we identified three emerging patterns in student writing: using narrative thinking in warrants, rebuttals, and qualifications. In Study 2 we found that in a random sample of essays, 7th graders were significantly more likely than 4th graders to exhibit narrative thinking in their argumentative essays. Our findings suggest that narrative, sometimes thought to be an early-developing genre of little importance beyond the early grades, may in fact play an integral role in students’ acquisition of sophisticated argumentation skills.
Article outline
- Introduction
- Setting for the studies
- Study 1
- Evidence of narrative thinking in warrants
- Evidence of narrative thinking in rebuttals
- Evidence of narrative thinking in qualifications
- Study 2
- Methods
- Sample selection
- Participants
- Defining narrative thinking
- Inter-rater reliability
- Results
- Overall trends
- Differences by grade
- Differences by topic
- Discussion
-
Acknowledgments
-
Note
-
References
References
Anderson, R. C., Chinn, C., Chang, J., Waggoner, M., & Yi, H.
(
1997)
On the logical integrity of children’s arguments.
Cognition and Instruction, 15(2), 135–167.
Aukrust, V. G., & Snow, C. E.
(
1998)
Narratives and explanations during mealtime conversations in Norway and the U.S.
Language in Society, 27(2), 221–246.
Berland, L. K., & Reiser, B. J.
(
2009)
Making sense of argumentation and explanation.
Science Education, 93(1), 26–55.
Berman, R. A., & Nir-Sagiv, B.
(
2004)
Linguistic indicators of inter-genre differentiation in later language development.
Journal of Child Language, 31(2), 339–380.
Berman, R. A., & Nir-Sagiv, B.
(
2007)
Comparing narrative and expository text construction across adolescence: A developmental paradox.
Discourse Processes, 43(2), 79–120.
Berman, R. A., & Slobin, D. I.
(
1994)
Relating events in narrative: A crosslinguistic developmental study. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Blum-Kulka, S.
(
1997)
Dinner talk: Cultural patterns of sociability and socialization in family discourse. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Bruner, J.
(
1991)
The narrative construction of reality.
Critical Inquiry, 18(1), 1–21.
Crammond, J. G.
(
1998)
The uses and complexity of argument structures in expert and student persuasive writing.
Written Communication, 15(2), 230–268.
Duhaylongsod, L., Snow, C. E., Selman, R. L., & Donovan, M. S.
(
2015)
Toward disciplinary literacy: Dilemmas and challenges in designing history curriculum to support middle school students.
Harvard Educational Review, 85(4), 587–608.
Duke, N. K.
(
2000)
3.6 minutes per day: The scarcity of informational texts in first grade.
Reading Research Quarterly, 35(2), 202–224.
Hudson, J. A., & Shapiro
(
1991)
From knowing to telling: The development of children’s scripts, stories, and personal narratives. In
A. McCabe, &
C. Peterson (Eds.),
Developing narrative structure (pp.89–135). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Jiménez-Aleixandre, M. P., Rodríguez, A. B., & Duschl, R. A.
(
2000)
“Doing the lesson” or “doing science”: Argument in high school genetics.
Science Education, 84(6), 757–792.
Killen, M., & Rutland, A.
(
2011)
Children and social exclusion: Morality, prejudice, and group identity. Chichester, West Sussex, UK, Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
Kuhn, D., & Crowell, A.
(
2011)
Dialogic argumentation as a vehicle for developing young adolescents’ thinking.
Psychological Science, 22(4), 545–552.
Kyratzis, A.
(
2004)
Talk and interaction among children and the co-construction of peer groups and peer culture.
Annual Review of Anthropology, 33, 625–649.
Lawrence, J. F., Capotosto, L., Branum-Martin, L., White, C., & Snow, C. E.
(
2012)
Language proficiency, home-language status, and English vocabulary development: A longitudinal follow-up of the Word Generation program.
Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 15(3), 437–451.
Lawrence, J. F., Crosson, A. C., Paré-Blagoev, E. J., & Snow, C. E.
(
2015)
Word Generation randomized trial: Discussion mediates the impact of program treatment on academic word learning.
American Educational Research Journal, 52(4), 750–786.
Longobardi, E., Spataro, P., Renna, M., & Rossi-Arnaud, C.
(
2014)
Comparing fictional, personal, and hypothetical narratives in primary school: Story grammar and mental state language.
European Journal of Psychology of Education, 29(2), 257–275.
MacArthur, C. A., Ferretti, R. P., & Okolo, C. M.
(
2002)
On defending controversial viewpoints: Debates of sixth graders about the desirability of early 20th-century American immigration.
Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 17(3), 160–172.
MacWhinney, B.
(
1991)
The CHILDES project: Tools for analyzing talk. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Matsuhashi, A., & Gordon, E.
(
1985)
Revision, addition, and the power of the unseen text. In
S. W. Freedman (Ed.),
The acquisition of written language: Response and revision (pp.226–249). Norwood, NJ: Ablex PubCorp.
McCabe, A.
(
1997)
Cultural background and storytelling: A review and implications for schooling.
The Elementary School Journal, 97(5), 453–473.
Mol, S. E., Bus, A. G., de Jong, M. T., & Smeets, D. J. H.
(
2008)
Added value of dialogic parent–child book readings: A meta-analysis.
Early Education and Development, 19(1), 7–26.
Mol, S. E., Bus, A. G., & de Jong, M. T.
(
2009)
Interactive book reading in early education: A tool to stimulate print knowledge as well as oral language.
Review of Educational Research, 79(2), 979–1007.
National Governors Association Center for Best Practices, C. of C. S. S. O
(
2010)
Common core state standards for English language arts & literacy in history/social studies, science, and technical subjects. Retrieved from
[URL]
Pappas, C. C.
(
1993)
Is narrative “primary”? Some insights from kindergarteners’ pretend readings of stories and information books.
Journal of Literacy Research, 25(1), 97–129.
Scinto, L. F. M.
(
1986)
Written language and psychological development. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
Snow, C. E., & Juel, C.
(
2005)
Teaching children to read: What do we know about how to do it? In
M. J. Snowling, &
C. Hulme (Eds.),
The science of reading: A handbook (pp.501–520). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
Snow, C. E., Lawrence, J. F., & White, C.
(
2009)
Generating knowledge of academic language among urban middle school students.
Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 2(4), 325–344.
Toulmin, S. E.
(
2003)
The uses of argument (Updated ed.). Cambridge, UK; New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Uccelli, P.
(
2009)
Emerging temporality: Past tense and temporal/aspectual markers in Spanish-speaking children’s intra-conversational narratives.
Journal of Child Language, 36(5), 929–966.
Werner, H.
(
1948)
Comparative psychology of mental development. New York, NY: International Universities Press.
Cited by
Cited by 1 other publications
Rapanta, Chrysi & Carlotta Pisano
2021.
Structuring International University Students’ Reflection and Meta-reflection Experiences Online. In
Technology and Innovation in Learning, Teaching and Education [
Communications in Computer and Information Science, 1384],
► pp. 141 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 20 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.