Cover not available
Introduction published In:
Usage-based and Typological Approaches to Linguistic Units
Edited by Tsuyoshi Ono, Ritva Laury and Ryoko Suzuki
[Studies in Language 43:2] 2019
► pp. 245–253
Introduction

On the notion of unit in the study of human languages

 | University of Alberta
ORCID logo | University of Helsinki
 | Keio University
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
    • 1.1The notion of unit in linguistics
    • 1.2Unit in individual languages
    • 1.3Cross-linguistic perspective and functional motivation
    • 1.4Units and criteria to identify them in interactional linguistics
  • 2.Short summary of papers
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References


This article is available free of charge.

Published online: 13 November 2019
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.00014.int
References (26)
References
Abraham, Werner & Leonid Kulikov (eds.). 1999. Tense-aspect, transitivity and causativity. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth & Margret Selting. 2018. Interactional linguistics: Studying language in social interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Croft, William. 2001. Radical construction grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Crystal, David. 2008. A dictionary of linguistics and phonetics. London: Wiley-Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dryer, Matthew. 1997. Are grammatical relations universal? In Joan Bybee, John Haiman & Sandra A. Thompson (eds.), Essays on language function and language type, 115–143. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2008. From subordinate clause to noun-phrase: yang constructions in colloquial Indonesian. In Ritva Laury (ed.), Crosslinguistic studies of clause combining: The multifunctionality of conjunctions, 1–33. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fillmore, Charles J. 1974. Pragmatics and the description of discourse. In Siegfried J. Schmidt (ed.), Pragmatics II, 83–104. Munich: Fink.Google Scholar
Ford, Cecilia E., Barbara A. Fox & Sandra A. Thompson. 2013. Units and/or action trajectories: The language of grammatical categories and the language or social action. In Beatrice Szczepek Reed & Geoffrey Raymond (eds.), Units of talk – Units of action, 13–56. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fox, B., Thompson, S., C. Ford & E. Couper-Kuhlen. 2013. Conversation analysis in linguistics. In Jack Sidnell & Tanya Stivers (eds.), Handbook of conversation analysis, 726–740. New York: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin. 2010. Comparative concepts and descriptive categories in cross-linguistic studies. Language 86(3). 663–687. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2018. How comparative concepts and descriptive linguistic categories are different. In Daniel van Olmen, Tanja Mortelmans & Frank Brisard (eds.), Aspects of Linguistic Variation., 83–114. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hutchby, Ian & Robing Wooffitt. 2008. Conversation analysis. 2nd edn. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Laury, Ritva & Tsuyoshi Ono. 2014. The limits of grammar: Clause combining in Finnish and Japanese conversation. Pragmatics 241. 561–592. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Linell, Per. 2005. The written language bias in linguistics: Its nature, origins and transformations. London and New York: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Miller, Jim. 1995. Does spoken language have sentences. In F. R. Palmer (ed.), Grammar and meaning: Essays in honour of Sir John Lyons, 116–135. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Miller, Jim & Regina Weinert. 1998. Spontaneous spoken language: Syntax and discourse. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Ono, Tsuyoshi & Kimberly Jones. 2008. Conversation and Grammar: Approaching So-called Conditionals in Japanese. In Junko Mori & Amy Ohta, eds., Japanese Applied Linguistics: Discourse and Social Perspectives. London: Continuum International. 21–51.Google Scholar
Ono, Tsuyoshi & Sandra A. Thompson. 1995. What can conversation tell us about syntax? In P. W. Davis (ed.), Alternative linguistics: Descriptive and theoretical modes, 405–434. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
. 2009. Fixedness in Japanese adjectives in conversation: Toward a new understanding of a lexical (‘part-of-speech’) category. In Roberta Corrigan, Edith Moravcsik, Hamid Ouali & Kathleen Wheatley (eds.), Formulaic language, 117–145. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sacks, Harvey, Emanuel A. Schegloff & Gail Jefferson. 1974. A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking in conversation. Language 50 (4). 696–735. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, E. A. 1996. Turn organization: One intersection of grammar and interaction. In E. Ochs, S. Thompson & E. Schegloff (eds.), Interaction and grammar, 52–133. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Szczepek-Reed, Beatrice & Geoff Raymond. 2013. Units of talk – Units of action. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tao, Hongyin. 2003. Units in Mandarin conversation. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Thompson, Sandra A. 2002. ‘Object complements’ and conversation: Towards a realistic account. Studies in Language 26 (1). 125–164. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thompson, Sandra A. & Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen. 2005. The clause as a locus of grammar and interaction. Discourse Studies 7 (4/5). 481–505. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Laury, Ritva & Tsuyoshi Ono
2020.  Introduction. In Fixed Expressions [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 315], ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 december 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.