Article published in:
Source-Goal (a)symmetries across languages
Edited by Anetta Kopecka and Marine Vuillermet
[Studies in Language 45:1] 2021
► pp. 172202
References

References

Bourdin, Philippe
1997On Goal-bias across languages: Modal, configurational and orientational parameters. Palek, Bohumil (ed.), Proceedings of LP ‘96: Typology: prototypes, item orderings and universals, proceedings of the conference held in Prague, August 20–22, 1996, 185–216. Prague: Charles University Press.Google Scholar
Bowerman, Melissa, Marianne Gullberg, Asifa Majid & Bhuvana Narasimhan
2004Put project: The cross-linguistic encoding of placement events. In Asifa Majid (ed.), Field Manual, 10–24. Nijmegen: Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics.Google Scholar
Cita-Triana, Nadia Caterine
2013La expresión de eventos de ubicación y remoción en la lengua yuhup. Bogotá: Universidad Nacional de Colombia Trabajo de grado.Google Scholar
Craig, Colette
1979Jacaltec: Field work in Guatemala. In Timothy Shopen (ed.), Languages and their speakers, 3–57. Cambridge: Winthrop Publishers.Google Scholar
Craig Grinevald, Colette
1993Jakaltek directionals: Their meaning and discourse function. Languages of the World 7(2). 23–36.Google Scholar
Creissels, Denis
2006Encoding the distinction between location, source and destination. A typological study. In Maya Hickmann & Stéphane Robert (eds.), Space in languages: Linguistic systems and cognitive categories, 20–28. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Epps, Patience
2008A grammar of Hup. Berlin: de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Epps, Patience & Katherine Bolaños
2017Reconsidering the “Makú” Language Family of Northwest Amazonia. International Journal of American Linguistics 83(3). 467–507. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fortis, Jean-Michel & Alice Vittrant
2011Vers une typologie des constructions de trajectoire. Faits de Langues. Les Cahiers 3. 71–98. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ikegami, Yoshihiko
1979‘Goal’ over ‘Source’: A case of dissymetry in linguistic orientation. Angol Filológiai Tanulmányok / Hungarian Studies in English 12. 139–157.Google Scholar
Ishibashi, Miyuki
2012The expression of ‘putting’ and ‘taking’ events in Japanese: The asymmetry of Source and Goal revisited. In Anetta Kopecka & Bhuvana Narasimhan (eds.), Events of putting and taking. A crosslinguistic perspective, 253–272. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ishibashi, Miyuki, Anetta Kopecka & Marine Vuillermet
2006Trajectoire. Matériel visuel pour élicitation des données linguistiques. Lyon: Laboratoire Dynamique du Langage (CNRS/Université de Lyon 2).Google Scholar
Kopecka, Anetta & Miyuki Ishibashi
2011L’(a-)symétrie dans l’expression de la Source et du but: perspective translinguistique. Faits de Langues. Les Cahiers 3. 131–149. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kopecka, Anetta, Bhuvana Narasimhan, Melissa Bowerman, Marianne Gullberg & Asifa Majid
2012Putting and taking events. A crosslinguistic perspective. In Anetta Kopecka & Bhuvana Narasimhan (eds.), Events of putting and taking. A crosslinguistic perspective, 1–18. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lakusta, Laura & Barbara Landau
2005Starting at the end: The importance of Goals in spatial language. Cognition 96. 1–33. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Landaburu, Jon
2000Clasificación de las lenguas indígenas de Colombia. In María Stella González de Pérez & María Luisa Rodríguez de Montes (eds.), Lenguas Indígenas de Colombia. Una visión descriptiva, 25–48. Bogotá: Instituto Caro y Cuervo.Google Scholar
Mahecha, Dany, Carlos Franky & Gabriel Cabrera
2000Nukak, Kakua, Yuhup y Hupdu (Makú). Cazadores nómadas de la Amazonía colombiana. In François Correa (ed.), Geografía humana de Colombia. Amazonía Amerindia. Territorio de diversidad cultural, vol. 2, 129–211. Bogota: Instituto Colombiano de Antropología e Historia.Google Scholar
Martins, Silvana Andrade
2004Fonologia e gramática Dâw. Amsterdam: LOT.Google Scholar
Martins, Silvana & Valteir Martins
1999Makú. In Robert M. W. Dixon, & Alexandra Aikhenvald (eds.), The Amazonian languages, 251–267. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ospina-Bozzi, Ana María
2002Les structures élémentaires du yuhup makú, langue de l’Amazonie colombienne : morphologie et syntaxe. Paris: Université de Paris.Google Scholar
2004–2005Clasificación nominal en yuhup. Amerindia 29/30. 179–194.Google Scholar
2007Predicates in Yuhup. In W. L. Wetzels (ed.), Language endangerment and endangered languages: Linguistic and anthropological studies with special emphasis on the languages and cultures of the Andean-Amazonian border area, 191–207. Leiden: Publications of the Research School of Asian, African, and Amerindian Studies (CNWS), Leiden University.Google Scholar
2009Productivité et intégration des prédicats complexes en Yuhup, langue de l’Amazonie Colombienne. Faits de Langues. Les Cahiers 1. 161–179. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010Localización estática en yuhup. In Gabriel Cabrera (ed.), Viviendo en el bosque. Un siglo de investigaciones sobre los makú del Noroeste amazónico, 189–231. Medellin: Facultad de Ciencias Humanas y Económicas. Universidad Nacional de Colombia.Google Scholar
2011Le Yuhup. In Emilio Bonvini, Joëlle Busuttil & Alain Peyraube (eds.), Dictionnaire de langues, 1561–1569. Paris: PUF.Google Scholar
2013Localización estática y prefijos locativos en yuhup. In Ana María Ospina-Bozzi (ed.), Expresión de nociones espaciales en lenguas amazónicas, 143–166. Bogotá: Instituto Caro y Cuervo, Universidad Nacional de Colombia.Google Scholar
Ospina-Bozzi, Ana María & Elsa Gomez-Imbert
2013Predicados complejos en el Noroeste Amazónico: el caso del Yuhup, el Tatuyo y el Barasana. In Patience Epps & Kristine Stenzel (eds.), Upper Rio Negro. Cultural and linguistic interaction in Northwestern Amazonia, 309–351. Rio de Janeiro: Museu Nacional – Museu do Índio Funai.Google Scholar
Pantcheva, Marina
2010The Syntactic structure of locations, Goals, and Sources. Linguistics 48(5). 1043–1081. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Papahagi, Cristiana
2011Pour une typologie des systèmes d’adnominaux de la trajectoire. Faits de Langues. Les Cahiers 3. 117–130. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Silva, Cácio & Elisângela Silva
2012A língua dos Yuhupdeh. Introduçao etnolinguística, dicionário Yuhup-Poruguês e glossário semântico-gramatical. São Gabriel da Cachoeira: Prô-Amazônia, AECIPY.Google Scholar
Slobin, Dan I.
2004The many ways to search for a frog: Linguistic typology and the expression of motion events. In Sven Strömqvist & Ludo Verhoeven (eds.), Relating events in narratives: Typological and contextual perspectives, vol. 2, 219–257. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Stefanowitsch, Anatol & Ada Rohde
2004The goal bias in the encoding of motion events. In Günter Radden & Klaus-Uwe Panther (eds.), Studies in linguistic motivation, 249–267. Berlin/New York: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Talmy, Leonard
2003Toward a cognitive semantics. Vol II: Typology and process in concept structuring. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Ungerer, Friedrich & Hans-Jorg Schmid
1996An introduction to cognitive linguistics. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Verspoor, Marjolijn, René Dirven & Günter Radden
1998Putting concepts together: Syntax. In René Dirven & Marjolijn Verspoor (eds.), Cognitive exploration of language and linguistics, 79–105. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar