Article published in:
Studies in Language
Vol. 1:2 (1977) ► pp. 155196
Cited by

Cited by 23 other publications

Brandone, Amanda C. & Susan A. Gelman
2009. Differences in preschoolers’ and adults’ use of generics about novel animals and artifacts: A window onto a conceptual divide. Cognition 110:1  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Burton-Roberts, Noel
1986. Thematic predicates and the pragmatics of non-descriptive definition. Journal of Linguistics 22:1  pp. 41 ff. Crossref logo
Dobrovie-Sorin, Carmen & Claire Beyssade
2012.  In Redefining Indefinites [Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 85],  pp. 191 ff. Crossref logo
Greenberg, Yael
2012. Genericity and (Non)accidentalness. Recherches linguistiques de Vincennes :41  pp. 163 ff. Crossref logo
Jacobsson, Bengt
1997. Notes on genericity and article usage in English. Studia Neophilologica 69:2  pp. 139 ff. Crossref logo
Kowalewska-Buraczewska, Aleksandra
2020. The Logic and Normative Force of Dual-Character Generics: Towards a Theoretical Model for the Study of Normatively Shifted Predications. Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric 61:1  pp. 113 ff. Crossref logo
Leslie, Sarah-Jane
2015. “Hillary Clinton is the Only Man in the Obama Administration”: Dual Character Concepts, Generics, and Gender. Analytic Philosophy 56:2  pp. 111 ff. Crossref logo
NISHIDA, KOICHI
2002. ON^|^ldquo;REFLEXIVE INDEFINITES^|^rdquo; IN ENGLISH AND JAPANESE. ENGLISH LINGUISTICS 19:2  pp. 266 ff. Crossref logo
NISHIDA, KOICHI
2011. ON BOUND PRONOUN-LIKE INDEFINITES IN ENGLISH: AN EXTENSION OF THE THEORY OF INTER-N-BAR ANAPHORA. ENGLISH LINGUISTICS 28:1  pp. 23 ff. Crossref logo
Prasada, Sandeep
2012. Mechanisms for characterizing kinds and classes1. Recherches linguistiques de Vincennes :41  pp. 45 ff. Crossref logo
Prasada, Sandeep & Elaine M. Dillingham
2006. Principled and statistical connections in common sense conception. Cognition 99:1  pp. 73 ff. Crossref logo
Prasada, Sandeep & Elaine M. Dillingham
2009. Representation of Principled Connections: A Window Onto the Formal Aspect of Common Sense Conception. Cognitive Science 33:3  pp. 401 ff. Crossref logo
Ritchie, Katherine
2021. Essentializing inferences. Mind & Language 36:4  pp. 570 ff. Crossref logo
Roig, Audrey
2013. Des N et du N sujets : des généricités toujours refusées ?. Travaux de linguistique 67:2  pp. 61 ff. Crossref logo
Rosola, Martina
2019.  In Modeling and Using Context [Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 11939],  pp. 223 ff. Crossref logo
Seres, Daria & M.Teresa Espinal
2019. Russian definitional generic sentences. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics 4:1 Crossref logo
van Rooij, Robert & Schulz, Katrin
2020. A Causal Semantics of IS Generics. Journal of Semantics 37:2  pp. 269 ff. Crossref logo
Vogeleer, Svetlana & Liliane Tasmowski
2005. Les N, un N et des N en lecture générique. Travaux de linguistique 50:1  pp. 53 ff. Crossref logo
Wasserman, Ryan
2011. DISPOSITIONS AND GENERICS. Philosophical Perspectives 25:1  pp. 425 ff. Crossref logo
YOUNGEUNYOON
2012. Indefinite Singular and Bare Plural Generics in English and Korean. The Journal of Studies in Language 28:3  pp. 555 ff. Crossref logo
곽은주
2009. An Analysis of Korean Generic Interpretations. Korean Journal of Linguistics 34:2  pp. 221 ff. Crossref logo
곽은주
2013. Context-dependent Countability in Korean. Korean Journal of Linguistics 38:1  pp. 27 ff. Crossref logo
곽은주
2014. English-Korean Translation Methods of Generic Expressions Based on Interpretations. The Journal of Translation Studies 15:3  pp. 7 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 07 november 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.