Article published In:
Studies in LanguageVol. 1:2 (1977) ► pp.155–196
Generic Sentences and Analyticity
Cited by
Cited by 26 other publications
Brandone, Amanda C. & Susan A. Gelman
2009. Differences in preschoolers’ and adults’ use of generics about novel animals and artifacts: A window onto a conceptual divide. Cognition 110:1 ► pp. 1 ff. 
Burton-Roberts, Noel
1986. Thematic predicates and the pragmatics of non-descriptive definition. Journal of Linguistics 22:1 ► pp. 41 ff.
Dobrovie-Sorin, Carmen & Claire Beyssade
2012. Genericity, (In)Definiteness and Bare Nouns. In Redefining Indefinites [Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 85], ► pp. 191 ff.
Greenberg, Yael
2012. Genericity and (Non)accidentalness. Recherches linguistiques de Vincennes :41 ► pp. 163 ff.
Jacobsson, Bengt
1997. Notes on genericity and article usage in English. Studia Neophilologica 69:2 ► pp. 139 ff.
Kowalewska-Buraczewska, Aleksandra
2020. The Logic and Normative Force of Dual-Character Generics: Towards a Theoretical Model for the Study of Normatively Shifted Predications. Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric 61:1 ► pp. 113 ff.
Leslie, Sarah‐Jane
2015. “Hillary Clinton is the Only Man in the Obama Administration”: Dual Character Concepts, Generics, and Gender. Analytic Philosophy 56:2 ► pp. 111 ff.
Mena, Ricardo
2023. Metalinguistic effects. Mind & Language 38:2 ► pp. 545 ff.
NISHIDA, KOICHI
2002. ON^|^ldquo;REFLEXIVE INDEFINITES^|^rdquo; IN ENGLISH AND JAPANESE. ENGLISH LINGUISTICS 19:2 ► pp. 266 ff.
NISHIDA, KOICHI
2011. ON BOUND PRONOUN-LIKE INDEFINITES IN ENGLISH: AN EXTENSION OF THE THEORY OF INTER-N-BAR ANAPHORA. ENGLISH LINGUISTICS 28:1 ► pp. 23 ff.
Plunkett, David, Rachel Katharine Sterken & Timothy Sundell
2023. Generics and metalinguistic negotiation. Synthese 201:2
Prasada, Sandeep
2012. Mechanisms for characterizing kinds and classes1. Recherches linguistiques de Vincennes :41 ► pp. 45 ff.
Prasada, Sandeep & Elaine M. Dillingham
2006. Principled and statistical connections in common sense conception. Cognition 99:1 ► pp. 73 ff.
Prasada, Sandeep & Elaine M. Dillingham
2009. Representation of Principled Connections: A Window Onto the Formal Aspect of Common Sense Conception. Cognitive Science 33:3 ► pp. 401 ff.
Ritchie, Katherine
2021. Essentializing inferences. Mind & Language 36:4 ► pp. 570 ff.
Roig, Audrey
2014. Des N et du N sujets : des généricités toujours refusées ?. Travaux de linguistique n°67:2 ► pp. 61 ff.
Rosola, Martina
2019. Generics in Context: The Robustness and the Explanatory Implicatures. In Modeling and Using Context [Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 11939], ► pp. 223 ff.
Seres, Daria & M.Teresa Espinal
2019. Russian definitional generic sentences. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics 4:1
Stanojević, Veran & Ljubica Đurić
2017. Sur les indéfinis singuliers génériques en français et en serbe. Travaux de linguistique n° 72:1 ► pp. 121 ff.
van Rooij, Robert & Schulz, Katrin
2020. A Causal Semantics of IS Generics. Journal of Semantics 37:2 ► pp. 269 ff.
Vogeleer, Svetlana & Liliane Tasmowski
2005. Les N, un N et des N en lecture générique. Travaux de linguistique 50:1 ► pp. 53 ff.
Wasserman, Ryan
2011. DISPOSITIONS AND GENERICS. Philosophical Perspectives 25:1 ► pp. 425 ff.
YOUNGEUNYOON
2012. Indefinite Singular and Bare Plural Generics in English and Korean. The Journal of Studies in Language 28:3 ► pp. 555 ff.
곽은주
2009. An Analysis of Korean Generic Interpretations. Korean Journal of Linguistics 34:2 ► pp. 221 ff.
곽은주
2013. Context-dependent Countability in Korean. Korean Journal of Linguistics 38:1 ► pp. 27 ff.
곽은주
2014. English-Korean Translation Methods of Generic Expressions Based on Interpretations. The Journal of Translation Studies 15:3 ► pp. 7 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 14 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.