Review published In:
Studies in Language
Vol. 10:2 (1986) ► pp.527534
Bailey, C. J. N. and Maroldt, K.
1977 “The French lineage of English”, in: Langues en contact: Pidgins, Creoles  – Languages in contact, ed. by J. Meisel. Tübingen: Gunter Narr, 21–53.Google Scholar
Cole, P., W. Harbert, S. Hermon, and S. N. Sridhar
1980 “The acquisition of subjecthood”. Language 56.4:719–743.Google Scholar
Givón, T.
1971 “Historical syntax and synchronic morphology: an archaeologist’s field trip”. Papers from the 7th regional meeting of the Chicago Linguistics Society. Chicago: CLS, 394–415.Google Scholar
Keenan, E. L.
1976 “Toward a universal definition of ‘subject’”. In: Subject and topic, ed. by C. Li. New York: Academic press, 303–334.Google Scholar
Radford, Andrew
1982A Student’s guide to Chomsky’s transformational grammar. Cambridge: University Press.Google Scholar
Vennemann, T.
1975 “An explanation of drift.” In: Word order and word order change, ed. by C. Li. Austin: University of Texas Press, 269–305.Google Scholar
1982 “Verb second, verb late, and the brace construction in Germanic.” In: Historical Syntax, ed. by J. Fislak. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Zaenen, A. and J. Maling
1983 “Passive and Oblique Case,” in: Papers in Lexical Functional Grammar, ed. by L. Levin, M. Rappaport and A. Zaenen. Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club, 159–191.Google Scholar