Review published In:
Studies in Language
Vol. 13:1 (1989) ► pp.171193
References
Aissen, J.; and J. Hankamer
1980 “Lexical extension and grammatical transformations”. In: Proceedings of the Sixth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistic Society. 238–249.Google Scholar
Brendemoen, B.; and E. A. Csató
1987 “A syntactic analysis of Turkish gerundial clauses with subject control”. In: Boeschoten and Verhoeven (eds). 121–135.Google Scholar
Boeschoten, H. E.; and L. Th. Verhoeven
(eds) 1987Studies on Modern Turkish. Tilburg: Tilburg University Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N.
1981Lectures on Government and Binding. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
George, L.; and J. Kornfilt
1977 “Infinitival Double Passives in Turkish”. In: Proceedings of the Seventh Annual Meeting of the North Eastern Linguistic Society, 65–79.Google Scholar
1981 “Finiteness and boundedness in Turkish”. In: Heny (ed.). 105–127.Google Scholar
Gibson, J.; and I. Özkaragöz
1981 “The syntactic nature of the Turkish causative construction”. In: Proceedings of the Seventeenth Annual Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society. 83–98.Google Scholar
Hankamer, J.; and L. Knecht
1976 “The role of the subject/non-subject distinction in determining the choice of the relative clause participle in Turkish”. In: Hankamer and Aissen (eds). 197–221.Google Scholar
Hankamer, J.; and J. Aissen
(eds) 1976Harvard studies in syntax and semantics, Vol. 21.Google Scholar
Heny, F.
(ed.) 1981Binding and filtering. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Keenan, E. L.
1975 “Some universals of passive in relational grammar”. Proceedings of the Eleventh Annual Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society. 340–352.Google Scholar
Knecht, L.
1986Subject and Object in Turkish. MIT Ph.D. dissertation.Google Scholar
Özkaragöz, İ.
1980 “Evidence from Turkish for the unaccusative hypothesis”. Proceedings of the Sixth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistic Society. 411–422.Google Scholar
1986The relational structure of Turkish syntax. UC San Diego Ph.D. dissertation.Google Scholar
Perlmutter, D.
1978 “Impersonal passives and the unaccusative hypothesis”. Proceedings of the Fourth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistic Society. 157–189.Google Scholar
Perlmutter, D.; and P. Postal
1983 “Toward a universal characterization of passivization”. In: Perlmutter and Postal (eds). 3–29.Google Scholar
(eds.) 1983Studies in relational grammar. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Postal, P.
1986Studies of passive clauses. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Ross, J. R.
1967Constraints on variables in syntax. MIT Ph.D. dissertation.Google Scholar
Sebüktekin, H.
1971Turkish-English contrastive analysis. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Shibatani, M.
(ed.) 1976Syntax and Semantics 6: The Grammar of Causative Constructions. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Sobin, N.
1985 “On case assignment in Ukrainian morphological passive constructions”. Linguistic Inquiry. 16.4.649–662.Google Scholar
Zimmer, K.
1976 “Some Constraints on Turkish Causativization”. In: Shibatani (ed.). Syntax and Semantics 6: The Grammar of Causative Constructions. New York: Academic Press. 399–412.Google Scholar