Cover not available
Review published In:
Studies in Language
Vol. 13:1 (1989) ► pp.221–226
Book review

Richard Hogg & C. B. McCully. Metrical phonology. A coursebook
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987. 279 pp.

Reviewed by
| Free University of Amsterdam
Published online: 1 January 1989
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.13.1.14boo
References
Booij, G. E.
1983 “Principles and parameters in prosodic phonology.” Linguistics 211, 249–280.Google Scholar
1988 Review of Nespor and Vogel (1986), Journal of Linguistics 241, 515–525.Google Scholar
Giegerich, H.
1985 Metrical phonology and phonological structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hayes, B.
1981 A metrical theory of stress rules. Bloomington: IULC.Google Scholar
1982 “Extrametricality and English stress.” Linguistic Inquiry 131, 227–276.Google Scholar
1984 “The phonology of rhythm in English.” Linguistic Inquiry 151, 33–74.Google Scholar
Kenstowicz, M. and J. Rubach
1987 “Syllabic nuclei in Slovak.” Language 631, 463–497.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, P.
1982 “From cyclic to lexical phonology.” In: Van der Hulst and Smith (eds). 131–75.Google Scholar
Liberman, M. and A. Prince
1977 “On stress and linguistic rhythm.” Linguistic Inquiry 81, 249–336.Google Scholar
Nespor, M. and I. Vogel
1986 Prosodic phonology. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Prince, A.
1983 “Relating to the grid.” Linguistic Inquiry 141, 19–100.Google Scholar
Selkirk, E. O.
1980 “The role of prosodic categories in English word stress.” Linguistic Inquiry 111, 563–605.Google Scholar
1984 Phonology and syntax. The relation between sound and structure. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
1986 “On derived domains in sentence phonology.” Phonology Yearbook 31, 371–405.Google Scholar
Van der Hulst, H.; and N. Smith
(eds) 1982 The structure of phonological representations, Part I. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar