Article published In:
Studies in Language
Vol. 13:2 (1989) ► pp.293315
Cited by

Cited by 24 other publications

Brosa‐Rodríguez, Antoni & M. Dolores Jiménez‐López
2024. Quantifying basic colors' salience from cross‐linguistic corpora. Color Research & Application 49:1  pp. 34 ff. DOI logo
Bybee, Joan & Shelece Easterday
2019. Consonant strengthening: A crosslinguistic survey and articulatory proposal. Linguistic Typology 23:2  pp. 263 ff. DOI logo
Croft, William, Tanmoy Bhattacharya, Dave Kleinschmidt, D. Eric Smith & T. Florian Jaeger
2011. Greenbergian universals, diachrony, and statistical analyses. Linguistic Typology 15:2 DOI logo
Cysouw, Michael
2011. Understanding transition probabilities. Linguistic Typology 15:2 DOI logo
Dryer, Matthew S.
2003. Significant and non-significant implicational universals. Linguistic Typology 7:1 DOI logo
Gerdes, Kim, Sylvain Kahane & Xinying Chen
2021. Typometrics: From Implicational to Quantitative Universals in Word Order Typology. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics 6:1 DOI logo
Guzmán Naranjo, Matías & Laura Becker
2022. Statistical bias control in typology. Linguistic Typology 26:3  pp. 605 ff. DOI logo
HOLMAN, ERIC W.
2008. APPROXIMATELY INDEPENDENT FEATURES OF LANGUAGES. International Journal of Modern Physics C 19:02  pp. 215 ff. DOI logo
HORIE, KAORU
1997. FORM-MEANING INTERACTION IN DIACHRONY: A CASE STUDY FROM JAPANESE. ENGLISH LINGUISTICS 14:0  pp. 428 ff. DOI logo
Huisman, John L. A., Roeland van Hout & Asifa Majid
2023. Cross-linguistic constraints and lineage-specific developments in the semantics of cutting and breaking in Japonic and Germanic. Linguistic Typology 27:1  pp. 41 ff. DOI logo
Jäger, Gerhard & Johannes Wahle
2021. Phylogenetic Typology. Frontiers in Psychology 12 DOI logo
Macklin-Cordes, Jayden L. & Erich R. Round
2022. Challenges of sampling and how phylogenetic comparative methods help: with a case study of the Pama-Nyungan laminal contrast. Linguistic Typology 26:3  pp. 533 ff. DOI logo
Maddieson, Ian
2023. Investigating the ‘what’, ‘where’ and ‘why’ of global phonological typology. Linguistic Typology 27:2  pp. 245 ff. DOI logo
Majid, Asifa, Melissa Bowerman, Miriam van Staden & James S Boster
2007. The semantic categories of cutting and breaking events: A crosslinguistic perspective. Cognitive Linguistics 18:2 DOI logo
Majid, Asifa, Fiona Jordan & Michael Dunn
2015. Semantic systems in closely related languages. Language Sciences 49  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Miestamo, Matti, Dik Bakker & Antti Arppe
2016. Sampling for variety. Linguistic Typology 20:2  pp. 233 ff. DOI logo
Piantadosi, Steven T. & Edward Gibson
2014. Quantitative Standards for Absolute Linguistic Universals. Cognitive Science 38:4  pp. 736 ff. DOI logo
Salaberri, Iker
2022. A cross-linguistic study of emphatic negative coordination. Studies in Language 46:3  pp. 647 ff. DOI logo
Siewierska, A.
2006. Word Order and Linearization. In Encyclopedia of Language & Linguistics,  pp. 642 ff. DOI logo
Stolz, Thomas
2007. Harry PottermeetsLe petit prince– On the usefulness of parallel corpora in crosslinguistic investigations. Language Typology and Universals 60:2  pp. 100 ff. DOI logo
Voelkel, Svenja & Franziska Kretzschmar
2021. Introducing Linguistic Research, DOI logo
Yong, Qian & Haoran Ma
2023. A typological study on the syntactic variations of counterfactual clauses. Australian Journal of Linguistics 43:3  pp. 219 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2003. Bibliography. In The Handbook of Linguistics,  pp. 714 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2006. Re-doing typology. Linguistic Typology 10:1 DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 14 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.