Markedness in Grammar

Cited by 38 other publications

AL-Makatrah, Elham & Yasin Mohamad Subakir Mohd

2017. The Acquisition of Do-Support in Negation and Interrogatives by Adult Arab Learners of English: A Preliminary Study. SSRN Electronic Journal

BALPINAR, Metin

2021. JAPONCA VE TÜRKÇE İŞARET SÖZCÜKLERİNİN ALGISAL KULLANIMLARI ÜZERİNE. Selçuk Üniversitesi Türkiyat Araştırmaları Dergisi ► pp. 291 ff.

Callies, Marcus

2015.  In Transfer Effects in Multilingual Language Development [Hamburg Studies on Linguistic Diversity, 4], ► pp. 129 ff.

Catasso, Nicholas

2011. The Grammaticalization of Demonstratives: A Comparative Analysis. Journal of Universal Language 12:1 ► pp. 7 ff.

Chen, Ruina, Sirui Deng & Haitao Liu

2021. Syntactic Complexity of Different Text Types: From the Perspective of Dependency Distance Both Linearly and Hierarchically. Journal of Quantitative Linguistics ► pp. 1 ff.

Clausen, Sara Juul & Line Burholt Kristensen

2015. The cognitive status of stød. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 38:2 ► pp. 163 ff.

Cucatto, Mariana

2021. Para mayor satisfacción (de): expresión conectiva plurifuncional, fundamentación y disuasión. Círculo de Lingüística Aplicada a la Comunicación 88 ► pp. 107 ff.

Ditges, Ruth, Elena Barbieri, Cynthia K. Thompson, Sandra Weintraub, Cornelius Weiller, Marek-Marsel Mesulam, Dorothee Kümmerer, Nils Schröter & Mariacristina Musso

2021. German Language Adaptation of the NAVS (NAVS-G) and of the NAT (NAT-G): Testing Grammar in Aphasia. Brain Sciences 11:4 ► pp. 474 ff.

Dromey, Christopher, Kelsey Boyce & Ron Channell

2014. Effects of Age and Syntactic Complexity on Speech Motor Performance. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 57:6 ► pp. 2142 ff.

Fedzechkina, Maryia, Becky Chu & T. Florian Jaeger

2018. Human Information Processing Shapes Language Change. Psychological Science 29:1 ► pp. 72 ff.

Fedzechkina, Maryia, T. Florian Jaeger & Elissa L. Newport

2012. Language learners restructure their input to facilitate efficient communication. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 109:44 ► pp. 17897 ff.

Fedzechkina, Maryia, Elissa L. Newport & T. Florian Jaeger

2017. Balancing Effort and Information Transmission During Language Acquisition: Evidence From Word Order and Case Marking. Cognitive Science 41:2 ► pp. 416 ff.

Gatiyatullina, Galya, Marina Solnyshkina, Valery Solovyev, Andrey Danilov, Ekaterina Martynova & Iskander Yarmakeev

2020.  In 2020 13th International Conference on Developments in eSystems Engineering (DeSE), ► pp. 393 ff.

Georgakopoulou, Alexandra

1995. Narrative Organization and Contextual Constraints: The Case of Modern Greek Storytelling. Journal of Narrative and Life History 5:2 ► pp. 161 ff.

Gibson, Edward, Richard Futrell, Steven P. Piantadosi, Isabelle Dautriche, Kyle Mahowald, Leon Bergen & Roger Levy

2019. How Efficiency Shapes Human Language. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 23:5 ► pp. 389 ff.

Givón, T.

2015.  In The Diachrony of Grammar,

Hahn, Michael, Dan Jurafsky & Richard Futrell

2020. Universals of word order reflect optimization of grammars for efficient communication. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 117:5 ► pp. 2347 ff.

Hanke, Mirko, Cornelia Hamann & Esther Ruigendijk

2013. On the laws of attraction at cocktail parties: Babble noise influences the production of number agreement. Language and Cognitive Processes 28:8 ► pp. 1114 ff.

HASPELMATH, MARTIN, ANDREEA CALUDE, MICHAEL SPAGNOL, HEIKO NARROG & ELİF BAMYACI

2014. Coding causal–noncausal verb alternations: A form–frequency correspondence explanation. Journal of Linguistics 50:3 ► pp. 587 ff.

Haspelmath, Martin & Andres Karjus

2017. Explaining asymmetries in number marking: Singulatives, pluratives, and usage frequency. Linguistics 55:6

Helasvuo, Marja-Liisa & Aki-Juhani Kyröläinen

2016. Choosing between zero and pronominal subject: modeling subject expression in the 1st person singular in Finnish conversation. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 12:2

Jaeger, T. Florian & Harry Tily

2011. On language ‘utility’: processing complexity and communicative efficiency. WIREs Cognitive Science 2:3 ► pp. 323 ff.

Janic, Katarzyna & Charlotte Hemmings

2021. Alignment shift as functional markedness reversal. Journal of Historical Linguistics 11:2 ► pp. 299 ff.

Kapteijns, Bob, Florian Hintz & Masatoshi Koizumi

2021. Comparing predictors of sentence self-paced reading times: Syntactic complexity versus transitional probability metrics. PLOS ONE 16:7 ► pp. e0254546 ff.

Kubota, Mikio, Luca Pollonini & George Zouridakis

2020. Local syntactic violations evoke fast mismatch-related neural activity detected by optical neuroimaging. Experimental Brain Research 238:11 ► pp. 2665 ff.

NORCLIFFE, ELISABETH & T. FLORIAN JAEGER

2016. Predicting head-marking variability in Yucatec Maya relative clause production. Language and Cognition 8:2 ► pp. 167 ff.

Norrby, Catrin & Gisela Håkansson

2007. The interaction of complexity and grammatical processability: The case of Swedish as a foreign language. IRAL - International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 45:1

Pustet, Regina

2009. On the correlation between discourse frequency and structural complexity in markedness theory. Discours :5

Qin, Hongwu, Lei Kong & Ranran Chu

2020.  In Corpus-based Translation and Interpreting Studies in Chinese Contexts, ► pp. 31 ff.

Scheffler, Paweł

2011. Rule difficulty: teachers’ intuitions and learners’ performance. Language Awareness 20:3 ► pp. 221 ff.

Schmid, Monika S. & Dieter Stein

1996. Subjektivierung in markierter Wortstellung im Englischen. Zeitschrift für Literaturwissenschaft und Linguistik 26:2 ► pp. 97 ff.

Tabullo, ángel, Mariana Arismendi, Alejandro Wainselboim, Gerardo Primero, Sergio Vernis, Enrique Segura, Silvano Zanutto & Alberto Yorio

2012. On the Learnability of Frequent and Infrequent Word Orders: An Artificial Language Learning Study. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 65:9 ► pp. 1848 ff.

Tal, Shira & Inbal Arnon

2022. Redundancy can benefit learning: Evidence from word order and case marking. Cognition 224 ► pp. 105055 ff.

Tal, Shira, Kenny Smith, Jennifer Culbertson, Eitan Grossman & Inbal Arnon

2022. The Impact of Information Structure on the Emergence of Differential Object Marking: An Experimental Study. Cognitive Science 46:3

Uchihara, Hiroto & Ambrocio Gutiérrez

2021. Teotitlán Zapotec: An ‘activizing’ language. Linguistic Typology 25:2 ► pp. 257 ff.

김양순

2012. English Raising Constructions: SOA and Phase-based EPP. The Journal of Studies in Language 28:3 ► pp. 479 ff.

백준오 & 김영주

2015. Rethinking the complexity of written production by learners of Korean. Discourse and Cognition 22:2 ► pp. 53 ff.

진준화

2013. Mechanism of Cognition in the Meaning-based Word Order of the Korean and Chinese Sentence Arrangement. The Review of Korean Cultural Studies 44:null ► pp. 7 ff.

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 18 april 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.