AL-Makatrah, Elham & Yasin Mohamad Subakir Mohd
2017.
The Acquisition of Do-Support in Negation and Interrogatives by Adult Arab Learners of English: A Preliminary Study.
SSRN Electronic Journal
BALPINAR, Metin
2021.
JAPONCA VE TÜRKÇE İŞARET SÖZCÜKLERİNİN ALGISAL KULLANIMLARI ÜZERİNE.
Selçuk Üniversitesi Türkiyat Araştırmaları Dergisi :53
► pp. 291 ff.
Beltrama, Andrea & Laura Staum Casasanto
2021.
The Social Meaning of Semantic Properties. In
Social Meaning and Linguistic Variation,
► pp. 80 ff.
Catasso, Nicholas
2011.
The Grammaticalization of Demonstratives: A Comparative Analysis.
Journal of Universal Language 12:1
► pp. 7 ff.
Chen, Ruina, Sirui Deng & Haitao Liu
2022.
Syntactic Complexity of Different Text Types: From the Perspective of Dependency Distance Both Linearly and Hierarchically.
Journal of Quantitative Linguistics 29:4
► pp. 510 ff.
Ciampelli, Silvia, Janna N de Boer, Alban E Voppel, Hugo Corona Hernandez, Sanne G Brederoo, Edwin van Dellen, Natalia B Mota & Iris E C Sommer
2023.
Syntactic Network Analysis in Schizophrenia-Spectrum Disorders.
Schizophrenia Bulletin 49:Supplement_2
► pp. S172 ff.
Clausen, Sara Juul & Line Burholt Kristensen
2015.
The cognitive status of stød.
Nordic Journal of Linguistics 38:2
► pp. 163 ff.
Cucatto, Mariana
2021.
Para mayor satisfacción (de): expresión conectiva plurifuncional, fundamentación y disuasión.
Círculo de Lingüística Aplicada a la Comunicación 88
► pp. 107 ff.
Ditges, Ruth, Elena Barbieri, Cynthia K. Thompson, Sandra Weintraub, Cornelius Weiller, Marek-Marsel Mesulam, Dorothee Kümmerer, Nils Schröter & Mariacristina Musso
2021.
German Language Adaptation of the NAVS (NAVS-G) and of the NAT (NAT-G): Testing Grammar in Aphasia.
Brain Sciences 11:4
► pp. 474 ff.
Dromey, Christopher, Kelsey Boyce & Ron Channell
2014.
Effects of Age and Syntactic Complexity on Speech Motor Performance.
Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 57:6
► pp. 2142 ff.
Fedzechkina, Maryia, Becky Chu & T. Florian Jaeger
2018.
Human Information Processing Shapes Language Change.
Psychological Science 29:1
► pp. 72 ff.
Fedzechkina, Maryia, T. Florian Jaeger & Elissa L. Newport
2012.
Language learners restructure their input to facilitate efficient communication.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 109:44
► pp. 17897 ff.
Fedzechkina, Maryia, Elissa L. Newport & T. Florian Jaeger
2017.
Balancing Effort and Information Transmission During Language Acquisition: Evidence From Word Order and Case Marking.
Cognitive Science 41:2
► pp. 416 ff.
Fretheim, Thorstein
2020.
Om betydningen og bruken av de norske modalpartiklene da og a*.
HumaNetten :44
Gatiyatullina, Galya, Marina Solnyshkina, Valery Solovyev, Andrey Danilov, Ekaterina Martynova & Iskander Yarmakeev
2020.
2020 13th International Conference on Developments in eSystems Engineering (DeSE),
► pp. 393 ff.
Georgakopoulou, Alexandra
Gibson, Edward, Richard Futrell, Steven P. Piantadosi, Isabelle Dautriche, Kyle Mahowald, Leon Bergen & Roger Levy
2019.
How Efficiency Shapes Human Language.
Trends in Cognitive Sciences 23:5
► pp. 389 ff.
Hahn, Michael, Dan Jurafsky & Richard Futrell
2020.
Universals of word order reflect optimization of grammars for efficient communication.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 117:5
► pp. 2347 ff.
Han, Lili, Jing Lu, Zhisheng (Edward) Wen & Yuan Tian
2023.
Momentary engagement in simultaneous versus consecutive interpreting: through the lens of translanguaging and CDST.
Frontiers in Psychology 14
Hanke, Mirko, Cornelia Hamann & Esther Ruigendijk
2013.
On the laws of attraction at cocktail parties: Babble noise influences the production of number agreement.
Language and Cognitive Processes 28:8
► pp. 1114 ff.
HASPELMATH, MARTIN, ANDREEA CALUDE, MICHAEL SPAGNOL, HEIKO NARROG & ELİF BAMYACI
2014.
Coding causal–noncausal verb alternations: A form–frequency correspondence explanation.
Journal of Linguistics 50:3
► pp. 587 ff.
Haspelmath, Martin & Andres Karjus
2017.
Explaining asymmetries in number marking: Singulatives, pluratives, and usage frequency.
Linguistics 55:6
Helasvuo, Marja-Liisa & Aki-Juhani Kyröläinen
2016.
Choosing between zero and pronominal subject: modeling subject expression in the 1st person singular in Finnish conversation.
Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 12:2
Ibáñez Orellana, Romualdo, Juan Zamora Osorio, Mariela Cisnero Correa & Solange Aguirre Rozas
2022.
Análisis automático de la complejidad sintáctica de textos escolares.
Círculo de Lingüística Aplicada a la Comunicación 91
► pp. 127 ff.
Jaeger, T. Florian & Harry Tily
2011.
On language ‘utility’: processing complexity and communicative efficiency.
WIREs Cognitive Science 2:3
► pp. 323 ff.
Janic, Katarzyna & Charlotte Hemmings
Kapteijns, Bob, Florian Hintz & Masatoshi Koizumi
2021.
Comparing predictors of sentence self-paced reading times: Syntactic complexity versus transitional probability metrics.
PLOS ONE 16:7
► pp. e0254546 ff.
Karabin, Megan, Aki-Juhani Kyröläinen & Victor Kuperman
2023.
Increase in Linguistic Complexity in Older Adults During COVID-19.
Experimental Aging Research ► pp. 1 ff.
Kubota, Mikio, Luca Pollonini & George Zouridakis
2020.
Local syntactic violations evoke fast mismatch-related neural activity detected by optical neuroimaging.
Experimental Brain Research 238:11
► pp. 2665 ff.
Niu, Ruochen & Haitao Liu
2022.
Effects of Syntactic Distance and Word Order on Language Processing: An Investigation Based on a Psycholinguistic Treebank of English.
Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 51:5
► pp. 1043 ff.
NORCLIFFE, ELISABETH & T. FLORIAN JAEGER
2016.
Predicting head-marking variability in Yucatec Maya relative clause production.
Language and Cognition 8:2
► pp. 167 ff.
Norrby, Catrin & Gisela Håkansson
2007.
The interaction of complexity and grammatical processability: The case of Swedish as a foreign language.
IRAL - International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 45:1
Pustet, Regina
2009.
On the correlation between discourse frequency and structural complexity in markedness theory.
Discours :5
Qin, Hongwu, Lei Kong & Ranran Chu
2020.
The Role of Translation Played in the Evolution of Mandarin: A Corpus-based Account. In
Corpus-based Translation and Interpreting Studies in Chinese Contexts,
► pp. 31 ff.
Scheffler, Paweł
2011.
Rule difficulty: teachers’ intuitions and learners’ performance.
Language Awareness 20:3
► pp. 221 ff.
Schmid, Monika S. & Dieter Stein
1996.
Subjektivierung in markierter Wortstellung im Englischen.
Zeitschrift für Literaturwissenschaft und Linguistik 26:2
► pp. 97 ff.
Tabullo, ángel, Mariana Arismendi, Alejandro Wainselboim, Gerardo Primero, Sergio Vernis, Enrique Segura, Silvano Zanutto & Alberto Yorio
2012.
On the Learnability of Frequent and Infrequent Word Orders: An Artificial Language Learning Study.
Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 65:9
► pp. 1848 ff.
Tal, Shira & Inbal Arnon
2022.
Redundancy can benefit learning: Evidence from word order and case marking.
Cognition 224
► pp. 105055 ff.
Tal, Shira, Kenny Smith, Jennifer Culbertson, Eitan Grossman & Inbal Arnon
2022.
The Impact of Information Structure on the Emergence of Differential Object Marking: An Experimental Study.
Cognitive Science 46:3
Uchihara, Hiroto & Ambrocio Gutiérrez
2021.
Teotitlán Zapotec: An ‘activizing’ language.
Linguistic Typology 25:2
► pp. 257 ff.
Velnić, Marta
2024.
The acquisition of grammatical alternates: a comparison of Italian and Norwegian possessives.
The Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 27:1
김양순
2012.
English Raising Constructions: SOA and Phase-based EPP.
The Journal of Studies in Language 28:3
► pp. 479 ff.
백준오 & 김영주
2015.
Rethinking the complexity of written production by learners of Korean.
Discourse and Cognition 22:2
► pp. 53 ff.
진준화
2013.
Mechanism of Cognition in the Meaning-based Word Order of the Korean and Chinese Sentence Arrangement.
The Review of Korean Cultural Studies 44:null
► pp. 7 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 14 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.