Article published in:
Studies in Language
Vol. 41:4 (2017) ► pp. 813842
References

References

Abbi, Anvita
1992Reduplication in South Asian languages. An areal, typological and historical study. New Delhi: Allied Publishers Limited.Google Scholar
Abraham, Werner
2005Intensity and diminution triggered by reduplicating morphology: Janus-faced iconicity. In Bernhard Hurch (ed.), Studies on reduplication, 547–568. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ahlner, Felix & Jordan Zlatev
2010Cross-modal iconicity: A cognitive semiotic approach to sound symbolism. Sign Systems Studies 38(1). 298–348.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Akita, Kimi
2009A grammar of sound-symbolic words in Japanese: Theoretical approaches to iconic and lexical properties of Japanese mimetics. Kobe: Kobe University PhD dissertation. http://​www​.lib​.kobe​-u​.ac​.jp​/repository​/thesis​/d1​/D1004724​.pdf (13 September 2016).
Auracher, Jan
2015Synaesthetic sound iconicity: phonosemantic associations between acoustic features of phonemes and emotional behavior. In Masako K. Hiraga, William J. Herlofsky, Kazuko Shinohara & Kimi Akita (eds.), Iconicity. East meets West, 93–108. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Bergen, Benjamin K.
2004The psychological reality of phonaestemes. Language 80. 290–297. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Berlin, Brent
1992Ethnobiological classification: Principles of categorization of plants and animals in traditional societies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Blasi, Damián, Søren Wichman, Harald Hammarström, Peter F. Stadler & Morten H. Christiansen
2016Sound-meaning association biases evidenced across thousands of languages. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciene 2016 (PNAS). Crossref.Google Scholar
Botha, Rudolf P.
1988Form and meaning in word formation: A study of Afrikaans reduplication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 839 ]
Braun, Maria & Ingo Plag
2003How transparent is creole morphology? A study of early Sranan word-formation. In Geert Booij & Yap van Marle (eds.), Yearbook of morphology 2002, 81–104. Dordrecht: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan, Revere D. Perkins & William Pagliuca
1994 The evolution of grammar . Tense, aspect and modality in the languages of the world. Chicago & London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Clynes, Adrian
1995Topics in the phonology and morphology of Balinese [based on the dialect of Singaraja, North Bali]. Canberra, ACT: Australian National University PhD dissertation.Google Scholar
1996Interactions of semantics and phonology: Evidence from an Austronesian language. In Shobhana L. Chellian & Willem J. De Reuse (eds.), Papers from the Fifth Annual Meeting of the Southeast Asian Linguistics Society, 33–50. Arizona State University.Google Scholar
1998The emergence of the marked: interactions of phonology and semantics in Balinese. University of Brunei Darussalam. Ms.Google Scholar
Diffloth, Gérard
1979Expressive phonology and prosaic phonology in Mon-Khmer. In Theraphan L. Thongkum, Vichin Panupong, Pranee Kullavanijaya & M. R. Kalaya Tingsabadh (eds.), Studies in Tai and Mon-Khmer phonetics and phonology. In Honour of Eugénie J. A. Henderson, 49–59. Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University Press.Google Scholar
Dressler, Wolfgang U.
2000Extragrammatical vs. marginal morphology. In Ursula Doleschal & Anna M. Thornton (eds.), Extragrammatical and marginal morphology (Lincom Studies in Theoretical Linguistics 12), 1–10. München: Lincom Europe.Google Scholar
Dressler, Wolfgang U., Katarzyna Dziubalska-Kołaczyk, Natalia Gagarina & Marianne Kilani-Schoch
2005Reduplication in child language. In Bernhard Hurch (ed.), Studies on reduplication, 455–474. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dingemanse, Mark
2009Ideophones in unexpected places. In Peter K. Austin, Olivier Bond, Monik Charette, David Nathan & Peter Sells (eds.), Proceedings of the 2nd Conference on Language Documentation and Linguistic Theory, 83–97. London: School of Oriental and African Studies (SOAS).Google Scholar
2011The meaning and use of Ideophones. Nijmegen: Max Planck Institute Nijmegen, PhD dissertation.Google Scholar
2012Advances in the cross-linguistic study of ideophones. Language and Linguistics Compass 6(10). 654–672. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2015Ideophones and reduplication. Depiction, description, and the interpretation of repeated talk in discourse. Studies in Language 39(4). 946–970.Google Scholar
Dingemanse, Mark, Damian E. Blasi, Gary Lupayan, Morten H. Christiansen & Padraic Monaghan
2015Arbitrariness, iconicity and systematicity in language. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 19(10). 603–615. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Downing, Laura J. & Barbara Stiebels
2012Iconicity. In Jochen Trommer (ed.), The morphology and phonology of exponence, 379–426. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
El Zarka, Dina
2005On the borderline of reduplication: Gemination and other consonant doubling in Arabic morphology. In Bernhard Hurch (ed.), Studies on reduplication, 369–394. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2009Verbale Pluralität in ägyptisch-arabischen vierkonsonantigen Verben. Zeitschrift für Arabische Linguistik/Journal of Arabic Linguistics/Journal de Linguistique Arabe 50. 51–73.Google Scholar
Fischer, Olga
2011Cognitive iconic grounding of reduplication in language. In Pascal Michelucci, Olga Fischer & Christina Ljungberg (eds.), Semblance and signification, 55–82. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 840 ]
Goodwin Gómez, Gale
2009Reduplication, ideophones, and onomatopoetic repetition in Yanomami. Grazer Linguistische Studien 71. 21–38.Google Scholar
2014Reduplication in the Yanomae language of Northern Brazil. In Gale Goodwin Gómez & Hein van der Voort (eds.), Reduplication in indigenous languages of South America (Brill’s Studies in the Indigenous Languages of the Americas 7), 161–183. Leiden & Boston: Brill. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin
1997Indefinite pronouns. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Harrison, Sheldon P. & Salich Y. Albert
1977Mokilese-English dictionary. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar
Hess, Thomas
1966Snohomish chameleon morphology. International Journal of American Linguistics 32. 350–356. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hinton, Leanne, Johanna Nichols & John J. Ohala
1994Introduction: sound symbolic processes. In Leanne Hinton, Johanna Nichols & John J. Ohala (eds.), Sound symbolism, 1–12. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hurch, Bernhard & Veronika Mattes
2005Über die Entstehung von partieller Reduplikation. In Gertraud Fenk-Oczlon & Christian Winkler (eds.), Sprache und Natürlichkeit. Gedenkband für Willi Mayerthaler, 137–156. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Inkelas, Sharon
2014Non-concatenative derivation: Reduplication. In Rochelle Lieber & Pavol Štekauer (eds.), The Oxford handbook of derivational morphology (Oxford Handbooks in Linguistics), 169–189. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kiyomi, Setsuko
1995A new approach to reduplication: A semantic study of noun and verb reduplication in Malayo-Polynesian languages. Linguistics 27(6). 1145–1167.Google Scholar
Klamer, Marian
2001Expressives and iconicity in the lexicon. In F. K. Erhard Voeltz & Christa Kilian-Hatz (eds.), Ideophones, 165–181. Amsterdam & Philadephia: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2002Semantically motivated patterns: A study of Dutch and Kambera expressives. Language 78 (2). 258–286. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kocher, Frieda
1921Reduplikationsbildungen im Französischen und Italienischen. Aarau: Sauerländer & Co.Google Scholar
Kouwenberg, Silvia & Darlene LaCharité
2001The iconic interpretation of reduplication: Issues in the study of reduplication in Caribbean Creole languages. European Journal of English Studies 5(1). 59–80. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kröll, Heinz
1991Beitrag zu den Reduplikationen im Portugiesischen (II). Lusorama 15. 25–44.Google Scholar
Lisboa, Marcos de
1754Vocabulario de la lengua Bicol. Manila.Google Scholar
Maas, Utz
2005Syntactic reduplication in Arabic. In Bernhard Hurch (ed.), Studies on reduplication, 395–429. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mattes, Veronika
2014Types of reduplication. A case study of Bikol. Berlin & Boston: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Mayerthaler, Willi
1977Studien zur theoretischen und zur französischen Morphologie, Reduplikation, Echowörter, morphologische Natürlichkeit, Haplologie, Produktivität, Regeltelescoping, paradigmatischer Ausgleich. Tübingen: Niemeyer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mintz, Malcolm W.
2001Bikol. In Jane Garry & Carl Rubino (eds.), Encyclopedia of the world’s languages: past and present, 90–95. New York & Dublin: H.W. Wilson Press.Google Scholar
2004Bikol Dictionary. diksionáriong bíkol. Vol. I and II. Perth: Indonesian/Malay Texts and Resources.Google Scholar
Mintz, Malcolm W. & José Del Rosario Britannico
1985 Bikol-English dictionary . diksionariong bikol-inglés. Quezon City: New Day Publishers.Google Scholar
[ p. 841 ]
Moravcsik, Edith A.
1978Reduplicative constructions. In Joseph Greenberg (ed.), Universals of human language, vol. 3, 297–334. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Niepokuj, Mary
1997The development of verbal reduplication in Indo-European (Journal of Indoeuropean Studies Monograph 24). Washington: Institute for the Study of Man.Google Scholar
Nöth, Winfried
2015Three paradigms of iconicity research in language and literature. In Masako K. Hiraga, William J. Herlofsky, Kazuko Shinohara & Kimi Akita (eds.), Iconicity. East meets West, 13–34. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Novotna, Jana
2000Reduplication in Swahili. Afrikanische Arbeitspapiere 64. 57–73.Google Scholar
Perniss, Pamela, Robin L. Thompson & Gabriella, Vigliocco
2010Iconicity as a general property of language: Evidence from spoken and signed languages. Frontiers in Psychology 1(227). 1–15.Google Scholar
Procházka, Stephan
1995Semantische Funktionen der reduplizierten Wurzeln im Arabischen. Archiv Orientalni 63. 39–70.Google Scholar
Pott, August Friedrich
1862Doppelung als eines der wichtigsten Bildungsmittel der Sprache. Lemgo & Detmold: Meyer. http://​reduplication​.uni​-graz​.at​/pott/.
Rangjung Yeshe Publications
1996–2000The Rangjung Yeshe Tibetan-English Dharma dictionary. Ranjung Yeshe translations and publications in cooperation with the Karma Kagyu Buddhist Network (RYTP-KKBN). http://​rywiki​.tsadra​.org​/index​.php.
Regier, Terry
1998Reduplication and the arbitrariness of the sign. In Morton A. Gernsbacher & Sharon J. Derry (eds.), Proceedings of the Twentieth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, 887–892. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Roberts, John R.
1991Reduplication in Amele. In Tom Dutton (ed.), Papers in Papuan Linguistics No. 1 (Pacific Linguistics Series A-73), 115–146. Canberra: The Australian National University.Google Scholar
Rubino, Carl R.
2001Iconic morphology and word formation in Ilocano. In F. K. Erhard Voeltz & Christa Kilian-Hatz (eds.), Ideophones, 303–320. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2005Reduplication: Form, function and distribution. In Bernhard Hurch (ed.), Studies on reduplication, 11–29. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Saperstein, Andrew D.
1997A word-and-paradigm approach to reduplication. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University PhD dissertation.Google Scholar
Schindler, Wolfgang
1991Reduplizierende Wortbildung im Deutschen. Zeitschrift für Phonetik, Sprachwissenschaft und Kommunikationsforschung 44(5). 597–613.Google Scholar
Schütz, Albert S.
1985The Fijian language. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar
Schwaiger, Thomas
2015Reduplication. In Peter Müller, Ingeborg Ohnheiser, Susan Olsen & Franz Rainer (eds.), Word-formation. An international handbook of the languages of Europe (HSK 40.1), 467–484. Berlin & Boston: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
2017. The structure of reduplicants: a typological investigation of iconicity and preferred form in reduplication. University of Graz: Doctoral dissertation.
Singh, Rajendra
2005Reduplication in Modern Hindi and the theory of reduplication. In Bernhard Hurch (ed.), Studies on reduplication, 263–281. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Skoda, Françoise
1982Le redoublement expressif: un universal linguistique. Analyse du procédé en grec ancien et en d’autres langues (Société d’Études Linguistiques et Anthropologiques de France 15). Paris: SELAF.Google Scholar
Sonesson, Göran
2008Prolegomena to a general theory of iconicity. Considerations on language, gesture, and pictures. In Willem Klaas & Ludovic De Cuypere (eds.), Naturalness and iconicity in language, 47–72. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 842 ]
Stolz, Thomas
2007aDas ist doch keine Reduplikation! In Andreas Ammann & Aina Urdze (eds.), Wiederholung, Parallelismus, Reduplikation. Strategien der multiplen Strukturanwendung, 47–80. Bochum: Brockmeyer.Google Scholar
2007bRe: Reduplication: Iconic vs. counter-iconic principles (and their areal correlates). In Paolo Ramat & Elisa Roma (eds.), Europe and the Mediterranean as linguistic areas. Convergencies from a historical and typological perspective, 317–350. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stolz, Thomas, Natalyia Levkovych & Barbara Dewein
2009Reduplicative stem formation: a comparative look at Maltese and Chamorro. Ilsienna 1. 87–133.Google Scholar
Stolz, Thomas, Cornelia Stroh & Aina Urdze
2011Total Reduplication. The areal linguistics of a potential universal. Berlin: Akademie Verlag. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tamura, Suzuko
2000The Ainu language (ICHEL Linguistic Studies 12). Tokyo: Sanseido.Google Scholar
Tsujimura, Natsuko
2005A constructional approach to mimetic verbs. In Mirjam Fried & Hans C. Boas (eds.), Grammatical constructions: Back to the roots, 137–154. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2014Mimetic verbs and meaning. In Franz Rainer, Francesco Gardani, Hans Christian Luschützky & Wolfgang U. Dressler (eds.), Morphology and meaning. Selected papers from the 15th International Morphology Meeting, Vienna, February 2012, 303–314. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vollmann, Ralf
2009Reduplication in Tibetan. Grazer Linguistische Studien 71. 115–134.Google Scholar
Voeltz, F. K. Erhard & Christa Kilian-Hatz
(eds.) 2001Ideophones. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Voort, Hein van der
2003Reduplication of person markers in Kwaza. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 35. 65–94. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Usuki, Takeshi & Kimi Akita
2015What’s in a mimetic?: On the dynamicity of its iconic stems. In Masako K. Hiraga, William J. Herlofsky, Kazuko, Shinohara & Kimi Akita (eds.), Iconicity. East meets West, 109–123. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Westermann, Diedrich Hermann
1937Laut und Sinn in einigen westafrikanischen Sudan-Sprachen. Archiv für vergleichende Phonetik 1. 154–72 & 193–211.Google Scholar
Weidhaas, Thomas & Hans-Jörg Schmid
2015Diminutive verbs in German: semantic analysis and theoretical implications. Morphology 25. 183–227. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wiese, Richard
1990Über die Interaktion von Morphologie und Phonologie: Reduplikation im Deutschen. Zeitschrift für Phonetik, Sprachwissenschaft und Kommunikationsforschung 43(5). 603–624.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 2 other publications

BERENT, IRIS, OUTI BAT-EL, DIANE BRENTARI, QATHERINE ANDAN & VERED VAKNIN-NUSBAUM
2020. Amodal phonology. Journal of Linguistics  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Kawahara, Shigeto & Jeff Moore
2021. How to express evolution in English Pokémon names. Linguistics 0:0 Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 21 april 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.