Linguists generally assume ‘clause’ to be a basic unit for the analysis of grammatical structure. Data from
natural conversations, however, suggests that ‘clause’ may not be grammaticized to the same extent across languages. Understanding
‘clause’ as a predicate (plus any arguments, inferred or expressed), we can show that participants do indeed organize their talk
around ‘clauses’. I argue that English-speaking participants in everyday interaction do indeed orient to clausal units as so
defined, by building their turns around predicates, and that these turns do key interactional work. The data further reveal that
these units must be understood as emergent structures, recurrent patterns in a given language that emerge from humans pursuing
their ordinary interactional business of communicating information, needs, identities, attitudes, and desires.
2013Signaling trouble: On the linguistic design of other-initiation of repair in English conversation. The Netherlands: University of Groningen Ph.D. dissertation.
Bybee, Joan
2001Frequency effects on French liaison. In Joan L. Bybee & Paul J. Hopper (eds.), Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure, 337–359. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
2006From usage to grammar: the mind’s response to repetition. Language 82(4). 529–551.
Bybee, Joan
2007Frequency of use and the organization of language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bybee, Joan
2010Language, usage and cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Camazine, Scott, Jean-Louis Deneubourg, Nigel R. Franks, James Sneyd, Guy Theraulaz & Eric Bonabeau
2001Self-Organization in Biological Systems. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth
2014What does grammar tell us about action? In Ritva Laury, Marja Etelämäki & Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen (eds.), Approaches to grammar for Interactional Linguistics, Special issue of Pragmatics 24(3). 623–647.
Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth & Margret Selting
2018Interactional Linguistics: Studying language in social interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth and Sandra A. Thompson
Forthcoming. Action ascription in everyday advice-giving sequences. In Depperman, Arnulf and Michael Haugh eds. Action Ascription: Interaction in context Cambridge Cambridge University Press
Curl, Traci S.
2006Offers of assistance: Constraints on syntactic design. Journal of Pragmatics 381. 1257–1280.
Curl, Traci S. & Paul Drew
2008Contingency and action: a comparison of two forms of requesting. Research on Language and Social Interaction 41(2). 1–25.
Dingemanse, Mark & N. J. Enfield
2015Other-initiated repair across languages: Towards a typology of conversational structures. Open Linguistics 11. 98–118.
2003Argument structure: grammar in use. In Du Bois, John W., Lorraine E. Kumpf, and William J. Ashby, eds. 2003 Preferred argument structure: grammar as architecture for function, 10–60. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Evans, Nicholas
2007Insubordination and its uses. In Irina Nikolaeva (ed.), Finiteness: Theoretical and Empirical Foundations, 366–431. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ford, Cecilia E.
1993Grammar in interaction: adverbial clauses in American English conversations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ford, Cecilia E., Barbara A. Fox & Sandra A. Thompson
2007Principles shaping grammatical practices: An exploration. Discourse Studies 91. 299–318.
Ford, Cecilia E., Barbara A. Fox & Sandra A. Thompson
2002Social Interaction and grammar. In Michael Tomasello (ed.), The new psychology of language: cognitive and functional approaches to language structure, vol. 21, 119–143. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Fox, Barbara A. & Sandra A. Thompson
2010Responses to WH-questions in English conversation. Research on Language and Social Interaction 43(2). 133–156.
Goodwin, Charles
1979The interactive construction of a sentence in natural conversation. In George Psathas (ed.), Everyday language: Studies in ethnomethodology, 97–121. New York: Irvington.
Goodwin, Charles
1981Conversational organization: interaction between speakers and hearers. New York: Academic Press. [available at [URL]]
1992Assessments and the construction of context. In Alessandro Duranti & Charles Goodwin (eds.), Rethinking context, 147–190. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
2013The conversation analytic approach to transcription. In Jack Sidnell & Tanya Stivers (eds.), Handbook of Conversation Analysis, 57–76. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
Heritage, John
1984A change-of-state token and aspects of its sequential placement. In J. M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (eds.), Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis, 299–345. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Heritage, John
2012aEpistemics in action: Action formation and territories of knowledge. Research on Language and Social Interaction 45(1). 1–29.
Heritage, John
2012bThe Epistemic Engine: Sequence Organization and Territories of Knowledge. Research on Language and Social Interaction 451. 30–52.
Hopper, Paul
1987Emergent grammar. BLS 131. 139–157.
Hopper, Paul J.
1998Emergent grammar. In Michael Tomasello (ed.), The new psychology of language: Cognitive and functional approaches to language structure, 155–175. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Hopper, Paul
2000Grammatical Constructions and their Discourse Origins: Prototype or Family Resemblance? In Martin Pütz & Susanne Niemeier (eds.), Applied Cognitive Linguistics: Theory, Acquisition and Language Pedagogy, 109–130. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Hopper, Paul
2004The openness of grammatical constructions. Chicago Linguistic Society 401. 239–256.
Hopper, Paul J., and Sandra A. Thompson
1984The discourse basis for lexical categories in universal grammar, Language 60.4: 703–752.
Iwasaki, Shoichi & Tsuyoshi Ono
2001“Sentence” in spontaneous spoken Japanese discourse. In Joan Bybee & Michael Noonan (eds.), Complex sentences in grammar and discourse, 175–202. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
2009I thought it was pretty neat. Social action formats for taking a stance. In S. Slembrouck, M. Taverniers, and M. Van Herreweghe (eds.), From ‘Will’ to ‘Well’. Studies in Linguistics offered to Anne-Marie Simon-Vandenbergen, 293–304. Gent: Academia Press.
Kärkkäinen, Elise
2012I thought it was very interesting: Conversational formats for taking a stance. Journal of Pragmatics 44(15). 2194–2210.
Kärkkäinen, Elise and Tiina Keisanen
2012Linguistic and embodied formats for making (concrete) offers. Discourse Studies 14.5: 587–611.
Kendrick, Kobin H.
2015Other-initiated repair in English. Open Linguistics 11. 164–190.
Laury, Ritva, Camilla Lindholm & Jan Lindström
2013Syntactically non-integrated conditional clauses in spoken Finnish and Swedish. In Eva Havu & Irma Hyvärinen (eds.), Comparing and Contrasting Syntactic Structures. From Dependency to Quasi-subordination. Mémoires de la Société Néophilologique de Helsinki LXXXVI, 231–270. Helsinki: Société Néophilologique.
Levinson, Stephen C.
2013Action formation and ascription. In Jack Sidnell & Tanya Stivers (eds.), The Handbook of Conversation Analysis, 103–130. Malden, MA: Wiley Blackwell.
Mazeland, Harrie
2013Grammar in Conversation. In Jack Sidnell & Tanya Stivers (eds.), The Handbook of Conversation Analysis, 475–491. Malden, MA: Wiley Blackwell.
Nakayama, Toshihide
2002Nuuchahnulth (Nootka) Morphosyntax. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Ochs, Elinor, Emanuel A. Schegloff & Sandra A. Thompson
(eds.)1996Interaction and grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
2008Compact versus narrative serial verb constructions in Kalam. In Gunter Senft (ed.), Serial verb constructions in Austronesian and Papuan languages, 171–202. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.
2011Event Representation in serial verb constructions. In Jürgen Bohnemeyer & Eric Pederson (eds.), Event Representation in Language and Cognition, 13–42. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
1984Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: Some features of preferred/dispreferred turn shapes. In J. M. Atkinson & John Heritage (eds.), Structures of social action. Studies in conversation analysis, 57–101. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Raymond, Geoffrey
2003Grammar and social organization: Yes/no interrogatives and the structure of responding. American Sociological Review 681. 939–967.
Sacks, Harvey, Emanuel A. Schegloff & Gail Jefferson
1974A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language 50(4). 696–735.
Schegloff, Emanuel A.
1989Reflections on language, development, and the interactional character of talk-in-interaction. In Marc H. Bomstein & Jerome S. Bruner (eds.), Interaction in Human Development, 139–153. London: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Schegloff, Emanuel A.
2007Sequence organization in interaction: A primer in conversation analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Scollon, Ronald
1976Conversations with a one year old: A case study of the developmental foundation of syntax. Honolulu: University Press of Hawaii.
2013Advice giving in telephone interactions between mothers and their young adult daughters. Loughborough, UK: Loughborough University unpublished PhD dissertation.
Shaw, Chloe & Alexa Hepburn
2013Managing the Moral Implications of Advice in Informal Interaction. Research on Language and Social Interaction 46(4). 344–362.
Stirling, Lesley
1999Isolated if-clauses in Australian English. In Peter Collins & David Lee (eds.), The clause in English: In honour of Rodney Huddleston, 273–294. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 14 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.