Edited by Tsuyoshi Ono, Ritva Laury and Ryoko Suzuki
[Studies in Language 43:2] 2019
► pp. 254–280
Understanding ‘clause’ as an emergent ‘unit’ in everyday conversation
Linguists generally assume ‘clause’ to be a basic unit for the analysis of grammatical structure. Data from natural conversations, however, suggests that ‘clause’ may not be grammaticized to the same extent across languages. Understanding ‘clause’ as a predicate (plus any arguments, inferred or expressed), we can show that participants do indeed organize their talk around ‘clauses’. I argue that English-speaking participants in everyday interaction do indeed orient to clausal units as so defined, by building their turns around predicates, and that these turns do key interactional work. The data further reveal that these units must be understood as emergent structures, recurrent patterns in a given language that emerge from humans pursuing their ordinary interactional business of communicating information, needs, identities, attitudes, and desires.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Problematizing ‘social action’
- 3.Problematizing ‘clause’: ‘Clause’ as ‘predicate-plus’
- 4.Clauses as vehicles for social action
- 4.1Directive-commissive actions
- 4.2Assessments
- 4.3Informings
- 4.4Assertions
- 4.5Requests for information
- 5.Social actions not done by clauses
- 6.Scaffolding
- 7.Conclusion and outlook
- Acknowledgements
- Notes
-
References
https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.16032.tho
References
Cited by
Cited by 3 other publications
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 january 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.