Review published in:
Studies in Language
Vol. 42:2 (2018) ► pp. 466473
References

References

Abraham, Werner
2006Bare and prepositional differential case marking: The exotic case of German (and Icelandic) among all of Germanic. In: Kulikov, Leonid, Andrej Malchukov & Peter de Swart (eds.), Studies on case, valency and transitivity, 115–146. John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Baker, Mark C.
1988Incorporation: A theory of grammatical function changing. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
1996The polysynthesis parameter. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2003Lexical categories: Verbs, nouns, and adjectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2008The syntax of agreement and concord. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bobalijk, Jonathan
2008Where’s Phi? Agreement as a post-syntactic operation. In David Adger, Daniel Harbour & Susanna Béjar (eds.), Phi theory: Phi features across interfaces and modules, 295–328. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam
2000Minimalist inquiries: The framework. In Roger Martin, David Michaels, and Juan Urigereka (eds.), Step by Step: Essays on Minimalist Syntax in Honor of Howard Lasnik. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
2001Derivation by phase. In Michael Kenstowicz (ed.), Ken Hale: A life in language, ed., 1–52. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard
1981Language universals and linguistic typology: Syntax and morphology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Dalrymple, Mary and Irina Nikolaeva
2011Objects and information structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin & Matthew S. Dryer & David Gil & Bernard Comrie
(eds.) 2005The World Atlas of Language Structures. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
[ p. 473 ]
de Hoop, Helen, and Andrej Malchukov
2008Case-marking strategies. Linguistic Inquiry 39. 565–587 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Iemmolo, Giorgio
2010Topicality and differential object marking: Evidence from Romance and beyond. Studies in Language 34. 239–272.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Legate, Julie
2008Morphological and Abstract Case. Linguistic Inquiry 39.1. 55–101 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Levin, Theodore & Omer Preminger
2015Case in Sakha: are two modalities really necessary? Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 33. 231–250.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
MacWhinney, Brian, Andrej Malchukov and Edith Moravcsik
(eds.) 2014Competing motivations in grammar and cognition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Malchukov, Andrej & Andrew Spencer
(eds.) 2009The Oxford Handbook of Case. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Malchukov, Andrej
2008Animacy and asymmetries in differential case marking. Lingua 118, 203–221.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2015Towards a typology of split ergativity: A TAM hierarchy for alignment splits. In Bornkessel-Schlesewsky, Ina, Andrej Malchukov and Marc Richards (eds.), Scales and Hierarchies: A Cross-Disciplinary Perspective, 275–297. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Marantz, Alec
1991Case and licensing. In Proceedings of ESCOL ‘91, 175–195. Ithaca: Cornell Linguistic Club.Google Scholar
Nichols, Johanna
1992Linguistic diversity in space and time. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pesetsky, David & Esther Torrego
2010Case. In Cedric Boeckx (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Minimalism, 52–71. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Siewierska, Anna & Dik Bakker
2009Case and alternative strategies: word order and agreement marking. In: Andrej Malchukov & Andrew Spencer (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Case, 549–562. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sinnemäki, Kaius
2008Complexity trade-offs in core argument marking. In Matti Miestamo, Kaius Sinnemäki, and Fred Karlsson (eds.), Language complexity: Typology, contact, change. Studies in Language Companion Series 94, 67–88. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar