Book review
Baker, Mark. 2015. Case
References
Aissen, Judith
2003 Differential object marking: Iconicity vs. economy.
Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 21(3). 435–483.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Baker, Mark C. & Nadya Vinokurova
2010 Two modalities of case assignment: Case in Sakha.
Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 28(3). 593–642.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Baker, Mark C. & William Croft
2017 Lexical categories: Legacy, lacuna, and opportunity for functionalists and formalists.
Annual Review of Linguistics, 31, pp. 179–197.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Barker, Chris
2012 Quantificational binding does not require c-command.
Linguistic Inquiry 43(4). 614–633.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bresnan, Joan, Shipra Dingare & Christopher D. Manning
2001 Soft constraints mirror hard constraints: Voice and person in English and Lummi. In
Butt, Miriam &
Tracy Holloway King (eds.),
Proceedings of the LFG 01 Conference, 13–32. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chomsky, Noam
1981 Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht: Foris.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Comrie, Bernard
1978 Ergativity. In
Winfred P. Lehmann (ed.),
Syntactic typology: Studies in the phenomenology of language, 329–394. Austin: University of Texas Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dryer, Matthew S.
1986 Primary objects, secondary objects, and antidative.
Language 62(4). 808–845.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Handschuh, Corinna
2014 A typology of marked-S languages. Berlin: Language Science Press. [
Studies in Diversity Linguistics 1].
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Haspelmath, Martin
2004 Explaining the Ditransitive Person-Role Constraint: A usage-based approach.
Constructions 21. (
[URL])
Haspelmath, Martin
2005 Argument marking in ditransitive alignment types.
Linguistic Discovery 3(1). 1–21.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Haspelmath, Martin
2011 On S, A, P, T, and R as comparative concepts for alignment typology.
Lingustic Typology 15(3). 535–567.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Haspelmath, Martin
2014 Comparative syntax. In
Andrew Carnie,
Yosuke Sato &
Dan Siddiqi (eds.),
The Routledge handbook of syntax, 490–508. London: Routledge.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Heine, Bernd & Christa König
2010 On the linear order of ditransitive objects.
Language Sciences 32(1). 87–131.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Klaiman, M. H.
1992 Inverse languages.
Lingua 881. 227–261.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lehmann, Christian
2015 Thoughts on grammaticalization. Berlin: Language Science Press (
[URL]).
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Malchukov, Andrej
2008 Animacy and asymmetries in differential case marking.
Lingua 1181. 203–221.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Maslova, Elena
2003 A grammar of Kolyma Yukaghir. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
McGregor, William B.
2010 Optional ergative case marking systems in a typological-semiotic perspective.
Lingua 120(7). 1610–1636.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Narrog, Heiko & Shinya Ito
2007 Re-constructing semantic maps: The comitative-instrumental area.
STUF – Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung 60(4). 273–292.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Perlmutter, David M.
1980 Relational grammar. In
Edith A. Moravcsik &
Jessica R. Wirth (eds.),
Current approaches to syntax, 195–229. New York: Academic Press [
Syntax and Semantics 13].
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Primus, Beatrice
1999 Cases and thematic roles: Ergative, accusative and active. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Stiebels, Barbara
2015 Control. In
Tibor Kiss &
Artemis Alexiadou (eds.),
Syntax: Theory and analysis, vol. 11, 412–446. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton [
Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft (HSK), 42].
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
van Lier, Eva
2012 Referential effects on the expression of three-participant events across languages: An introduction in memory of Anna Siewierska.
Linguistic Discovery 10(3). 1–16.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Van Valin, Robert D., Jr.
2005 Exploring the syntax-semantics interface. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cited by
Cited by 3 other publications
Anouba, Acha Arnaud & Huang Dechun
2023.
Risk-Taking and Sustainable Entrepreneurship Intention in Côte d’Ivoire SMEs: Moderating Role of Government Subsidy policy.
International Journal of Science and Business ► pp. 126 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Haspelmath, Martin
2019.
Ergativity and depth of analysis.
Rhema :4, 2019
► pp. 108 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Haspelmath, Martin
2021.
Role-reference associations and the explanation of argument coding splits.
Linguistics 59:1
► pp. 123 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 16 june 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.