Review published In:
Studies in Language
Vol. 42:2 (2018) ► pp.474486
References (26)
Aissen, Judith
2003Differential object marking: Iconicity vs. economy. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 21(3). 435–483. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baker, Mark C. & Nadya Vinokurova
2010Two modalities of case assignment: Case in Sakha. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 28(3). 593–642. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baker, Mark C. & William Croft
2017Lexical categories: Legacy, lacuna, and opportunity for functionalists and formalists. Annual Review of Linguistics, 31, pp. 179–197. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barker, Chris
2012Quantificational binding does not require c-command. Linguistic Inquiry 43(4). 614–633. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bresnan, Joan, Shipra Dingare & Christopher D. Manning
2001Soft constraints mirror hard constraints: Voice and person in English and Lummi. In Butt, Miriam & Tracy Holloway King (eds.), Proceedings of the LFG 01 Conference, 13–32. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam
1981Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard
1978Ergativity. In Winfred P. Lehmann (ed.), Syntactic typology: Studies in the phenomenology of language, 329–394. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Dryer, Matthew S.
1986Primary objects, secondary objects, and antidative. Language 62(4). 808–845. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Handschuh, Corinna
2014A typology of marked-S languages. Berlin: Language Science Press. [Studies in Diversity Linguistics 1]. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin
2004Explaining the Ditransitive Person-Role Constraint: A usage-based approach. Constructions 21. ([URL])
2005Argument marking in ditransitive alignment types. Linguistic Discovery 3(1). 1–21. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2007Ditransitive alignment splits and inverse alignment. Functions of Language 14(1). 79–102. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2011On S, A, P, T, and R as comparative concepts for alignment typology. Lingustic Typology 15(3). 535–567.Google Scholar
2014Comparative syntax. In Andrew Carnie, Yosuke Sato & Dan Siddiqi (eds.), The Routledge handbook of syntax, 490–508. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd & Christa König
2010On the linear order of ditransitive objects. Language Sciences 32(1). 87–131. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Klaiman, M. H.
1992Inverse languages. Lingua 881. 227–261. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lehmann, Christian
2015Thoughts on grammaticalization. Berlin: Language Science Press ([URL]). DOI logo
Malchukov, Andrej
2008Animacy and asymmetries in differential case marking. Lingua 1181. 203–221. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Maslova, Elena
2003A grammar of Kolyma Yukaghir. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McGregor, William B.
2010Optional ergative case marking systems in a typological-semiotic perspective. Lingua 120(7). 1610–1636. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Narrog, Heiko & Shinya Ito
2007Re-constructing semantic maps: The comitative-instrumental area. STUF – Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung 60(4). 273–292.Google Scholar
Perlmutter, David M.
1980Relational grammar. In Edith A. Moravcsik & Jessica R. Wirth (eds.), Current approaches to syntax, 195–229. New York: Academic Press [Syntax and Semantics 13]. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Primus, Beatrice
1999Cases and thematic roles: Ergative, accusative and active. Tübingen: Niemeyer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stiebels, Barbara
2015Control. In Tibor Kiss & Artemis Alexiadou (eds.), Syntax: Theory and analysis, vol. 11, 412–446. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton [Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft (HSK), 42].Google Scholar
van Lier, Eva
2012Referential effects on the expression of three-participant events across languages: An introduction in memory of Anna Siewierska. Linguistic Discovery 10(3). 1–16. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Valin, Robert D., Jr.
2005Exploring the syntax-semantics interface. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (3)

Cited by 3 other publications

Anouba, Acha Arnaud & Huang Dechun
2023. Risk-Taking and Sustainable Entrepreneurship Intention in Côte d’Ivoire SMEs: Moderating Role of Government Subsidy policy. International Journal of Science and Business  pp. 126 ff. DOI logo
Haspelmath, Martin
2019. Ergativity and depth of analysis. Rhema :4, 2019  pp. 108 ff. DOI logo
Haspelmath, Martin
2021. Role-reference associations and the explanation of argument coding splits. Linguistics 59:1  pp. 123 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 16 june 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.