Referring expressions in categorizing activities
Rethinking the nature of linguistic units for the study of interaction
Linguistic units as traditionally conceived by linguists favor structural features and referential
meanings. In this paper, we propose a new way of understanding the nature of linguistic units by analyzing the
interaction of multiple semiotic resources (gestures, bodily movement, eye gaze and speech)
in social interaction. We focus on the discursive activity of “categorizing” in different situations and in
two languages, English and Mandarin Chinese. Categorizing is broadly defined as any activity that involves explicitly
or implicitly classifying people or objects into types. We show that the meanings of linguistic units
(including the referential) may be distorted or incomplete when forms are extracted from their contexts and
analyzed in isolation. Instead, we argue that an interactional, activity-based view, focusing on the
deployment of linguistic elements as part of a coordinated system of semiotic resources, will enable us to
understand the nature of linguistic units in a more productive way.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Key concepts and approaches to categorizing
- 2.1Cognitive approaches to categorization
- 2.2Previous work focusing on categorizing as social action
- 2.3Rethinking categorizing as a socially-motivated activity
- 2.4Methodological tools used in MCA
- 3.Data and methods
- 4.Data analysis
- 4.1English data
- 4.2Mandarin Chinese data
- 5.Discussion
- 6.Conclusions
- Acknowledgements
- Notes
-
References
References
Austin, John
1962 How to do things with words. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Blumer, Herbert
1969 Symbolic interactionism: Perspective and method. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

Butler, Carly & Ann Weatherall
2006 “No, we’re not playing families”: Membership categorization in children’s play.
Research on Language and Social Interaction 39(4). 441–470.


Drew, Paul
2005 Is confusion a state of mind? In
Hedwig te Molder &
Jonathan Potter (eds.),
Conversation and cognition, 161–183. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.


Du Bois, John W.
1980 Beyond definiteness: The trace of identity in discourse. In
Wallace L. Chafe (ed.),
The pear stories: Cognitive, cultural, and linguistic aspects of narrative production, 203–74. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

Du Bois, John W.
2007 The stance triangle. In
Robert Englebretson (ed.),
Stancetaking in discourse, 139–182. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.


Du Bois, John W.
2014 Towards a dialogic syntax.
Cognitive Linguistics 25(3). 359–410.


Edwards, Derek
1991 Categories are for talking: On the cognitive and discursive bases of categorization.
Theory and Psychology 1(4). 515–542.


Edwards, Derek
1997 Discourse and cognition. London: Sage Publications.

Edwards, Derek & Jonathan Potter
2005 Discursive psychology, mental states and descriptions. In
Hedwig te Molder &
Jonathan Potter (eds.),
Conversation and cognition, 241–259. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.


Fitzgerald, Richard, William Housley & Carly W. Butler
2009 Omnirelevance and interactional context.
Australian Journal of Communication 36(3). 45–64.

Ford, Cecilia, Barbara Fox and Sandra A. Thompson
Garot, Robert & Tim Berard
2011 Ethnomethodology and membership categorization analysis. In
Ruth Wodak,
Barbara Johnstone &
Paul Kerswill (eds.),
The Sage handbook of sociolinguistics, 125–138. London: Sage.


Goffman, Erving
1974 Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of the experience. New York: Harper Colophon.

Goodwin, Charles
1979 The interactive construction of a sentence in natural conversation. In
George Psathas (ed.),
Everyday language: Studies in ethnomethodology, 97–121. New York: Irvington.

Goodwin, Charles
1980 Restarts, pauses, and the achievement of mutual gaze at turn-beginning.
Sociological Inquiry 50(3–4). 272–302.


Goodwin, Charles
1986 Gestures as a resource for the organization of mutual attention.
Semiotica 62(1/2). 29–49.

Goodwin, Charles
1994 Professional vision.
American Anthropologist 96(3). 606–633.


Goodwin, Charles
1996 Transparent vision. In
Elinor Ochs,
Emanuel Schegloff &
Sandra A. Thompson (eds.),
Interaction and grammar, 370–404. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.


Goodwin, Charles
2003 Pointing as situated practice. In
Sotaro Kita (ed.),
Pointing: Where language, culture and cognition meet, 217–241. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Goodwin, Charles
2011 Contextures of action. In
Jürgen Streek,
Charles Goodwin &
Curtis LeBaron (eds.),
Embodied interaction: Language and body in the material world, 182–193. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Goodwin, Charles & Marjorie Harness Goodwin
1987 Concurrent operations on talk: Notes on the interactive organization of assessments.
Pragmatics 11. 1–54.

Gu, Yueguo
1990 Politeness phenomena in Modern Chinese.
Journal of Pragmatics 141. 237–257.


Gumperz, John J.
1992 Contextualization and understanding. In
Alessandro Duranti &
Charles Goodwin (eds.),
Rethinking context: Language as an interactive phenomenon, 229–252. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Heritage, John
2012 The epistemic engine: Sequence organization and territories of knowledge.
Research on Language and Social Interaction 45(1). 30–52.


Hester, Stephen, & Peter Eglin
1997 Membership categorization analysis: An introduction. In
Stephen Hester &
Peter Eglin (eds.),
Culture in action: Studies in membership categorization analysis, 1–23. Washington, DC: International Institute for Ethnomethodology and Conversation Analysis and University Press of America.

Lakoff, George
1987 Women, fire, and dangerous things. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.


Lakoff, George & Mark Johnson
1980 Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Levinson, Stephen C.
1983 Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.


Levinson, Stephen C.
2013 Action formation and ascription. In
Jack Sidnell &
Tanya Stivers (eds.),
The handbook of conversation analysis, 103–130. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.

Mayes, Patricia
2010 The discursive construction of identity and power in the critical classroom: Implications for applied critical theories.
Discourse & Society 21(2). 189–210.


Mayes, Patricia
2015 Becoming an autonomous writer: Epistemic stance displays and membership categorization in the writing conference.
Discourse Studies 17(6). 1–18.


Ochs, Elinor, Patrick Gonzales, & Sally Jacoby
1996 “When I come down, I’m in the domain state”: Grammar and graphic representation in the interpretative activity of physicists. In
Elinor Ochs,
Emanuel Schegloff &
Sandra A. Thompson (eds.),
Interaction and grammar, 328–369. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.


Pomerantz, Anita
1984 Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: Some features of preferred/dispreferred turn shapes. In
John M. Atkinson &
John Heritage (eds.),
Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis, 57–101. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Rosch, Eleanor
1978 Principles of categorization. In
Eleanor Rosch &
Barbara B. Lloyd (eds.),
Cognition and categorization, 27–48. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Sacks, Harvey
1972 On the analyzability of stories by children. In
John J. Gumperz &
Dell Hymes (eds.),
Directions in sociolinguistics: The ethnography of communication, 325–345. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

Sacks, Harvey
1992 Lectures on conversation. (Vol. 11,
G. Jefferson, ed.) Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

Sacks, Harvey, Emanuel A. Schegloff & Gail Jefferson
1974 A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation.
Language 501. 696–735.


Sapir, Edward
1925 Sound patterns of language.
Language 1(2). 37–51.


Schegloff, Emmanuel A.
2007a A tutorial on membership categorization.
Journal of Pragmatics 391. 462–482.


Schegloff, Emmanuel A.
2007b Sequence organization in interaction: A primer in conversation analysis I. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.


Silverstein, Michael
1976 Shifters, linguistic categories, and cultural description. In
Keith H. Basso &
Henry A. Selby (eds.),
Meaning in anthropology, 11–55. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.

Stokoe, Elizabeth
2012 Moving forward with membership categorization analysis: Methods for systematic analysis.
Discourse Studies 14(3). 277–303.


Tannen, Deborah
1993 (ed.)
Framing in discourse. New York: Oxford University Press.

Tao, Hongyin
1999 Body movement and participant alignment in Mandarin Chinese conversational interactions.
Chicago Linguistic Society 351. 125–139.

Thibodeau, Paul H. & Lera Boroditsky
2011 Metaphors we think with: The role of metaphor in reasoning.
PLoS ONE 6(2).


Thibodeau, Paul H. & Lera Boroditsky
2013 Natural language metaphors covertly influence reasoning.
PLoS ONE 8(1). e52961.


Wittgenstein, Ludwig
1953 Philosophical investigations. (
Anscombe, G. E. M., trans.). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

Cited by
Cited by 5 other publications
Malyuga, Elena N. & Wayne Rimmer
2021.
Making sense of “buzzword” as a term through co-occurrences analysis.
Heliyon 7:6
► pp. e07208 ff.

Suomalainen, Karita, Anna Vatanen & Ritva Laury
Suzuki, Ryoko
2022.
Creativity in compliment responses in Japanese everyday talk.
East Asian Pragmatics 7:3
► pp. 365 ff.

Tao, Hongyin
[no author supplied]
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 march 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.