Cover not available
Article published In:
Studies in Language
Vol. 42:4 (2018) ► pp.886–922

The constructionalization and constructional change of noncanonical V-NP expressions in Mandarin Chinese

| Zhejiang Normal University
| Zhejiang University
This paper investigates the process of constructionalization and constructional change of apparently noncanonical yet highly frequent V-NP expressions in Mandarin Chinese, which exist in other languages as well (e.g., Southeast Asian languages and African languages). A corpus-based survey of 20 frequently used monosyllabic verbs shows that both the token and the type frequency of the noncanonical V-NP expressions have on the whole been increasing throughout the history of the Chinese language. From a constructional perspective, it is proposed that the noncanonical V-NP structure has gone through a process of grammatical constructionalization and constructional change (Traugott & Trousdale 2013), which involves diachronic changes in productivity, schematicity and compositionality and which is manifested in the increasing number of the semantic types of postverbal NPs.
Keywords: Chinese, constructionalization, constructional change, productivity, schematicity, compositionality
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Construction and constructionalization
  • 3.Evolutionary properties of noncanonical V-NP construction
    • 3.1High productivity
    • 3.2High schematicity
    • 3.3Low compositionality
  • 4.Constructionalization and constructional change of noncanonical V-NP constructions and their expansion types
    • 4.1Extension Type I
    • 4.2Extension type II
    • 4.3Extension type III
    • 4.4Extension type IV
  • 5.Diachronic evolution of the NPs in noncanonical V-NP construction
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • Abbreviations
  • References
Published online: 4 February 2019
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.17001.li
References (52)
References
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y., R. M. W. Dixon & Masayuki Onishi (eds.). 2001. Non-Canonical Marking of Subjects and Objects. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Andersson, Peter. 2014. The fast case: Constructionalization of a Swedish concessive. Nordic Association of Linguistics 37(2). 141–167. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Arbib, Michael A. 2012. Compositionality and beyond: Embodied meaning in language and protolanguage. In Markus Werning, Wolfram Hinzen & Edouard Machery (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Compositionality, 475–492. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Barðdal, Jóhanna. 2008. Productivity: Evidence from Case and Argument Structure in Icelandic. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bergs, Alexander & Gabriele Diewald. 2008. Introduction: Constructions and Language Change. In Alexander Bergs & Gabriele Diewald (eds.), Constructions and Language Change, 1–21. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bisang, Walter. 2008. Precategoriality and syntax-based parts of speech: The case of Late Archaic Chinese. Studies in Language 32(3). 568–589. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan & Sandra Thompson. 1997. Three frequency effects in syntax. Berkeley Linguistic Society 231. 378–88. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Campbell, Lyle. 2001. What’s wrong with grammaticalization?. Language Sciences 231. 113–161. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chen, Changlai & Jianfeng Hu. 2003. Dai shoushi chengfen de bujiwu dongci de kaocha [Investigation of intransitive verbs capable of having a patient]. Yuyan Jiaoxue yu Yanjiu [Language Teaching and Linguistic Studies] 31. 63–72.Google Scholar
Clausner, Timothy C. & William Croft. 1997. Productivity and schematicity in metaphors. Cognitive Science 21(3). 247–282. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Croft, William. 2001. Radical Construction Grammar: Syntactic Theory in Typological Perspective. New York: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Diewald, Gabriele. 2002. A model for relevant types of contexts in grammaticalization. In Ilse Wischer & Gabriele Diewald (eds.), New Reflections of Grammaticalization, 103–120. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fischer, Olga, Muriel Norde & Harry Perridon. 2004. Up and Down the Cline – The Nature of Grammaticalization. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fried, Mirjam. 2008. Constructions and constructs: Mapping a shift between predication and attribution. In Alexander Bergs & Gabriele Diewald (eds.), Constructions and Language Change, 47–79. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Goldberg, Adele E. 1995. Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
2004. Pragmatics and argument structure. In Laurence R. Horn & Gregory Ward (eds.), The Handbook of Pragmatics, 427–441. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
2006. Constructions at Work. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Goldberg, Adele E. & Ray Jackendoff. 2004. The English resultative as a family of constructions. Language 80(3). 532–568. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Guo, Jimao. 1999. Shi tan “fei Shanghai” deng bu jiwu dongci dai binyu xianxiang [On the phenomenon of intransitive verb taking object: The case of fei Shanghai ]. Zhongguo Yuwen [Studies of the Chinese Language] 51. 337–346.Google Scholar
Hilpert, Martin. 2008. Germanic Future Constructions: A Usage-based Approach to Language Change. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Himmelmann, Nikolaus P. 2004. Lexicalization and grammaticalization: Opposite or orthogonal?. In Walter Bisang, Nikolaus P. Himmelmann & Björn Wiemer (eds), What Makes Grammaticalization?: A Look from Its Fringes and Its Components, 21–42. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, Thomas & Graeme Trousdale. 2011. Variation, change and constructions in English. Cognitive Linguistics 22(1). 1–23. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Holvoet, Axel & Nicole Nau. 2014. Argument marking and grammatical relations in Baltic. In Axel Holvoet & Nicole Nau (eds), Grammatical relations and their non-canonical encoding in Baltic, 1–41. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hopper, Paul J. & Elizabeth C. Traugott. 2003. Grammaticalization (2nd Edition). Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Huening, Matthias & Geert Booij. 2014. From compounding to derivation: The emergence of derivational affixes through constructionalization. Folia Linguistica 48(2). 579–604. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kittilä, Seppo. 2010. Transitivity typology. In Jae Jung Song (ed), The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Typology, 346–367. New York: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lehmann, Christian. 2002. Thoughts on Grammaticalization (2nd edition). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Li, Yanzhi. 2015. Constructionalization and Constructional Objects in Chinese. Zhejiang: Zhejiang University Doctoral dissertation.Google Scholar
Li, Yanzhi & Wu Yicheng. 2014. The semantics and pragmatics of the CHI+NON-FOOD NP construction. Intercultural Pragmatics 11(2). 279–300. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2018. [Chi/Shui + fei shoushi NP] biaodashi de goushi yanbian [On the evolution of [‘eat/sleep’ + Non-patient NP] constructions in Chinese]. Xiandai Waiyu [Modern Foreign Languages] 21. 147–160.Google Scholar
Liu, Meichun. 2005. Lexical information and beyond: Meaning coercion and constructional inference of the mandarin verb GAN. Journal of Chinese Linguistics 33(2). 310–332.Google Scholar
Liu, Tanzhou. 2009. Yiyuan feizuoge dongci dai binyu xianxiang [The phenomenon of un-ergative intransitive verbs taking objects]. Zhongguo Yuwen [Studies of The Chinese Language] 21. 110–119.Google Scholar
Liu, Xiaolin. 2004. Ye tan bujiwu dongci dai binyu de wenti [A further exploration into the isse of intransitive verbs taking objects]. Waiguo Yu [Joural of Foreign Languages] 11:33–39.Google Scholar
. 2007. Ye tan “Wang Mian sile fuqin” de shengcheng fangshi [On the generation of Wang Mian sile fuqin]. Zhongguo Yuwen [Studies of The Chinese Language] 51. 440–443.Google Scholar
Lu, Bingfu. 2001. Cong binyu biaoji de fenbu kan yuyan leixingxue de gongneng fenxi [On Linguistic functional analysis from the perspective of object marker distribution]. Dangdai Yuyanxue [Contemporary Linguistics] 41. 253–263.Google Scholar
Næss, Åshild. 2007. Prototypical Transitivity. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Noël, Dirk. 2007. Diachronic construction grammar and grammaticalization theory. Functions of Language 14(2). 177–202. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Recanati, François. 2012. Compositionality, flexibility, and context dependence. In M. Werning, W. Hinzen & E. Machery (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Compositionality, 175–191. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Shen, Jiaxuan. 2006. “‘Wang Mian sile fuqin’ de shengcheng fangshi [On generation of Wang Mian sile fuqin]. Zhongguo Yuwen [Studies of The Chinese Language] 41. 291–300.Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth C. & Graeme Trousdale. 2013. Constructionalization and Constructional Changes. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Trousdale, Graeme. 2013. Multiple inheritance and constructional change. Studies in Language 37(3). 491–514. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Trousdale, Graeme & Muriel Norde. 2012. Degrammaticalization and constructionalization: Two case studies. Language Sciences 361. 32–46. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wang, Weihui. 2000. Donghan-Suitang Changyongci Yanbian Yanjiu [On the evolution of common words from Eastern Han Dynasty to Sui-Tang Dynasties]. Nanjing: Nanjing University Press.Google Scholar
. 2011. Guren ruhe chifan [How the ancients eat]. Yuyan Wenzi Zhoubao [Language Weekly] 1(19). 4.Google Scholar
Williams, Kemp. 1991. Radial structuring in the Hausa lexicon: A prototype analysis of Hausa ‘eat’ and ‘drink’. Lingua 851. 321–340. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wu, Yicheng & Yanzhi Li. 2014. Yuyan jiwuxing de goushi yanjiu [Transitivity in the constructional perspective]. Waiguo Yu [Journal of Foreign Languages] 37(3). 41–48.Google Scholar
Xiong, Xueliang. 2012. A cultural-pragmatic account of the ‘CHI+NP’ expressions in Chinese. Intercultural Pragmatics 9(2). 225–243. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yu, Liming & Lü Jianjun. 2011. “Wang Mian sile fuqin” de lishi kaocha [The historical development of the construction as represented by the sentence Wang Mian si-le fuqin]. Zhonguo Yuwen [Studies of The Chinese Language] 11. 32–42.Google Scholar
Zhan, Fangqiong & Elizabeth C. Traugott. 2015. The constructionalization of the Chinese cleft construction. Studies in Language 39(2). 459–491. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zhang, Cheng. 2002. Hanyu jieci cizu cixu de jufa yanbain [The Historical Evolution of the Word-order of Prepositional Phrases in Chinese]. Beijing: Beijing Language and Culture University Press.Google Scholar
Zipf, K. George. 1935. The Psycho-biology of Language: An Introduction to Dynamic Philology. Cambridge, MA.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
. 1949. Human Behavior and the Principle of Least Effort: An Introduction to Human Ecology. Cambridge, Mass.: Addison-Wesley Press.Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Sun, Xiaoxue & Yicheng Wu
2022. (Non-)compositionality and complexity: A crosslinguistic investigation. Lingua 275 ► pp. 103344 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 18 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.