Article published in:
Studies in Language
Vol. 42:2 (2018) ► pp. 369388
References

References

Beyssade, Claire & Carmen Dobrovie-Sorin
2005A syntax-based analysis of predication. In Efthymia Georgala & Jonathan Howell (eds.), Proceedings of the 15th Semantics and Linguistic Theory Conference (SALT), 44–61, Ithaca: Cornell University. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Büring, Daniel
2006Focus projection and default prominence. In Valéria Molnár & Susanne Winkler (eds.), The Architecture of Focus, 321–346. Berlin/New York: Mouton De Gruyter.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chierchia, Gennaro
1985Formal semantics and the grammar of predication. Linguistic Inquiry 16(3). 417–443.Google Scholar
Côté, Marie-Hélène
2001On the status of subject clitics in Child French. In Margareta Almgren, Andoni Barrena, Maria-José Ezeizabarrena, Itziar Idiazabal & Brian MacWhinney (eds.), Research on Child Language Acquisition, 1314–1330. Somerville: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Culbertson, J.
2010Convergent evidence for categorical change in French: from subject clitic to agreement marker. Language 86(1). 85–132.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dawkins, R.
1976The Selfish Gene. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Deng, J.
2015Language memes in Chinese blessing texted messages. Linguistica Atlantica 34(2). 79–87.Google Scholar
[ p. 387 ]
Destruel, Emilie
2013The French C’est-cleft: Empirical studies of its meaning and use. Austin, TX: University of Texas at Austin dissertation.Google Scholar
Engdahl, Elisabet
2006Information packaging in questions. In Olivier Bonami & Patricia Cabredo-Hofherr (eds.), Empirical Issues in Syntax and Semantics, vol. 6, 93–111.Google Scholar
Féry, Caroline
2001The Phonology of Focus in French. In Audiatur Vox Sapientiae. A Festschrift for Arnim von Stechow, 153–181. Berlin: Akademie-Verlag.Google Scholar
Hamlaoui, Fatima
2007French cleft sentences and the syntax-phonology interface. In Proceedings of the 2007 annual conference of the Canadian Linguistic Association.Google Scholar
2009La focalisation à l’interface de la syntaxe et de la phonologie: le cas du français dans une perspective typologique. Paris: Université Paris III Sorbonne Nouvelle dissertation.Google Scholar
Hamlaoui, Fatima & Laurent Roussarie
2015#Je suis Charlie. Semantic and prosodic anatomy of an empathic copular sentence. ZAS Working Papers in Linguistics (ZASPiL) 58. 1–15.Google Scholar
Horn, Laurence. R.
1981Exhaustiveness and the semantics of clefts. In Victoria Burke & James Pustejovsky (eds.), Papers from the 11th Annual Meeting of NELS, 124–142. Amherst, GLSA.Google Scholar
vander Klok, Jozina, Heather Goad & Michael Wagner
2014Prosodic Focus in English vs. French: A Scope Account. Ms. McGill University (LingBuzz).Google Scholar
König, Ekkehard
1991The Meaning of Focus Particles: A Comparative Perspective. London: Routledge.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Krifka, Manfred
2001For a structured meaning account of questions and answers. In Caroline Féry & Werner Sternefeld (eds.), Audiatur Vox Sapientia. A Festschrift for Arnim von Stechow, 287–319. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.Google Scholar
2006Association with focus phrases. In Varléria Molnar & Susanne Winkler (eds.), The Architecture of Focus, 105–136. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kupferman, Lucien
1979Les constructions il est médecin / c’est un médecin: Essai de solution. Cahier de Linguistique 9. 131–164.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ladd, Robert D.
2007Intonational Phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Matushansky, Ora
2015The Other Francis Bacon: On Non-BARE Proper Names. Erkenntnis 80(2). 335–362.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Moeschler, Jacques
2009Pragmatics, propositional and non-propositional effects. Can a theory of utterance interpretation account for emotions in verbal communication? Social Science Information 48(3). 447–463.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Partee, Barbara
1987Noun phrase interpretation and type-shifting principle. In Jeroen Groenendijk, Dick de Jongh & Martin Stokhof (eds.), Studies in Discourse Representation Theory and the Theory of Generalized Quantifiers, 115–144. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Pešková, Andrea
2015Sujetos pronominales en el español porteño: Implicaciones pragmáticas en la interfaz sintáctico-fonológica (Beihefte zur Zeitschrift für romanische Philologie 394). Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Reinhart, Tanya
1982Pragmatics and linguistics – an analysis of sentence topics. Tech. Rep., IULC, Bloomington.Google Scholar
1995Interface strategies. In OTS Working Papers in Theoretical Linguistics, 55–109. Utrecht: OTS, Utrecht University.Google Scholar
2006Interface strategies: Optimal and Costly Computations. Cambridge, MA: MIT press.Google Scholar
Rooth, Mats
1992A theory of focus interpretation. Natural Language Semantics 1. 75–116.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 388 ]
Samek-Lodovici, Vieri
2005Prosody-syntax interaction in the expression of focus. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 23. 687–755.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Selkirk, Elisabeth
2011The Syntax-Phonology interface. In John Goldsmith, Jason Riggle & Alan Yu (eds.), The Handbook of Phonological Theory, 485–532. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1995Sentence Prosody: Intonation, stress, and phrasing. In John Goldsmith (ed.), The Handbook of Phonological Theory, 550–569. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
1984Phonology and Syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT press.Google Scholar
Siemund, Peter
2000Intensifiers in English and German: A Comparison. London: Routledge.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sportiche, Dominique
1988A theory of floating quantifiers and its corollaries for constituent structure. Linguistic Inquiry 19(2). 425–451.Google Scholar
Stalnaker, Robert
1974Pragmatic Presuppositions. In Milton M. Kunitz & Peter Unger (eds.), Semantics and Philosophy, 197–213. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
von Stechow, Arnim
1982Structured propositions. Tech. Rep., Konstanz SFB. http://​www2​.sfs​.uni​-tuebingen​.de​/˜arnim10/.
Szendrői, Kriszta
2001Focus and the syntax-phonology interface. London: University College of London dissertation.Google Scholar
2003A stress-based approach to the syntax of Hungarian focus. The Linguistic Review 20. 37–78.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Truckenbrodt, Hubert
1995Phonological Phrases: Their Relation to Syntax, Focus, and Prominence. Cambridge, MA: MIT Ph.D. thesis.Google Scholar
Vallduví, Enric & Elisabet Engdahl
1996The linguistic realization of information packaging. Linguistics 34. 459–519.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zribi-Hertz, Anne
1994The syntax of nominative clitics in Standard and Advanced French. In Guglielmo Cinque, Jan Koster, Jean-Yves Pollock, Luigi Rizzi & Raffaella Zanuttini (eds.), Paths towards Universal Grammar: Studies in Honor of Richard S. Kayne, 453–472. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Zubizarreta, Maria-Luisa
1998Prosody, Focus and Word Order. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar