Article published in:
Studies in Language
Vol. 43:1 (2019) ► pp. 120194
References

References

Aasmae, Niina
2014An introductory course of the Erzya language. Tartu: Tartu Ülikooli Paul Ariste Soome.Google Scholar
Adelaar, Willem F. H.
1997O sufixo onomático e a preservação das consoantes do fim de raiz em Guarani paraguaio. Boletim da Associação Brasileira de Lingüística 20. 11–19.Google Scholar
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y.
2002Typological parameters for the study of clitics, with special reference to Tariana. In R. M. W. Dixon & Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald (eds.), Word. A cross-linguistic typology, 42–78. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
2003A grammar of Tariana, from north-west Amazonia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010Language contact and pragmatic notions: Tariana in its multi-lingual context. In José Camacho, Rodrigo Gutiérrez-Bravo & Liliana Sánchez (eds.), Information structure in indigenous languages of the Americas: Syntactic approaches, 17–38. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
2012The languages of the Amazon. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Arnold, Werner
1989Lehrbuch des Neuwestaramäischen. Wiesbaden: Otto Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Barbosa, Lemos Pe. A.
1956Curso de tupi antigo: Gramática, exercícios, textos. Rio de Janeiro: Livraria São José.Google Scholar
Beeston, Alfred F. L.
1984Sabaic grammar (Journal of Semitic Studies Monograph 6). Manchester: University of Manchester Press.Google Scholar
[ p. 189 ]
Behnke, Anja
2010Die Struktur der Nominalphrase im Tersaamischen. Berlin: Humboldt Universität MA thesis.Google Scholar
Berta, Árpád
1998Tatar and Bashkir. In Lars Johansson & Éva Ágnes Csató (eds.), The Turkic languages, 283–300. London & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bertheau, Ernest
1843Gregorii Bar Hebraei qui et Abulpharag grammatica linguae syriacae in metro ephraemeo. Göttingen: Vandenhoek & Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Bertinetto, Pier Marco
2006On the tense-aspect system of Bolivian Chaco Guaraní. In Wolf Dietrich (ed.), Guaraní y ‘mawetí-tupí-guaraní’. Estudios históricos y descriptivos sobre una familia lingüística de América del Sur, 105–167. Münster: LIT.Google Scholar
2014 [2009]Ayoreo. In Mily Crevels & Pieter C. Muysken (eds.), Lenguas de Bolivia, Tomo 3: Oriente, 369–413. La Paz: Plural Editores. English version [Ayoreo (Zamuco). A grammatical sketch, 2009] at http://​linguistica​.sns​.it​/QLL​/QLL09​/Bertinetto​_1​.PDF (30 March 2018.)
Blau, Joshua
2006Some reflections on the disappearance of cases in Arabic. In Pier Giorgio Borbone, Alessandro Mengozzi & Mauro Tosco (eds.), Loquentes linguis: Studi in onore di Fabrizio A. Pennacchietti, 79–90. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Borges, Mônica V.
2006Aspectos fonológicos e morfossintáticos do avá-canoeiro (tupi-guarani). Campinas: Universidade Estadual de Campinas doctoral dissertation.Google Scholar
Briggs, Janet
1972Quiero contarles unos casos del Beni. Cochabamba: Instituto Lingüístico de Verano & Ministerio de Educación y Cultura, Dirección Nacional de Antropología. 2 vols.Google Scholar
Buccellati, Giorgio
1968An interpretation of the Akkadian stative as a nominal sentence. Journal of Near Eastern Studies 27. 1–12. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Butts, Aaron M.
2013Language change in the wake of empire: Syriac in its Greco-Roman context. Chicago: University of Chicago doctoral dissertation.Google Scholar
Cabral, Ana S. A. C.
1995Contact-induced language change in the Western Amazon: the non-genetic origin of the Kokama language. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh doctoral dissertation.Google Scholar
2001Observações sobre a história do morfema -a da família tupi-guarani. In Francesc Queixalós (ed.), Des noms et des verbes en tupi-guarani: état de la question, 133–162. München: Lincom Europa.Google Scholar
Cabral, Ana S. A. C., Ariel P. C. E. Silva & Suseile A. Sousa
2013Expressão do caso argumentativo em três línguas tupí-guaraní: asuriní do tocantins, avá-canoeiro e zo’é. Anais do SILEL. Simpósio Internacional de Letras e Linguística 3(1). 1–17.Google Scholar
Carvalho, Márcia G. P. de
2001Sinais de morte ou de vitalidade? Mudanças estruturais na língua tembé: Contribuição ao estudo dos efeitos de contato lingüístico na Amazônia Oriental. Belém: Universidade Federal do Pará MA thesis.Google Scholar
Carver, Daniel E.
2016The Akkadian stative: A non-finite verb. Ancient Near Eastern Studies 53. 1–24.Google Scholar
Castrén, Matthias A.
1858Versuch einer jenissei-ostjanischen und kottischen Sprachlehre. St. Petersburg: Kaiserliche Akademie der Wissenschaften.Google Scholar
Chomé, Ignace
1958 [ante 1745] Arte de la lengua zamuca. Présentation de Suzanne Lussagnet. Journal de la Société des Américanistes de Paris 47. 121–178. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ciucci, Luca
2016 [2013]Inflectional morphology in the Zamucoan languages. Asunción: CEADUC.Google Scholar
Ciucci, Luca & Pier Marco Bertinetto
2015A diachronic view of the Zamucoan verb in-flection. Folia Linguistica Historica 36(1). 19–87.Google Scholar
[ p. 190 ]
2017Possessive inflection in Proto-Zamucoan: A reconstruction. Diachronica 34. 283–330. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2019Possessive classifiers in Zamucoan. In Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald & Elena Mihas (eds.), Genders and classifiers: A cross-linguistic typology, 144–175. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
In preparation. Towards the reconstruction of Proto-Zamucoan nominal suffixation.
Coppock, Elizabeth & David Beaver
2015Definiteness and determinacy. Linguistics and Philosophy 38. 377–435. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Creissels, Denis
Forthcoming. Inverse-locational predication and other ‘existential’ constructions in typological perspective. Italian Journal of Linguistics.
Décsy, Gy
1970Das Existentialverb in den prädikativen Fügungen des Selkupischen. In Wolf-gang Schlachter (ed.), Symposion über die Syntax der uralischen Sprachen, 50–64. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Dietrich, Wolf
1986El idioma chiriguano. Gramática, textos, vocabulario. Madrid: Instituto de Cooperación Iberoamericana.Google Scholar
2001Categorias lexicais nas línguas tupi-guarani (visão comparativa). In Francesc Queixalós (ed.), Des noms et des verbes en tupi-guarani: état de la question, 21–37. München: Lincom Europa.Google Scholar
Dixon, R. M. W.
2010Basic linguistic theory. Vol. 2, 159–188. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dobson, Rose M.
1988Aspectos da língua kayabi. Cuiabá: Sociedade Internacional de Lingüística.Google Scholar
Fabre, Alain
2016Gramática de la lengua nivacle (familia mataguayo, Chaco Paraguayo). München: Lincom.Google Scholar
Feist, Timothy
2010A Grammar of Skolt Saami. Manchester: University of Manchester doctoral dissertation.Google Scholar
Fullilove, William
2014Definiteness in Qumran Aramaic. Washington, DC: The Catholic University of America doctoral dissertation.Google Scholar
García Martínez, Florentino & Eibert J. C. Tigchelaar
1997The Dead Sea Scrolls. Study edition. Vol. 1. Leiden – Boston & Grand Rapids (Michigan): Brill & Eerdmans.Google Scholar
1998The Dead Sea Scrolls. Study edition. Vol. 2. Leiden – Boston & Grand Rapids (Michigan): Brill & Eerdmans.Google Scholar
Georg, Stephan
2007A descriptive grammar of Ket (Yenisei-Ostyak). Kent, UK: Global Oriental. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Goldenberg, Gideon
1983On Syriac sentence structure. In Michael Sokoloff (ed.), Arameans, Aramaic and the Aramaic literary tradition, 97–140. Ramat-Gan: Bar-Ilan University Press.Google Scholar
1991On predicative adjectives and Syriac syntax. Bibliotheca Orientalis 48. 716–726.Google Scholar
Guildea, Spike
2018Reconstructing the copula and nonverbal predicate constructions in Cariban. In Simon Overall, Rosa Vallejos & Spike Guildea (eds.), Nonverbal predication in Amazonian languages, 365–402. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 191 ]
Hasselbach, Rebecca
2007External plural markers in Semitic: A new assessment. In Cynthia L. Miller (ed.), Studies in Semitic and Afroasiatic linguistics presented to Gene B. Gragg, 123–138. Chicago: The Oriental Institute of the University of Chicago.Google Scholar
2013Case in Semitic. Roles, relations and reconstruction. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Haude, Katharina
2018Nonverbal predication in Movima. In Simon Overall, Rosa Vallejos & Spike Guildea (eds.), Nonverbal predication in Amazonian languages, 217–244. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Helimski, Eugene
1998aNganasan. In Daniel Abondolo (ed.), The Uralic languages, 480–515. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
1998bSelkup. In Daniel Abondolo (ed.), The Uralic languages, 548–579. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hengeveld, Kees
1992Non-verbal predication. Theory, typology, diachrony. Berlin / New York: De Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Heusinger, Klaus von
2002Specificity and definiteness in sentence and discourse structure. Journal of Semantics 9. 245–274. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Higham, Alice, Maxine Morarie & Greta Paul
2000Ayoré-English dictionary. Sanford, FL: New Tribes Mission. 3 vols.Google Scholar
Huehnergard, John
1987Stative, predicative form, pseudo-verb. Journal of Near Eastern Studies 46. 215–232. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2005A grammar of Akkadian. Winona Lake, IN: Eisenbrauns.Google Scholar
2017Arabic in its Semitic context. In Ahmad Al-Jallad (ed.), Arabic in context, 3–34. Leiden: Brill. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jastrow, Otto
1997The Neo-Aramaic languages. In Robert Hetzron (ed.), The Semitic languages, 334–377. New York & London: Routledge.Google Scholar
2005Der bestimmte Artikel im Aramäischen – ein Blick auf 3000 Jahre Sprachgeschichte. In Bogdan Burtea, Josef Tropper & Helen Younansardaroud (eds.), Studia semitica et semitohamitica. Festschrift für Rainer Voigt anläßlich seines 60. Geburtstages am 17. Januar 2004, 137–150. Münster: Ugarit-Verlag.Google Scholar
Jensen, Cheryl
1998Comparative Tupí-Guaraní morphosyntax. In Desmond C. Derbyshire and Geoffrey K. Pullum (eds.), Handbook of Amazonian languages, Vol. 4., 399–618. Berlin & New York: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
1999Tupí-Guaraní. In R. M. W. Dixon and Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald (eds.), The Amazonian languages, 125–164. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Johansson, Lars
1998The structure of Turkic. In Lars Johansson & Éva Ágnes Csató (eds.), The Turkic languages, 30–66. London & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Joosten, Jan
1989The predicative adjective in the status emphaticus in Syriac. Bibliotheca Orientalis 46. 18–24.Google Scholar
Kangasmaa-Minn, Eeva
1998Mari. In Daniel Abondolo (ed.), The Uralic languages, 219–248. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kelm, Heinz
1964Das Zamuco: eine lebende Sprache. Anthropos 59. 457–516, 770–842.Google Scholar
Keresztes, Lázló
1998Mansi. In Daniel Abondolo (ed.), The Uralic languages, 387–427. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Khan, Geoffrey
2008The Neo-Aramaic dialect of Barwar (3 vols.). Leiden & Boston: Brill. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2018Remarks on the historical development and syntax of the copula in North-Eastern Neo-Aramaic dialects. Aramaic Studies 16. 234–269. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 192 ]
Kouwenberg, Norbertus J. C.
2000Nouns and verbs: the verbal nature of the Akkadian stative. Orientalia 69. 21–71.Google Scholar
Kraus, Fritz R.
1984Nominalsätze in altbabylonischen Briefen und der Stativ. Amsterdam: Noord-Hollandsche Uitgevers Maatschappij.Google Scholar
Kuryłowicz, Jerzy
1972Studies in Semitic grammar and metrics. Wrocław: Zakładim Ossolińskich.Google Scholar
Launey, Michel
1994Une grammaire omniprédicative. Essai sur la morphosyntaxe du nahuatl classique. Paris: CRNS Editions.Google Scholar
2004The features of omnipredicativity in Classical Nahuatl. Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung 57. 49–69.Google Scholar
Lemaréchal, Alain
1989Les parties du discours. Sémantique et syntaxe. PUF, Paris.Google Scholar
Magalhâes, Marina M. S.
2016Os dois diferentes tipos de sintagmas nominais complexos com núcleo verbal estativo da língua guajá. In Francesc Queixalós & Dioney M. Gomes (eds.), O sintagma nominal em línguas amazônicas, 187–202. Campinas: Pontes Editores.Google Scholar
Mattissen, Johanna
2003Dependent-head synthesis in Nivkh. A contribution to a typology of polysynthesis. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Meira, Sérgio
2006Stative verbs vs. nouns in Sateré-Mawé and the Tupian family. In Grażyna J. Rowicka & Eithne B. Carlin (eds.), What’s in a verb?, 189–214. Utrecht: LOT.Google Scholar
Michael, Lev
2014On the pre-Columbian origin of Proto-Omagua-Kokama. Journal of Language Contact 7(2). 309–344. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Miestamo, Matti
2011Skolt Saami: A typological profile. Suomalais-Ugrilaisen Seuran Ai-kakauskirja & Journal de la Société Finno-Ougrienne 93. 111–145.Google Scholar
Mihas, Elena
2015A grammar of Alto Perené (Arawak). Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Mikkelsen, Lise
2005Copular clause. Specification, predication and equation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mithun, Marianne
1999The languages of Native North America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Morarie, Maxine
1980Simplified Ayoreo grammar. Cochabamba: Publicaciones Nueva Vida (mimeo).Google Scholar
Morarie, Maxine & Janet Briggs
1985Génesis erámi taningai. Cochabamba & Asunción: Misión Nuevas Tribus.Google Scholar
Moro, Andrea
1997The raising of predicates. Predicative noun phrases and the theory of clause structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2005Copular sentences. In Martin Everaert, Henk van Riemsdjik, Rob Goedemans & Bart Hollebrandse (eds.), The Blackwell companion to syntax, Vol. 2, 1–23. London: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Müller, Ana & Luciana Sanchez-Mendes
2016The semantics of bare nouns in Karitiana. In Francesc Queixalós & Dioney M. Gomes (eds.), O sintagma nominal em línguas amazônicas, 241–261. Campinas: Pontes Editores.Google Scholar
Nedjalkov, Vladimir P. & Galina A. Otaina
2013A syntax of the Nivkh language. The Amur dialect. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: Benjamins (translation of the Russian original). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nikolaeva, Irina
2014A grammar of Tundra Nenets. Berlin: De Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nöldeke, Theodor
1898 [1966]Kurzgefasste syrische Grammatik. Darmstadt: Wissen-schaftliche Buchgesellschaft.Google Scholar
[ p. 193 ]
Overall, Simon
2018Nonverbal predication and copula constructions in Aguaruna. In Simon Overall, Rosa Vallejos & Spike Guildea (eds.), Nonverbal predication in Ama-zonian languages, 135–162. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Overall, Simon, Rosa Vallejos & Spike Guildea
(eds.) 2018aNonverbal predication in Amazonian languages. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2018bNonverbal predication in Amazonia: Typological and diachronic considerations. In Simon Overall, Rosa Vallejos & Spike Guildea (eds.), Nonverbal predication in Amazonian languages, 1–49. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pat-El, Na’ma
2009The development of the Semitic definite article: A syntactic approach. Journal of Semitic Studies 54. 19–50. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Payne, Thomas E.
1997Describing morphosyntax: A guide for field linguists. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Peña, Germán
2015A grammar of Wampis. Eugene, OR: University of Oregon doctoral dissertation.Google Scholar
Pennacchietti, Fabrizio
2005Ripercussioni sintattiche in conseguenza dell’introduzione dell’articolo determinativo proclitico in semitico. Aula Orientalis 23. 175–184.Google Scholar
Praça, Walkíria N.
2007Morfossintaxe da língua tapirapé. Brasília, Brazil: Universidade de Brasília doctoral dissertation.Google Scholar
Queixalós, Francesc
2001Le suffixe référentiant en émérillon. In Francesc Queixalós (ed.), Des noms et des verbes en tupi-guarani: état de la question, 115–132. München: Lincom Europa.Google Scholar
2006The primacy and fate of predicativity in Tupi-Guarani. In Ximena Lois & Valentina Vapnarsky (eds.), Lexical categories and root classes in Am-erindian languages, 249–287. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Reinisch, Leo
1893Die Bedauye-Sprache in Nordost-Afrika. Vienna: Gewold. 2 vols.Google Scholar
Rodrigues, Aryon D.
1996Argumento e predicado em tupinambá. Boletim da Associação Brasileira de Lingüística 19. 57–66.Google Scholar
2001Sobre a natureza do caso argumentativo. In Francesc Queixalós (ed.), Des noms et des verbes en tupi-guarani: état de la question, 103–114. München: Lincom Europa.Google Scholar
Rodrigues, Aryon D. & Ana S. A. C. Cabral
2012Tupían. In Lyle Campbell & Verónica Grondona (eds.), The Indigenous languages of South America. A comprehen-sive guide, 495–574. Berlin: De Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rose, Françoise
2002My hammock = I have a hammock. Possessed nouns constituting pos-sessive clauses in Emérillon (Tupi-Guarani). In Ana S. A. C. Cabral & Aryon D. Rodrigues (eds.), Línguas indígenas brasileiras. Fonologia, gramática e história. Atas do I Encontro Internacional do GTLI da ANPOLL, 392–402. Belém, Brazil: CNPQ & Universidade federal do Para.Google Scholar
2003Morphosyntaxe de l’émérillon. Une langue tupi-guarani de Guyane française. Lyon: Université Lumière Lyon 2 doctoral dissertation.Google Scholar
2018Nonverbal predication and the nonverbal clause type of Mojeño Trinita-rio. In Simon Overall, Rosa Vallejos & Spike Guildea (eds.), Nonverbal predication in Amazonian languages, 53–84. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Roy, Isabelle
2013Nonverbal predication: Copular sentences at the syntax-semantics interface. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rubin, Aaron D.
2005Studies in Semitic grammaticalization. Winona Lake, IN: Eisenbrauns.Google Scholar
[ p. 194 ]
Sammallahti, Pekka
1998The Saami languages. An introduction. Kárášjohka: Davvi Girji.Google Scholar
Sasse, Hans-Jürgen
1988Der irokesische Sprachtyp (Arbeitspapier 9). Köln: Institut für Sprachwissenschaft, Universität zu Köln. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schwarz, Anne
2018Between verb and noun: Explorations into the domain of nonverbal predication in Ecuadorian Secoya. In Simon Overall, Rosa Vallejos & Spike Guildea (eds.), Nonverbal predication in Amazonian languages, 193–216. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Seki, Lucy
2000Gramática do kamaiurá. Língua tupi-guarani do Alto Xingu. Campinas: Editora da Unicamp.Google Scholar
2001Classes de palavras e categorias sintático-funcionais em kamaiurá. In Francesc Queixalós (ed.), Des noms et des verbes en tupi-guarani: état de la question, 39–66. München: Lincom Europa.Google Scholar
Souza, Patrícia O. B.
2004Estudos de aspectos da língua kaiabi (Tupi). Campinas: Universidade Estadual de Campinas MA thesis.Google Scholar
Stassen, Leon
1997Intransitive predication. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
2013Nominal and locational predication. In Matthew S. Dryer & Martin Haspelmath (eds.), The World Atlas of Language Structures Online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. http://​wals​.info​/chapter​/119 (27 December 2017.)
Stone, Gerald
1980An introduction to Polish. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Tropper, Joseph
2001Die Herausbildung des bestimmten Artikels im Semitischen. Journal of Semitic Studies 46. 1–31. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tucker, Archibald N. & Margaret A. Bryan
1966Linguistic analysis: the non-Bantu languages of North-Eastern Africa. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Turunen, Rigina
2009A typology of non-verbal predication in Erzya. Acta Linguistica Hungarica 56. 251–313. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010Non-verbal predication in Erzya. Studies on morphosyntactic varia-tion and part of speech distinctions. Helsinki: University of Helsinki doctoral disser-tation.Google Scholar
Ulrich, Matthew & Rosemary Ulrich
2000Diccionario I̵shɨro (Chamacoco) – Español / Español – I̵shɨro (Chamacoco). Asunción: Misión Nuevas Tribus Paraguay.Google Scholar
Vallejos, Rosa
2016A grammar of Kukama-Kukamiria. A language from the Amazon. Leiden & Boston: Brill. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wilbur, Joshua K.
2014A grammar of Pite Saami. Berlin: Language Science Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wintschalek, Walter
1993Die Areallinguistik am Beispiel syntaktischer Übereinstimmungen im Wolga-Kama-Areal. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Wright, William
1871Apocryphal Acts of the Apostles, I. The Syriac texts. London: Williams and Norgate.Google Scholar
Voigt, Rainer M.
1998Der Artikel im Semitischen. Journal of Semitic Studies 43. 221–258. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
von Heusinger, Klaus
see Heusinger).
Zaicz, Gábor
1998Mordva. In Daniel Abondolo (ed.), The Uralic languages, 184–218. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
[ p. 195 ]
Cited by

Cited by 4 other publications

Bertinetto, Pier Marco
2021. Zamucoan Person Marking as a Perturbed System*. Studia Linguistica 75:2  pp. 265 ff. Crossref logo
Ciucci, Luca
2020. Matter borrowing, pattern borrowing and typological rarities in the Gran Chaco of South America. Morphology 30:4  pp. 283 ff. Crossref logo
Ciucci, Luca
2021. How Historical Data Complement Fieldwork: New Diachronic Perspectives on Zamucoan Verb Inflection*. Studia Linguistica 75:2  pp. 289 ff. Crossref logo
Ciucci, Luca
2021. How to restructure a grammatical category: the innovative person system of Chamacoco (Zamucoan, northern Paraguay). Folia Linguistica 55:s42-s1  pp. 111 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 09 november 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.