Article published in:
Studies in Language
Vol. 41:4 (2017) ► pp. 9561006
References

[ p. 996 ]References

Archi, Alfonso
1977I poteri della dea Ištar hurrito-ittita. Oriens Antiquus 16. 297–311.Google Scholar
Ariel, Mira
2008Pragmatics and Grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bar-Asher Siegal, Elitzur A.
2011Notes on reciprocal constructions in Akkadian in light of typological and historical considerations. Semitica et Classica 4. 23–42. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bar-Asher Siegal, Elitzur. A.
2014NP-strategies in Semitic languages in a typological perspective. Diachronica 31(3). 337–378. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Beekes, Robert
2010Etymological dictionary of Greek. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Boley, Jacqueline
1989The sentence particles and the place words in Old and Middle Hittite [Innsbrucker Beiträge zur Sprachwissenschaft 60]. Innsbruck: Institut für Sprachwissenschaft.Google Scholar
1993The Hittite particle -z/-za [Innsbrucker Beiträge zur Sprachwissenschaft]. Innsbruck: Institut für Sprachwissenschaft.Google Scholar
Brinton, Laurel J. & Elizabeth C. Traugott
2005Lexicalization and language change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brosch, Cyril
2014Untersuchungen zur hethitischen Raumgrammatik [TOPOI: Berlin Studies of the Ancient World 20]. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Cambi, Valentina
2007Tempo e Aspetto in ittito. Con particolare riferimento al suffisso -ske/a. Alessandria: Edizioni dell’Orso.Google Scholar
CHD =Güterbock, Hans Gustav, Harry A. Jr. Hoffner & Theo P. J. van den Hout 1989- The Hittite Dictionary of the Oriental Institute of the University of Chicago. Chicago: The Oriental Institute of the University of Chicago.Google Scholar
Corbett, Greville
2006Agreement. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cotticelli-Kurras, Paola & Alfredo Rizza
2011Die hethitische Partikel -z(a) im Licht neuer theoretischer Ansätze. In Thomas Krisch & Thomas Lindner (eds.), Indogermanistik und Linguistik im Dialog: Akten der XIII. Fachtagung der Indogermanischen Gesellschaft, 120–130. Wiesbaden: Reichert.Google Scholar
Creissels, Denis
2006Syntaxe générale, une introduction typologique. Paris: Hermès.Google Scholar
Cuzzolin, Perluigi, Ignazio Putzu & Paolo Ramat
2006The Indo-European adverb in diachronic and typological perspective. Indogermanische Forschungen 111. 1–38.Google Scholar
Darlymple, Mary, Makoto Kanazawa, Yookyung Kim, Sam Mchombo & Stanley Peters
1998Reciprocal expressions and the concept of reciprocity. Linguistics and Philosophy 21. 159–210. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dimitriadis, Alexis
2008Irreducible symmetry in reciprocal constructions. In Ekkehard König & Volker Gast (eds.), Reciprocals and reflexives: Theoretical and cross-linguistic explorations, 375–410. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Dressler, Wolfgang
1968Studien zur verbalen Pluralität. Iterativum, Distributivum, Durativum, Intensivum in der allgemeinen Grammatik, im Lateinischen und Hethitischen. Österreichische Akademie der Wissenschaften. Philosophisch-historische Klasse: Sitzungsberichte, 259/1. Vienna: Böhlau.Google Scholar
Dunkel, George E.
2014Lexikon der indogermanischen Partikeln und Pronominal-stämme. Band 2: Lexikon. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
Eichner, Heiner
1992Anatolian. In Jadranka Gvozdanović (ed.), Indo-European Numerals, 29–96. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 997 ]
Evans, Nicholas
2008Reciprocal constructions: Towards a structural typology. In Ekkehard König & Volker Gast (eds.), Reciprocals and reflexives: Theoretical and cross-linguistic explorations, 33–103. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Evans, Nicholas, Stephen C. Levinson, Alice Gaby & Asifa Majid
2011Introduction: Reciprocals and semantic typology. In Nicholas Evans, Stephen C. Levinson, Alice Gaby & Asifa Majid (eds.), Reciprocals and semantic typology [Typological Studies in Language 98], 1–28. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fanelli, Valentina
2009Le costruzioni reciproche nella lingua latina. Roma: Universitaria editrice.Google Scholar
Fortson, Benjamin W.
2004Indo-European language and culture: An introduction. Chichester: Blackwell Wiley.Google Scholar
Frajzyngier, Zygmunt & Traci S. Curl
(eds.) 2000Reciprocals: Forms and functions [Typological Studies in Language 41]. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Francia, Rita
1995Costruzione e valore del pronome possessivo enclitico di prima plurale in Hittito. Studi Micenei ed Egeo-Anatolici 35. 93–99.Google Scholar
2002 Le funzioni sintattiche degli elementi avverbiali di luogo ittiti: anda(n), āppa(n), katta(n), katti-, peran, šer, šar, šarā [Studia Asiana 1]. Roma: Herder.Google Scholar
Friedrich, Johannes
1950Churritische Märchen und Sagen in hethitischer Sprache. Zeitschrift für Assyriologie 49. 213–255. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1960Hethitisches Elementarbuch, 1. Teil: Kurzgefaßte Grammatik (2nd ed.) [Indogermanische Bibliothek, 1. Reihe: Lehr- und Handbücher]. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
Garrett, Andrew J.
1996Wackernagel’s Law and Unaccusativity in Hittite. In A. L. Halpern & A. M. Zwicky (eds.), Approaching second: Second position clitics and related phenomena, 83–133. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Gast, Volver & Florian Haas
2008Anaphors in German and other European languages. In Ekkehard König & Volker Gast (eds.), Reciprocals and reflexives: Theoretical and cross-linguistic explorations, 307–346. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Goedegebuure, Petra
2003The Hittite distal demonstrative ASI (UNI, ENI, etc.). Die Sprache 43. 1–32.Google Scholar
2006A new proposal for the reading of the Hittite numeral ‘1’: šia- . In Theo P. J. van den Hout & C. H. van Zoest (eds.), The life and times of Ḫattušili III and Tutḫaliya IV: Proceedings of a symposium held in honour of J. de Roos, 12–13 December 2003, Leiden, 65–88. Leiden: Nederlands Historisch-Archeologisch Instituut te Instanbul.Google Scholar
2014The Hittite demonstratives. Studies in deixis, topics, and focus [Studien zu den Bogazköy-Texten 55]. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Goetze, Albrecht
1933Über die Partikeln -za, -kan und -šan der hethitischen Satzverbindung. Archiv Orientální 5. 1–38.Google Scholar
Grestenberger, Laura
2016Reconstructing Proto-Indo-European deponents. Journal of Indo-European Linguistics 4. 98–149.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Güterbock, Hans G.
1983A Hurro-Hittite hymn to Ishtar. Journal of the American Oriental Society 103. 155–164. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Haas, Florian
2007The development of English each other: grammaticalization, lexicalization, or both?. English Language and Linguistics 11(1). 31–50. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010Reciprocity in English: Historical development and synchronic structure. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
[ p. 998 ]
Haspelmath, Martin & Susanne Maria Michaelis
2017Analytic and synthetic: typological change in varieties of European languages. In Isabelle Buchstaller & Beat Siebenhaar (eds.), Language variation – European perspectives VI: Selected papers from the 8th International Conference on Language Variation in Europe (ICLaVE 8), Leipzig 2015: 3–22. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin
1987Transitivity alternations of the anticausative type [Arbeitspapiere, N. F. 5]. Cologne: Institut für Sprachwissenschaft.Google Scholar
1993More on the typology of the inchoative/causative verb alternations. In Bernard Comrie & Maria Polinsky (eds.), Causatives and transitivity, 87–120. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2008A frequentist explanation of some universals of reflexive marking. Linguistic Discovery 6(1). 40–63. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
HED =Puhvel, Jaan 1984 – Hittite Etymological Dictionary. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
HEG =Tischler, Johann 1983–2010Hethitisches Etymologisches Glossar. Innsbruck: Institut für Sprachwissenschaft.Google Scholar
Heim, Irene
1982The semantics of definite and indefinite noun phrases. Massachusetts: University of Massachusetts PhD Dissertation.Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd & Tania Kuteva
2002World lexicon of grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Heine, Bernd & Hiroyuki Miyashita
2008The intersection between reflexives and reciprocals: A grammaticalization perspective. In Ekkehard König & Volker Gast (eds.), Reciprocals and reflexives: Theoretical and cross-linguistic explorations, 169–224. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd
2002On the role of context in grammaticalization. In Ilse Wischer & Gabriele Diewald (eds.), New reflections on grammaticalization [Typological Studies in Language 49], 83–101. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hoffner, Harry A. Jr. & Craig H. Melchert
2008A grammar of the Hittite language. Part I: reference grammar. Winona Lake, Indiana: Eisenbrauns.Google Scholar
Hoffner, Harry A. Jr.
1969On the use of Hittite -za in nominal sentences. Journal of Near Eastern Studies 28. 225–230. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hopper, Paul J. & Elizabeth C. Traugott
1993Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
HW2 =Friedrich, Johannes, Annelies Kammenhuber & Inge Hoffmann 1975- Hethitisches Worterbuch [Indogermanische Bibliothek. 2. Reihe: Wörterbücher]. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
Inglese, Guglielmo
2015Towards a Hittite treebank. Basic challenges and methodological remarks. In Marco Passarotti, Francesco Mambrini & Caroline Sporleder, (eds.), Proceedings of the Workshop on Corpus-Based Research in the Humanities (CRH) 10 December 2015, Warsaw, Poland, 59–68. http://​crh4​.ipipan​.waw​.pl​/proceedings/.
In preparation. The Hittite middle voice. Pavia: University of Pavia PhD Dissertation.
[ p. 999 ]
Josephson, Folke
2003The Hittite reflexive construction in a typological perspective. In Brigitte L. M. Bauer & Georges-Jean Pinault (eds.), Language in time and space: A Festschrift for Werner Winter on the occasion of his 80th birthday, 211–232. Berlin/ New York: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2008Actionality and aspect in Hittite. In Folke Josephson & Ingmar Söhrman (eds.), Interdependence of diachronic and synchronic analyses, 131–147. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kemmer, Suzanne
1993The middle voice [Typological Studies in Language 23]. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kloekhorst, Alwin
2008Etymological dictionary of the Hittite inherited lexicon. Leiden/Boston: Brill.Google Scholar
Knjazev, Jurij P.
2007Lexical reciprocals as a means of expressing reciprocal situations. In Vladimir P. Nedjalkov, Emma Š. Geniušene & Zlatka Guentchéva (eds.), Reciprocal constructions [Typological Studies in Language 71], 115–146. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
König, Ekkehard & Volker Gast
2008Reciprocity and reflexivity – description, typology and theory. In Ekkehard König & Volker Gast (eds.), Reciprocals and reflexives: Theoretical and cross-linguistic explorations, 1–32. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
König, Ekkehard & Shigehiro Kokutani
2006Towards a typology of reciprocal constructions: focus on German and Japanese. Linguistics 44(2). 271–302. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
König, Ekkehard & Peter Siemund
2000Intensifiers and reflexives: a typological perspective. In Zygmunt Frajzyngier & Traci S. Curl (eds.), Reflexives: Forms and functions [Typological Studies in Language 41], 41–74. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
König, Ekkehard & Letizia Vezzosi
2004The role of predicate meaning in the development of reflexivity. In Walter Bisang, Nikolaus Himmelmann & Björn Wiemer (eds.), What makes grammaticalization: A look from its fringes and its components, 213–244. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Krisch, Thomas
1999Zur Reziprozität in altindogermanischen Sprachen. In Heiner Eichner & Hans-Christian Luschützky (eds.), Compositiones Indogermanicae in memoriam Jochem Schindler Gedenkschrift für Jochern Schindler, 275–297. Praha: enigma corporation.Google Scholar
Kulikov, Leonid
2007Reciprocal constructions in Vedic. In Vladimir P. Nedjalkov, Emma Š. Geniušene & Zlatka Guentchéva (eds.), Reciprocal constructions [Typological Studies in Language 71], 709–738. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013Middle and reflexive. In Silvia Luraghi & Claudia Parodi (eds.), The Bloomsbury Companion to Syntax, 261–280. London/New Delhi/New York/Sydney: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
2014Grammaticalization of reciprocal pronouns in Indo-Arian: Evidence from Sanskrit and Indo-European for a diachronic typology of reciprocal constructions. Journal of South Asian Languages and Linguistics 1(2). 117–156 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Letuchiy, Alexander
2009Towards a typology of labile verbs: lability vs. derivation. In Patience Epps & Alexandre Arkhipov (eds.), New challenges in typology: Transcending the borders and refining the distinctions, 223–244. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Lichtenberk, Frantisek
1985Multiple uses of reciprocal constructions. Australian Journal of Linguistics 5. 19–41. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 1000 ]
2000Reciprocals without reflexives. In Zygmunt Frajzyngier & Traci S. Curl (eds.), Reciprocals: Forms and functions [Typological Studies in Language 41], 32–62. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Luraghi, Silvia
1990Old Hittite sentence structure. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
2010The rise (and possible fall) of configurationality. In Silvia Luraghi & Vit Bubenik (eds.), Continuum Companion to Historical Linguistics, 212–229. London/New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
2012Basic valency orientation and the middle voice in Hittite. Studies in Language 36(1). 1–32. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2016Basic valency orientation in PIE. Paper presented at the 15th Fachtagung of the Indogermanische Gesellschaft “Back to the Root – The Structure, Function, and Semantics of the PIE Root” , Wien 12–16/09/2016.
Majid, Asifa, Nicholas Evans, Alice Gaby & Stephen C. Levinson
2011The semantics of reciprocal constructions across languages: an extensional approach. In Nicholas Evans, Stephen C. Levinson, Alice Gaby & Asifa Majid (eds.), Reciprocals and semantic typology [Typological Studies in Language 98], 29–60. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Malchukov, Andrej
2015Valency classes and alternation: parameters of variation. In Andrej Malchukov & Bernard Comrie (eds.), Valency classes in the world’s languages, vol. 1, 73–130. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Maslova, Elena & Vladimir P. Nedjalkov
2005Reciprocal constructions. In Mattew S. Dryer & Martin Haspelmath (eds.), The World Atlas of Language Structures Online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. Accessed at http://​wals​.info​/chapter​/106.
Maslova, Elena
2008Reflexive encoding of reciprocity: Cross-linguistic and language-internal variation. In Ekkehard König & Volker Gast (eds.), Reciprocals and reflexives: Theoretical and cross-linguistic explorations, 225–258. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Mattiola, Simone
2017The conceptual space of pluractional constructions. Lingue e Linguaggio 16(1). 119–146.Google Scholar
Mauri, Caterina
2008Coordination relations in the languages of Europe and beyond. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
McGregor, William
2000Reflexive and reciprocal constructions in Nyulnyulan languages. In Zygmunt Frajzyngier & Traci S. Curl (eds.), Reciprocals: Forms and functions [Typological Studies in Language 41], 85–122. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Melchert, Craig H.
2005Latin insolēscō, Hittite šulle(šš)- and PIE Statives in -ē- . In Nikolak N. Kazansky (ed.), Hṛdā́ mánasā. Studies presented to Professor Leonard G. Herzenberg on his 70th birthday, 90–98. St. Petersburg: Nauka.Google Scholar
2009Local adverbs in Hittite: Synchrony and diachrony. Language and Linguistics Compass 3(2). 607–602. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Forthcoming. Semantics and etymology of Hittite takš- . To appear in Indo-Iranian and Its Indo-European Origin. Studies in honor of Alexander Lubotsky.
Miller, Jared L.
2013Royal Hittite instructions and related administrative texts [Writings from the Ancient World 31]. Society of Biblical Literature: Atlanta.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 1001 ]
Nedjalkov, Vladimir P. & Emma Genušiene
2007Questionnaire on reciprocals. In Vladimir P. Nedjalkov, Emma Š. Geniušene & Zlatka Guentchéva (eds.), Reciprocal constructions [Typological Studies in Language 71], 379–434. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nedjalkov, Vladimir P.
2007aOverview of the research. Definitions of terms, framework, and related issues. In Vladimir P. Nedjalkov, Emma Š. Geniušene & Zlatka Guentchéva (eds.), Reciprocal constructions [Typological Studies in Language 71], 3–114. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2007bEncoding of the reciprocal meaning. In Vladimir P. Nedjalkov, Emma Š. Geniušene & Zlatka Guentchéva (eds.), Reciprocal constructions [Typological Studies in Language 71], 147–208. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2007cPolysemy of reciprocal markers. In Vladimir P. Nedjalkov, Emma Š. Geniušene & Zlatka Guentchéva (eds.), Reciprocal constructions [Typological Studies in Language 71], 231–334. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Newmann, Paul
1990Nominal and verbal plurality in Chadic. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Neu, Erich
1968aInterpretationen der hethitischen mediopassiven Verbalformen. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
1968bDas hethitische Mediopassiv und seine indogermanischen Grundlagen. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Nikolaev, Alexander
2010Hittite menaḫḫanda . Journal of the American Oriental Society 130(1). 36–71.Google Scholar
Nowicki, Helmut
2000Zum Einleitungsparagraphen des Anitta-Textes (CTH 1, 1–4). In Christian Zinko & Michaela Ofitsch (eds.), 125 Jahre Indogermanistik in Graz, 411–419. Graz: Leykam.Google Scholar
Plank, Frans
2008Thoughts on the origin, progress, and pronominal status of reciprocal forms in Germanic, occasioned by those of Bavarian. In Ekkehard König & Volker Gast (eds.), Reciprocals and reflexives: Theoretical and cross-linguistic explorations, 347–374. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Sankho, Sergueï & Nicole Tersis
2008Is a “friend” an “enemy”? Between “proximity” and “opposition”. In Martine Vanhove (ed.), From polysemy to semantic change [Studies in Language Companion 106], 314–340. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Sansò, Andrea
2017Where do antipassives constructions come from? A study in diachronic typology. Diachronica 34(2). 175–218. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Starke, Frank
1977Die Funktionen der dimensionalen Kasus und Ortsadverbien im Hethitischen [Studien zu den Bogazköy-Texten 22]. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth C. & Graeme Trousdale
2014Constructionalization and constructional changes [Oxford Studies in Diachronic and Historical Linguistics 6]. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Vezzosi, Letizia
2010Micro-processes of grammaticalization. The case of Italian l’un l’altro . In Katerina Stathi, Elke Gehweiler & Ekkehard König (eds.), Grammaticalization. Current views and issues, 343–372. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wali, Kashi
2000Lexical anaphors and pronouns in Marathi. In Barbara C. Lust, Kashi Wali, James W. Gair & K. V. Subbarao (eds.), Lexical anaphors and pronouns in selected South Asian languages: A principled typology [Empirical Approaches to Language Typology 22], 513–574. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
[ p. 1002 ]
Yakubovich, Ilya & Elisabeth Rieken
2016The derivational history of the PIE root *al- ‘other’. Paper presented at the 15th Fachtagung of the Indogermanische Gesellschaft “Back to the Root – The Structure, Function, and Semantics of the PIE Root” , Wien 12–16/09/2016.
Yakubovich, Ilya
2006Prehistoric contacts between Hittite and Luwian: The case of reflexive pronouns. In Karlene Jones-Bley, Martin E. Huld, Angela Della Volpe & Miriam Dexter Robbins (eds.), Proceedings of the Seventeenth Annual UCLA Indo-European Conference [Journal of Indo-European Studies Monograph Series 52], 77–106. Washington, DC: Institute for the Study of Man.Google Scholar
Yoshida, Kazuhiko
1990The Hittite mediopassive endings in -ri. Berlin/New York: Mouton de GruyterGoogle Scholar
Zaliznjak, Anna A. & Aleksej D. Shmelev
2007Sociativity, conjoining, reciprocity, and the Latin prefix com- . In Vladimir P. Nedjalkov, Emma Š. Geniušene & Zlatka Guentchéva (eds.), Reciprocal constructions [Typological Studies in Language 71], 209–230. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 4 other publications

No author info given
2020.  In The NP-strategy for Expressing Reciprocity [Typological Studies in Language, 127], Crossref logo
Inglese, Guglielmo & Simone Mattiola
2020. Pluractionality in Hittite. STUF - Language Typology and Universals 73:2  pp. 261 ff. Crossref logo
Inglese, Guglielmo & Chiara Zanchi
2020. Reciprocal constructions in Homeric Greek: A typological and corpus-based approach. Folia Linguistica 54:s41  pp. 117 ff. Crossref logo
Kuteva, Tania, Bernd Heine, Bo Hong, Haiping Long, Heiko Narrog & Seongha Rhee
2019.  In World Lexicon of Grammaticalization, Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 21 april 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.