Ideophones and direct quotations are “depictive” signs, or vivid re-enactments of what they signify. Pursuing the
typology of linguistic depiction, the current study proposes a three-way classification of depiction marking strategies: framing,
foregrounding, and backgrounding. While well-known formal characteristics of ideophones, such as prosodic prominence and quotative
constructions, illustrate framing and foregrounding, this paper discusses low-pitched quotative indexes in Japanese as
backgrounding-type depiction markers. These quotatives immediately follow ideophones and exclamatory quotations and set them off.
They also underlie the exceptional pitch pattern of heavy syllables in ideophones.
2001Shinmeikai nihongo akusento jiten [A Shinmeikai dictionary of Japanese accent]. Tokyo: Sanseido.
Akita, Kimi
2015Ideophones and reported discourse as depictive signs. Gengo Bunka Kyōdō Kenkyū Purojekuto 2014: Shizen Gengo e no Rironteki Apurōchi [Osaka University Joint Project on Language & Culture 2014: Theoretical Approaches to Natural Language]. 1–10.
2016A constructional account of the “optional” quotative marking on Japanese mimetics. Journal of Linguistics 52(2). 245–275.
Alderete, John & Alexei Kochetov
2017Integrating sound symbolism with core grammar: The case of expressive palatalization. Language 93(4). 731–766.
Bodomo, Adams B.
2006The structure of ideophones in African and Asian languages: The case of Dagaare and Cantonese. In John Mugane, John P. Hutchison & Dee A. Worman (eds.), Selected proceedings of the 35th Annual Conference on African Linguistics: African languages and linguistics in broad perspectives, 203–213. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.
Clark, Herbert H.
2006Depicting as a method of communication. Psychological Review 123(3). 324–347.
Clark, Herbert H.
2019Depicting in communication. In Peter Hagoort (ed.), Human language: From genes and brains to behavior, 235–247. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Clark, Herbert H. & Richard J. Gerrig
1990Quotations as demonstrations. Language 66(4). 764–805.
2017Expressiveness and system integration: On the typology of ideophones, with special reference to Siwu. STUF – Language Typology and Universals 70(2). 119–141.
Dingemanse, Mark & Kimi Akita
2017An inverse relation between expressiveness and grammatical integration: On the morphosyntactic typology of ideophones, with special reference to Japanese. Journal of Linguistics 53(3). 501–532.
Dingemanse, Mark, Damián E. Blasi, Gary Lupyan, Morton H. Christiansen & Padraic Monaghan
2015Arbitrariness, iconicity, and systematicity in language. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 19(10). 603–615.
Ferrara, Lindsay & Gabrielle Hodge
2018Language as description, indication, and depiction. Frontiers in Psychology 9. 716. 1–15.
Franco, Ludovico
2017L-syntax and phono-symbolism: On the status of ideophones in complex predicates. Canadian Journal of Linguistics 62(2). 243–279.
Güldemann, Tom
2008Quotative indexes in African languages: A synchronic and diachronic survey. Berlin/New York: de Gruyter Mouton.
2007Nihongo onomatope goi ni okeru keitaiteki/on’inteki taikeisei ni tsuite [On the morphological and phonological systematicity of Japanese ideophonic lexemes]. Tokyo: Kurosio Publishers.
Kageyama, Taro
2007Explorations in the conceptual semantics of mimetic verbs. In Bjarke Frellesvig, Masayoshi Shibatani & John Smith (eds.), Current issues in the history and structure of Japanese, 27–82. Tokyo: Kurosio.
Kakehi, Hisao, Ikuhiro Tamori & Lawrence Schourup
1996Dictionary of iconic expressions in Japanese. Berlin/New York: de Gruyter Mouton.
Kita, Sotaro
1997Two-dimensional semantic analysis of Japanese mimetics. Linguistics 35(2). 379–415.
Kita, Sotaro
2001Semantic schism and interpretive integration in Japanese sentences with a mimetic: A reply to Tsujimura. Linguistics 39(2). 419–436.
Kuznetsova, Alexandra, Per B. Brockhoff & Rune H. B. Christensen
2017lmerTest package: Tests in linear mixed effects models. Journal of Statistical Software 82(13). 1–26.
Nasu, Akio
2002Nihongo onomatope no gokeisei to inritsu kōzō [Word formation and prosodic structure of Japanese ideophones]. Ibaraki: University of Tsukuba PhD dissertation.
Nuckolls, Janis B.
1996Sounds like life: Sound-symbolic grammar, performance, and cognition in Pastaza Quechua. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ohala, John J.
1994The frequency code underlies the sound-symbolic use of voice pitch. In Leanne Hinton, Johanna Nichols & John J. Ohala (eds.), Sound symbolism, 325–347. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Peirce, Charles Sanders
1932Collected papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, Vol. 21. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
R Core Team
2018R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
Sadanobu, Toshiyuki
2015Four types of linguistic resources for variable speaking units in common Japanese. Journal of the Phonetic Society of Japan 19(2). 109–114.
Sasamoto, Ryoko
2019Onomatopoeia and relevance: Communication of impressions via sound. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan.
Sells, Peter
2017The significance of the grammatical study of Japanese mimetics. In Noriko Iwasaki, Peter Sells & Kimi Akita (eds.), The grammar of Japanese mimetics: Perspectives from structure, acquisition, and translation, 7–19. London: Routledge.
Tanaka, Shin’ichi & Haruo Kubozono
1999Nihongo no hatsuon kyōshitsu: Riron to renshū [Introduction to Japanese pronunciation: Theory and practice]. Tokyo: Kurosio.
Thompson, Arthur Lewis & Youngah Do
2019Defining iconicity: An articulation-based methodology for explaining the phonological structure of ideophones. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics 4(1). 721. 1–40.
2015What’s in a mimetic?: On the dynamicity of its iconic stem. In Masako K. Hiraga, William J. Herlofsky, Kazuko Shinohara & Kimi Akita (eds.), Iconicity: East meets West, 109–123. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Voeltz, Friedrich K. Erhard & Christa Kilian-Hatz
(eds.)2001Ideophones. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Westermann, Diedrich
1927Laut, Ton und Sinn in westafrikanischen Sudansprachen. In Franz Boas (ed.), Festschrift Meinhof, 315–328. Hamburg: L. Friederichsen.
Cited by (4)
Cited by 4 other publications
Erben Johansson, Niklas
2024. Prominence effects in vocal iconicity: Implications for lexical access and language change. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 155:1 ► pp. 8 ff.
McLean, Bonnie, Michael Dunn & Mark Dingemanse
2023. Two measures are better than one: combining iconicity ratings and guessing experiments for a more nuanced picture of iconicity in the lexicon. Language and Cognition 15:4 ► pp. 716 ff.
Yasui, Eiko
2023. Japanese onomatopoeia in bodily demonstrations in a traditional dance instruction: A resource for synchronizing body movements. Journal of Pragmatics 207 ► pp. 45 ff.
Hao, Zhoushao & Gengxin Sun
2022. Naive Bayesian Prediction of Japanese Annotated Corpus for Textual Semantic Word Formation Classification. Mathematical Problems in Engineering 2022 ► pp. 1 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.