Cover not available
Article published In:
Studies in Language
Vol. 43:4 (2019) ► pp.757–799

The grammaticalisation of verb-auxiliary order in East African Bantu

From information structure to tense-aspect

ORCID logo | University of Essex
Bantu languages employ a combination of simple and compound verb forms to encode tense-aspect-mood distinctions. Compound constructions typically involve an auxiliary form followed by an inflected main verb. However, the six East African Bantu languages under examination in this paper exhibit a word order in which the auxiliary appears after the verb. This order is typologically unusual for languages with SVO word order and comparatively unusual in the context of the Bantu languages. This paper presents a synchronic description of this word order and develops an account of its possible origins. It is proposed that the verb-auxiliary order originated from a verb-fronting construction which was used historically to convey predication focus. The account further corroborates the claim that the progressive aspect is an inherently focal category in Bantu and, from a wider perspective, shows the interplay between the encoding of information structure and tense-aspect information.
Keywords: Bantu, grammaticalisation, word order, language contact, information structure
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Verb-auxiliary order in East African Bantu
    • 2.1Auxiliaries in Bantu languages
    • 2.2Verb-auxiliary order: The data
    • 2.3Rangi
    • 2.4Mbugwe
    • 2.5Gusii
    • 2.6Kuria
    • 2.7Ngoreme
    • 2.8Simbiti
    • 2.9Summary
  • 3.The development of the verb-auxiliary order
    • 3.1Background
    • 3.2The proposed pathway of change
    • 3.3Support for the pathway of change: Form
      • 3.3.1Link between verb-auxiliary order and verb fronting
      • 3.3.2Evidence from ni
    • 3.4Support for the pathway of change: Meaning
      • 3.4.1The ‘inversion contexts’: Support from information structure
      • 3.4.2A closer look at tense and aspect
    • 3.5From predicate-centred focus to progressive to future tense
  • 4.Language contact and the development of verb-auxiliary order
    • 4.1Previous contact-based accounts of the verb-auxiliary order
    • 4.2A linguistic overview of the area
    • 4.3Challenges with a contact-based account of the verb-auxiliary order
  • 5.Summary and concluding remarks
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 23 January 2020
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.17033.gib
References
Abels, Klaus & Peter Muriungi
2008 The focus marker in Kîîtharaka: Syntax and semantics. Lingua, 687–731. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Anderson, Gregory
2006 Auxiliary Verb Constructions. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2011 Auxiliary Verb Constructions in the Languages of Africa. Studies in African Linguistics 40(1–2). 1409.Google Scholar
Ashton, Ethel O.
1947 Swahili grammar, including intonation. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Aunio, Lotta
2015a Contact leading to a more complex tonal system: The case of Ikoma and Datooga in north-west Tanzania. Helsinki: University of Helsinki thesis.Google Scholar
2015b A typological perspective on Bantu nominal tone: The case of Ikoma-Nata-Isenye in western Tanzania. Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies 33(3). 359–371. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Aunio, Lotta, Holly Robinson, Tim Roth, Oliver Stegen & John B. Walker
2019 The Mara languages (JE40). In Koen Bostoen, Derek Nurse, Gérard Philippson & Mark van de Velde (eds), The Bantu Languages, 2nd ed. 501–532. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bastin, Yvonne
1989 El, prefijo locativo de la clase 18 y la expresión del progresivo presente en bantú (I). Estudios Africanos. Revista de la Asociación Española de Africanistas 4(7). 61–86.Google Scholar
Bennett, Patrick R.
1985 Gikuyu ni Kioigire: essays, texts and glossaries. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin-Madison thesis.Google Scholar
Bouka, L. Y.
1989 Elements de description du kaamba. Parler bantou de la Republique Populaire du Congo (Groupe Koongo, HI7b). Brussels. Universite Libre de Bruxelles thesis.Google Scholar
Botne, Robert
1989 Reconstruction of a grammaticalized auxiliary in Bantu. Studies in the Linguistics Sciences. 19(2). 169–186.Google Scholar
2004 Specificity in Lusaamia infinitives. Studies in Language 28(1). 137–164. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brenzinger, Matthias
2013 The twelve modern Khoisan languages. Paper presented at Khoisan Languages and Linguistics, Proceedings of the 3rd International Symposium (Research in Khoisan Studies 29), Cologne: Rüdiger Köppe.Google Scholar
2014 Classifying the non-Bantu click languages. In Lungisile Ntsebeza & Chris Sanders (eds), Papers from the Pre-Colonial Catalytic Project, vol. 11, 80–102. Cape Town: University of Cape Town.Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan, Revere Perkins & William Pagliuca
1994 The evolution of grammar. Chicago & London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Cammenga, Jelle
2002 Phonology and Morphology of Ekegusii: A Bantu language of Kenya. Köln: Rüdiger Köppe Verlag.Google Scholar
2004 Igikuria Phonology and Morphology: A Bantu language of South-West Kenya and North-West Tanzania. East-African languages and dialects. Köln: Rüdiger Köppe Verlag.Google Scholar
Campbell, Lyle
1987 Syntactic change in Pipil. International Journal of American Linguistics 531. 253–80. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Coetsem, Frans
1988 Loan phonology and the two transfer types in language contact. Dordrecht: Foris. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Collins, Peter
1991 Cleft and Pseudo-Cleft Constructions in English. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Comrie, Bernard
1976 Aspect. Cambridge Textbooks in Linguistics. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dahl, Östen
1985 Tense and Aspect Systems. New York: Basil BlackwGell.Google Scholar
Dom, Sebastian & Koen Bostoen
2015 Examining variation in the expression of tense/aspect to classify the Kikongo language cluster. Africana Linguistica 211. 163–211. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Drubig, Hans B.
2003 Toward a typology of focus and focus constructions. Linguistics 41(1). 1–50. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dryer, Matthew S.
1992 The Greenbergian word order correlations. Language 68(1). 81–138. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dunham, Margaret
2005 Eléments de description du langi, langue Bantu F.33 de Tanzanie (Collection Langues et littératures de l’Afrique noire SELAF 413). Louvain: Peeters.Google Scholar
Ehret, Christopher
1986 Proposals on Khoisan reconstruction. Sprache und Geschichte in Afrika 7(2). 105–130.Google Scholar
Elderkin, Edward D.
1986 Diachronic Inferences from basic sentence and noun Structure in Central Khoisan and Sandawe. Sprache und Geschichte in Afrika 71. 131–156.Google Scholar
1989 The significance and origin of the use of pitch in Sandawe. York: University of York dissertation.Google Scholar
Gibson, Hannah
2012 Auxiliary placement in Rangi: A Dynamic Syntax perspective. London: SOAS University of London dissertation.Google Scholar
2013 Auxiliary placement in Rangi: A case of contact-induced change? SOAS Working Papers in Linguistics 161. 153–166.Google Scholar
2016 A unified dynamic account of auxiliary placement in Rangi. Lingua 1841. 79–103. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2019 Auxiliary constructions in Bantu. Essex: University of Essex thesis.Google Scholar
Gibson, Hannah & Lutz Marten
2019 Probing the interaction of language contact and internal innovation: Four case studies of morphosyntactic change in Rangi. Studies in African Linguistics 491. 63–92.Google Scholar
Greenberg, Joseph H.
1966 Some universals of grammar with particular reference to the order of meaningful elements. In Joseph H. Greenberg (ed), Universals of Language, 73–113. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
2005 “Complex predicates based on generic auxiliaries as an areal feature in Northeast Africa.” Studies in African linguistic typology 641. 131–154. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2014 Khoisan language classification today. In Tom Güldemann & Anne-Maria Feh (eds), Beyond ‘Khoisan’: Historical Relations in the Kalahari Basin, 1–41. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Güldemann, Tom, and Rainer Vossen
2000 “Khoisan.“ African languages: An introduction, 99–122.Google Scholar
Gunnink, Hilde
2016 The fronted-infinitive in few. Paper presented at 6th International Bantu conference, Helsinki University. 20–23rd June 2016.
Guthrie, Malcolm
1967–71 Comparative Bantu. Farnborough: Gregg.Google Scholar
Guy, Gregory
1990 The sociolinguistic types of language change. Diachronica 7(1). 38–47. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hadermann, Pascale
1996 Grammaticalisation de la structure infinitive+verbé conjugue dans quelques langues bantoues. Studies in African Linguistics 25(2). 155–169.Google Scholar
Harris, Alice & Lyle Campbell
1995 Historical syntax in cross-linguistic perspective. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hartmann, Katharina & Tonjes Veenstra
2013 Introduction to Cleft structures. In Katharina Hartmann & Tonjes Veenstra (eds). Cleft Structures, 1–32. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heine, Bernd
1993 Auxiliaries: Cognitive Forces and grammaticalization. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd & Tania Kuteva
2005 On contact-induced grammaticalization. Studies in Language 27(3). 529–572. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hopper, Paul J.
1991 On some principles of grammaticalization. In Elizabeth Closs Traugott & Bernd Heine (eds.), Approaches to grammaticalization, 17–35. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hyman, Larry & John Watters
1984 Auxiliary focus. Studies in African Linguistics 151. 233–273.Google Scholar
Kerr, Elisabeth J.
2017 Focus marking in Ekegusii. Cambridge: University of Cambridge thesis.Google Scholar
Kießling, Roland
2007 The “marked nominative” in Datooga. Journal of African Languages and Linguistics 28(2). 149–191. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kießling, Roland, Maarten Mous & Derek Nurse
2008 The Tanzanian Rift Valley area. A Linguistic Geography of Africa. In Bernd Heine & Derek Nurse (eds.), A linguistic geography of Africa, 186–227. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
de Kind, Jasper, Sebastian Dom, Gilles-Maurice de Schryver & Koen Bostoen
2015 Event-centrality and the pragmatics-semantics interface in Kikongo: From predication focus to progressive aspect and vice versa. Folia Linguistics Historica 361. 113–163.Google Scholar
Lambrecht, Knud
1994 Information Structure and Sentence Form. Topic, focus and the mental representations of discourse referents. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lehmann, Christian
2008 Information structure and grammaticalization. In Elena Seoane & María José López-Couso (eds.), Theoretical and Empirical Issues in grammaticalization (Typological Studies in Language 77), 207–229. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leslau, Wolf
1945 The influence of Cushitic on the Semitic languages of Ethiopia: A problem of substratum. Word 11. 59–82. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Maho, Jouni Filip
1999 A comparative study of Bantu noun classes. Gothenburg: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis.Google Scholar
Marten, Lutz
Forthcoming. Bantu and Bantoid. In Rainer Vossen ed. Handbook of African Linguistics Oxford Oxford University Press
Marten, Lutz, Peter Edelesten, Rozenn Guérois & Hannah Gibson
2018 Database of morphosyntactic variation in Bantu. Leverhulme Trust funded project ‘Morphosyntactic variation in Bantu: typology, contact and change’.Google Scholar
Meeussen, Achille Emille
1967 Bantu Grammatical Reconstructions. Africana Linguistica 31. 79–121. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Morimoto, Yukiko
2013 Gĩkũyũ. Unpublished ms. Paper presented to the Predicate-centered focus types: B7 project meeting, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Nov. 19, 2013.
2016 Verb doubling vs. the conjoint/disjoint alternation. Paper presented at 6th International Bantu conference, Helsinki University 20–23rd June 2016.
2017 The Kikuyu focus marker nĩ: formal and functional similarities to the conjoint/disjoint alternation. In Jenneke van der Wal & Larry M. Hyman (eds.), The conjoint/disjoint alternation in Bantu, 147–174. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Mous, Maarten
1993 A grammar of Iraqw (Cushitic Language Studies 9). Hamburg: Helmut Buske.Google Scholar
2000 Counter-universal rise of infinitive-auxiliary order in Mbugwe (Tanzania, Bantu, F34.). In Rainer Vossen, Angelika Mietzner & Antje Meissner (eds.), Mehr als nur Worte… : afrikanistische Beiträge zum 65. Geburtstag von Franz Rottland, 469–481. Köln: Köppe.Google Scholar
2004 A grammatical sketch of Mbugwe: Bantu F34, Tanzania (Grammatische Analysen afrikanischer Sprachen). Köln: Rüdiger Köppe Verlag.Google Scholar
2016 Alagwa Grammar, Texts and Lexicon (Cushitic Language Series). Köln: Rüdiger Köppe Verlag.Google Scholar
Ndumbu, J. M. G. & W. H. Whiteley
1962 Some problems of stability and emphasis in Kamba one-word tenses. Journal of African Languages 1(2). 167–180.Google Scholar
Nurse, Derek
2000 Diachronic morphosyntactic change in Western Tanzania. In Rainer Vossen, Angelika Mietzner and Antje Meissner (eds.), Mehr als nur Worte… : afrikanistische Beiträge zum 65. Geburtstag von Franz Rottland, 517–534. Köln: Köppe.Google Scholar
2003 Aspect and tense in Bantu languages. In Derek Nurse & Gérard Philippson (eds.), The Bantu Languages, 90–102. London, Routledge.Google Scholar
2008 Tense and Aspect in Bantu. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Nurse, Derek & Gérard Philippson
2006 Common TA markers in Bantu. Journal of African Languages and Linguistics 271. 155–196. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Philippson, Gérard and Derek Nurse
2000 Gweno, a little known Bantu language of Northern Tanzania. Unpublished manuscrip. Institut National des Langues et Civilisations Orientales, Paris / Dynamique du Langage, Lyon and Memorial University of Newfoundland.Google Scholar
Riedel, Kristina
2009 The syntax of object marking in Sambaa: A comparative Bantu perspective. Amsterdam: Netherlands Graduate School of Linguistics.Google Scholar
Roth, Tim
2014 The Case of Ngoreme: Distinguishing contact from inheritance in Mara Bantu. Paper presented at Language Contact: State of the Art, Helsinki, Finland.
2018 Aspect in Ikoma and Ngroreme: a comparison and analysis of two Western Serengeti Bantu languages. Helsinki: University of Helsinki dissertation.Google Scholar
Schachter, Paul
1973 Focus and relativization. Language 49(1). 19–46. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schwarz, Florian
2003a Focus marking in Kikuyu. Berlin: Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin thesis.Google Scholar
2003b Focus marking in Kikuyu. ZAS Papers in Linguistics 301. 41–118.Google Scholar
2007 Ex-situ focus in Kikuyu. In Enoch O. Aboh, Katharina Hartmann & Malte Zimmermann (eds.), Focus strategies in African languages: The interaction of focus and grammar in Niger-Congo and Afro-Asiatic, 139–160. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Stegen, Oliver
2002 Derivational processes in Rangi. Studies in African Linguistics 31(1/2). 129–153.Google Scholar
2006 Participatory Research, TAM Functions, and Dialect Survey Among the Rangi. SIL, unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Takizala, Alexis
1972 Focus and relativisation: The case of Kihung’an. Studies in African Linguistics 3(2). 259–286.Google Scholar
Thomason, Sarah G. & Terrence Kaufmann
1988 Language Contact, Creolization and Genetic Linguistics. Berkeley; University of California Press.Google Scholar
van de Velde, Mark & Koen Bostoen
2019 The Bantu languages, 2nd edn. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van der Wal, Jenneke
2016 Diagnosing focus. Studies in Language 40(2). 259–301. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Walker, John B.
2013 Comparative tense and aspect in the Mara Bantu languages: Towards a linguistic history. Langley City, CA: Trinity Western University thesis.Google Scholar
Westphal, Ernst O. J.
1971 The click languages of southern and eastern Africa. In Thomas A. Sebeok (ed.), Current trends in linguistics 7: Linguistics in Sub-Saharan Africa, 367–420. The Hague: Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Whiteley, Wilfred. H.
1959 The tense system of Gusii. Kampala: East African Literature Bureau.Google Scholar
Wilhelmsen, Vera
2014 Periphrastic verbs in Mbugwe (F34). Unpublished ms. Uppsala University.Google Scholar
2018 A description of the Mbugwe lanaguage – with a focus on tone and TAM. Uppsala: Uppsala University dissertation.Google Scholar
Wright, Richard, Ian Maddieson, Peter Ladefoged & Bonny Sands
1995 A phonetic study of Sandawe clicks. UCLA Working Papers in Phonetics 911. 1–24.Google Scholar