This paper makes a contribution to phonological typology by investigating the distribution of affricate-rich languages in Eurasia. It shows that affricate-rich and affricate-dense languages cluster areally within Eurasia and have area-specific histories. In particular, the affricate-rich areas of western Eurasia – a ‘European’ area and a Caucasian area – are not the result of contact-induced sound changes or borrowing, while the two affricate-rich areas of eastern Eurasia – the Hindukush area and the Eastern Himalayan area – are the result of contact. Specifically, affricate-dense areas depend on the emergence of retroflex affricates. Moreover, languages outside these affricate-dense areas tend to lose retroflex affricates.
Arsenault, Paul Edmond. 2012. Retroflex consonant harmony in South Asia. Toronto: University of Toronto dissertation.
Backstrom, Peter C.1994. A phonological reconstruction of Proto-Western Tibetan. Arlington: University of Texas at Arlington MA thesis.
Bartee, Ellen Lynn. 2007. A grammar of Dongwang Tibetan. Santa Barbara: University of California, Santa Barbara dissertation.
Baxter, William Hubbard. 1992. A handbook of Old Chinese phonology (Trends in linguistics 64). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Baxter, William Hubbard. 1999. Reconstructing Proto-‘Mandarin’ retroflex initials. In Richard VanNess Simmons (ed.), Issues in Chinese dialect description and classification (Journal of Chinese linguistics: Monograph series 15), 1–35. Berkeley, California: Project on Linguistic Analysis.
Baxter, William Hubbard. 2000. Did Proto-Mandarin exist?Journal of Chinese Linguistics 28(1). 100–115.
Bickel, Balthasar. 2007. Typology in the 21st century: Major current developments. Linguistic Typology 11(1). 239–251.
Bickel, Balthasar. 2015. Distributional typology. In Bernd Heine & Heiko Narrog (eds.), The Oxford handbook of linguistic analysis, 901–923. Oxford University Press.
Blevins, Juliette. 2009. Another universal bites the dust: Northwest Mekeo lacks coronal phonemes. Oceanic Linguistics 48(1). 264–273.
Blevins, Juliette. 2017. Areal sound patterns: From perceptual magnets to stone soup. In Raymond Hickey (ed.), The Cambridge handbook of areal linguistics, 88–121. Cambridge University Press.
Boersma, Paul & Silke Hamann. 2007. The evolution of auditory contrast (unpublished manuscript). [URL].
Bradley, David. 1979. Proto-Loloish (Scandinavian Institute of Asian Studies monograph series no. 39). London: Curzon Press.
Bradley, David. 2017. Lisu. In R. P. E. Sybesma, Wolfgang Behr, Yueguo Gu, Zev J. Handel, Cheng-Teh James Huang & James Myers (eds.), Encyclopedia of Chinese language and linguistics, Leiden/Boston: Brill.
Campbell, Lyle. 2017. Why is it so hard to define a linguistic area? In Raymond Hickey (ed.), The Cambridge handbook of areal linguistics, 19–39. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Carlton, Terence R.1991. Introduction to the phonological history of the Slavic languages. Columbus, Ohio: Slavica Publishers.
Ćavar, Malgorzata. 2011. Merger of the place contrast in the posterior sibilants in Croatian (unpublished manuscript).
Chen, Matthew Y.1976. From Middle Chinese to Modern Peking. Journal of Chinese Linguistics 4(2/3). 113–277.
Chirikba, Viacheslav. 1999. The West Caucasian material in ‘The North Caucasian etymological dictionary’ by S. L. Nikolayev and S. A. Starostin. In Helma van den Berg (ed.), Studies in Caucasian linguistics, 152–170. Leiden: CNWS Publications.
Chirkova, Ekaterina. 2014. Phonological profile of Kami, the Tibetan dialect of Muli (manuscript). In Jackson T. -S. Sun (ed.), Special issue of Language and Linguistics on lesser known dialects of Tibetan. In press.
Chirkova, Katia. 2008. On the position of Baima within Tibetan: A look from basic vocabulary. In Alexander Lubotsky & Frederik Kortlandt (eds.), Evidence and counter-evidence: Essays in honour of Frederik Kortlandt. Volume 2: General linguistics, 69–91. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
Denwood, Philip. 1999. Tibetan (London Oriental and African language library v. 3). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Dwyer, Arienne M.2007. Salar: A study in Inner Asian language contact processes (Turcologica 37). Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.
Edelman, Dzhoi. 1980. K substratnomy naslediyu Tsentralnoaziatskogo yazykovogo soyuza [On the substrate heritage of the Central Asian linguistic area]. Voprosy yazykoznaniya 51. 21–33.
Edelman, Dzhoi. 1983. The Dardic and Nuristani languages. Moscow: Nauka.
Edelman, Dzhoi. 1986. Sravnitelnaya grammatika vostochnoiranskikh yazykov. Fonologiya [Comparative grammar of East Iranian languages. Phonology]. Moscow: Nauka.
Evans, Jonathan. 2004. The reconstruction of Proto-Qiang verb inflection. In Ying-chin Lin, Fang-min Hsu, Chun-chih Lee, Jackson T. -S. Sun, Hsiu-fang Yang & Dah-an Ho (eds.), Studies on Sino-Tibetan languages: Papers in honor of professor Hwang-cherng Gong on his seventieth birthday, 201–238. Taipei: Instute of Linguistics, Academia Sinica.
Gordon, Matthew & Ayla Applebaum. 2006. Phonetic structures of Turkish Kabardian. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 36(2). 159.
Gordon, Matthew Kelly. 2016. Phonological typology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Grawunder, Sven. 2017. The Caucasus. In Raymond Hickey (ed.), The Cambridge handbook of areal linguistics, 356–395. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gui, Ming Chao. 2001. Yunnanese and Kunming Chinese: a study of the language communities, the phonological systems, and the phonological developments (LINCOM studies in Asian linguistics 28). München: LINCOM Europa.
Hall, T. Alan. 1997. The historical development of retroflex consonants in Indo-Aryan. Lingua 102(4). 203–221.
Haller, Felix. 2004. Dialekt und Erzählungen von Themchen: sprachwissenschaftliche Beschreibung eines Nomadendialektes aus Nord-Amdo (Beiträge zur tibetischen Erzählforschung Bd. 14). Bonn: VGH Wissenschaftsverlag.
Hamann, Silke. 2003. The phonetics and phonology of retroflexes (LOT 75). Utrecht: LOT.
Hegedűs, Irén. 2012. The RUKI-rule in Nuristani. In Benedicte Nielsen Whitehead (ed.), The sound of Indo-European: phonetics, phonemics and morphophonemics (Copenhagen studies in Indo-European vol. 4), 145–168. Copenhagen: Museum Tusculanum, University of Copenhagen.
Hegedűs, Irén & Václav Blažek. 2010. On the position of Nuristani within Indo-Iranian. Paper presented at the conference Sound of Indo-European 2
(Opava, Oct 2010).
Hill, Nathan W.2010. An overview of Old Tibetan synchronic phonology. Transactions of the Philological Society 108(2). 110–125.
Hongladarom, Krisadawan. 1996. Rgyalthang Tibetan of Yunnan: A preliminary report. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 19(2). 69–92.
Huber, Brigitte. 2005. The Tibetan dialect of Lende (Kyirong): A grammatical description with historical annotations (Beiträge zur tibetischen Erzählforschung Bd. 15). Bonn: VGH Wissenschaftsverlag.
Jacques, Guillaume. 2014. A phonological profile of Cone. In Jackson T. -S. Sun (ed.), Phonological profiles of little-studied Tibetic varieties (Language and Linguistics monograph series 55), 269–330. Taipei: Institute of Linguistics, Academia Sinica.
Janhunen, Juha. 1982. On the structure of Proto-Uralic. Finnisch-ugrische Forschungen 441. 23–42.
Janhunen, Juha. 2003. Proto-Mongolic. In Juha Janhunen (ed.), The Mongolic languages (Routledge language family series 5), 1–29. London: Routledge.
Kogan, Anton. 2015. Nekotorye voprosy geneticheskoj klassifikacii dardskih jazykov po dannym istoricheskoj fonetiki [Some issues of the genealogical classification of the Dardic languages based on historical phonology]. Journal of Language Relationship 13(12). 1–21.
Konow, Sten. 1936. Note on the ancient North-Western Prakrit. Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies 8(2–3). 603–612.
Kümmel, Martin. 2007. Konsonantenwandel: Bausteine zu einer Typologie des Lautwandels und ihre Konsequenzen für die vergleichende Rekonstruktion. Wiesbaden: Reichert.
Kurpaska, Maria. 2010. Chinese language(s): A look through the prism of the Great Dictionary of Modern Chinese Dialects (Trends in linguistics: Studies and monographs 215). Berlin/New York: De Gruyter Mouton.
Ladefoged, Peter & Ian Maddieson. 1996. The sounds of the world’s languages. Oxford, UK/Cambridge, MA: Blackwell Publishers.
LaPolla, Randy J.2001. The role of migration and language contact in the development of the Sino-Tibetan language family. In Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald & Robert M. W. Dixon (eds.), Areal diffusion and genetic inheritance: problems in comparative linguistics, 225–254. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.
Lee, Wai-Sum & Eric Zee. 2003. Standard Chinese (Beijing). Journal of the International Phonetic Association 33(1). 109–112.
Liljegren, Henrik. 2017. Profiling Indo-Aryan in the Hindukush-Karakoram: A preliminary study of micro-typological patterns. Journal of South Asian Languages and Linguistics 4(1). 107–156.
Liljegren, Henrik & Erik Svärd. 2017. Bisyndetic contrast marking in the Hindukush: Additional evidence of a historical contact zone. Journal of Language Contact Online preprint.
Lindblom, Björn & Ian Maddieson. 1988. Phonetic universals in consonant systems. In Victoria Fromkin, Larry M. Hyman & Charles N. Li (eds.), Language, speech, and mind: studies in honour of Victoria A. Fromkin, 62–78. London/New York: Routledge.
Maddieson, Ian. 1984. Patterns of sounds. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Maddieson, Ian & Kristin Precoda. 1992. UPSID and PHONEME (version 1.1). Los Angeles: University of California at Los Angeles.
Makley, Charlene, Keith Dede, Hua Kan & Wang Qingshan. 1999. The Amdo dialect of Labrang. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 22(1). 97–127.
Matisoff, James A.2003. Handbook of Proto-Tibeto-Burman: system and philosophy of Sino-Tibetan reconstruction (University of California publications in linguistics v. 135). Berkeley: University of California Press.
Michael, Lev, Tammy Stark, Emily Clem & Will Chang (eds.). 2015. South American phonological inventory database v1.1.4. Berkeley: University of California. [URL].
Moran, Steven, Daniel McCloy & Richard Wright (eds.). 2014. PHOIBLE online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. [URL].
Morén, Bruce. 2006. Consonant-vowel interactions in Serbian: Features, representations and constraint interactions. Lingua 116(8). 1198–1244.
Nichols, Johanna. 1997. Modeling ancient population structures and movement in linguistics. Annual review of anthropology 26(1). 359–384.
Niederer, Barbara. 1998. Les langues Hmong-Mjen (Miáo-Yáo): phonologie historique (LINCOM studies in Asian linguistics 07). München: LINCOM EUROPA.
Nikolaev, Dmitry. 2018. The Database of Eurasian Phonological Inventories: A research tool for distributional phonological typology. Linguistics Vanguard 4(1).
Nikolaev, Dmitry, Andrey Nikulin & Anton Kukhto (eds.). 2015. The database of Eurasian phonological inventories (beta version). [URL].
Norman, Jerry. 1974. The initials of Proto-Min. Journal of Chinese Linguistics 2(1). 27–36.
Norman, Jerry. 1988. Chinese (Cambridge language surveys). Cambridge, UK/New York: Cambridge University Press.
Norman, Jerry. 1991. The Min dialects in historical perspective. In William S. -Y. Wang (ed.), Languages and dialects of China (Journal of Chinese Linguistics Monograph Series 3), 323–358. Berkeley, California: Project on Linguistic Analysis.
Nugteren, Hans. 2011. Mongolic phonology and the Qinghai-Gansu languages. Utrecht: LOT.
Petrović, Dragoljub & Snežana Gudurić. 2010. Fonologija srpskoga jezika [Phonology of Serbian]. Beograd: Institut za srpski jezik SANU.
Ratliff, Martha Susan. 2010. Hmong-Mien language history (Studies in language change 8). Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.
Robbeets, Martine. 2017. The Transeurasian languages. In Raymond Hickey (ed.), The Cambridge handbook of areal linguistics, 586–626. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rochoń, Marzena. 2001. Coronal fricatives and affricates in Slavic languages. Paper presented at the Fourth European Conference on Formal Description of Slavic Languages, Potsdam.
Shorto, Harry Leonard, Paul Sidwell, Doug Cooper & Christian Bauer. 2006. A Mon-Khmer comparative dictionary (Pacific linguistics 579). Canberra: Pacific Linguistics, Research School of Pacific and Asian Studies, Australian National University.
Starostin, Sergei. 2008. Altaic loans in Old Chinese. In Alicia Sanchez-Mazas, Roger Blench, Malcolm D. Ross, Ilia Peiros & Marie Lin (eds.), Past human migrations in East Asia: Matching archaeology, linguistics and genetics (Routledge Studies in the Early History of Asia 5), 254–262. London/New York: Routledge.
Stolz, Thomas & Nataliya Levkovych. 2017. Convergence and divergence in the phonology of the languages of Europe. In Raymond Hickey (ed.), The Cambridge handbook of areal linguistics, 122–160. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sun, Jackson T. -S.2003. Phonological profile of Zhongu: A new Tibetan dialect of Northern Sichuan. Language and linguistics 4(4). 769–836.
Sun, Jackson T. -S.2006. Special linguistic features of gSerpa Tibetan. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman area 29(1). 107–126.
Suzuki, Hiroyuki. 2009. Tibetan dialects spoken in Shar khog and Khod po khog. East and West 59(1/4). 273–283.
Suzuki, Hiroyuki & Tshering mTshomo. 2009. Preliminary analysis of the phonological history of Melung Tibetan. Language and Linguistics 10(3). 521–537.
Tenishev, Edgem R.1976. Stroj salarskogo jazyka [Grammar of Salar]. Moscow: Nauka.
Tikkanen, Bertil. 1988. On Burushaski and other ancient substrata in northwestern South Asia. Studia Orientalia 641. 303–325.
Tikkanen, Bertil. 1999. Archaeological-linguistic correlations in the formation of retroflex typologies and correlating areal features in South Asia. In Roger Blench & Matthew Spriggs (eds.), Archaeology and languages IV: Language change and cultural transformation, 138–148. Abingdon, UK: Taylor & Francis.
Tikkanen, Bertil. 2008. Some areal phonological isoglosses in the transit zone between South and Central Asia. In Israr-ud-Din (ed.), Proceedings of the third international Hindu Kush cultural conference, 250–262. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 december 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.