Article published in:
Studies in Language
Vol. 44:1 (2020) ► pp. 132164
References

References

Aikhenvald, Alexandra
2004Evidentiality. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
2012The essence of mirativity. Linguistics Typology 16: 435–485.Google Scholar
2014The grammar of knowledge: a cross-linguistic view of evidentials and the expression of information source. In Alexandra Aikhenvald & Robert M. W. Dixon (eds.), The grammar of knowledge: a cross-linguistic typology. Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(ed.) 2018The Oxford handbook of Evidentiality. Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Aikhenvald, Alexandra and Robert M. W. Dixon
(eds) 2006Serial verb constructions: a cross-linguistic typology. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Anderson, Gregory
2006Auxiliary Verb Constructions. Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Andvik, Erik
2010A Grammar of Tshangla. Leiden/Boston: Brill. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Aronson, Howard
1967The grammatical categories of the indicative in the contemporary bulgarian literary language. In To Honor Roman Jakobson: Essays on the Occasion of His Seventieth Birthday, 11 October 1966, 1:82–98. Janua Linguarum. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Bashir, Elena
2010Traces of mirativity in Shina. Himalayan Linguistics 9 (2): 1–55.Google Scholar
Bickel, Balthasar
1999Nominalization and focus in some Kiranti languages. In Yogendra Yadava and Warren Glover, (eds.), Topics in Nepalese Linguistics, 271–296. Kathmandu: Royal Nepal Academy.Google Scholar
1995Relatives à antécédent interne, nominalisation et focalisation: entre syntax et morphologie en Bélharien. Bulletin de La Société de Linguistique de Paris XC (1): 391–427. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1998review article: converbs in cross-linguistic perspective. Linguistic Typology 2 (3): 381–97.Google Scholar
Bosch, André
2016Language contact in Upper Mangdep: a comparative grammar of verbal constructions. Sydney: University of Sydney Honours Thesis.Google Scholar
Busch, John M.
2007Verbal nominalization in Kurtoep. Eugene, OR: University of Oregon MA Thesis.Google Scholar
Chelliah, Shobhana, and Gwendolyn Hyslop
2011Introduction to special issue on optional case marking in tibeto-burman. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 34 (2): 1–7.Google Scholar
Curnow, Timothy
2000Why ‘first/non-first’ person is not grammaticalised mirativity. In Keith Allan & John Henderson (eds.), Proceedings of ALS2k, the 2000 conference of the Australian Linguistic SocietyGoogle Scholar
DeLancey, Scott
1990Ergativity and the cognitive model of event structure in Lhasa Tibetan. Cognitive Linguistics 1.3:289–321. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 162 ]
1991The origin of verb serialization in Modern Tibetan. Studies in Language 15: 1–23. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1997Mirativity: The grammatical marking of unexpected information. Linguistic Typology 1: 33–52. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1999Relativization in Tibetan. In Yogendra P. Yadava & Warren W. Glover, (eds.) Topics in Nepalese Linguistics, 231–49. Kamaldi, Kathmandu: Royal Nepal Academy.Google Scholar
2002Nominalization and relativization in Bodic. In Proceedings of the 28th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, Parasession on Tibeto-Burman languages and Southeast Asian Linguistics, 55–72. Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
2011a‘Optional’ ‘ergativity’ in Tibeto-Burman Languages. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 34 (2): 9–20.Google Scholar
2011bFinite structures from clausal nominalization in Tibeto-Burman. In Foong Ha Yap, Karen Grunow-Hårsta, & Janick Wrona, (eds.), Nominalization in Asian languages: Diachronic and typological perspectivesxs, Sino-Tibetan and Iranian languages: 343–59. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012Still mirative after all these years. Linguistic Typology 16: 529–564.Google Scholar
Denning, Keith
1987Obligation and space: the origins of markers of the obligative modality. Chicago Linguistic Society 23: 45–55.Google Scholar
Dickinson, Connie
2000Mirativity in Tsafiki. Studies in Language 24 (2): 379–421. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Donohue, Cathryn, & Mark Donohue
2016On Ergativity in Bumthang. Language 92 (1): 179–88. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Driem, George van
2015Synoptic grammar of the Bumthang language. Himalayan Linguistics Archive 6: 1–77.Google Scholar
1998Dzongkha. Leiden: Research CNWS, School of Asian, African, and Amerindian Studies.Google Scholar
Floyd, Simeon, Elisabeth Norcliffe, & Lila San Roque
(eds.) 2018Egophoricity. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Friedman, Victor
1977The grammatical categories of the Mecedonian indicative. Columbus: Slavica.Google Scholar
1986Evidentiality in the Balkans: Bulgarian, Macedonian, and Albanian. In Wallace L. Chafe & Johanna Nichols (eds.), Evidentiality: The linguistic coding of epistemology, 168–187. Advances in Discourse Processes 20. Norwood, N.J.: Ablex Publishing Corporation.Google Scholar
Genetti, Carol
1992Semantic and grammatical categories of relative-clause morphology in the languages of Nepal. Studies in Language 29 (1): 35–87. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Genetti, Carol, Alexander R. Coupe, Ellen Bartee, Kristine Hildebrandt, & You-Jing Lin
2008Syntactic aspects of nominalization in five Tibeto-Burman languages of the Himalayan Area. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 31 (2): 97–143.Google Scholar
Grunow-Harsta, Karen
2007Evidentiality and mirativity in Magar. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 30 (2): 151–194.Google Scholar
Guion, Susan G.
1998The role of perception in the sound change of velar palatalization. Phonetica 55(1–2). 18–52. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Heine, Bernd, Ulrike Claudi, & Friederike Hünnemeyer
1991Grammaticalization: A conceptual framework. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
[ p. 163 ]
Heine, Bernd & Tania Kuteva
2004World lexicon of grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hill, Nathan
2012“Mirativity” does not exist: “Lhasa” ḥdug and other suspects. Linguistic Typology 16: 289–433. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hongladarom, Krisadawan
2007Evidentiality in Rgyalthang Tibetan. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 30 (2): 17–44.Google Scholar
Hopper, Paul J., & Elizabeth C. Traugott
2003Grammaticalization. Cambridge Textbooks in Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hyslop, Gwendolyn
2010Kurtöp Case: The pragmatic ergative and beyond. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 33 (1): 1–40.Google Scholar
2011Mirativity in Kurtöp. Journal of South Asian Linguistics 4 (1): 43–60.Google Scholar
2013The Kurtöp clause-chaining construction: Converbs, clause chains, and verb serialization. In Tim Thornes, Erik Andvik, Gwendolyn Hyslop & Joana Jansen (eds.), Functional-Historical Approaches to Explanation: In Honor of Scott DeLancey (Typological Studies in Language 103). 155–78. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2014aA preliminary reconstruction of East Bodish. In Nathan Hill & Thomas Owen-Smith, Trans-Himalayan Linguistics 155–79. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
2014bOn the category of speaker expectation of interlocutor knowledge in Kurtöp. Proceedings from the 40th annual meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 201–214. Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society.Google Scholar
2014cThe grammar of knowledge in Kurtöp: evidentiality, mirativity, and expectation of knowledge. In Alexandra Aikhenvald & Robert M. W. Dixon (eds.), The grammar of knowledge: a cross-linguistic typology. Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2017A grammar of Kurtöp. (Languages of the Greater Himalayan Region 18). Leiden: Brill. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2018On egophoricity and mirativity in Kurtöp. In, Elisabeth Norcliffe, Simeon Floyd, & Lila San Roque, Egophoricity, 109–137. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hyslop, Gwendolyn, and Karma Tshering
2017An overview of some epistemic categories in Dzongkha. In Lauren Gawne & Nathan W. Hill (eds.), Evidential systems of Tibetan languages, 352–365. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lehmann, Christian
1995Thoughts on grammaticalization. Revised and expanded version, 1. publ. edn. (LINCOM Studies in Theoretical Linguistics 1). München: LINCOM Europa.Google Scholar
Matisoff, James
1972Lahu nominalization, relativization, and genitivization. In John P. Kimball (ed.), Syntax and Semantics 1, 237–57. New York: Seminar Press.Google Scholar
2003Handbook of Proto-Tibeto-Burman: system and philosophy of reconstruction. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
McDonald, M. & Stephen Wurm
1979Basic materials in Waŋkumara (Galal̪i): Grammar, sentences, and vocabulary. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
Noonan, Michael
1997Versatile nominalizations. In John Haiman, Joan Bybee, & Sandra Thompson (eds.), Essays on Language Function and Language Type: Dedicated to T. Givón, 373–94. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 164 ]
Post, Mark W.
2013Person-sensitive TAME marking in Galo: Historical origins and functional motivation. In Tim Thornes, Erik Andvik, Gwendolyn Hyslop & Joana Jansen (eds.), Functional-Historical Approaches to Explanation: In Honor of Scott DeLancey (Typological Studies in Language 103). 107–130. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Poudel, Kedar P.
2006Dhankute Tamang Grammar. Munich: Lincom.Google Scholar
Sandman, Erika
2018Egophoricity in Wutun. In Elisabeth Norcliffe, Simeon Floyd & Lila San Roque (eds.), Egophoricity, 173–196. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Shimada, Masaharu, & Akiko Nagano
2017Mirative in Japanese: the rise of mirative markers via grammaticalization. Journal of Historical Linguistics 7(1–2): 213–244. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sun, Jackson T. S.
1993Evidentials in Amdo Tibetan. Bulletin of the Institute of History and Philology, Academia Sinica 63 (4): 945–1001.Google Scholar
Tournadre, Nicolas
2008 “Against the Concept of ‘Conjunct’/‘Disjunct’ in Tibetan.” In Chomolangma, Demawend Und Kasbek, Festschrift Für Roland Bielmeier, edited by Brigitte Huber, Marianne Volkart, Paul Widmer, and Peter Schwieger, 281–308. Halle: International Institute for Tibetan and Buddhist Studies GmbH.Google Scholar
Watters, David
2002A Grammar of Kham. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Widmer, Manuel
2017The evolution of egophoricity and evidentiality in the Himalayas: the case of Bunan. Journal of Historical Linguistics 1(1–2): 245–274. CrossrefGoogle Scholar